| Literature DB >> 35335263 |
Petunia Mashiane1, Tinotenda Shoko2, Vimbainashe Manhivi2, Retha Slabbert1, Yasmina Sultanbawa3, Dharini Sivakumar2,3.
Abstract
Prior to consumption, African pumpkin leaves (Momordica balsamina L.) are generally cooked. In this study, the effects of common household cooking methods (boiling, steaming, microwaving, stir-frying) on bioactive metabolites, carotenoids, antioxidant activity, antinutrients and inhibitory effects on α-glucosidase and α-amylase activities were examined. A set of 14 bioactive metabolites were identified in raw and cooked African leaves using UPLC-QTOF/MS. The results showed that the four different types of household cooking methods had different effects on the bioactive metabolomics profile of African pumpkin leaves. In comparison to raw leaves and leaves cooked in other methods, the concentrations of six phenolic compounds, rutin, cryptochlorogenic acid (4-caffeoylquinic acid), pseudolaroside A, isorhamnetin 3-O-robinoside, quercetin 3-galactoside, and trans-4-feruloylquinic acid, were highest in stir-fried leaves. Of all household cooking methods tested, stir-frying increased the content of lutein, β-carotene, and zeaxanthin by 60.00%, 146.15%, and 123.51%, respectively. Moreover, stir-frying African pumpkin leaves increased the antioxidant activity (DPPH and ABTS) and the inhibition of α-glucosidase and α-amylase. Compared to all four methods of household cooking, stir-frying reduced the antinutritive compounds compared to raw leaves. This work provides useful information to the consumers on the selection of suitable cooking methods for African pumpkin leaves.Entities:
Keywords: antinutrients; antioxidants; carotenoids; phytochemicals; traditional leafy vegetables
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35335263 PMCID: PMC8951283 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27061901
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Impact of different household cooking techniques on the bioactive metabolites of African pumpkin leaves (Momordica balsamina L.).
| Metabolites (mg kg−1) | Raw Leaves | Steaming | Microwaving | Boiling | Stir-Frying |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Methylquinic acid | 3.96 ± 0.71 *a | 1.44 ± 0.26 c | 2.53 ± 3.29 b | 2.08 ± 0.99 b | 0.33 ± 0.06 d |
| 4-caffeoylquinicacid (cryptochlorogenic acid) | 6.61 ± 1.18 d | 76.01 ± 13.57 b | 3.34 ± 2.13 e | 8.35 ± 1.36 c | 507.02 ± 90.54 a |
| 33.04 ± 1.90 b | 12.17 ± 2.17 d | 1.47 ± 0.44 e | 20.82 ± 5.81 c | 99.83 ± 17.83 a | |
| 17.50 ± 3.12 b | 13.61 ± 2.43 c | 1.57 ± 0.33 e | 10.34 ± 5.60 d | 116.57 ± 20.82 a | |
| 1505.20 ± 2.7 a | 261.19 ± 46.6 d | 21.87 ± 2.98 e | 299.05 ± 74.2 c | 983.1 ± 175.56 b | |
| Trans-4-feruloylquinic acid | 244.86 ± 4.72 a | 19.54 ± 3.49 b | 1.38 ± 0.71 d | 6.06 ± 4.31 c | 259.99 ± 46.43 a |
| Quercetin-3-galactoside | 22.26 ± 3.97 b | 15.59 ± 2.78 c | 0.62 ± 0.32 e | 1.33 ± 0.92 d | 206.06 ± 36.80 a |
| Phenethyl rutinoside | 95.73 ± 17.10 a | 10.04 ± 1.79 c | 1.13 ± 0.28 d | 11.96 ± 1.52 c | 60.90 ± 10.87 b |
| Rhamnetin-3- | 5.76 ± 1.03 b | 2.56 ± 0.46 c | 0.17 ± 0.18 d | 0.27 ± 0.10 d | 55.43 ± 9.90 a |
| Quercetin-3-rutinoside (rutin) | 175.24 ± 3.29 c | 209.68 ± 37.4 b | 7.94 ± 2.41 d | 8.15 ± 1.49 d | 405.15 ± 72.35 a |
| Pseudolaroside A | 246.97 ± 1.10 b | 155.12 ± 27.7 c | 5.45 ± 0.62 e | 81.31 ± 24.09 d | 678.89 ± 121.2 a |
| β- | 15.12 ± 1.70 c | 31.71 ± 5.66 a | 1.34 ± 0.54 e | 17.37 ± 1.60 b | 6.10 ± 1.09 d |
| Kaempferol- | 231.27 ± 1.30 b | 50.76 ± 9.07 c | 0.94 ± 0.69 e | 1.80 ± 0.40 d | 425.81 ± 76.04 a |
| Isorhamnetin-3- | 41.76 ± 1.46 b | 12.49 ± 2.23 c | 0.52 ± 0.42 d | 0.61 ± 0.33 d | 249.26 ± 44.51 a |
* Standard deviation, the Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) test shows that means in the same row with different superscript alphabetic letter letters a–e is significantly different (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 1Statistical analyses of bioactive metabolites by Metaboanalyst 4.0 software. (A) Unsupervised PCA score plot of phenolic compounds of Momordica balsamina leaves generated by UPLC-QTOF/MS analysis showing the separation of five clusters. R: raw leaves; M: microwaved leaves; S: streamed leaves; B: boiled leaves; SF: stir-fried leaves. (B) The PC 1 and PC2 loadings of bioactive metabolites. (C) Supervised PLS-DA score plot of bioactive metabolites. (D) VIP scores of bioactive metabolites in PLS-DA. (E) Heat map. The colored areas on the map correspond to concentrations of different bioactive metabolites. Bioactive metabolites are arranged in rows, and different household cooking techniques are in columns. The red color indicates high levels, and the blue color indicates low levels.
