Literature DB >> 26119045

A radiomics model from joint FDG-PET and MRI texture features for the prediction of lung metastases in soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremities.

M Vallières1, C R Freeman, S R Skamene, I El Naqa.   

Abstract

This study aims at developing a joint FDG-PET and MRI texture-based model for the early evaluation of lung metastasis risk in soft-tissue sarcomas (STSs). We investigate if the creation of new composite textures from the combination of FDG-PET and MR imaging information could better identify aggressive tumours. Towards this goal, a cohort of 51 patients with histologically proven STSs of the extremities was retrospectively evaluated. All patients had pre-treatment FDG-PET and MRI scans comprised of T1-weighted and T2-weighted fat-suppression sequences (T2FS). Nine non-texture features (SUV metrics and shape features) and forty-one texture features were extracted from the tumour region of separate (FDG-PET, T1 and T2FS) and fused (FDG-PET/T1 and FDG-PET/T2FS) scans. Volume fusion of the FDG-PET and MRI scans was implemented using the wavelet transform. The influence of six different extraction parameters on the predictive value of textures was investigated. The incorporation of features into multivariable models was performed using logistic regression. The multivariable modeling strategy involved imbalance-adjusted bootstrap resampling in the following four steps leading to final prediction model construction: (1) feature set reduction; (2) feature selection; (3) prediction performance estimation; and (4) computation of model coefficients. Univariate analysis showed that the isotropic voxel size at which texture features were extracted had the most impact on predictive value. In multivariable analysis, texture features extracted from fused scans significantly outperformed those from separate scans in terms of lung metastases prediction estimates. The best performance was obtained using a combination of four texture features extracted from FDG-PET/T1 and FDG-PET/T2FS scans. This model reached an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.984 ± 0.002, a sensitivity of 0.955 ± 0.006, and a specificity of 0.926 ± 0.004 in bootstrapping evaluations. Ultimately, lung metastasis risk assessment at diagnosis of STSs could improve patient outcomes by allowing better treatment adaptation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26119045     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/14/5471

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  250 in total

1.  Extracting and Selecting Robust Radiomic Features from PET/MR Images in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Pengfei Yang; Lei Xu; Zuozhen Cao; Yidong Wan; Yi Xue; Yangkang Jiang; Eric Yen; Chen Luo; Jing Wang; Yi Rong; Tianye Niu
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 2.  Image-based biomarkers for solid tumor quantification.

Authors:  Peter Savadjiev; Jaron Chong; Anthony Dohan; Vincent Agnus; Reza Forghani; Caroline Reinhold; Benoit Gallix
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Brain Cancer Imaging Phenomics Toolkit (brain-CaPTk): An Interactive Platform for Quantitative Analysis of Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Saima Rathore; Spyridon Bakas; Sarthak Pati; Hamed Akbari; Ratheesh Kalarot; Patmaa Sridharan; Martin Rozycki; Mark Bergman; Birkan Tunc; Ragini Verma; Michel Bilello; Christos Davatzikos
Journal:  Brainlesion       Date:  2018-02-17

Review 4.  Radiomics in precision medicine for lung cancer.

Authors:  Julie Constanzo; Lise Wei; Huan-Hsin Tseng; Issam El Naqa
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2017-12

5.  Applying a new bilateral mammographic density segmentation method to improve accuracy of breast cancer risk prediction.

Authors:  Shiju Yan; Yunzhi Wang; Faranak Aghaei; Yuchen Qiu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  Computer-aided diagnosis with radiogenomics: analysis of the relationship between genotype and morphological changes of the brain magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Chiharu Kai; Yoshikazu Uchiyama; Junji Shiraishi; Hiroshi Fujita; Kunio Doi
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2018-05-10

7.  Treatment-related features improve machine learning prediction of prognosis in soft tissue sarcoma patients.

Authors:  Jan C Peeken; Tatyana Goldberg; Christoph Knie; Basil Komboz; Michael Bernhofer; Francesco Pasa; Kerstin A Kessel; Pouya D Tafti; Burkhard Rost; Fridtjof Nüsslin; Andreas E Braun; Stephanie E Combs
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 3.621

8.  Machine learning and modeling: Data, validation, communication challenges.

Authors:  Issam El Naqa; Dan Ruan; Gilmer Valdes; Andre Dekker; Todd McNutt; Yaorong Ge; Q Jackie Wu; Jung Hun Oh; Maria Thor; Wade Smith; Arvind Rao; Clifton Fuller; Ying Xiao; Frank Manion; Matthew Schipper; Charles Mayo; Jean M Moran; Randall Ten Haken
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Adaptive Sparsity Regularization Based Collaborative Clustering for Cancer Prognosis.

Authors:  Hangfan Liu; Hongming Li; Yuemeng Li; Shi Yin; Pamela Boimel; James Janopaul-Naylor; Haoyu Zhong; Ying Xiao; Edgar Ben-Josef; Yong Fan
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2019-10-10

10.  Comparison of radiomics machine-learning classifiers and feature selection for differentiation of sacral chordoma and sacral giant cell tumour based on 3D computed tomography features.

Authors:  Ping Yin; Ning Mao; Chao Zhao; Jiangfen Wu; Chao Sun; Lei Chen; Nan Hong
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.