Literature DB >> 23543043

Duocentric® reversed shoulder prosthesis and Personal Fit® templates: innovative strategies to optimize prosthesis positioning and prevent scapular notching.

P Trouilloud1, M Gonzalvez, P Martz, H Charles, F Handelberg, R W Nyffeler, E Baulot.   

Abstract

We describe our experience with a new system of patient-specific template called Personal Fit(®), which is unique in shoulder surgery and used in combination with Duocentric(®) prosthesis. The reverse prosthesis's concept is the invention of Paul Grammont, developed with Grammont's team of Dijon University as from 1981, which led to the first reversed total shoulder prosthesis called Trumpet in 1985. The Duocentric(®) prosthesis developed in 2001 is the third-generation prosthesis, coming from the Trumpet and the second-generation prosthesis Delta(®) (DePuy). This prosthesis provides a novel solution to the notching problem with an inferior overhang integrated onto the glenoid baseplate. Personal Fit(®) system is based on reconstructing the shoulder joint bones in three dimensions using CT scan data, placing a landmark on the scapula and locating points on the glenoid and humerus. That will be used as a reference for the patient-specific templates. We study the glenoid position planned with Personal Fit(®) software relative to native glenoid position in 30 cases. On average, the difference between the planned retroversion (or anteversion in one case) and native retroversion was 8.6°.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23543043     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-013-1213-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  5 in total

Review 1.  Indications for reverse shoulder replacement: a systematic review.

Authors:  C D Smith; P Guyver; T D Bunker
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2012-05

Review 2.  Problems, complications, reoperations, and revisions in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Matthias A Zumstein; Miguel Pinedo; Jason Old; Pascal Boileau
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Glenoid morphology in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: classification and surgical implications.

Authors:  Mark A Frankle; Atsushi Teramoto; Zong-Ping Luo; Jonathan C Levy; Derek Pupello
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2009-05-30       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 4.  Genetic and biomechanical determinants of glenoid version: implications for glenoid implant placement in shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Joshua P Landau; Heinz R Hoenecke
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Delta shoulder prosthesis for rotator cuff rupture.

Authors:  P M Grammont; E Baulot
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 1.390

  5 in total
  14 in total

1.  Effect of humeral stem design on humeral position and range of motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alexandre Lädermann; Patrick J Denard; Pascal Boileau; Alain Farron; Pierric Deransart; Alexandre Terrier; Julien Ston; Gilles Walch
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Soft tissue balancing in total shoulder replacement.

Authors:  Maike Mueller; Gregory Hoy
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2014-03

3.  Glenoid morphology and the safe zone for protecting the suprascapular nerve during baseplate fixation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yuhui Yang; Jianlin Zuo; Tong Liu; Pu Shao; Haihe Wu; Zhongli Gao; Jianlin Xiao
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Implant Design Considerations.

Authors:  Ujash Sheth; Matthew Saltzman
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2019-12

5.  Implant characteristics affect in vivo shoulder kinematics during multiplanar functional motions after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christopher Como; Clarissa LeVasseur; Gillian Kane; Ajinkya Rai; Maria Munsch; Alexandra Gabrielli; Jonathan Hughes; William Anderst; Albert Lin
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 2.789

6.  Grammont versus lateralizing reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fracture: functional and radiographic outcomes.

Authors:  M A Verdano; D Aliani; C Galavotti; C Maroun; E Vaienti; F Ceccarelli
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2018-10-20

Review 7.  A Critical Review on Prosthetic Features Available for Reversed Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Bart Middernacht; Alexander Van Tongel; Lieven De Wilde
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-12-25       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Effect of critical shoulder angle, glenoid lateralization, and humeral inclination on range of movement in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alexandre Lädermann; Eileen Tay; Philippe Collin; Sébastien Piotton; Chih-Hao Chiu; Aude Michelet; Caecilia Charbonnier
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 5.853

9.  Accuracy of patient-specific instrumentation in anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Richard James Dallalana; Ryan A McMahon; Ben East; Liam Geraghty
Journal:  Int J Shoulder Surg       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

10.  The glenoid-intramedullary humeral angle: a measurement of compensatory scapular abduction in advanced rotator cuff arthropathy and its potential effects on implant choice.

Authors:  Christopher M Loftis; Devin St Clair; James L Cook; Daniel S Robertson; Robert C Reams; Matthew J Smith
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-04-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.