| Literature DB >> 35326662 |
Yu-Erh Huang1,2, Ying-Huang Tsai3, Yu-Jie Huang4, Jr-Hau Lung5, Kuo-Wei Ho6, Tzu-Chen Yen7, Sheng-Chieh Chan8,9, Shu-Tian Chen2,10, Ming-Feng Tsai6, Ming-Szu Hung2,3,11.
Abstract
This study aims to investigate the role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) in early prediction of response and survival following epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinomas and EGFR mutations. Thirty patients with stage IIIB/IV lung adenocarcinomas and EGFR mutations receiving first-line EGFR-TKIs were prospectively evaluated between November 2012 and May 2015. EGFR mutations were quantified by delta cycle threshold (dCt). 18F-FDG PET/CT was performed before and 2 weeks after treatment initiation. PET response was assessed based on PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST). Baseline and percentage changes in the summed standardized uptake value, metabolic tumor volume (bsumMTV and ΔsumMTV, respectively), and total lesion glycolysis of ≤5 target lesions/patient were calculated. The association between parameters (clinical and PET) and non-progression disease after 3 months of treatment in CT based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (nPD3mo), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were tested. The median follow-up time was 19.6 months. The median PFS and OS were 12.0 and 25.3 months, respectively. The PERCIST criteria was an independent predictor of nPD3mo (p = 0.009), dCt (p = 0.014) and bsumMTV (p = 0.014) were independent predictors of PFS, and dCt (p = 0.014) and ΔsumMTV (p = 0.005) were independent predictors of OS. 18F-FDG PET/CT achieved early prediction of outcomes in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinomas and EGFR mutations receiving EGFR-TKIs.Entities:
Keywords: 18F-FDG PET; adenocarcinoma of lung; early response evaluation; survival; tyrosine kinase inhibitors
Year: 2022 PMID: 35326662 PMCID: PMC8945925 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14061507
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancers (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6694 Impact factor: 6.639
Figure 1Patient flow diagram.
Patient characteristics.
| Characteristics | No. (%) |
|---|---|
| Number of patients | 30 (100) |
| Age (y) | |
| Median | 71 |
| Range | 40–91 |
| Sex | |
| Female | 18 (60) |
| Male | 12 (40) |
| Smoking | |
| Never | 22 (73) |
| Ever | 8 (27) |
| ECOG performance status | |
| 0 | 1 (3) |
| 1 | 29 (97) |
| AJCC clinical stage | |
| IIIB | 1 (3) |
| IV | 29 (97) |
| EGFR mutation type | |
| Classical | 25 (83) |
| Exon 21 L858R | 13 (43) |
| Exon 19 deletion | 11 (37) |
| Both | 1 (3) |
| Others | 5 (17) |
| CEA (ng/mL) | |
| Median | 6.92 |
| Range | 0.5–1034 |
| CT response at 3 months (RECIST) | |
| PR | 23 (77) |
| SD | 1 (3) |
| PD | 6 (20) |
| PET response at 2 weeks (PERCIST) | |
| PMR | 21 (70) |
| SMD | 9 (30) |
ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; AJCC, American Joint Committee on Cancer; EGFR, epithelial growth factor receptor; RECIST, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; PD, progression disease; PERCIST, Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria in Solid Tumors; PMR, metabolic partial response; SMD, metabolic stable disease.
Multivariate analysis of parameters and association with nPD3mo (n = 30).
| Parameter | Nonprogression ( | Progression ( | Odds Ratio (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| dCt | 3.65 | 5.22 | 0.180 | 0.66 (0.41–1.07) |
| (8.54–1.07) | (8.89–2.63) | |||
| MR (PERCIST) | 83 | 17 | 0.009 * | 25.0 (2.27–276) |
| ΔsumSUL (%) | −46.2 | −20.7 | 0.516 | 0.003 (0–0.41) |
| (−72.5 to 24.4) | (−49.7 to −3.24) | |||
| ΔsumMTV (%) | −77.0 | −35.8 | 0.191 | 0.03 (0.001–0.74) |
| (−99.8 to 5.35) | (−65.4 to 82.5) | |||
| ΔsumTLG (%) | −80.8 | −39.6 | 0.272 | 0.28 (0.001–0.79) |
| (−99.8 to 2.47) | (−72.3 to 76.7) | |||
| bsumMTV (cm3) | 63.00 | 80.60 | 0.080 | 0.99 (0.98–1.00) |
| (1.090–287.2) | (8.410–287.3) | |||
| bsumTLG (g) | 247.9 | 307.8 | 0.085 | 1.00 (0.99–1.00) |
| (2.950–1124) | (24.47–1124) |
MR, metabolic responder; PERCIST, Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria in Solid Tumors; SUL, standardized uptake value normalized to lean body mass; MTV, metabolic tumor volume; TLG, total lesion glycolysis; CI, confidence interval. The sample statistics presented in this table were frequency (percentage, %) for categorical variables and median (range) for continuous variables. * p < 0.05 indicates a significant difference.