The effects of different household cooking techniques on carotenoid components of African pumpkin leaves (Momordica balsamina L.).
| Household Cooking Methods | Lutein | % Loss or Gain | Zeaxanthin mg 100 g−1 | % Loss or Gain | β-Carotene | % Loss or Gain | Total Carotenoids |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw | 34.13 ± 0.45 *c | 1.30 ± 0.20 bc | 9.05 ± 0.01 d | 44.48 d | |||
| Stir-frying | 54.69 ± 1.0 a | 60.24 ± 0.53 a | 3.20 ± 0.29 a | 146.15 ± 0.62 a | 20.68 ± 0.10 a | 123.51 ± 0.70 a | 78.57 a |
| Boiling | 43.08 ± 1.8 b | 26.22 ± 0.20 c | 2.25 ± 0.25 ab | 73.08 ± 0.75 b | 12.41 ± 0.08c | 37.13±0.52 c | 57.74 c |
| Steaming | 44.51 ± 1.1 b | 30.41 ± 0.60 b | 1.85 ± 1.24 b | 42.31 ± 0.64 d | 17.33 ± 0.03 b | 91.49 ± 0.43 b | 63.69 bc |
| Microwave | 41.71 ± 1.2 b | 22.21 ± 0.33 c | 0.64 ± 0.20 c | 50.77 ± 0.54 c | 7.97 ± 0.03 e | 11.93 ± 0.54 d | 50.32 cd |
* Standard deviation, the Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) test shows that means in the same row with different superscript alphabetic letter letters a–e is significantly different (p ≤ 0.05), different alphabet letters in the same column for African pumpkin leaves indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Effects of household cooking techniques on antioxidant and antidiabetic activities of African pumpkin leaves (Momordica balsamina L.).
| Household Cooking Techniques | DPPH | ABTS | α-Glucosidase | α-Amylase |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw | 1.78 ± 0.10 *d | 0.78 ± 0.02 d | 2.23 ± 0.20 d | 1.31 ± 0.21 d |
| Stir-frying | 0.71 ± 0.20 e | 0.61 ± 0.04 e | 1.35 ± 0.09 e | 0.80 ± 0.16 e |
| Microwave | 4.16 ± 0.08 a | 3.52 ± 0.25 a | 5.97 ± 0.79 a | 4.64 ± 0.20 a |
| Steaming | 2.62 ± 0.11 c | 1.21 ± 0.03 c | 3.28 ± 0.28 c | 2.58 ± 0.25 c |
| Boiling | 3.82 ± 0.25 b | 2.62 ± 0.11 b | 4.14 ± 0.00 b | 3.81 ± 0.11 b |
| Acarbose | 6.87 ± 0.22 | 3.14 ± 0.13 |
* Standard deviation. the Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) test shows that means in the same row with different superscript alphabetic letter letters a–e is significantly different (p ≤ 0.05).
Effects of household cooking techniques on antinutritive compounds present in African pumpkin leaves (Momordica balsamina L.).
| Household Cooking Techniques | Tannins | % Loss | Phytates | % Loss | Alkaloids | % Loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw | 165.20±1.68 *a | 41.37 ± 0.36 a | 35.00 ± 0.05 a | |||
| Stir fry | 157.31 ± 0.45 b | 5.88 ±0.52 c | 33.00 ± 1.40 b | 20.23 ± 0.18 c | 23.60 ± 0.29 b | 32.57 ± 0.53 d |
| Boiling | 56.43 ± 1.26 e | 66.25 ± 0.17 a | 18.41 ± 0.53 d | 55.49 ± 0.28 a | 4.04 ± 0.08 e | 88.46 ± 0.26 a |
| Steaming | 131.85 ± 0.99 c | 21.14 ± 0.17 b | 28.75 ± 1.03 c | 30.51 ± 0.39 b | 17.73 ± 0.28 c | 49.34 ± 0.47 c |
| Microwave | 63.48 ± 1.18 d | 62.03 ± 0.08 a | 20.15 ± 0.38 d | 51.29 ± 0.44 a | 14.88 ± 0.29 d | 57.49 ± 0.45 b |
* Standard deviation, the Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) test shows that means in the same row with different superscript alphabetic letter letters a–e is significantly different (p ≤ 0.05).