A modular approach to prepare tri- and tetracyclic carbazoles by a sequential [3 + 2]heteroannulation is described. First, optimization of Pd-catalyzed Buchwald-Hartwig amination followed by C/N-arylation in a one-pot process is established. Second, mechanistic analyses identified the origins of chemo- and regioselective sequential control of both bond-forming steps. Finally, the substrate scope is demonstrated by the preparation of a range of tri- and tetracyclic carbazoles, including expedient access to several natural products and anti-cancer agents.
A modular approach to prepare tri- and tetracyclic carbazoles by a sequential [3 + 2]heteroannulation is described. First, optimization of Pd-catalyzed Buchwald-Hartwig amination followed by C/N-arylation in a one-pot process is established. Second, mechanistic analyses identified the origins of chemo- and regioselective sequential control of both bond-forming steps. Finally, the substrate scope is demonstrated by the preparation of a range of tri- and tetracyclic carbazoles, including expedient access to several natural products and anti-cancer agents.
Carbazoles
are ubiquitous N-heterocycles used throughout medicinal
chemistry and material sciences.[1−3] From a pharmaceutical perspective,
the carbazole core features extensively in drugs and natural products,
many of which exhibit potent anti-proliferative activities (Figure a).[4−9] The breadth of applications has inspired the development of numerous
methodologies for their preparation.[2,9,10] Pd-catalyzed processes in particular enable a [3
+ 2]heteroannulation via Pd(0)-catalyzed Buchwald–Hartwig amination[11] followed by Pd(II)-catalyzed C-arylation at a late stage in a synthetic workflow.[12−25] However, a generalized set of guidelines that control the chemoselectivity
of each C–N/C–C bond-forming reaction, and the factors
that influence Pd(0)[23] versus Pd(II)[17] catalysis in a one-pot process have not been
established. Furthermore, a mechanistic understanding of any regiocontrol
underpinning the second C–H activation step for the formation
of tetracyclic carbazoles is unknown.
Figure 1
Generalized approach for the synthesis
of tri–/tetracyclic
carbazoles by Pd-catalyzed [3 + 2]heteroannulation.
Generalized approach for the synthesis
of tri–/tetracyclic
carbazoles by Pd-catalyzed [3 + 2]heteroannulation.In this manuscript, we establish reaction guidelines to prepare
tri- and tetracyclic carbazoles by controlling the chemoselectivity
of the first Pd(0)-catalyzed C–N bond-forming step and the
regioselectivity of the second Pd(II)-catalyzed C/N-arylation (Figure b). Our rationale
was to use o-chloroanilines (1) to define
the A-ring of a carbazole core and heteroaryl bromides to form the
C/D-rings of tricyclic and tetracyclic products. An initial version
of this work was deposited in ChemRxiv on the 24th
of November 2021.[26]
Results and Discussion
The motivation for this work was to develop a robust, one-pot synthetic
framework that can access both tri- and tetracyclic carbazoles. The
synthesis of tetracyclic carbazoles using a heteroaryl bromide substrate
such as 3 has potentially two competing C–H activation
sites. If the C-arylation proceeded via a Pd(II)-catalyzed intermediate, then we surmised that the more
nucleophilic 5-position of an isoquinoline will result in preferential
C–H bond activation at this site.[27] However, the mechanistic determinants that control the regioselectivity
of such Pd(II)-catalyzed C-arylation are not known
with respect to a convergent [3 + 2]heteroannulation approach.[28−31]Our studies commenced with optimizing reaction conditions
for the
Pd(0)-catalyzed C–N bond-forming step using 4-methoxy-2-chloroaniline
(1a) and 6-bromoisoquinoline (6a) as exemplar
substrates (Scheme ). An extensive screen (Table S1) identified
DavePhos and K3PO4 as the optimal ligand/base
pairing, which formed 7a in 87% yield.
