Literature DB >> 25953489

Effects of humeral component retroversion on functional outcomes in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for cuff tear arthropathy.

Yong Girl Rhee1, Nam Su Cho2, Seong Cheol Moon2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The currently recommended 0° to 30° humeral component retroversion angle for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is based on expert opinion rather than anatomical or clinical evidence.
METHODS: Sixty-two patients who underwent RTSA for cuff tear arthropathy were reviewed retrospectively. The humeral component was inserted with 20° retroversion in 30 patients (group A) and with 0° retroversion in 32 (group B). The mean age at the time of operation was 66.2 years and 68.9 years, and the mean follow-up period was 43.3 months and 38.4 months in groups A and B, respectively.
RESULTS: At the last follow-up, external rotation at the side was 47.2° ± 8.4° in group A and 43.9° ± 7.0° in group B, whereas internal rotation to the posterior was L3 and L2, respectively (P = .102 and P = .092). The ranges of motion between the 2 groups at the last follow-up were not significantly different. Most daily movements related to activities of daily living showed no significant differences between the 2 groups, with the exception of back washing/back doing up bra (1.5 ± 1.2 in group A vs 2.1 ± 0.8 in group B of 3 points, P = .026).
CONCLUSIONS: Range of motion after RTSA did not significantly differ between 20° and 0° humeral component retroversion angle. Most daily movements did not differ between the 2 groups, but patients in the 0° retroversion angle group scored better on activities related to internal rotation.
Copyright © 2015 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Shoulder; activities of daily living; cuff tear arthropathy; humeral component; range of motion; retroversion; reverse total shoulder arthroplasty; rotator cuff tear

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25953489     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.03.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  10 in total

Review 1.  Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Implant Design Considerations.

Authors:  Ujash Sheth; Matthew Saltzman
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2019-12

2.  Is there any influence of humeral component retroversion on range of motion and clinical outcome in reverse shoulder arthroplasty? A clinical study.

Authors:  F A de Boer; P M van Kampen; P E Huijsmans
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2016-12-03

3.  Patient Posture Affects Simulated ROM in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Modeling Study Using Preoperative Planning Software.

Authors:  Philipp Moroder; Manuel Urvoy; Patric Raiss; Jean-David Werthel; Doruk Akgün; Jean Chaoui; Paul Siegert
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 4.755

4.  Implant characteristics affect in vivo shoulder kinematics during multiplanar functional motions after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christopher Como; Clarissa LeVasseur; Gillian Kane; Ajinkya Rai; Maria Munsch; Alexandra Gabrielli; Jonathan Hughes; William Anderst; Albert Lin
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 2.789

Review 5.  Treatment Strategy for Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears.

Authors:  Joo Han Oh; Min Suk Park; Sung Min Rhee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2018-05-18

6.  The functional internal rotation scale: a novel shoulder arthroplasty outcome measure.

Authors:  Alexander W Aleem; Aaron M Chamberlain; Jay D Keener
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2019-11-27

Review 7.  The modern reverse shoulder arthroplasty and an updated systematic review for each complication: part II.

Authors:  Sarav S Shah; Alexander M Roche; Spencer W Sullivan; Benjamin T Gaal; Stewart Dalton; Arjun Sharma; Joseph J King; Brian M Grawe; Surena Namdari; Macy Lawler; Joshua Helmkamp; Grant E Garrigues; Thomas W Wright; Bradley S Schoch; Kyle Flik; Randall J Otto; Richard Jones; Andrew Jawa; Peter McCann; Joseph Abboud; Gabe Horneff; Glen Ross; Richard Friedman; Eric T Ricchetti; Douglas Boardman; Robert Z Tashjian; Lawrence V Gulotta
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-09-10

8.  Three-dimensional kinematics of reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a comparison between shoulders with good or poor elevation.

Authors:  Keisuke Matsuki; Shota Hoshika; Yusuke Ueda; Morihito Tokai; Norimasa Takahashi; Hiroyuki Sugaya; Scott A Banks
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-03-31

9.  Factors influencing functional internal rotation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Bettina Hochreiter; Anita Hasler; Julian Hasler; Philipp Kriechling; Paul Borbas; Christian Gerber
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-04-20

Review 10.  Does Humeral Component Version Affect Range of Motion and Clinical Outcomes in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Shivan S Jassim; Lukas Ernstbrunner; Eugene T Ek
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 4.241

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.