| Literature DB >> 35317364 |
Yuta Mitobe1, Yuri Yamaguchi2, Yasuko Baba3, Tomomi Yoshioka4, Kenji Nakagawa5, Takeshi Itou6, Kiyoyasu Kurahashi7.
Abstract
Postoperative sore throat can occur as a complication in patients who have undergone surgery under general anesthesia. The incidence of postoperative sore throat ranges from 12.1% to 70%, and its effects include damage to the epithelium and mucosal cells caused by airway securement, damage to the vocal cords, congestion, blood clots, and factors such as an inappropriately large tube, cuff shape, cuff pressure, and airway securement. Notably, there are individual differences in pain thresholds, and the sensation of pain is affected by mental states, such as anxiety, and varies from person to person. Therefore, we conducted a literature review using PubMed to clarify patient factors related to the development of postoperative sore throat. The extracted keywords were "postoperative sore throat," "anesthesia," and "patient factors." We found 16 articles that met our search criteria. We expanded the search period and retrieved 19 cases from 1990 to 2020. We also included references that were judged to be closely related to the list of citations of the retrieved references. The study designs included were randomized controlled trials, clinical trials, meta-analyses, reviews, and systematic reviews. The results showed that female sex, smoking, and age were the most common patient factors. However, we could not find any literature that studied the relationship between postoperative sore throat and mental states such as anxiety. Copyright 2022, Mitobe et al.Entities:
Keywords: Anesthesia; Patient factors; Postoperative sore throat
Year: 2022 PMID: 35317364 PMCID: PMC8912995 DOI: 10.14740/jocmr4665
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med Res ISSN: 1918-3003
Figure 1Flowchart of literature review.
Studies Included in the Analysis
| Author | Number of patients | Comparison groups (POST incidence rate, median) | Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shariffuddin et al, 2017 [ | 147 patients | Ambu®AuraGain™ (10%) | There was a significant reduction in the incidence of POST in the Ambu®AuraGain™ group |
| ASA-PS = I - III | LMA Supreme™ (38%) | ||
| Tan et al, 2005 [ | 135 patients | LMA Classic™ (41%) | SoftSeal™ group had the highest incidence of mucosal trauma; LMAUnique™ group had the lowest incidence of POST |
| ASA-PS = I - II | LMA Unique™ (14%) | ||
| SoftSeal™ (42%) | |||
| Teoh et al, 2009 [ | 140 patients | Pentax AWS (0%) | Mucosal bleeding, lip bleeding, and POST were significantly more common in the Glidescope group. |
| ASA-PS = I - II | Glidescope (18.6%) | ||
| Bein et al, 2004 [ | 80 patients | ILM (3, 0 - 6) | The incidences of POST and hoarseness were lower in the Bonfils group. |
| ASA-PS = I - III | Bonfils (0, 0 - 4) | ||
| Chen et al, 2014 [ | 144 patients | FAST (21.2%) | The incidence of POST was higher in the FAST group. |
| ASA-PS = I - II | IT (6.8%) | ||
| Higgins et al, 2002 [ | 5,264 patients | ETT (45.5%) | Age, gender, ASA, BMI, duration of surgery, type of airway management, and surgical technique were factors. |
| ASA-PS = I - III | LMA (17.5%) | ||
| FM (3.3%) | |||
| Women: men = 13.4%: 9.1% | |||
| Biro et al, 2005 [ | 809 patients | POST occurrence (40%) | Female, history of smoking or lung disease, anesthesia for prolonged denture, PONV, and bloodstains on the intubation tube were related factors. |
| No POST occurrence (60%) | |||
| Jaensson et al, 2014 [ | 297 patients | ETT (32%) | ETT had a higher incidence of POST than LMA; there was no significant difference in the incidence of POST between ETT and LAM. |
| ASA-PS = I - III | LMA (19%) | ||
| Griffiths et al, 2013 [ | 102 patients | ETT (32.7%) | There was no significant difference in POST occurrence between the two groups. |
| ASA-PS = I - II | LMA ProSeal (23.5%) | ||
| Amini et al, 2007 [ | 100 patients | RLT (8 patients) | Cuff pressure at the end of surgery was significantly lower in the DLT group. |
| ASA-PS = I - II | DLT (12 patients) | There was no significant difference in POST occurrence between the two groups. | |
| Andrews et al, 2009 [ | 90 patients | Cobra PLA™ (17 patients) | Insertion time was longer in Cobra PLA. |
| ASA-PS = I - IV | LMA (8 patients) | There was no significant difference in POST occurrence between the two groups. | |
| Kihara et al, 2000 [ | 120 patients | ILM-BL (5%) | There was no difference in POST incidence and severity or hoarseness in the two groups. |
| ASA-PS = I - II | ILM-LW (6.6%) | ||
| Bennett et al, 2000 [ | 126 patients | Contents of the cuff | There was no significant difference in the occurrence of POST. |
| ASA-PS = I - II | Air (15.6%) | There was no significant difference between intubation time and cuff pressure and the occurrence of POST. | |
| Saline solution (14.5%) | Gastric tube insertion was a confounding factor in the occurrence of POST. | ||
| Lomax et al, 2011 [ | 110 patients | GlideRite® (2: 0 - 3) | There was no significant difference in the incidence of POST. |
| ASA-PS = I - II | Pre-rotated RAE™ (2: 0 - 5) | ||
| Schaefer et al, 1994 [ | 100 patients | Laryngoscopic (16%) | There was no significant difference in complications between the two groups. |
| ASA-PS = I - II | Fiber optic (14%) |
POST: postoperative sore throat; ASA-PS: American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status; LMA: laryngeal mask airway; AWS: airway scope; ILM: intubating laryngeal mask; FAST: Foley Airway Stylet Tool; IT: introducer tool; ETT: endotracheal tube; FM: facemask; RLT: reusable laryngeal tube; DLT: disposable laryngeal tube; PLA: Cobra perilaryngeal airway; LM-BL: blind intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask; ILM-LW: light wand-guided intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask; RAE: right angle endotracheal; BMI: body mass index; PONV: postoperative nausea and vomiting.