Scheme 1
Scope (Isolated Yields)
of Buchwald–Hartwig Amination
Using these conditions, secondary anilines 7b–e (56–91%) were obtained using chloroanilines (1b–e) bearing electron-rich and electron-withdrawing substituents when
reacted with 6-bromoisoquinoline (6a). The conditions
tolerated a range of heteroaryl bromides to form 7g–j, except for 2-bromoquinoxaline (6d). In this case,
a mixture of secondary (7i, 27%) and tertiary anilines
(8, 25%) was formed. Using 5-bromo-1,3-dihydroisobenzofuran
(6e) formed 7j in 18% yield. This process
was also compatible with 2-bromonaphthalene-1,4-dione (6f) producing 1,4-napthoquinones[32] (7k–p) in 59–82%. Whilst this reaction could
conceivably proceed via Michael addition, the reaction
afforded the secondary anilines 7k–p in 5–7%
in the absence of a Pd catalyst.With conditions for the Pd(0)-catalyzed
C–N bond-forming
step established, the optimization of the one-pot process was explored
(Table S2). The optimal ligand/base pairing
of HPCy3BF4 with K3PO4 was identified, which formed 9a from 1a and 6a in 82% yield (Scheme a). This highlights that the second C–H
activation step is regioselective for the 7-position of 6a. To further understand how the nature of the chloroaniline and heteroaryl
bromide substrates influenced the chemo- and regioselectivity of both
bond-forming steps, a series of test reactions was undertaken. Exchanging
6-bromoisoquinoline (6a) for isoquinoline (10) formed dimethoxyphenazine (11) and the tertiary aniline
(12) in 35 and 25% isolated yields, respectively (Scheme b). No dihydrophenazine
was isolated from the reaction, which suggests that an in
situ oxidation occurred.[33] No
reaction occurred when isoquinoline (10) was the coupling
partner with 1-chloro-3-methoxybenzene (13, Scheme c). Only secondary
aniline (15) was isolated when para-anisidine
(14) was reacted with 6-bromoisoquinoline (6a, Scheme d). Taken
collectively, these test reactions highlighted the following requirements
for the preparation of the tetracyclic core: (i) aryl bromide is essential
and prevents dimerization of the o-chloroaniline,
(ii) whilst the absence of a bromo substituent in the heteroaryl substrate
results in C–H activation at the same site, there is little
regiocontrol, (iii) a chloro substituent is essential for C-arylation.
Scheme 2
Mechanistic Studies of the [3 + 2]Heteroannulation
Reaction conditions: Pd(OAc)2 (5 mol %), HPCy3BF4 (10 mol %), K3PO4 (3 equiv), 1,4-dioxane; (i) 30 min, 120 °C MW; (ii)
8 h, 160 °C MW; wrt = with respect to.
Mechanistic Studies of the [3 + 2]Heteroannulation
Reaction conditions: Pd(OAc)2 (5 mol %), HPCy3BF4 (10 mol %), K3PO4 (3 equiv), 1,4-dioxane; (i) 30 min, 120 °C MW; (ii)
8 h, 160 °C MW; wrt = with respect to.The influence of the electron-donating aniline lone pair in the
direct C-arylation step was then explored (Scheme e). We surmised that
the acetylated substrate (16) would deactivate the C-ring
and render the C-arylation less efficient. This indeed
occurred as highlighted by the formation of deacetylated C-arylated regioisomers, 9a and 17, in 27%
total yield (1.2:1.0, 9a:17). We assume
that deacetylation occurs in situ because of the
high temperatures and the presence of a base in the reaction mixture.
An unexpected result was the formation of the linear tetracyclic carbazole 17, which arises from C–H activation of the isoquinoline
7-position of 16. The formation of 17 suggests
that C–H activation of the 7-position is favored if the acetyl
group is present prior to C-arylation. In contrast,
if 7a is present, presumably formed by deactylation of 16, C–H activation at the 5-position occurs. DFT calculations
confirmed that the 5-position is indeed the more electron-rich site
(Scheme e and the
Supporting Information Section 6). We speculate that the acetyl group
(i.e., 16) directs C–H activation
at this site via coordination of a Pd(II) species
through the amide carbonyl.[34−36]This series of reactions
has guided us to propose that oxidative
addition of the C–Cl bond in 7a occurs first and
proceeds via a Pd(0) species to form 18 (Scheme f). Pd(II)-catalyzed C-arylation forms the palladacycle (20), which
could proceed through a concerted metalation–deprotonation
pathway via the formation of 19a.[12]Alternatively, since the efficiency of
the reaction is higher with
the lone pair of aniline (18) donating into the ring,
a Friedel–Crafts-like electrophilic aromatic substitution mechanism
proceeding via imine (19b) followed
by tautomerization might also be possible to form 20.[37] Finally, reductive elimination of 20 produces the C-arylated product (9a). With mechanistic knowledge of the second C–C bond-forming
step established, the substrate scope of the process was investigated
(Scheme ).
Scheme 3
Scope and
Isolated Yields of the [3 + 2]Heteroannulation,,,
Addition of PivOH
(30 mol
%).
Formation of 7e in 79%; traces of 9d detected by LCMS.
Ligand = HPtBu3BF4.
Ligand = DavePhos.
