Literature DB >> 24812245

Timing of metabolic response monitoring during erlotinib treatment in non-small cell lung cancer.

Matthijs H van Gool1, Tjeerd S Aukema2, Eva E Schaake3, Herman Rijna4, Renato A Valdés Olmos5, Renée van Pel6, Sjaak A Burgers3, Harm van Tinteren7, Houke M Klomp.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the timing of metabolic response monitoring with (18)F-FDG PET of (neoadjuvant) erlotinib treatment in patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.
METHODS: This study was designed as an open-label phase II trial performed in 4 hospitals in The Netherlands. Patients received preoperative erlotinib (150 mg) once daily for 3 wk. Response evaluation was performed after 4-7 d and at 3 wk with (18)F-FDG PET/CT scans. Tumor (18)F-FDG uptake and changes were measured as standardized uptake values (SUVs). The metabolic response was classified on the basis of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria (>25% decrease in the maximum SUV) and was compared with histopathologic regression as observed in the resection specimen.
RESULTS: From December 2006 to November 2010, 60 patients with non-small cell lung cancer eligible for surgical resection were enrolled in this study. For 43 patients (18 men and 25 women), baseline (18)F-FDG PET/CT scans as well as both monitoring scans and histopathologic response monitoring were available. A partial metabolic response on (18)F-FDG PET/CT scans was observed for 10 patients (23%) after 1 wk and for 14 patients (33%) after 3 wk. Histopathologic examination revealed regression (necrosis of >50%) in 11 patients (26%). In these patients, the maximum SUV decreased by a mean of 17% within 1 wk and a mean of 31% at 3 wk. Seven patients were identified as responders within 1 wk.
CONCLUSION: Response monitoring with (18)F-FDG PET/CT within 1 wk after the start of erlotinib treatment identified approximately 64% of histopathologic responders on the basis of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria.
© 2014 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PET/CT; epidermal growth; molecular biology; non–small cell lung carcinoma; oncology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24812245     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.113.130674

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  7 in total

1.  Assessment of very early response evaluation with 18F-FDG-PET/CT predicts survival in erlotinib treated NSCLC patients-A comparison of methods.

Authors:  Joan Fledelius; Anne Winther-Larsen; Azza A Khalil; Karin Hjorthaug; Jørgen Frøkiær; Peter Meldgaard
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-02-05

2.  PET Imaging-Based Phenotyping as a Predictive Biomarker of Response to Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Are We There Yet?

Authors:  Victor H Gerbaudo; Chun K Kim
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-10-11

3.  An Exploratory Study of Neoadjuvant Cetuximab Followed by Cetuximab and Chemoradiotherapy in Women With Newly Diagnosed Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Paula M Fracasso; Linda R Duska; Premal H Thaker; Feng Gao; Imran Zoberi; Farrokh Dehdashti; Barry A Siegel; Livnat Uliel; Christine O Menias; Patrice K Rehm; Sherry A Goodner; Allison N Creekmore; Heather L Lothamer; Janet S Rader
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 2.787

4.  TLG-S criteria are superior to both EORTC and PERCIST for predicting outcomes in patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma treated with erlotinib.

Authors:  Kung-Chu Ho; Yu-Hua Dean Fang; Hsiao-Wen Chung; Yuan-Chang Liu; John Wen-Cheng Chang; Ming-Mo Hou; Cheng-Ta Yang; Nai-Ming Cheng; Tzu-Pei Su; Tzu-Chen Yen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Tumor heterogeneity on (18)F-FDG-PET/CT for response monitoring in non-small cell lung cancer treated with erlotinib.

Authors:  Matthijs H van Gool; Tjeerd S Aukema; Michiel Sinaasappel; Renato A Valdés Olmos; Houke M Klomp
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 6.  Metabolic Imaging to Assess Treatment Response to Cytotoxic and Cytostatic Agents.

Authors:  Natalie J Serkova; S Gail Eckhardt
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT for Early Prediction of Outcomes in Patients with Advanced Lung Adenocarcinomas and EGFR Mutations Treated with First-Line EGFR-TKIs.

Authors:  Yu-Erh Huang; Ying-Huang Tsai; Yu-Jie Huang; Jr-Hau Lung; Kuo-Wei Ho; Tzu-Chen Yen; Sheng-Chieh Chan; Shu-Tian Chen; Ming-Feng Tsai; Ming-Szu Hung
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 6.639

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.