Relationship Between Anesthesia Techniques and Postoperative Sore Throat
| Author | Time to secure airway | POST occurrence status |
|---|---|---|
| Chen et al, 2014 [ | FAST: 17.1 ± 6.1 s | FAST (21.2%), IT (6.8%) |
| IT: 12.6 ± 4.7 s | ||
| Tan et al, 2005 [ | LMA Classic™: 32.9 s (15 - 65 s) | LMA Classic™ (41%) |
| LMA Unique™: 39.6 s (16 - 130 s) | LMA Unique™ (14%) | |
| SoftSeal™: 49.4 s (13 - 300 s) | SoftSeal™ (42%) | |
| Bein et al, 2004 [ | Bonfils, mean: 40 s | Bonfils, median: 4 (0 - 4) |
| LMA, mean: 28 s | LMA, median: 3 (0 - 6) | |
| Teoh et al, 2009 [ | Pentax AWS, mean: 18.9 s | Pentax AWS: (0%) |
| Glidescope, mean: 27.8 s | Glidescope: (18.6%) | |
| Andrews et al, 2009 [ | Cobra PLA™: 39 ± 21 s | Cobra PLA™ (17 patients) |
| LMA: 27 ± 10 s | LMA: (8 patients) | |
| Kihara et al, 2005 [ | ILM-BL: 66 s | ILM-BL (5%) |
| ILM-LW: 46 s | ILM-LW (6.6%) | |
| Shariffuddin et al, 2017 [ | Three levels of tube insertion ease (easy, acceptable, and difficult) | Ambu®AuraGain™ (10%) |
| Ambu®AuraGain™ (48%:40%:12%) | LMASupreme™ (38%) | |
| LMASupreme™ (74%:18%:10%) |
POST: postoperative sore throat; FAST: Foley Airway Stylet Tool; IT: introducer tool; LMA: laryngeal mask airway; AWS: airway scope; PLA: Cobra perilaryngeal airway; ILM-BL: blind intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask; ILM-LW: light wand-guided intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask.
Relationship Between Cuff Pressure and Postoperative Sore Throat
| Author | Cuff pressure | Occurrence of POST |
|---|---|---|
| Amini et al, 2007 [ | LT-R: 55.1 cm H2O | LT-R (8 patients) |
| LT-D: 61.7 cm H2O | LT-D (12 patients) | |
| Bennett et al, 2000 [ | The air group: in the air group mean intra-cuff pressure increased significantly (start: 14.0 mm Hg, end: 40.9 mm Hg) | Air (15.6%), saline solution (14.5%) |
| The saline solution group: in the saline group there was no significant increase (start: 12.7 mm Hg, end: 14.6 mm Hg). |
POST: postoperative sore throat; LT-R: reusable laryngeal tube; LT-D: disposable laryngeal tube.
Predictors of Postoperative Sore Throat
| Author | Predictors | OR | 95% CI | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higgins et al, 2002 [ | Age (in 10-year increments) | 0.92 | 0.85 - 0.98 | 0.05 |
| Sex, male/female | 0.76 | 0.59 - 0.99 | 0.05 | |
| ASA-PS III vs. I/II | 0.45 | 0.21 - 0.94 | 0.05 | |
| Postoperative stay, every 30 min | 1.05 | 1.01 - 1.10 | 0.05 | |
| Succinylcholine | 1.67 | 1.25 - 2.23 | 0.0005 | |
| ETT vs. FM | 12.4 | 8.83 - 17.39 | 0.0001 | |
| LMA vs. FM | 5.26 | 3.79 - 7.29 | 0.0001 | |
| Ophthalmic surgery | 0.58 | 0.40 - 0.84 | 0.01 | |
| Gynecologic surgery | 1.52 | 1.14 - 2.03 | 0.01 | |
| Biro et al, 2005 [ | Female | 1.66 | 0.003 | |
| Bloodstain on intubation tube | 4.81 | 0.001 | ||
| Artificial tooth | 0.46 | 0.001 | ||
| History of respiratory disease | 3.12 | 0.02 | ||
| Young patients (per year) | 0.98 | 0.001 | ||
| Anesthesia time | 1.27 | 0.001 | ||
| History of PONV | 0.29 | 0.001 |
POST: postoperative sore throat; ASA-PS: American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status; ETT: endotracheal tube; FM: facemask; LMA: laryngeal mask airway; PONV: postoperative nausea and vomiting; OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval.