| Literature DB >> 34650014 |
Ankita Pednekar1, Ida Ataide1, Marina Fernandes1, Rajan Lambor1, Renita Soares1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess and quantify coronal tooth discolouration by ProRoot MTA, Biodentine and MTA repair HP as pulpotomy agents and to identify colour stability of these materials in presence of blood contamination.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34650014 PMCID: PMC8461484 DOI: 10.14744/eej.2021.66375
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Endod J ISSN: 2548-0839
Figure 1Mean value of ’L’ at each time of observation
Mean values of ‘L’ at each time of observation
| Time | Group | Mean±SD | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| T0 | Group 1A | 62.347±6.544 | 0.203 |
| Group 1B | 64.933±5.418 | ||
| Group 2A | 66.160±4.566 | ||
| Group 2B | 65.493±5.659 | ||
| Group 3A | 64.020±3.895 | ||
| Group 3B | 65.420±4.712 | ||
| Group 4A | 61.800±3.536 | ||
| Group 4B | 63.973±5.216 | ||
| T1 | Group 1A | 65.553±6.780 | 0.053 |
| Group 1B | 66.093±8.589 | ||
| Group 2A | 68.127±4.362 | ||
| Group 2B | 63.367±5.612 | ||
| Group 3A | 69.753±4.429 | ||
| Group 3B | 69.300±6.427 | ||
| Group 4A | 65.733±4.655 | ||
| Group 4B | 64.967±5.995 | ||
| T7 | Group 1A | 67.560±6.929 | 0.690 |
| Group 1B | 68.360±8.717 | ||
| Group 2A | 69.220±3.607 | ||
| Group 2B | 70.393±5.928 | ||
| Group 3A | 71.633±4.670 | ||
| Group 3B | 70.240±6.705 | ||
| Group 4A | 68.900±5.603 | ||
| Group 4B | 68.547±6.037 | ||
| T30 | Group 1A | 67.567±5.628 | 0.048 |
| Group 1B | 68.047±6.384 | ||
| Group 2A | 67.673±2.954 | ||
| Group 2B | 65.973±4.857 | ||
| Group 3A | 71.367±5.430 | ||
| Group 3B | 67.433±3.891 | ||
| Group 4A | 67.087±3.663 | ||
| Group 4B | 65.293±4.588 | ||
| T60 | Group 1A | 68.127±7.059 | <0.001 |
| Group 1B | 68.707±4.134 | ||
| Group 2A | 64.747±3.855 | ||
| Group 2B | 65.800±2.849 | ||
| Group 3A | 72.220±4.267 | ||
| Group 3B | 69.573±2.831 | ||
| Group 4A | 71.427±4.063 | ||
| Group 4B | 66.200±6.587 | ||
| T180 | Group 1A | 68.747±6.598 | <0.001 |
| Group 1B | 58.193±4.194 | ||
| Group 2A | 62.293±4.086 | ||
| Group 2B | 64.020±3.033 | ||
| Group 3A | 70.553±3.379 | ||
| Group 3B | 68.453±4.706 | ||
| Group 4A | 69.413±3.325 | ||
| Group 4B | 63.893±5.264 |
One-Way ANOVA:
P<0.05; Significant;
P<0.001; Highly significant
Figure 2Change in ∆E at each time of observation
Mean values of ‘Delta E’ at each time of observation
| Time | Group | Mean±SD | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | Group 1A | 3.860±1.148 | <0.001 |
| Group 1B | 4.707±1.274 | ||
| Group 2A | 4.180±1.058 | ||
| Group 2B | 4.540±1.074 | ||
| Group 3A | 5.240±0.703 | ||
| Group 3B | 7.947±1.308 | ||
| Group 4A | 4.053±0.802 | ||
| Group 4B | 3.913±0.770 | ||
| T7 | Group 1A | 1.920±0.531 | <0.001 |
| Group 1B | 5.000±0.896 | ||
| Group 2A | 2.200±0.740 | ||
| Group 2B | 5.527±0.678 | ||
| Group 3A | 2.700±0.711 | ||
| Group 3B | 2.660±0.780 | ||
| Group 4A | 2.987±0.334 | ||
| Group 4B | 4.140±0.738 | ||
| T30 | Group 1A | 1.080±0.803 | <0.001 |
| Group 1B | 2.107±0.894 | ||
| Group 2A | 2.107±1.108 | ||
| Group 2B | 4.807±0.646 | ||
| Group 3A | 1.753±0.722 | ||
| Group 3B | 4.847±0.976 | ||
| Group 4A | 4.147±1.011 | ||
| Group 4B | 4.513±0.936 | ||
| T60 | Group 1A | 2.233±0.863 | <0.001 |
| Group 1B | 4.133±0.954 | ||
| Group 2A | 3.760±0.990 | ||
| Group 2B | 4.460±0.860 | ||
| Group 3A | 4.120±1.100 | ||
| Group 3B | 4.500±1.059 | ||
| Group 4A | 4.420±0.994 | ||
| Group 4B | 4.560±1.250 | ||
| T180 | Group 1A | 1.747±0.913 | <0.001 |
| Group 1B | 8.340±0.745 | ||
| Group 2A | 4.547±1.425 | ||
| Group 2B | 2.307±0.554 | ||
| Group 3A | 2.520±0.963 | ||
| Group 3B | 4.733±0.990 | ||
| Group 4A | 4.167±0.804 | ||
| Group 4B | 4.187±0.865 |
One-Way ANOVA: *P<0.05; Significant;
P<0.001; Highly significant
Figure 3∆E values of experimental groups at different measurement points
Figure 4L* values of experimental groups at different measurement points