Literature DB >> 2052394

Sex differences in the perception of noxious heat stimuli.

Jocelyne S Feine1, Catherine M Bushnell, Denis Miron, Gary H Duncan.   

Abstract

This study compared pain perception in young male and female subjects, using experimental noxious heat stimuli. During 2 sessions, each of 40 subjects rated the magnitude of 120 heat stimuli, ranging from 45 degrees C to 50 degrees C. The study included a comparison of visual analogue and magnitude matching rating procedures, as well as a test of simulated analgesia, in which the range of stimuli presented during the 2 experimental sessions was shifted by 1 degree C. We found that females rated noxious heat stimuli as more intense than did males, independent of the gender of the experimenter or the type of rating scale. In addition, the data suggest that females discriminate among the painful heat intensities better than males. For example, female subjects showed significant between-session discrimination of noxious heat stimuli, while male subjects did not, and females produced steeper within-session stimulus-response functions than did males. These observed differences in nociceptive discrimination between males and females indicate that the sex-related variation in pain perception is probably related to sensory factors rather than differences in attitude or emotional response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2052394     DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(91)90094-E

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  25 in total

1.  Pain perception to the cold pressor test during the menstrual cycle in relation to estrogen levels and a comparison with men.

Authors:  B Hellström; U Lundberg
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  2000 Apr-Jun

2.  Identification of a sex-specific quantitative trait locus mediating nonopioid stress-induced analgesia in female mice.

Authors:  J S Mogil; S P Richards; L A O'Toole; M L Helms; S R Mitchell; B Kest; J K Belknap
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Sex, gender, and pain: women and men really are different.

Authors:  R B Fillingim
Journal:  Curr Rev Pain       Date:  2000

4.  Gender differences in pain perception and patterns of cerebral activation during noxious heat stimulation in humans.

Authors:  P E Paulson; S Minoshima; T J Morrow; K L Casey
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 6.961

5.  Effects of fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) nodule depth on pain score.

Authors:  H Toman; F Ozkul; G Erbag; M Erbas; T Simsek; G Adam; M K Arik; M Asik
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 6.  Gender differences affecting vocal health of women in vocally demanding careers.

Authors:  Eric J Hunter; Kristine Tanner; Marshall E Smith
Journal:  Logoped Phoniatr Vocol       Date:  2011-07-04       Impact factor: 1.487

7.  Sex differences in spatial accuracy relate to the neural activation of antagonistic muscles in young adults.

Authors:  Agostina Casamento-Moran; Sandra K Hunter; Yen-Ting Chen; Min Hyuk Kwon; Emily J Fox; Basma Yacoubi; Evangelos A Christou
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  Somatic symptom reporting in women and men.

Authors:  A J Barsky; H M Peekna; J F Borus
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  [Do men and women have different perceptions of pain?].

Authors:  F López de Castro; F J Rodríguez Alcalá; I Méndez Gallego; R Mancebo Pardo; R Gómez Calcerrada
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.137

10.  The Anesthetic Effect of Anterior Middle Superior Alveolar Technique (AMSA).

Authors:  Lívia de Souza Tolentino; André Barbisan Souza; Ana Alice Girardi; Giuseppe Alexandre Romito; Maurício Guimarães Araújo
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2015
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.