Scope and
Isolated Yields of the [3 + 2]Heteroannulation,,,
Addition of PivOH
(30 mol
%).Formation of 7e in 79%; traces of 9d detected by LCMS.Ligand = HPtBu3BF4.Ligand = DavePhos.The reaction conditions formed 7H-pyrido[3,4-c]carbazole analogues (9a–c). The presence
of a nitro group resulted in only trace amounts of 9d formed, with the secondary aniline (7e) isolated in
79% yield. The reaction conditions also tolerated heteroatom changes
and saturation in the D-ring of the heteroaryl bromide (9e–j).[30] The [3 + 2]heteroannulation strategy
was also compatible with the formation of carbazole-1,4-quinones (21a–f).[28,38] Access to N-arylated
products is also possible, forming a mixture of fused imidazoles (9k–l) via an N-arylation
step, alongside tertiary anilines (22–23). Steric
bulk ortho to the aniline substrate is also tolerated,
forming 9m in 62%. However, when 3-methyl-2-chloroaniline
is used as a substrate, a mixture of regioisomers was formed as an
inseparable mixture (see Supporting Information).The modularity of this strategy is also exemplified by the
preparation
of natural products glycozoline (9n),[39] harmane (9o),[40] and murrayafoline A (9p).[41,42] In addition, preparation of 9q demonstrates that the
reaction conditions tolerate functional groups bearing potential Pd-chelating
sites and bulky substituents ortho to the corresponding
aryl bromide.Our [3 + 2]heteroannulation strategy was extended
to the targeted
synthesis of biologically active tetracyclic carbazoles. Carbazole-1,4-quinones
(e.g., 21a–f) have established
anti-cancer activity via topoisomerase inhibition
or by the production of reactive oxygen species.[38,43] We used 21b as a key intermediate for the targeted
synthesis of a deaza analogue of the natural product 9-methoxyellipticine
(Scheme a), producing 26 in three steps and in an overall yield of 20%.[44]
Scheme 4
Application of the [3 + 2]Heteroannulation
Process for the Targeted
Synthesis of Biologically Active Tetracyclic Carbazoles.
Yield calculated
from the
alkylation of 9e; X = iodide for 27 and
chloride for 28.
Application of the [3 + 2]Heteroannulation
Process for the Targeted
Synthesis of Biologically Active Tetracyclic Carbazoles.
Yield calculated
from the
alkylation of 9e; X = iodide for 27 and
chloride for 28.Further exemplification
of our strategy was demonstrated by the
preparation of alkylated 7H-pyridocarbazoles (e.g., 9a–e), which have well-established
anti-cancer activity.[45,46] Previous preparative methods
of this series of compounds have involved a six-step linear synthesis
affording compound 9e in 28% overall yield.[47] Our two-step convergent strategy accessed the
7H-pyrido[4,3-c]carbazole core 9e in a single step (83%), followed by alkylation (30–32) to produce mono-N-alkylated examples (27–28) and the potent anti-cancer agent ditercalinium dichloride (29, Scheme b).[48]
Conclusions
In
summary, we have established a mechanistic framework for the
preparation of fused tetracyclic carbazoles. The key to the modularity
of this [3 + 2]heteroannulation approach is knowledge of the molecular
hallmarks that underpin both the chemo- and regioselectivity of the
process. The strategy is amenable for the diversification of tri-
and tetracyclic carbazoles and is a scalable method for target-focused
synthesis of tetracyclic carbazoles. We envisage that this convergent
approach could find application in medicinal chemistry for structure–activity
profiling and in broader synthetic applications that require step-efficient
access to carbazole scaffolds.
Experimental Section
General
Information
All reagents and solvents were
obtained from commercial suppliers and were used without further purification
unless otherwise stated. Purification was carried out according to
standard laboratory methods. Starting materials were purchased from
commercial suppliers and used without further purification unless
otherwise stated. Dry solvents for reactions were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich
and stored under nitrogen. Dichloromethane, chloroform, methanol,
ethyl acetate, and petroleum ether (40–60 °C) for purification
purposes were used as obtained from suppliers, without further purification.
Reactions were carried out using conventional glassware for the preparation
of starting materials. Microwave reactions were carried out in capped
2–5 mL microwave vials purchased from Biotage. Microwave reactions
were carried out at elevated temperatures using a Biotage Initiator+
equipped with a Robot Eight microwave system. Thin-layer chromatography
was carried out using Merck silica plates coated with a fluorescent
indicator UV254, and they were analyzed under both 254 and 375 nm
UV light or developed using potassium permanganate solution. Normal
phase flash chromatography was carried out using 60 Å, 40–63
μm silica gel from Fluorochem. Semi-preparative reversed-phase
HPLC purification was carried out on a Kinetex 5 μm, 150 ×
21.2 mm XB C18 using a DIONEX 3000 series HPLC system equipped with
a VWD3400 variable wavelength detector. Preparative purifications
of small molecules were performed using a 30–90% gradient B
(solvent A: 0.1% TFA in water, solvent B: 0.1% TFA in acetonitrile),
with a flow rate of 12.0 mL/min. The absorbance of the UV-active material
was detected at 254 nm. Analytical reversed-phase HPLC (RP-HPLC) was
carried out on a Shimadzu Prominence instrument equipped with a PDA
detector scanning from 190 to 600 nm using a Thermofisher Hypersil
GOLD column 100 × 4.6 mm, with a particle size of 5 μm.
The Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra were obtained on a Shimadzu
IR Affinity-1 instrument. Only major absorbance bands are reported.
The 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and 19F NMR
spectra were obtained on a Bruker AV 400 at 400, 101, and 376 MHz,
respectively. Chemical shifts are reported in parts per million (ppm),
and coupling constants are reported in hertz with DMSO-d6 referenced at 2.50 (1H) and 39.52 ppm (13C) and MeOD-d4 referenced at
3.31 (1H) and 49.0 ppm (13C). Assignment of 13C NMR signals is based on HSQC and HMBC experiments. The
COSY and NOESY spectra were used to assign unequivocally atom connectivities.
