Literature DB >> 24480326

Biomechanical effects of humeral neck-shaft angle and subscapularis integrity in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Joo Han Oh1, Sang-Jin Shin2, Michelle H McGarry3, Jonathan H Scott3, Nathanael Heckmann3, Thay Q Lee4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The variability in functional outcomes and the occurrence of scapular notching and instability after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty remain problems. The objectives of this study were to measure the effect of reverse humeral component neck-shaft angle on impingement-free range of motion, abduction moment, and anterior dislocation force and to evaluate the effect of subscapularis loading on dislocation force.
METHODS: Six cadaveric shoulders were tested with 155°, 145°, and 135° reverse shoulder humeral neck-shaft angles. The adduction angle at which bone contact occurred and the internal and external rotational impingement-free range of motion angles were measured. Glenohumeral abduction moment was measured at 0° and 30° of abduction, and anterior dislocation forces were measured at 30° of internal rotation, 0°, and 30° of external rotation with and without subscapularis loading.
RESULTS: Adduction deficit angles for 155°, 145°, and 135° neck-shaft angle were 2° ± 5° of abduction, 7° ± 4° of adduction, and 12° ± 2° of adduction (P < .05). Impingement-free angles of humeral rotation and abduction moments were not statistically different between the neck-shaft angles. The anterior dislocation force was significantly higher for the 135° neck-shaft angle at 30° of external rotation and significantly higher for the 155° neck-shaft angle at 30° of internal rotation (P < .01). The anterior dislocation forces were significantly higher when the subscapularis was loaded (P < .01).
CONCLUSIONS: The 155° neck-shaft angle was more prone to scapular bone contact during adduction but was more stable at the internally rotated position, which was the least stable humeral rotation position. Subscapularis loading gave further anterior stability with all neck-shaft angles at all positions. Published by Mosby, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroplasty; anterior dislocation; biomechanics; notching; reverse shoulder

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24480326     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  27 in total

1.  The influence of subscapularis tendon reattachment on range of motion in reversed shoulder arthroplasty: a clinical study.

Authors:  F A de Boer; P M van Kampen; P E Huijsmans
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2016-03-16

Review 2.  [Reversed total shoulder arthroplasty in rotator cuff defect arthropathy].

Authors:  T Patzer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 3.  [Treatment after anatomical and inverse shoulder TEP].

Authors:  M Farkhondeh Fal; J Kircher
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Implant Design Considerations.

Authors:  Ujash Sheth; Matthew Saltzman
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2019-12

5.  Superior Baseplate Inclination Is Associated With Instability After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Robert Z Tashjian; Brook I Martin; Cassandra A Ricketts; Heath B Henninger; Erin K Granger; Peter N Chalmers
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  The role of the subscapularis tendon in a lateralized reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: repair versus nonrepair.

Authors:  Edoardo Franceschetti; Edoardo Giovannetti de Sanctis; Riccardo Ranieri; Alessio Palumbo; Michele Paciotti; Francesco Franceschi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-01-05       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Treatment of proximal humerus fractures using reverse shoulder arthroplasty: do the inclination of the humeral component and the lateral offset of the glenosphere influence the clinical outcome and tuberosity healing?

Authors:  Malte Holschen; Maria Körting; Patrick Khourdaji; Benjamin Bockmann; Tobias L Schulte; Kai-Axel Witt; Jörn Steinbeck
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Grammont versus lateralizing reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fracture: functional and radiographic outcomes.

Authors:  M A Verdano; D Aliani; C Galavotti; C Maroun; E Vaienti; F Ceccarelli
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2018-10-20

9.  Treating cuff tear arthropathy by reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: do the inclination of the humeral component and the lateral offset of the glenosphere influence the clinical and the radiological outcome?

Authors:  Malte Holschen; Alexandros Kiriazis; Benjamin Bockmann; Tobias L Schulte; Kai-Axel Witt; Jörn Steinbeck
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-04-20

10.  Risk factors for instability after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Vincenzo Guarrella; Mikael Chelli; Peter Domos; Francesco Ascione; Pascal Boileau; Gilles Walch
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2019-07-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.