| Literature DB >> 35328625 |
Sanghee Lee1,2,3, Theresa R Mendoza1,2, Danielle N Burner1,2, Michelle T Muldong1,2, Christina C N Wu2,4, Catalina Arreola-Villanueva1,2, Abril Zuniga1,2, Olga Greenburg1,2, William Y Zhu1,2, Jamillah Murtadha1,2, Evodie Koutouan1,2, Naomi Pineda1,2, Hao Pham1,2, Sung-Gu Kang5, Hyun Tae Kim6, Gabriel Pineda4, Kathleen M Lennon4, Nicholas A Cacalano7, Catriona H M Jamieson2,5, Christopher J Kane1,2, Anna A Kulidjian8, Terry Gaasterland9,10, Christina A M Jamieson1,2.
Abstract
Advanced prostate cancer (PCa) patients with bone metastases are treated with androgen pathway directed therapy (APDT). However, this treatment invariably fails and the cancer becomes castration resistant. To elucidate resistance mechanisms and to provide a more predictive pre-clinical research platform reflecting tumor heterogeneity, we established organoids from a patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model of bone metastatic prostate cancer, PCSD1. APDT-resistant PDX-derived organoids (PDOs) emerged when cultured without androgen or with the anti-androgen, enzalutamide. Transcriptomics revealed up-regulation of neurogenic and steroidogenic genes and down-regulation of DNA repair, cell cycle, circadian pathways and the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-CoV-2 host viral entry factors, ACE2 and TMPRSS2. Time course analysis of the cell cycle in live cells revealed that enzalutamide induced a gradual transition into a reversible dormant state as shown here for the first time at the single cell level in the context of multi-cellular, 3D living organoids using the Fucci2BL fluorescent live cell cycle tracker system. We show here a new mechanism of castration resistance in which enzalutamide induced dormancy and novel basal-luminal-like cells in bone metastatic prostate cancer organoids. These PDX organoids can be used to develop therapies targeting dormant APDT-resistant cells and host factors required for SARS-CoV-2 viral entry.Entities:
Keywords: SARS-CoV-2; androgen pathway directed therapy; angiotensin-converting enzyme 2; basal-luminal-like hybrid; bone metastatic prostate cancer; dormant; enzalutamide; patient-derived organoids; patient-derived xenograft; prostate cancer San Diego 1; transmembrane protease serine 2
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35328625 PMCID: PMC8952299 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23063203
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1PDX-derived organoids (PDOs) recapitulate heterogeneity and androgen pathway directed therapy (APDT) resistance of the patient’s tumor. (A) Workflow to establish and optimize 3D organoids from patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model of prostate cancer bone metastasis. (B) Representative images of hematoxylin and eosin (HE) stained samples of prostatectomy tissue from the donor patient, PCSD1 intra-femoral xenografts and PCSD1 organoids. Red arrows point to structures seen in both the organoids and xenografts growing in the femur. HE images are shown at 10× magnification. (C) A heterogeneous mix of PCSD1 tumor cells grown in 3D organoid cultures consisting of single cells, hollow epithelial cysts and cell-filled spheroids. Bright-field microscope images of single cells and the spheroid are at 10× magnification and the cyst is at 20× magnification. Scale bars represent 50 µm. (D) Experimental design of 3D cultures of PCSD1-GFP/luciferase expressing organoids under four treatment conditions: -DHT, +DHT (1 nM), +DHT/Vehicle (1 nM/0.1% DMSO) and +DHT/enzalutamide (1 nM/10 µM). PCSD1 organoids in each treatment group were imaged weekly with a Keyence digital microscope for four weeks. (E) A representative image of cysts in each treatment condition after four weeks of treatment. (F) A measurement example of cyst lumen diameter using the Hybrid Cell Counter software. Scale bar for spheroid image is 50 µm. After measurement of cyst lumen diameter, the number of epithelial cysts greater than 50 µm in size was quantified