Figure 2Illustrative images of 18F-FDG PET responses. (A) Maximum-intensity projection (MIP) 18F-FDG PET images at baseline and after 2 weeks of gefitinib treatment of a 58-year-old woman with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma and mutant EGFR (exon 19 del) showing marked 18F-FDG response visually. The SULmax of the single hottest lesion decreased from 10.7 (left upper pleura, arrow) to 4.10 (lingula of left lung, arrowhead), with a ΔSUL of −61.5% and a PMR based on PERCIST 1.0. She achieved PR at 3 months. (B) MIP 18F-FDG PET images at baseline and after 2 weeks of gefitinib treatment of a 78-year-old man with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma and mutant EGFR (L858R) showing SMD (nMR) based on PERCIST 1.0. The SULmax of the single hottest lesion decreased from 9.37 (right upper lobe pulmonary mass, arrow) to 8.91 (the same lesion, arrowhead), with a ΔSUL of −4.90%. There was also an incidental left parotid tumor. He had PD (a new left adrenal metastasis) at 3 months.
Multivariate analysis of parameters and association with PFS (n = 30).
| Parameter | Median PFS (Months) (95% CI) | Hazard Ratio (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| dCt | 0.014 * | 4.85 (1.38–17.1) | |
| ≥6 | 2.43 (0.01–4.86) | ||
| <6 | 14.3 (9.22–19.4) | ||
| PERCIST | 0.882 | 0.91 (0.26–3.19) | |
| nMR | 3.50 (0–10.2) | ||
| MR | 12.1 (2.46–7.31) | ||
| ΔsumSUL | 0.134 | 2.73 (0.77–10.2) | |
| ≥−40% | 3.50 (0–12.0) | ||
| <−40% | 15.4 (7.74–23.1) | ||
| ΔsumTLG | 0.107 | 3.36 (0.77–14.7) | |
| ≥−50% | 3.50 (0.76–6.24) | ||
| <−50% | 12.1 (8.98–15.3) | ||
| bsumMTV | 0.014 * | 5.60 (1.43–22.0) | |
| ≥40 cm3 | 8.97 (1.58–16.4) | ||
| <40 cm3 | 19.5 (9.07–30.0) | ||
| bsumTLG | 0.222 | 2.02 (0.65–6.24) | |
| ≥ 300 g | 7.59 (4.14–11.0) | ||
| < 300 g | 14.8 (11.5–18.1) |
dCt, delta cycle threshold; PERCIST, Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria in Solid Tumors; SUL, standardized uptake value normalized to lean body mass; TLG, total lesion glycolysis; PFS, progression-free survival; CI, confidence interval. * p < 0.05 indicates a significant difference.
Figure 3Kaplan–Meier survival curve showing differences in progression-free survival between patients with a dCt of ≥6 and those with a dCt of <6 (A) and between patients with a bsumMTV ≥ 40 cm3 and < 40 cm3 (B). (C) Kaplan–Meier survival curve showing differences in overall survival between patients with a ΔsumMTV of ≥−60% and those with a ΔsumMTV of <−60%. HR, hazard ratio.
Multivariate analysis of parameters and association with OS (n = 30).
| Parameter | Median OS (Months) (95% CI) | Hazard Ratio (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| dCt | 0.014 * | 9.84 (1.58–61.2) | |
| ≥6 | 12.8 (0–28.1) | ||
| <6 | 25.3 (20.9–29.8) | ||
| PERCIST | 0.636 | 0.64 (0.30–7.03) | |
| nMR | 20.1 (8.23–32.0) | ||
| MR | 25.3 (22.5–28.2) | ||
| ΔsumSUL | 0.106 | 0.14 (0.01–1.53) | |
| ≥−40% | 22.5 (15.1–29.9) | ||
| <−40% | 30.9 (30.9–30.9) | ||
| ΔsumMTV | 0.005 * | 13.1 (2.15–79.4) | |
| ≥−60% | 20.1 (10.3–29.9) | ||
| <−60% | 30.9 (22.4–39.4) | ||
| ΔsumTLG | 0.871 | 1.23 (0.10–14.8) | |
| ≥−50% | 22.5 (11.5–33.4) | ||
| <−50% | 30.9 (22.4–39.4) |
dCt, delta cycle threshold; PERCIST, Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria in Solid Tumors; SUL, standardized uptake value normalized to lean body mass; TLG, total lesion glycolysis; OS, overall survival; CI, confidence interval. * p < 0.05 indicates a significant difference.