The high-resolution mass spectra were recorded on a Bruker microTOF
II mass spectrometer at the SIRCAMs facility at the University of
Edinburgh or on an LTQ Orbitrap xL at the EPSRC National Facility
in Swansea.
General Experimental Procedure for Microwave-Assisted
Buchwald–Hartwig
Amination
Aryl bromide (0.50 mmol, 1.00 equiv), chloroaniline
(0.60 mmol, 1.2 equiv), Pd(OAc)2 (5 mol %), DavePhos (10
mol %), and K3PO4 (1.50 mmol, 3 equiv) were
added to a microwave vial (2–5 mL). 1,4-Dioxane (5 mL, 0.1
M) was added and the vial was capped, evacuated and purged with argon
three times, and then heated at 120 °C for 30 min under microwave
irradiation in a Biotage microwave. The reaction was allowed to cool
to rt, diluted with ethyl acetate (50 mL), and the solid was filtered
under vacuum. The organic phase was washed with water and brine, dried
with Na2SO4, filtered, and the solvent was removed in vacuo. The crude compound was purified by silica column
chromatography.
General Experimental Procedure A for Microwave-Assisted
One-Pot
Buchwald–Hartwig Amination/Direct Arylation
Aryl bromide
(0.50 mmol, 1 equiv), chloroaniline (0.60 mmol, 1.2 equiv), Pd(OAc)2 (5 mol %), DavePhos (10 mol %), and K3PO4 (1.50 mmol, 3 equiv) were added to a microwave vial (2–5
mL). 1,4-Dioxane (5.0 mL, 0.1 M) was added and the vial was capped,
evacuated and purged with argon three times, and heated at 120 °C
for 30 min followed by 160 °C for 8 h under microwave irradiation
in a Biotage microwave. The reaction was allowed to cool to rt, diluted
with DCM (50 mL), and the solid was filtered under vacuum. The solvent
was removed in vacuo, and the crude sample was dry-loaded
onto silica gel without work up. The crude compound was purified by
silica column chromatography.
General Experimental Procedure
B for Microwave-Assisted One-Pot
Buchwald–Hartwig Amination/Direct Arylation
Aryl bromide
(0.50 mmol, 1 equiv), chloroaniline (0.60 mmol, 1.2 equiv), Pd(OAc)2 (5 mol %), P(Cy3), HBF4 (10 mol %),
and K3PO4 (1.50 mmol, 3 equiv) were added to
a microwave vial (2–5 mL). 1,4-Dioxane (5.0 mL, 0.1 M) was
added, and the vial was capped, evacuated and purged with argon three
times, and heated at 120 °C for 30 min followed by 160 °C
for 8 h under microwave irradiation in a Biotage microwave. The reaction
was allowed to cool to rt and diluted with DCM (50 mL). The solvent
was removed in vacuo, and the crude sample dry-loaded
onto silica gel without work up. The crude compound was purified by
silica column chromatography.
10-Methoxy-7H-pyrido[3,4-c]carbazole (9a)
The reaction was carried out
according to the general procedure B using 6-bromoisoquinoline (104
mg, 0.50 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and 2-chloro-4-methoxyaniline (95 mg, 0.60
mmol, 1.2 equiv) as starting materials. The crude residue was purified
by silica gel column chromatography, petroleum ether (40–60
°C):EtOAc (1:1), to obtain compound 9a in 82% yield
(102 mg, brown solid).1H NMR ((CD3)2SO, 400 MHz): δ 11.94 (s, 1H, −NH), 9.30 (s, 1H, H4), 8.63 (d, 1H, J = 5.8 Hz, H2), 8.58 (d, J = 5.8 Hz, 1H, H1), 8.05–7.99
(m, 2H, H5,11), 7.85 (d, 1H, J = 8.8 Hz, H6), 7.60 (d, 1H, J = 8.8 Hz, H8), 7.13 (dd, 1H, J = 8.8, 2.4 Hz, H9), 3.96 (s,
3H, −OCH). 13C{1H} NMR ((CD3)2SO, 101 MHz): δ
154.1 (C10), 152.0 (C4), 144.1 (C2), 140.0 (C6a), 133.6 (C7a),
132.1 (C11c), 125.9 (C5), 123.6 (C11b), 123.0 (C11a), 116.4 (C1),
115.0 (C6), 114.3 (C9), 112.6 (C8), 112.3 (C4a), 103.9 (C11),
55.8 (−OCH3).IR v̅max (cm–1): 2830 (C–H
stretch), 1616 (C=N stretch), 1458 (C=C
stretch), 1229 (C–O stretch), 1031 (C–O stretch).HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C16H13ON2, 249.1022;
found, 249.1021.