in each culture. (G) An analysis example of spheroid area using the Hybrid Cell Counter software. Scale bar for spheroid image is 50 µm. (H) A representative image of spheroid in each treatment condition at week 1, 2, 3 and 4 of treatment. (I) Average lumen diameter of cysts. (J) Fold changes in lumen diameter. (K) Number of cyst count. (L) Fold changes in cyst count. (M) Average spheroid area. (N) Fold changes in the number of spheroids under four treatment conditions: −DHT, +DHT (1 nM), +DHT/Vehicle (1 nM/0.1% DMSO), and +DHT/enzalutamide (1 nM/10 µM). For fold change analysis in (J,L,N), quantified values were normalized to the DHT- condition. (O) The Alamar Blue viability assay performed on the cultures at weeks 1 and 4. Cell viability was determined using the 50 μL of the AlamarBlue reagent per well in 24-well plate (Invitrogen, by Life Technologies Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA). Data represent the mean from four independent (n = 4) experiments performed in triplicate ± SEM. A student’s t-test was used to determine statistical significance (* indicate p < 0.05, ** indicates p < 0.01 *** indicated p < 0.0001).
Figure 2Gene expression profiling of APDT treated patient xenograft-derived organoids (PDOs) and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of APDT up-regulated and down-regulated pathways in PDOs. (A) APDT significantly up-regulated genes, (B) APDT significantly down-regulated genes. (C) List of Gene Ontology (GO) pathways that were up-regulated (red) and down-regulated (blue) as evaluated using GSEA. Bars show the proportion (k) of total pathway genes (K), i.e., k/K values for GO annotation pathways which were up-regulated (red bars) or down-regulated (blue bars). (D) Bar graph showing−log(P) for each category of pathways, P calculated using Fisher’s exact test. (E) Bar graph showing percent of pathway genes with differential expression for each category. (F) Pie chart showing distribution of genes across enriched categories. (G) Enrichment scores and significant p-values for unified gene sets constructed from overlapping GSEA functional categories and literature.
Selected genes of interest in APDT-signature from PDX PCSD1 organoids.
| Direction of Gene | Category | Selected Genes of Interest |
|---|---|---|
| Down | Prostate and AR target genes | |
| Cell cycle, cell division, mitosis and miotic spindle structure and function | ||
| DNA synthesis and repair | ||
| Circadian clock |
| |
| Interferon signaling | ||
| WNT signaling | ||
| Epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) |
| |
| SARS-CoV2 host viral entry factors | ||
| Up | Serine/threonine kinase signaling and growth | |
| G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling |
| |
| Cytokine signaling | ||
| Circadian clock inhibition | ||
| Lipid metabolism, cholesterol, and steroid hormone biosynthesis | ||
| Neuronal function and development | ||
| Developmental transcription factors in stem cells and cancer stem cells |
Figure 3APDT up-regulated and down-regulated genes grouped by functional pathways. (A) Genes were clustered as percentage of maximum expression in functional classes and further classified according to the overall direction of gene expression change as either down-regulated or up-regulated. Gene expression is displayed as percentage of maximum normalized reads per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads (RPKM). Color scale shows increasing % maximum expression as increasing intensity of blue indicates increasing mRNA expression level while increasing white represents decreasing % maximum expression and mRNA expression. (B) Genome aligned reads mapped to the AR gene in the top panel and the TMPRSS2 gene in the bottom panel. Alignments from top to bottom are Experiment 1: PCSD1 organoid samples treated with DHT+Vehicle, DHT, No DHT, enzalutamide plus DHT then Experiment 2: DHT+Vehicle, DHT, No DHT, enzalutamide plus DHT. AR gene shows accumulated reads under exons E1–E8, and for the TMPRSS2 gene: exons E1–E14.
