| Literature DB >> 35326909 |
Ammar Eid1, Davide Mancino2,3,4, Mohammad Salem Rekab1,5, Youssef Haikel2,3,4, Naji Kharouf2,3.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate and compare, radiographically and clinically, the impacts of calcium-silicate based-cement (CSBC), nano-hydroxyapatite and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) as pulpotomy agents in permanent immature molars with incomplete root development. Sixty-three participants (63 permanent immature molars) were included in this study. The patients were randomly divided into three equal groups. Fast setting MTA (MM-MTA), nano-hydroxyapatite and platelet-rich fibrin were used as pulpotomy agents. The teeth were evaluated clinically and radiographically after 6 and 12 months by two blinded examiners. Apical closure and pulp canal obliteration percentages were recorded. The in vitro reaction of the tested materials after a 7-day immersion period of the different materials in phosphate-buffered solution was analyzed using scanning electron microscopy to associate the in vitro mineralization with in vivo pulp canal obliteration percentages. Data were analyzed using Chi-square and ANOVA tests (α = 0.05). No significant difference was found between the three tested groups in terms of clinical and radiographic success (p > 0.05). All cases demonstrated evidence of root growth, including complete apical closure or continued apical closure. At 12 months, complete apical closure was found among the MM-MTA group (50%), nano-hydroxyapatite group (55%) and platelet-rich fibrin group (60%) (p > 0.05). After 12 months, pulp canal obliteration was more observed in the MM-MTA and nano-hydroxyapatite groups than in the PRF group (p < 0.05). MM-MTA (auto-mixed), NHA (hand-mixed) and PRF (autologous) could be used as pulpotomy agents since they exhibit comparable high clinical and radiographic success rates. However, the fact that the groups managed with MM-MTA and NHA have a higher tendency to canal obliteration might indicate that PRF should be considered the first choice material as pulpotomy agent, as it would make retreatment considerably easier.Entities:
Keywords: MM-MTA; nano-hydroxyapatite; permanent molars with incomplete root development; pulpotomy
Year: 2022 PMID: 35326909 PMCID: PMC8949884 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10030431
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Healthcare (Basel) ISSN: 2227-9032
Figure 1A CONSORT diagram showing the flow of participants through each stage of the study.
Figure 2(a) Tooth isolated with rubber dam; (b) caries and coronal pulp removal; (c) pulp stumps after achieving hemostasis; (d) the placement of the pulpotomy agent.
Figure 3(a) The PRF clot; (b) The PRF membrane.
Age, sex and radiographic evidence of root canal growth in the three tested group at 6- and 12-month follow-ups. * p < 0.05.
| Criteria/Group | MM-MTA (G1) | Nano-Hydroxyapatite (G2) | PRF (G3) | Statistical Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 8.6 ± 2.0 | 8.8 ± 1.8 | 8.8 ± 2.1 | |
| Sex females (%) | 11 (55) | 10 (50) | 9 (45) | |
| Apical closure complete | 5 (25) | 3 (15) | 4 (19.04) | |
| Apical closure complete | 10 (50) | 11 (55) | 12 (60) | |
| Canal obliteration | 3 (15) | 4 (20) | 0 (0) | |
| Canal obliteration | 7 (35) | 9 (45) | 1 (5) |
Figure 4(a) Preoperative radiograph of an immature mandibular molar; (b) no complete apical closure at 6 months; (c) no complete apical closure at 12 months “continued apical closure”; (d) preoperative radiograph of an immature mandibular molar; (e) no complete apical closure at 6 months “continued apical closure”; (f) complete apical closure at 12 months; (g) preoperative radiograph of an immature mandibular molar; (h) complete apical closure at 6 months; (i) complete apical closure at 12 months.
Figure 5Representative scanning electron microscope images at 3000× magnification (a,b,d,e,g,h) and 12,000× magnification (c,f). The morphology observed for (a) PRF and (d) for MM-MTA and (h) NHA before immersion in PBS; (g) NHA powder; (b,c) the morphology observed for PRF, (e,f) for MM-MTA and (i) for NHA after immersion in PBS for 7 days at 37 °C.
Figure 6Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) analysis for some teeth after 12 months. (a) Sagittal view of incomplete apical closure in pulpotomy treatment using PRF; (b) sagittal view of complete apical closure in pulpotomy treatment using PRF; (c) axial view of complete apical closure in pulpotomy treatment using PRF.