10-Methyl-7H-pyrido[3,4-c]carbazole
(9b)
The reaction was carried out according
to the general procedure B using 6-bromoisoquinoline (104 mg, 0.50
mmol, 1.0 equiv) and 2-chloro-4-methylaniline (85 mg, 0.60 mmol, 1.2
equiv) as starting materials. The crude residue was purified by silica
gel column chromatography, petroleum ether (40–60 °C):EtOAc
(1:1) to obtain compound 9b in 54% yield (63 mg, brown
solid).1H NMR ((CD3)2SO, 400
MHz): δ 11.97 (s, 1H, −NH), 9.31 (s,
1H, H4), 8.63 (d, 1H, J = 5.7 Hz, H2), 8.58 (d, 1H, J = 5.7 Hz, H1), 8.41 (s, 1H, H11), 8.04 (d, 1H, J = 8.8 Hz, H5), 7.86 (d, 1H, J = 8.8 Hz, H6), 7.58 (d, 1H, J = 8.3 Hz, H8), 7.30 (dd, 1H, J = 8.3,
1.2 Hz, H9), 2.58 (s, 3H, −CH3). 13C{1H} NMR ((CD3)2SO, 101 MHz): δ 152.0 (C4), 143.9 (C2), 139.7 (C6a), 137.0 (C7a),
132.0 (C11c), 129.0 (C10), 126.1 (C9), 125.8 (C5), 123.7 (C4a),
122.9 (C11a), 121.3 (C11), 116.4 (C1), 114.9 (C6), 112.2 (C11b),
111.6 (C8), 21.3 (−CH3).IR v̅max (cm–1): 2917 (C–H stretch), 1616 (C=N stretch),
1474 (C=C
stretch).HRMS (ESI) m/z:
[M + H]+ calcd for C16H13N2, 233.1073; found,
233.1068.
The reaction was carried out according
to the general procedure B using 6-bromoisoquinoline (104 mg, 0.50
mmol, 1.0 equiv) and 2-chloro-6-methylaniline (85 mg, 0.60 mmol, 1.2
equiv) as starting materials. The crude residue was purified by silica
gel column chromatography, DCM:MeOH (0 to 2% MeOH), to obtain compound 9m in 62% yield (72 mg, white solid).1H
NMR ((CD3)2SO, 400 MHz): δ 12.01 (s, 1H,
−NH), 9.32 (s, 1H, H4), 8.63 (d, 1H, J = 5.8 Hz, H2), 8.56 (d, 1H, J = 5.7 Hz, H1), 8.42 (dd, 1H, J = 7.2,
2.4 H11), 8.06 (d, 1H, J = 8.9 Hz, H5), 7.91 (d, 1H, J = 8.9 Hz, H6), 7.31–7.24
(m, 2H, H9,H10), 2.65 (s, 3H, −CH). 13C{1H} NMR ((CD3)2SO, 101 MHz): δ
152.2 (C4), 144.1 (C2), 139.6 (C6a), 138.1 (C7a), 132.0 (C11c), 125.9 (C9), 125.2 (C5), 123.9 (C4a), 122.4 (C11a), 121.1 (C11), 120.3 (C8), 119.1 (C10), 116.3 (C1), 114.9 (C6), 112.8 (C11b),
17.5 (−CH3).HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C16H13N2, 233.1073; found,
233.1070.
Glycozoline (9n)[1]
Preparation 1
The reaction was carried
out according
to the general procedure A using 4-bromotoluene (85 mg, 0.50 mmol,
1.0 equiv) and 2-chloro-4-methoxyaniline (95 mg, 0.60 mmol, 1.2 equiv)
as starting materials. The crude residue was purified by silica gel
column chromatography, petroleum ether (40–60 °C):EtOAc
(100:6), to obtain compound 9m in 36% yield (38 mg, brown
crystalline solid).
Preparation 2
The reaction was carried
out according
to the general procedure A using 4-bromotoluene (85 mg, 0.50 mmol,
1.0 equiv) and 2-chloro-4-methoxyaniline (95 mg, 0.60 mmol, 1.2 equiv)
as starting materials with the addition of PivOH (15.3 mg, 0.15 mmol,
0.3 equiv). The crude residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography,
petroleum ether (40–60 °C):EtOAc (100:6) to obtain compound 9n in 64% yield (66 mg, brown crystalline solid).1H NMR ((CD3)2SO, 400 MHz): δ 10.85
(s, 1H, −NH), 7.87 (d, 1H, J = 1.0 Hz, H5), 7.61 (d, 1H, J = 2.5 Hz, H4), 7.34 (d, 1H, J = 8.8 Hz, H1), 7.32 (d, 1H, J = 8.3 Hz, H8), 7.16 (dd, 1H, J = 8.3, 1.0 Hz, H7), 6.98 (dd,
1H, J = 8.8, 2.5 Hz, H2), 3.83 (s, 3H, −OCH), 2.45 (s,
3H, −CH). 13C{1H} NMR ((CD3)2SO, 101 MHz): δ
152.8 (C3), 138.6 (C8a), 134.8 (C9a), 126.7 (C6, 7), 126.5 (C4a), 122.5 (C4b), 119.9 (C5), 114.5 (C2), 111.5 (C1), 110.6 (C8),
102.8 (C4), 55.5 (−OCH3), 21.0 (−CH3).IR v̅max (cm–1): 3401 (N–H stretch), 3003 (C–H stretch), 2835 (C–H
stretch), 1474 (C=C stretch), 1458 (C=C stretch), 1212
(C–O stretch), 1037 (C–O stretch).HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C14H14ON, 212.1070; found, 212.1079.
