BACKGROUND: While it has been challenging to establish prostate cancer patient-derived xenografts (PDXs), with a take rate of 10-40% and long latency time, multiple groups throughout the world have developed methods for the successful establishment of serially transplantable human prostate cancer PDXs using a variety of immune deficient mice. In 2014, the Movember Foundation launched a Global Action Plan 1 (GAP1) project to support an international collaborative prostate cancer PDX program involving eleven groups. Between these Movember consortium members, a total of 98 authenticated human prostate cancer PDXs were available for characterization. Eighty three of these were derived directly from patient material, and 15 were derived as variants of patient-derived material via serial passage in androgen deprived hosts. A major goal of the Movember GAP1 PDX project was to provide the prostate cancer research community with a summary of both the basic characteristics of the 98 available authenticated serially transplantable human prostate cancer PDX models and the appropriate contact information for collaborations. Herein, we report a summary of these PDX models. METHODS: PDX models were established in immunocompromised mice via subcutaneous or subrenal-capsule implantation. Dual-label species (ie, human vs mouse) specific centromere and telomere Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) and immuno-histochemical (IHC) staining of tissue microarrays (TMAs) containing replicates of the PDX models were used for characterization of expression of a number of phenotypic markers important for prostate cancer including AR (assessed by IHC and FISH), Ki67, vimentin, RB1, P-Akt, chromogranin A (CgA), p53, ERG, PTEN, PSMA, and epithelial cytokeratins. RESULTS: Within this series of PDX models, the full spectrum of clinical disease stages is represented, including androgen-sensitive and castration-resistant primary and metastatic prostate adenocarcinomas as well as prostate carcinomas with neuroendocrine differentiation. The annotated clinical characteristics of these PDXs were correlated with their marker expression profile. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate the clinical relevance of this series of PDXs as a platform for both basic science studies and therapeutic discovery/drug development. The present report provides the prostate cancer community with a summary of the basic characteristics and a contact information for collaborations using these models.
BACKGROUND: While it has been challenging to establish prostate cancerpatient-derived xenografts (PDXs), with a take rate of 10-40% and long latency time, multiple groups throughout the world have developed methods for the successful establishment of serially transplantable humanprostate cancer PDXs using a variety of immune deficient mice. In 2014, the Movember Foundation launched a Global Action Plan 1 (GAP1) project to support an international collaborative prostate cancer PDX program involving eleven groups. Between these Movember consortium members, a total of 98 authenticated humanprostate cancer PDXs were available for characterization. Eighty three of these were derived directly from patient material, and 15 were derived as variants of patient-derived material via serial passage in androgen deprived hosts. A major goal of the Movember GAP1 PDX project was to provide the prostate cancer research community with a summary of both the basic characteristics of the 98 available authenticated serially transplantable humanprostate cancer PDX models and the appropriate contact information for collaborations. Herein, we report a summary of these PDX models. METHODS: PDX models were established in immunocompromised mice via subcutaneous or subrenal-capsule implantation. Dual-label species (ie, human vs mouse) specific centromere and telomere Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) and immuno-histochemical (IHC) staining of tissue microarrays (TMAs) containing replicates of the PDX models were used for characterization of expression of a number of phenotypic markers important for prostate cancer including AR (assessed by IHC and FISH), Ki67, vimentin, RB1, P-Akt, chromogranin A (CgA), p53, ERG, PTEN, PSMA, and epithelial cytokeratins. RESULTS: Within this series of PDX models, the full spectrum of clinical disease stages is represented, including androgen-sensitive and castration-resistant primary and metastatic prostate adenocarcinomas as well as prostate carcinomas with neuroendocrine differentiation. The annotated clinical characteristics of these PDXs were correlated with their marker expression profile. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate the clinical relevance of this series of PDXs as a platform for both basic science studies and therapeutic discovery/drug development. The present report provides the prostate cancer community with a summary of the basic characteristics and a contact information for collaborations using these models.
Authors: Michael C Haffner; Akshay Bhamidipati; Harrison K Tsai; David M Esopi; Ajay M Vaghasia; Jin-Yih Low; Radhika A Patel; Gunes Guner; Minh-Tam Pham; Nicole Castagna; Jessica Hicks; Nicolas Wyhs; Ruedi Aebersold; Angelo M De Marzo; William G Nelson; Tiannan Guo; Srinivasan Yegnasubramanian Journal: Prostate Date: 2021-08-16 Impact factor: 4.104
Authors: Maija Valta; Jani Ylä-Pelto; Yu Lan; Tiina Kähkönen; Pekka Taimen; Peter J Boström; Otto Ettala; Sofia Khan; Niklas Paulin; Laura L Elo; Päivi J Koskinen; Pirkko Härkönen; Johanna Tuomela Journal: Transl Androl Urol Date: 2020-06
Authors: Nallasivam Palanisamy; Jun Yang; Peter D A Shepherd; Elsa M Li-Ning-Tapia; Estefania Labanca; Ganiraju C Manyam; Murali K Ravoori; Vikas Kundra; John C Araujo; Eleni Efstathiou; Louis L Pisters; Xinhai Wan; Xuemei Wang; Elba S Vazquez; Ana M Aparicio; Shannon L Carskadon; Scott A Tomlins; Lakshmi P Kunju; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Bradley M Broom; Christopher J Logothetis; Patricia Troncoso; Nora M Navone Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2020-06-23 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Eline A M Ruigrok; Nicole van Vliet; Simone U Dalm; Erik de Blois; Dik C van Gent; Joost Haeck; Corrina de Ridder; Debra Stuurman; Mark W Konijnenberg; Wytske M van Weerden; Marion de Jong; Julie Nonnekens Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2020-10-23 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Arjanneke F van de Merbel; Geertje van der Horst; Maaike H van der Mark; Selas T F Bots; Diana J M van den Wollenberg; Corrina M A de Ridder; Debra Stuurman; Tilly Aalders; Sigrun Erkens-Schulz; Nadine van Montfoort; Wouter R Karthaus; Niven Mehra; Minke Smits; Jack A Schalken; Wytske M van Weerden; Rob C Hoeben; Gabri van der Pluijm Journal: Cancer Gene Ther Date: 2021-06-16 Impact factor: 5.854