| Literature DB >> 35323604 |
Qing Yang1,2, Jinping Liu2, Kris A G Wyckhuys2, Yizhong Yang1, Yanhui Lu2.
Abstract
In cotton-growing regions of northwestern China, Hippodamia variegata (Goeze) and Propylaea quatuordecimpunctata (Linnaeus) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) are key natural enemies of hemipteran pests. As only H. variegata can be encountered in hot, arid production areas, the thermal responses and climatic adaptability of both species likely differ substantially. In this study, we assessed the survival, longevity, fecundity, prey consumption rate, and antioxidant capacity of both species under laboratory conditions at 32-38 °C. The (negative) impacts of elevated temperatures (i.e., 35 and 38 °C) on adult survival and reproduction were more pronounced for P. quatuordecimpunctata than for H. variegata. Similarly, high temperatures exhibited the strongest negative impacts on the prey consumption rates of P. quatuordecimpunctata. At elevated temperatures, superoxide dismutase and catalase activity increased, while glutathione-S-transferases activity decreased for both species. However, for P. quatuordecimpunctata, peroxidase activity and total antioxidant capacity progressively declined. Antioxidant responses thus constitute a key physiological adaptation of ladybugs to heat stress, reflecting a superior thermal tolerance of H. variegata. Our work emphasizes how laboratory assays can explain spatiotemporal distribution patterns of individual ladybugs and inform strategies to bolster their ensuing biological control under conditions of global warming or extreme weather events.Entities:
Keywords: IPM; antioxidant response; biological control; climate adaptability; sustainable agriculture; temperature stress
Year: 2022 PMID: 35323604 PMCID: PMC8955401 DOI: 10.3390/insects13030306
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Insects ISSN: 2075-4450 Impact factor: 2.769
Figure 1Survival curves of adult Hippodamia variegata (A) and Propylaea quatuordecimpunctata (B) at different temperatures. (C) Adult longevity of both species. Survival statistics were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier survival curve and compared using the log-rank test (individuals = 60, *** p < 0.001). For each species, different letters above the bars indicate statistically significant differences (ANOVA; Tukey’s post hoc test; p < 0.05).
Figure 2Age-specific fecundity of adult Hippodamia variegata (A) and Propylaea quatuordecimpunctata (B) at different temperatures. (C) Fecundity of both species. For each species, different letters above the bars indicate statistically significant differences among temperatures (ANOVA; Tukey’s post hoc test; p < 0.05).
Functional response parameters, as obtained through logistic regression, of adult female Hippodamia variegata and Propylaea quatuordecimpunctata reared on 4th instar Aphis gossypii under different temperature regimes. P1 is the linear coefficients of the logistic regression analysis equation; Tem is the experimental temperature; a is the instantaneous searching rate; Th is the handling time. The exact structure of the functional response models is described in the text.
| Species | Tem |
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 32 °C | −0.0205 ± 0.0024 | 0.98 | 1.01 | 0.002 | 507 | 500 | |
| 35 °C | −0.0822 ± 0.0039 | 0.98 | 1.12 | 0.001 | 1115 | 1000 | ||
| 38 °C | −0.0121 ± 0.0022 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.002 | 483 | 500 | ||
|
| 32 °C | −0.0418 ± 0.0038 | 0.98 | 0.84 | 0.004 | 211 | 250 | |
| 35 °C | −0.0969 ± 0.0028 | 0.98 | 0.74 | 0.004 | 185 | 250 | ||
| 38 °C | −0.0488 ± 0.0026 | 0.94 | 0.54 | 0.004 | 136 | 250 |
Figure 3Functional response curves of adult female Hippodamia variegata (A) and Propylaea quatuordecimpunctata (B) to 4th instar Aphis gossypii at different temperatures.
Figure 4Effects of temperature stress on the antioxidant capacity of Hippodamia variegata and Propylaea quatuordecimpunctata: (A) SOD activity; (B) CAT activity; (C) POD activity; (D) GSTs activity; (E) T-AOC activity; (F) protein concentration. Different letters above the bars indicate statistically significant difference at p < 0.05 (ANOVA followed by a Tukey’s post hoc test).