Harmane
(9o)[48]
The reaction
was carried out according to the general procedure A
using 3-bromo-2-methylpyridine (86 mg, 0.50 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and 2-chloroaniline
(77 mg, 0.60 mmol, 1.2 equiv) as starting materials. The crude residue
was purified by silica gel column chromatography, EtOAc (100%), to
obtain compound 9o in 45% yield (40 mg, purple solid).1H NMR ((CD3)2SO, 400 MHz): δ
11.53 (s, 1H, NH), 8.20 (d, 1H, J = 5.3 Hz, H3), 8.18 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, H5), 7.92 (d, 1H, J = 5.3 Hz, H4), 7.61–7.57
(m, 1H, H8), 7.52 (ddd, 1H, J = 8.3, 7.0, 1.2 Hz, H7), 7.22 (ddd,
1H, J = 8.0, 7.0, 1.2 Hz, H6), 2.76 (s, 3H, −CH). 13C{1H} NMR ((CD3)2SO, 101
MHz): δ 142.1 (C1), 140.3 (C8a), 137.5 (C3),
134.4 (C9a), 127.7 (C7), 126.8 (C4a), 121.7 (C5), 121.0 (C4b),
119.1 (C6), 112.6 (C4), 111.9 (C8), 20.4 (−CH3).IR v̅max (cm–1): 3062 (N–H stretch), 2954
(C–H stretch), 1627 (C=N
stretch), 1571 (C=C stretch), 1506 (C=C stretch).HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C12H11N2, 183.0917; found,
183.0927.
Murrayafoline A (9p)
The reaction was
carried out according to the general procedure A using 2-bromo-5-methylanisole
(101 mg, 0.50 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and 2-chloroaniline (77 mg, 0.60 mmol,
1.2 equiv) as starting materials with the addition of PivOH (15.3
mg, 0.15 mmol, 0.3 equiv). The crude residue was purified by silica
gel column chromatography, hexane:EtOAc (7:3), to obtain compound 9p in 43% yield (45 mg, brown crystalline solid).1H NMR ((CD3)2SO, 400 MHz): δ 11.12
(s, 1H, −NH), 8.00 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, H5), 7.49–7.46 (m,
1H, H4), 7.45–7.41 (m, 1H, H8), 7.32 (ddd, 1H, J = 8.3,
7.1, 1.3 Hz, H7), 7.09 (ddd, 1H, J = 8.0, 7.1, 1.1 Hz, H6), 6.82
(d, 1H, J = 1.1 Hz, H2), 3.96 (s, 3H, −OCH), 2.46 (s,
3H, −CH).13C{1H} NMR ((CD3)2SO, 101 MHz): δ
145.3 (C1), 139.7
(C8a), 128.0 (C9a), 127.8 (C3), 125.0 (C7), 123.4 (C4a/4b), 122.4
(C4a/4b), 120.0 (C5), 118.2 (C6), 112.2 (C4), 111.2 (C8),
107.7 (C2), 55.2 (−OCH3), 21.5 (−CH3).IR v̅max (cm–1): 3418 (N–H stretch), 2921 (C–H stretch), 1590 (C=C
stretch), 1454 (C=C stretch), 1232 (C–O stretch), 1040
(C–O stretch).HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C14H14ON, 212.1070; found, 212.1070.
5-Benzyl-2-methoxy-5H-benzo[b]carbazole-6,11-dione (71 mg,
0.19 mmol, 1.0 equiv) was dissolved in anhydrous THF (7 mL) under
an argon atmosphere. The reaction was cooled to −80 °C,
and a 1.6 M MeLi in THF solution (0.55 mL, 0.87 mmol) was added dropwise
over 5 min. The reaction mixture was stirred at −80 °C
for 3 h. Next, the reaction was quenched with water and extracted
with CHCl3. The combined organic phases were washed with
water and brine, dried over Na2SO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The isolated crude solid was dissolved in anhydrous
THF (5 mL) and added to a solution of SnCl2 (0.37 g, 1.94
mmol) in a mixture of 37% HCl (4.8 mL) and Et2O (4.8 mL).
