| Literature DB >> 35335368 |
Iliana María Ramirez-Velasquez1,2, Ederley Velez2, Alvaro Bedoya-Calle2, Francisco Jose Caro-Lopera2.
Abstract
Betanin and betanidin are compounds with extensive interest; they are effectively free radical scavengers. The present work aims to elucidate the differences between the mechanism of the antioxidant activity of betanin, betanidin, and their respective C15-epimers. Shape Theory establishes comparisons between the molecules' geometries and determines parallelisms with the descriptors BDE, PA, ETE IP, PDE, and infrared spectra (IR) obtained from the molecule simulations. Furthermore, the molecules were optimized using the B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) protocol. Finally, the molecular docking technique analyzes the antioxidant activity of the compounds in the complex with the therapeutic target xanthine oxidase (XO), based on a new proposal for the geometrical arrangement of the ligand atoms in the framework of Shape Theory. The results obtained indicate that the SPLET mechanism is the most favorable in all the molecules studied and that the first group that loses the hydrogen atom in the four molecules is the C17COOH, presenting less PA the isobetanidin. Furthermore, regarding the molecular docking, the interactions of these compounds with the target were favorable, standing out to a greater extent the interactions of isobetanidin with XO, which were analyzed after applying molecular dynamics.Entities:
Keywords: DFT calculations; antioxidant mechanisms; molecular docking; shape theory
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35335368 PMCID: PMC8954076 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27062003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Energy and distribution of HOMO and LUMO for Bn, IsoBn, Bd, IsoBd.
Calculated BDE, PA, ETE, IP, and PDE values for compounds studied. Data in kcal/mol, at B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) level of theory in water.
| Compound | Bond | HAT | SPLET | SET-PT | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BDE | PA | ETE | IP | PDE | ||
| Bn | C2 | 84.8 | 15.0 | 69.9 | 74.1 | 10.7 |
| C15 | 84.1 | 14.2 | 69.9 | 10.0 | ||
| C17 | 79.6 |
| 68.1 | 5.5 | ||
| N16 | 83.7 | 23.3 | 60.4 | 9.6 | ||
| C6 | 75.4 | 26.2 | 49.2 | 1.3 | ||
| IsoBn | C2 | 85.0 | 15.0 | 70.0 | 74.2 | 10.8 |
| C15 | 84.6 | 15.2 | 69.4 | 10.4 | ||
| C17 | 79.6 |
| 68.2 | 5.4 | ||
| N16 | 84.0 | 23.7 | 60.2 | 9.8 | ||
| C6 | 75.4 | 26.2 | 49.2 | 1.2 | ||
| Bd | C2 | 85.3 | 14.9 | 70.4 | 75.0 | 10.3 |
| C15 | 84.8 | 14.2 | 70.6 | 5.2 | ||
| C17 | 80.2 |
| 68.6 | 9.8 | ||
| N16 | 83.8 | 23.2 | 60.6 | 8.8 | ||
| C6 | 73.3 | 22.9 | 50.4 | −1.7 | ||
| C5 | 75.4 | 25.8 | 49.6 | 0.4 | ||
| IsoBd | C2 | 85.1 | 14.3 | 70.8 | 74.8 | 10.3 |
| C15 | 83.9 | 12.9 | 71.0 | 9.0 | ||
| C17 | 80.0 |
| 69.2 | 5.2 | ||
| N16 | 81.7 | 20.8 | 60.9 | 6.9 | ||
| C6 | 77.5 | 26.7 | 50.7 | 2.7 | ||
| C5 | 70.6 | 17.6 | 53.0 | −4.3 | ||
Figure 2Parent Isobetanidin (IsoBd) and their anios IsoBdAC2, IsoBdAC15, and IsoBdAC17.
RD between study compounds and their respective anions and PA values.
| Compound | PA | DR | DR by Subspaces | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| O | C | H | |||
| BnAC15 | 14.2 | 0.013 | 0.021 | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| BnAC17 | 11.6 | 0.010 | 0.015 | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| BnAC2 | 15.0 | 0.011 | 0.014 | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| BnAC6 | 26.2 | 0.013 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.014 |
| BnAN16 | 23.3 | 0.036 | 0.059 | 0.014 | 0.022 |
| IsoBnAC15 | 15.2 | 0.011 | 0.012 | 0.007 | 0.010 |
| IsoBnAC17 | 11.4 | 0.008 | 0.008 | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| IsoBnAC2 | 15.0 | 0.011 | 0.012 | 0.010 | 0.012 |
| IsoBnAC6 | 26.2 | 0.011 | 0.010 | 0.008 | 0.013 |
| IsoBnAN16 | 23.7 | 0.021 | 0.031 | 0.014 | 0.012 |
| BdAC15 | 14.2 | 0.013 | 0.021 | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| BdAC17 | 11.6 | 0.008 | 0.008 | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| BdAC2 | 14.9 | 0.009 | 0.008 | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| BdAC5 | 25.8 | 0.021 | 0.018 | 0.016 | 0.023 |
| BdAC6 | 22.9 | 0.013 | 0.010 | 0.010 | 0.014 |
| BdAN16 | 23.2 | 0.034 | 0.054 | 0.013 | 0.022 |
| IsoBdAC15 | 12.9 | 0.012 | 0.013 | 0.009 | 0.012 |
| IsoBdAC17 | 10.8 | 0.007 | 0.005 | 0.008 | 0.007 |
| IsoBdAC2 | 14.3 | 0.013 | 0.023 | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| IsoBdAC5 | 17.6 | 0.070 | 0.035 | 0.013 | 0.098 |
| IsoBdAC6 | 26.7 | 0.070 | 0.031 | 0.010 | 0.099 |
| IsoBdAN16 | 20.8 | 0.061 | 0.099 | 0.015 | 0.046 |
Figure 3Molecular models of binding of compounds to active site of xanthine oxidase. A three-dimensional model (Docking): (a) Bn, (b) IsoBn, (c) Bd, and (d) IsoBd.
