Literature DB >> 28313662

Influence of intraguild predation among generalist insect predators on the suppression of an herbivore population.

Jay A Rosenheim1, Lawrence R Wilhoit1, Christine A Armer1.   

Abstract

We evaluated the influence of intraguild predation among generalist insect predators on the suppression of an herbivore, the aphid Aphis gossypii, to test the appropriateness of the simple three trophic level model proposed by Hairston, Smith, and Slobodkin (1960). We manipulated components of the predator community, including three hemipteran predators and larvae of the predatory green lacewing Chrysoperla carnea, in field enclosure/exclosure experiments to address four questions: (1) Do generalist hemipteran predators feed on C. carnea? (2) Does intraguild predation (IGP) represent a substantial source of mortality for C. carnea? (3) Do predator species act in an independent, additive manner, or do significant interactions occur? (4) Can the experimental addition of some predators result in increased densities of aphids through a trophic cascade effect? Direct observations of predation in the field demonstrated that several generalist predators consume C. carnea and other carnivorous arthropods. Severely reduced survivorship of lacewing larvae in the presence of other predators showed that IGP was a major source of mortality. Decreased survival of lacewing larvae was primarily a result of predation rather than competition. IGP created significant interactions between the influences of lacewings and either Zelus renardii or Nabis predators on aphid population suppression. Despite the fact that the trophic web was too complex to delineate distinct trophic levels within the predatory arthropod community, some trophic links were sufficiently strong to produce cascades from higher-order carnivores to the level of herbivore population dynamics: experimental addition of either Z. renardii or Nabis predators generated sufficient lacewing larval mortality in one experiment to release aphid populations from regulation by lacewing predators. We conclude that intraguild predation in this system is wide-spread and has potentially important influences on the population dynamics of a key herbivore.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aphid; Biological control; Intraguild predation; Trophic cascade

Year:  1993        PMID: 28313662     DOI: 10.1007/BF00317517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  4 in total

1.  Intraguild predation: The dynamics of complex trophic interactions.

Authors:  G A Polis; R D Holt
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Invertebrate predator-prey body size relationships: an explanation for upper triangular food webs and patterns in food web structure?

Authors:  P H Warren; J H Lawton
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Control of arthropod abundance by Anolis lizards on St. Eustatius (Neth. Antilles).

Authors:  Stephen Pacala; Jonathan Roughgarden
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Effects of fish in river food webs.

Authors:  M E Power
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-11-09       Impact factor: 47.728

  4 in total
  41 in total

1.  Seasonal variation in top-down and bottom-up processes in a grassland arthropod community.

Authors:  Alison G Boyer; Robert E Swearingen; Margo A Blaha; Christopher T Fortson; Sara K Gremillion; Kelly A Osborn; Matthew D Moran
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-05-16       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Infochemical-mediated intraguild interactions among three predatory mites on cassava plants.

Authors:  Désiré Gnanvossou; Rachid Hanna; Marcel Dicke
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-02-05       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Responses of invertebrate natural enemies to complex-structured habitats: a meta-analytical synthesis.

Authors:  Gail A Langellotto; Robert F Denno
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-02-11       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Generalist red velvet mite predator (Balaustium sp.) performs better on a mixed diet.

Authors:  Karen Muñoz-Cárdenas; Luz Stella Fuentes; R Fernando Cantor; C Daniel Rodríguez; Arne Janssen; Maurice W Sabelis
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 2.132

5.  Estimating the prevalence and strength of non-independent predator effects.

Authors:  Heather D Vance-Chalcraft; Daniel A Soluk
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Intraguild interactions between spiders and ants and top-down control in a grassland food web.

Authors:  Dirk Sanders; Christian Platner
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Size structure and substitutability in an odonate intraguild predation system.

Authors:  Patrick W Crumrine
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-06-21       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Intraguild Predation in Heteroptera: Effects of Density and Predator Identity on Dipteran Prey.

Authors:  S Brahma; D Sharma; M Kundu; N Saha; G K Saha; G Aditya
Journal:  Neotrop Entomol       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 1.434

9.  Dominant meat ants affect only their specialist predator in an epigaeic arthropod community.

Authors:  Heloise Gibb
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-07-03       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Population dynamics of interacting predatory mites, Phytoseiulus persimilis and Neoseiulus californicus, held on detached bean leaves.

Authors:  A Walzer; S Blümel; P Schausberger
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.132

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.