Literature DB >> 35313293

Patient-specific deep learning model to enhance 4D-CBCT image for radiomics analysis.

Zeyu Zhang1,2, Mi Huang3, Zhuoran Jiang1,2, Yushi Chang4, Ke Lu1,2, Fang-Fang Yin1,2,5, Phuoc Tran6, Dapeng Wu7, Chris Beltran3, Lei Ren6.   

Abstract

Objective.4D-CBCT provides phase-resolved images valuable for radiomics analysis for outcome prediction throughout treatment courses. However, 4D-CBCT suffers from streak artifacts caused by under-sampling, which severely degrades the accuracy of radiomic features. Previously we developed group-patient-trained deep learning methods to enhance the 4D-CBCT quality for radiomics analysis, which was not optimized for individual patients. In this study, a patient-specific model was developed to further improve the accuracy of 4D-CBCT based radiomics analysis for individual patients.Approach.This patient-specific model was trained with intra-patient data. Specifically, patient planning 4D-CT was augmented through image translation, rotation, and deformation to generate 305 CT volumes from 10 volumes to simulate possible patient positions during the onboard image acquisition. 72 projections were simulated from 4D-CT for each phase and were used to reconstruct 4D-CBCT using FDK back-projection algorithm. The patient-specific model was trained using these 305 paired sets of patient-specific 4D-CT and 4D-CBCT data to enhance the 4D-CBCT image to match with 4D-CT images as ground truth. For model testing, 4D-CBCT were simulated from a separate set of 4D-CT scan images acquired from the same patient and were then enhanced by this patient-specific model. Radiomics features were then extracted from the testing 4D-CT, 4D-CBCT, and enhanced 4D-CBCT image sets for comparison. The patient-specific model was tested using 4 lung-SBRT patients' data and compared with the performance of the group-based model. The impact of model dimensionality, region of interest (ROI) selection, and loss function on the model accuracy was also investigated.Main results.Compared with a group-based model, the patient-specific training model further improved the accuracy of radiomic features, especially for features with large errors in the group-based model. For example, the 3D whole-body and ROI loss-based patient-specific model reduces the errors of the first-order median feature by 83.67%, the wavelet LLL feature maximum by 91.98%, and the wavelet HLL skewness feature by 15.0% on average for the four patients tested. In addition, the patient-specific models with different dimensionality (2D versus 3D) or loss functions (L1 versus L1 + VGG + GAN) achieved comparable results for improving the radiomics accuracy. Using whole-body or whole-body+ROI L1 loss for the model achieved better results than using the ROI L1 loss alone as the loss function.Significance.This study demonstrated that the patient-specific model is more effective than the group-based model on improving the accuracy of the 4D-CBCT radiomic features analysis, which could potentially improve the precision for outcome prediction in radiotherapy.
© 2022 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  4D-CBCT; CBCT; deep learning; generative adversarial network; patient-specific; radiomics; under-sampled projections

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35313293      PMCID: PMC9066277          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac5f6e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   4.174


  21 in total

1.  An accurate iterative reconstruction algorithm for sparse objects: application to 3D blood vessel reconstruction from a limited number of projections.

Authors:  Meihua Li; Haiquan Yang; Hiroyuki Kudo
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2002-08-07       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  On-the-fly motion-compensated cone-beam CT using an a priori model of the respiratory motion.

Authors:  Simon Rit; Jochem W H Wolthaus; Marcel van Herk; Jan-Jakob Sonke
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Tumour heterogeneity in non-small cell lung carcinoma assessed by CT texture analysis: a potential marker of survival.

Authors:  Balaji Ganeshan; Elleny Panayiotou; Kate Burnand; Sabina Dizdarevic; Ken Miles
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  A radiomics model from joint FDG-PET and MRI texture features for the prediction of lung metastases in soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremities.

Authors:  M Vallières; C R Freeman; S R Skamene; I El Naqa
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  SPARE: Sparse-view reconstruction challenge for 4D cone-beam CT from a 1-min scan.

Authors:  Chun-Chien Shieh; Yesenia Gonzalez; Bin Li; Xun Jia; Simon Rit; Cyril Mory; Matthew Riblett; Geoffrey Hugo; Yawei Zhang; Zhuoran Jiang; Xiaoning Liu; Lei Ren; Paul Keall
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Radiomic signature as a diagnostic factor for histologic subtype classification of non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Xinzhong Zhu; Di Dong; Zhendong Chen; Mengjie Fang; Liwen Zhang; Jiangdian Song; Dongdong Yu; Yali Zang; Zhenyu Liu; Jingyun Shi; Jie Tian
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Low dose cone-beam computed tomography reconstruction via hybrid prior contour based total variation regularization (hybrid-PCTV).

Authors:  Yingxuan Chen; Fang-Fang Yin; Yawei Zhang; You Zhang; Lei Ren
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2019-07

8.  Machine Learning methods for Quantitative Radiomic Biomarkers.

Authors:  Chintan Parmar; Patrick Grossmann; Johan Bussink; Philippe Lambin; Hugo J W L Aerts
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data.

Authors:  Robert J Gillies; Paul E Kinahan; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Deep Learning Algorithm for Reducing CT Slice Thickness: Effect on Reproducibility of Radiomic Features in Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Sohee Park; Sang Min Lee; Kyung Hyun Do; June Goo Lee; Woong Bae; Hyunho Park; Kyu Hwan Jung; Joon Beom Seo
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.