Literature DB >> 35313249

Implant characteristics affect in vivo shoulder kinematics during multiplanar functional motions after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Christopher Como1, Clarissa LeVasseur2, Gillian Kane1, Ajinkya Rai2, Maria Munsch2, Alexandra Gabrielli2, Jonathan Hughes2, William Anderst3, Albert Lin2.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine how implant characteristics affect in vivo shoulder kinematics after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Kinematics of the affected upper limb were measured in 32 participants during five motions (scapular plane abduction, hand-to-head, hand-to-back, internal/external rotation at 90° abduction, and circumduction) using optical motion capture. Shoulder abduction, plane of elevation, and internal/external rotation range of motion (ROM), peak angles, and continuous kinematics waveforms were calculated for each motion. Multiple regression was used to identify associations between kinematics and implant characteristics of lateralization, humeral retroversion, glenosphere size, glenosphere tilt, glenoid eccentricity, and implant neck-shaft angle (135° or 145°). Less humeral retroversion was associated with greater shoulder rotation ROM (p = 0.036) and greater plane of elevation ROM (p = 0.024) during circumduction, while less eccentricity was associated with more posterior plane of elevation during hand-to-back (p = 0.021). The 145° implant was associated with greater internal/external shoulder rotation ROM (p < 0.001), greater internal shoulder rotation (p = 0.002), and greater plane of elevation ROM (p = 001) during the hand-to-back. The 145° implant was also associated with more internal/external rotation ROM (p = 0.043) during shoulder rotation and more abduction ROM during circumduction (p = 0.043). During the hand-to-back motion, individuals having 135° neck-shaft angle implants were more abducted from 21 to 51% of the motion and were less internally rotated from 70 to 100% of the motion, while more lateralization was associated with less internal rotation from 90 to 100% of the motion. Retroversion and implant neck-shaft angle are the primary implant characteristics associated with in vivo shoulder kinematics during complex motions after RSA.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  RSA; Reverse shoulder arthroplasty; Shoulder; Shoulder kinematics

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35313249      PMCID: PMC9064972          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2022.111050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.789


  20 in total

1.  Generalized n-dimensional biomechanical field analysis using statistical parametric mapping.

Authors:  Todd C Pataky
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Optimal movement variability: a new theoretical perspective for neurologic physical therapy.

Authors:  Nicholas Stergiou; Regina Harbourne; James Cavanaugh
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.649

3.  Predictors of scapular notching in patients managed with the Delta III reverse total shoulder replacement.

Authors:  Ryan W Simovitch; Matthias A Zumstein; Eveline Lohri; Naeder Helmy; Christian Gerber
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Scapulohumeral rhythm in shoulders with reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  David Walker; Keisuke Matsuki; Aimee M Struk; Thomas W Wright; Scott A Banks
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Sample size estimation for biomechanical waveforms: Current practice, recommendations and a comparison to discrete power analysis.

Authors:  Mark A Robinson; Jos Vanrenterghem; Todd C Pataky
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Duocentric® reversed shoulder prosthesis and Personal Fit® templates: innovative strategies to optimize prosthesis positioning and prevent scapular notching.

Authors:  P Trouilloud; M Gonzalvez; P Martz; H Charles; F Handelberg; R W Nyffeler; E Baulot
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-03-31

7.  Biomechanical effects of humeral neck-shaft angle and subscapularis integrity in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Joo Han Oh; Sang-Jin Shin; Michelle H McGarry; Jonathan H Scott; Nathanael Heckmann; Thay Q Lee
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 3.019

8.  Factors associated with internal rotation outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Morgane Rol; Luc Favard; Julien Berhouet
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 2.256

Review 9.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for irreparable massive rotator cuff tears: a systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression.

Authors:  Nuno Sevivas; Nuno Ferreira; Renato Andrade; Pedro Moreira; Raquel Portugal; Diogo Alves; Manuel Vieira da Silva; Nuno Sousa; António J Salgado; João Espregueira-Mendes
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 3.019

10.  Effects of humeral component retroversion on functional outcomes in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for cuff tear arthropathy.

Authors:  Yong Girl Rhee; Nam Su Cho; Seong Cheol Moon
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 3.019

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.