The reaction mixture was stirred vigorously for 5 h and then extracted
with CHCl3. The combined organic phases were washed with
water and brine, dried over Na2SO4, and the
filtrate was concentrated in vacuo. The crude was
purified by silica gel flash column chromatography, petroleum ether
(40–60 °C):EtOAc (7:3), to afford the desired compound 25 in 40% yield (28 mg, cream solid).1H
NMR ((CD3)2SO, 400 MHz): δ 8.36 (dd, 1H, J = 8.8, 0.8 Hz, H10), 8.15
(dd, 1H, J = 8.9, 0.8 Hz, H7), 7.92 (d, 1H, J = 2.5 Hz, H1), 7.55–7.48 (m, 1H, H8), 7.48–7.42 (m, 1H, H9), 7.39
(d, 1H, J = 8.8 Hz, H4), 7.29 (m, 2H, 2 × H3′),
7.22 (m, 1H, H4′), 7.15 (dd, 1H, J = 8.8, 2.5 Hz, H3), 7.08 (m,
2H, 2 × H2′), 5.83 (s, 2H,
−CH), 3.90 (s, 3H, −OCH), 3.20 (s, 3H, C11–CH3), 2.84 (s, 3H, C6–CH3). 13C{1H} NMR ((CD3)2SO, 101 MHz): δ 153.4 (C2), 139.5 (C4a), 139.2 (C5a), 139.1 (C1′), 131.8 (C6a), 128.7 (2 × C3′), 126.9 (C4′,11a), 126.7 (C11), 125.6 (2 × C2′), 124.8 (C8), 124.5 (C10), 123.7 (C10a), 123.4 (C11b), 123.3
(C7), 122.2 (C9), 114.4 (C3), 109.8 (C4), 109.6 (C6), 108.2 (C1), 55.8 (−OCH3), 49.0 (−CH2), 15.2 (C11–CH3), 13.6 (C6–CH3).IR v̅max (cm–1): 2922 (C–H stretch), 1599
(C=C stretch), 1437 (C–H
bend), 1204 (C–O stretch).HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C27H25O2N, 366.1852;
found, 366.1854.
2-Methoxy-6,11-dimethyl-5H-benzo[b]carbazole (26)
The N-debenzylation
protocol was based on a literature procedure.[49] 5-Benzyl-2-methoxy-6,11-dimethyl-5H-benzo[b]carbazole (25) (10 mg, 0.027 mmol, 1 equiv)
was dissolved in DMSO (0.5 mL) and added to a flame-dried vial. While
stirring the solution at room temperature, KOBu (21 mg, 0.19 mmol, 7 equiv) in THF (0.5 mL) was added. An
oxygen balloon was then bubbled into the solution for 30 min. After
stirring at room temperature for 5 h, the reaction was quenched with
a saturated ammonium chloride aqueous solution. The product was extracted
three times with EtOAc. The combined organic phases were dried over
Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated in
vacuo. The crude was purified by silica gel column chromatography
using hexane:EtOAc (7:3) to afford the desired compound 26 in 61% yield (4.5 mg, yellow solid). Characterization of 26 is in agreement with that previously described in the literature.[5]1H NMR ((CD3)2SO, 400 MHz): δ 10.83 (s, 1H, NH),
8.32 (dd, 1H, J = 8.7, 0.7 Hz, H10), 8.10 (d, 1H, J = 8.7, 0.7 Hz, H7), 7.86 (d, 1H, J = 2.5 Hz, H1), 7.51 (ddd, 1H, J = 8.7,
6.5, 1.3 Hz, H8), 7.45–7.39 (m,
2H, H9,4), 7.14 (dd, 1H, J = 8.7, 2.5 Hz, H3), 3.89 (s, 3H, Ar–OCH3), 3.16 (s, 3H, C11–CH), 2.80 (s, 3H, C6–CH3). 13C{1H} NMR ((CD3)2SO, 101 MHz): δ 152.6 (C2),
138.9 (C5a), 137.5 (C4a), 130.6 (C6a), 126.4 (C10a), 125.8 (C11), 124.5 (C10), 124.3 (C8), 123.7 (C11b), 123.1
(C7), 122.7 (C11a), 121.5 (C9), 114.6
(C3), 110.7 (C4), 108.8 (C1), 107.7
(C6), 55.8 (Ar–OCH3),
15.1 (C11–CH3), 12.6 (C6–CH3).LC-MS (ESI +ve mode): m/z = 276.1.
Retention time = 8.19 min.
