PURPOSE: Positron emission tomography (PET) with [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) is increasingly used in early assessment of tumor response after chemotherapy. We investigated whether a change in [(18)F]FDG uptake at 2 days of gefitinib treatment predicts outcome in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Twenty patients were enrolled. [(18)F]FDG-PET/computed tomographic (CT) scan was carried out before and 2 days after gefitinib treatment. Maximum standardized uptake values (SUV) were measured, and post-gefitinib percentage changes in SUV were calculated. Early metabolic response (SUV decline < -25%) was compared with morphologic response evaluated by CT scan and with progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: At 2 days of gefitinib treatment, 10 patients (50%) showed metabolic response, 8 had metabolic stable disease, and 2 had progressive metabolic disease. Percentage changes of SUV at 2 days were correlated with those of tumor size in CT at 1 month (R(2) = 0.496; P = 0.0008). EGFR gene was assessable in 15 patients, and of 12 patients with EGFR mutations, 8 showed metabolic response at 2 days and 6 showed morphologic response at 1 month. None of 3 patients with wild-type EGFR showed metabolic or morphologic response. Metabolic response at 2 days was not statistically associated with PFS (P = 0.095), but when a cutoff value of -20% in SUV decline was used, metabolic responders had longer PFS (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Early assessment of [(18)F]FDG tumor uptake with PET at 2 days of gefitinib treatment could be useful to predict clinical outcome earlier than conventional CT evaluation in patients with lung adenocarcinoma.
PURPOSE: Positron emission tomography (PET) with [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) is increasingly used in early assessment of tumor response after chemotherapy. We investigated whether a change in [(18)F]FDG uptake at 2 days of gefitinib treatment predicts outcome in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Twenty patients were enrolled. [(18)F]FDG-PET/computed tomographic (CT) scan was carried out before and 2 days after gefitinib treatment. Maximum standardized uptake values (SUV) were measured, and post-gefitinib percentage changes in SUV were calculated. Early metabolic response (SUV decline < -25%) was compared with morphologic response evaluated by CT scan and with progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: At 2 days of gefitinib treatment, 10 patients (50%) showed metabolic response, 8 had metabolic stable disease, and 2 had progressive metabolic disease. Percentage changes of SUV at 2 days were correlated with those of tumor size in CT at 1 month (R(2) = 0.496; P = 0.0008). EGFR gene was assessable in 15 patients, and of 12 patients with EGFR mutations, 8 showed metabolic response at 2 days and 6 showed morphologic response at 1 month. None of 3 patients with wild-type EGFR showed metabolic or morphologic response. Metabolic response at 2 days was not statistically associated with PFS (P = 0.095), but when a cutoff value of -20% in SUV decline was used, metabolic responders had longer PFS (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Early assessment of [(18)F]FDG tumor uptake with PET at 2 days of gefitinib treatment could be useful to predict clinical outcome earlier than conventional CT evaluation in patients with lung adenocarcinoma.
Authors: Jian Guan; Nan J Xiao; Min Chen; Wen L Zhou; Yao W Zhang; Shuang Wang; Yong M Dai; Lu Li; Yue Zhang; Qin Y Li; Xiang Z Li; Mi Yang; Hu B Wu; Long H Chen; Lai Y Liu Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 1.889
Authors: Claudio R Scafoglio; Brendon Villegas; Gihad Abdelhady; Sean T Bailey; Jie Liu; Aditya S Shirali; W Dean Wallace; Clara E Magyar; Tristan R Grogan; David Elashoff; Tonya Walser; Jane Yanagawa; Denise R Aberle; Jorge R Barrio; Steven M Dubinett; David B Shackelford Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2018-11-14 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Miles A Miller; Madeleine J Oudin; Ryan J Sullivan; Stephanie J Wang; Aaron S Meyer; Hyungsoon Im; Dennie T Frederick; Jenny Tadros; Linda G Griffith; Hakho Lee; Ralph Weissleder; Keith T Flaherty; Frank B Gertler; Douglas A Lauffenburger Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2016-03-16 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Joan Fledelius; Anne Winther-Larsen; Azza A Khalil; Karin Hjorthaug; Jørgen Frøkiær; Peter Meldgaard Journal: Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2018-02-05
Authors: Carlos Caicedo; Maria Jose Garcia-Velloso; Maria Dolores Lozano; Tania Labiano; Carmen Vigil Diaz; Jose Maria Lopez-Picazo; Alfonso Gurpide; Javier J Zulueta; Javier Zulueta; Jose Angel Richter Echevarria; Jose Luis Perez Gracia Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2014-07-03 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Suk Hyun Lee; Sangwon Han; Hyo Sang Lee; Sun Young Chae; Jong Jin Lee; Dong Eun Song; Jin-Sook Ryu Journal: Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2015-09-22