Figure 4The anti-androgen, enzalutamide, decreased the protein levels of AR and TMPRSS2 in ADT-resistant PDO. (A) Quantitative RT-PCR analysis for AR level in PCSD1 3D organoids under the four treatment conditions: −DHT, +DHT (1 nM), +DHT/Vehicle (1 nM/0.1% DMSO) and +DHT/enzalutamide (1 nM/10 µM). Human beta actin was used as the internal control, reference gene (delta delta Ct target/reference). (B) IHC analysis of AR expression in PCSD1 3D organoids. Representative digital microscope images are shown of AR IHC staining performed on 4% paraformaldehyde fixed, paraffin embedded 5 µm sections from four culture conditions. Human prostate tissue was used as a positive control. (C) Quantitative RT-PCR analysis for PSA level in PCSD1 3D organoids. (D) Quantitative RT-PCR analysis for PSMA level in PCSD1 3D organoids under the four treatment conditions. Graphs represent one experiment performed in duplicate. (E) Immuno-histochemical (IHC) analysis of PSA expression in PCSD1 3D organoids. Red arrows point to PSA positive staining. (F) IHC analysis of TMPRSS2 expression in PCSD1 3D organoids. Representative digital microscope images are shown of (B,E,F) IHC staining performed on 4% paraformaldehyde fixed, paraffin embedded 5 μm sections from four culture conditions. Data represent the mean from four independent (n = 3) experiments performed in triplicate. (G) Confocal FV1000 images of IFC performed on PCSD1 3D organoids and normal human prostate cancer control tissue to visualize the prostate epithelial cell markers: cytokeratin 8 (CK8), a luminal epithelial cell protein, and cytokeratin 5 (CK5), a basal epithelial cell protein along with DAPI nuclear stain. Top five panels: PCSD1 3D organoids and patient prostate cancer tissue showed CK8 protein (red), and CK5 protein (green). DAPI stained the nuclei (blue). Inset (white square) shows further magnified image of organoids in panels 1–4 and normal prostate in panel 5 with CK8 (red) and CK5 (green) immunostaining. In the PCSD1 organoids, immunofluorescent cytochemical (IFC) analysis of CK5 and CK8 revealed heterogeneous expression patterns. Confocal microscope imaging of the control tissue, normal human prostate, showed the expected pattern of CK5+ basal cells and CK8+ luminal cells in glandular structure.
Figure 5Androgen pathway directed therapy induced a novel population of dormant cells in PDX organoids. (A) The Fucci2BL fluorescent, ubiquitination-based cell cycle indicator reporter system visualizes the phase of cell cycle shown by colorimetric signal of red, yellow and green fluorescence for G1, G1/S and S/G2/M, respectively. (B) Time course of cell cycle stages in live PCSD1 organoids under the four treatment conditions. Representative images for the same organoids followed through time in each treatment condition at week 1, 2, 3, and 4 of treatment of PCSD1 organoids stably expressing the Fucci2 BL bicistronic fluorescent, ubiquitination-based cell cycle indicator reporter system showing three cell cycle phases: G1/G0 by red fluorescence, G1/S by yellow fluorescence and G2/M by green fluorescence. The images of bright-field, red fluorescent channel and green fluorescent channel were obtained and merged. (C) Removal of enzalutamide led to cell cycle reactivation in dormant PCSD1 organoids. +DHT/enzalutamide containing media was removed from PCSD1 organoids after 4 weeks of treatment and replaced with +DHT/Vehicle media. Microscope images at 4 weeks prior to media change and at 5 weeks after 1 week of removal of enzalutamide containing media are shown for the same organoid.
Figure 6Novel dormancy mechanism of castration resistance in a bone metastatic prostate cancer organoid model. Overview of the PCSD1 patient-xenograft derived organoid (PDO) model for bone metastatic prostate cancer and its response to androgen pathway directed therapy. This model can be used for further understanding of tumor resistance, progression and dormancy under therapies that suppress the androgen pathway.