Figure 4Hydrogen bonds and alkyl interactions of IsoBd with XO obtained from MD study.
ΔG of compounds under study and reference considering geometry of ligands founded on shape theory and one calculated by expert software.
| ΔG Kcal/mol | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rotation | Bn | IsoBn | Bd | IsoBd | Reference |
| (Febuxostat) | |||||
| None | −7.5 | −6.3 | −6.8 | −8.1 | −7.8 |
| Plane xy 90° | −7.5 | −7.0 | −6.9 | −8.0 | −9.1 |
| Plane xy 180° | −7.5 | −5.9 | −6.9 | −8.0 | −9.1 |
| Plane xy 270° | −7.5 | −5.9 | −6.8 | −8.1 | −9.1 |
| Plane xz 90° | −7.5 | −5.9 | −6.7 | −8.1 | −9.1 |
| Plane xz 180° | −7.5 | −5.9 | −6.9 | −8.1 | −9.1 |
| Plane xz 270° | −7.5 | −6.1 | −6.8 | −8.1 | −9.1 |
| Plane yz 90° | −7.5 | −5.9 | −6.8 | −8.1 | −9.1 |
| Plane yz 180° | −7.5 | −5.8 | −6.8 | −7.3 | −9.1 |
| Plane yz 270° | −7.5 | −6.2 | −6.8 | −8.1 | −9.1 |
| ΔG (Kcal/mol) Autodock Vina | −7.5 | −7.0 | −6.9 | −8.0 | −9.0 |
Figure 5Molecular models of binding of compounds to active site of xanthine oxidase. A three-dimensional model based on shape theory (a) Bn, (b) IsoBn, (c) Bd, and (d) IsoBd.
Docking results of binding of Bn to active site of xanthine oxidase.
| Compound | ΔG (kcal/mol) | D-Bond Å | Type | Amino acids |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bn | −7.5 | 2.379 | Hydrogen Bond | Glu802 |
| 2.163 | Hydrogen Bond | Glu802 | ||
| 2.159 | Hydrogen Bond | Glu879 | ||
| 2.078 | Hydrogen Bond | Glu879 | ||
| 2.439 | Hydrogen Bond | Tyr1140 | ||
| 3.065 | Hydrogen Bond | His875 | ||
| 3.474 | Hydrogen Bond | Pro1076 | ||
| 4.359 | Hydrophobic | Val1011 |
Docking results of binding of IsoBn to active site of xanthine oxidase.
| Compound | ΔG (kcal/mol) | D-Bond Å | Type | Amino Acids |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IsoBn | −6.2 | 4.573 | Electrostatic | Glu802 |
| 2.750 | Hydrogen Bond | Glu879 | ||
| 3.698 | Hydrogen Bond | Ser1141 | ||
| 4.963 | Hydrophobic | Val1011 |
Docking results of binding of Bd to active site of xanthine oxidase.
| Compound | ΔG (kcal/mol) | D-Bond Å | Type | Amino Acids |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bd | −6.9 | 5.008 | Electrostatic | Glu802 |
| 2.705 | Hydrogen Bond | Ser876 | ||
| 2.949 | Hydrogen Bond | Asn768 | ||
| 3.508 | Hydrogen Bond | His875 | ||
| 3.407 | Hydrogen Bond | Pro1076 | ||
| 4.777 | Hydrophobic | Phe649 | ||
| 5.086 | Hydrophobic | Val1011 |
Docking results of binding of IsoBd to active site of xanthine oxidase.
| Compound | ΔG (kcal/mol) | D-Bond Å | Type | Amino Acids |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IsoBd | −8.1 | 5.246 | Electrostatic | Glu802 |
| 5.192 | Electrostatic | Glu1261 | ||
| 2.515 | Hydrogen Bond | Arg880 | ||
| 2.536 | Hydrogen Bond | Thr1010 | ||
| 2.729 | Hydrogen Bond | Ser876 | ||
| 3.449 | Electrostatic | Phe914 | ||
| 4.688 | Hydrophobic | Leu648 | ||
| 4.562 | Hydrophobic | Val1011 |