To a solution of 10-methoxy-7H-pyrido[4,3-c]carbazole 9e (60 mg, 0.24 mmol, 1.0 equiv)
in DMF (0.5 mL) was added a solution of 1-(2-chloroethyl)piperidine
hydrochloride (178 mg, 1.0 mmol, 4.0 equiv) in a 1:1 mixture of DMF:water
(1 mL). The reaction was stirred for 19 h at 80 °C in a DrySyn
heating block. The resulting yellow precipitate was filtered and washed
with cold Et2O. The resulting solid was recrystallized
from hot EtOH three times to yield compound 28 in 80%
yield (77 mg, yellow solid).1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 12.61 (s, 1H, NH), 11.00 (s, 1H, NH), 10.46 (s, 1H, H1) 8.86 (d, 1H, J = 6.7 Hz, H3), 8.76 (d, 1H, J = 6.7 Hz, H4), 8.50 (d, 1H, J = 8.9 Hz, H6), 8.41–8.34 (m, 1H, H11), 8.26 (d, 1H, J = 8.9 Hz, H5), 7.76 (d, 1H, J = 8.9 Hz, H8), 7.34 (dd, 1H, J = 8.9,
1.9 Hz, H9), 5.56–5.42 (m, 2H,
2 × H1″), 4.04 (s, 3H, −OCH), 3.95–3.82 (m, 2H, 2 × H2″), 3.67–3.54 (m, 2H, 2 × H2′ or H6′), 3.11–2.94 (m, 2H, 2 × H2′ or H6′), 1.90–1.77 (m,
4H, 2 × H3′,5′), 1.76–1.70
(m, 1H, H4′), 1.49–1.40
(m, 1H, H4′). 13C{1H} NMR ((CD3)2SO, 101 MHz): δ
154.7 (C10), 143.8 (C1), 139.4 (C6a), 134.5 (C7a), 133.7 (C4a),
132.5 (C3), 126.4 (C4), 124.8 (C6), 124.3 (C5), 123.6 (C11c),
121.3 (C11a), 116.1 (C9), 114.1 (C11b), 113.5 (C8), 105.9 (C11),
56.4 (−OCH3), 55.0 (C5), 54.2 (C2″), 52.6
(2 × C2′, 6′),
22.2 (2 × C3′, 5′), 21.2 (C4′).IR v̅max (cm–1): 3390 (N–H
stretch), 2958 (C–H stretch), 1634 (C=N
stretch), 1219 (C–O stretch), 1029 (C–O stretch).HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M]+ calcd for C23H26ON3, 360.2070;
found, 360.2081.
Ditercalinium (29)[47]
10-Methoxy-7H-pyrido[4,3-c]carbazole 9e (100 mg, 0.40 mmol, 1.0 equiv)
and 1,1′-bis(2-chloroethyl)-4,4′-bipiperidine
(89 mg, 0.24 mmol, 0.6 equiv) were charged to a 2–5 mL microwave
vial that was evacuated and purged with argon twice. DMF (4 mL) was
added, and the vial was heated to 80 °C in a DrySyn heating block
for 22 h. H2O (0.1 mL) was added to further solubilize
the starting materials, and the reaction was heated for a further
24 h at 80 °C. DMF (1 mL) was added to redissolve the formation
of a yellow precipitate, and the reaction was heated to 120 °C
for a further 24 h. The reaction was cooled, and the precipitate was
isolated by filtration. The precipitate was washed with cold Et2O and then recrystallized from hot EtOH five times to isolate 29 in 33% yield (52 mg, yellow solid).1H
NMR ((CD3)2SO, 400 MHz): δ 12.69 (s, 2H,
NH), 11.63 (s, 2H, NH), 10.51 (s
(br), 2H, H1), 9.00–8.78 (s (br),
2H, H3), 8.77–8.67 (d, 2H, J = 5.8 Hz, H4), 8.49 (d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz, H6), 8.45–8.29
(s (br), 2H, H11), 8.25 (d, 2H, J = 8.9 Hz, H5), 7.75 (d, 2H, J = 8.9 Hz, H8), 7.31 (dd, 2H, J = 9.0, 2.2 Hz, H9), 5.71–5.26
(m, 4H, H1″), 4.03, 4.00–3.77
(m, 4H, H2″), 3.73–3.50
(m, 4H, 4 × H2′eq or 4 × H2′ax), 3.11–2.91 (m, 4H, 4 × H2′eq or 4 × H2′ax), 2.06–1.51 (m, 8H, 4 × H3′eq and 4 × H3′ax), 1.48–1.29 (m, 2H, H4′). 13C{1H} NMR ((CD3)2SO, 101 MHz): δ 154.7 (C10), 143.7
(C1), 139.4 (C6a), 134.4 (C7a), 133.6 (C4a), 132.6 (C3), 126.4 (C4), 124.8 (C6),
124.3 (C5), 123.6 (C11c), 121.3 (C11a), 116.3 (C9), 114.1 (C11b),
113.4 (C8), 105.7 (C11), 56.4 (−OCH3), 55.3
(C5), 54.3 (C2″), 52.6 (2 × C2′), 37.3 (2×C4′), 25.8 (2 × C3′).IR v̅max (cm–1): 3342 (N–H stretch), 2927 (C–H
stretch), 1616 (C=N
stretch), 1472 (C=C stretch), 1402 (C=C stretch), 1214
(C–O stretch), 1031 (C–O stretch).HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M]2+ calcd for C46H50O2N6, 359.1992; found, 359.1991.
Authors: Ping Chen; Derek Norris; Kristin D Haslow; T G Murali Dhar; William J Pitts; Scott H Watterson; Daniel L Cheney; Donna A Bassolino; Catherine A Fleener; Katherine A Rouleau; Diane L Hollenbaugh; Robert M Townsend; Joel C Barrish; Edwin J Iwanowicz Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Lett Date: 2003-04-07 Impact factor: 2.823
Authors: Emma Campbell; Andrea Taladriz-Sender; Olivia I Paisley; Alan R Kennedy; Jacob T Bush; Glenn A Burley Journal: J Org Chem Date: 2022-03-18 Impact factor: 4.354