| Literature DB >> 35296637 |
Sean A P Clouston1,2, Minos Kritikos3, Chuan Huang4, Pei-Fen Kuan5, Paul Vaska4,6, Alison C Pellecchia7, Stephanie Santiago-Michels7, Melissa A Carr7, Sam Gandy8,9, Mary Sano9, Evelyn J Bromet10, Roberto G Lucchini11, Benjamin J Luft12.
Abstract
Prior research has demonstrated high levels of cognitive and physical functional impairments in World Trade Center (WTC) responders. A follow-up neuroimaging study identified changes to white matter connectivity within the cerebellum in responders with cognitive impairment (CI). In the first study to examine cerebellar cortical thickness in WTC responders with CI, we fielded a structural magnetic resonance imaging protocol. WTC responders (N = 99) participated in a structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study, of whom 48 had CI. Participants with CI did not differ demographically or by intracranial volume when compared to cognitively unimpaired participants. MRIs were processed using the CERES imaging pipeline; bilateral cortical thickness in 12 cerebellar lobules was reported. Analyses were completed comparing mean cerebellar cortical thickness across groups. Lobules were examined to determine the location and functional correlates of reduced cerebellar cortical thickness. Multivariable-adjusted analyses accounted for the false discovery rate. Mean cerebellar cortical thickness was reduced by 0.17 mm in responders with CI. Decrements in cerebellar cortical thickness were symmetric and located in the Cerebellar Crus (I and II), and in Lobules IV, VI, VIIb, VIIIa, VIIIb, and IX. Cerebellar cortical thickness was associated with episodic memory, response speed, and tandem balance. WTC responders with CI had evidence of reduced cerebellar cortical thickness that was present across lobules in a pattern unique to this cohort.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35296637 PMCID: PMC8927406 DOI: 10.1038/s41398-022-01873-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transl Psychiatry ISSN: 2158-3188 Impact factor: 7.989
Sample characteristics.
| Whole sample ( | Cognitively unimpaired ( | Cognitively impaired ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | % | % | |||||
| Female | 21.2% | 19.6% | 22.9% | 0.687 | |||
| University degree | 29.3% | 33.3% | 25.0% | 0.363 | |||
| Law enforcement | 73.7% | 80.4% | 66.7% | 0.121 | |||
| Race/ethnicity | |||||||
| White | 73.7% | 84.3% | 62.5% | 0.104 | |||
| Hispanic | 12.1% | 7.8% | 16.7% | ||||
| Black | 10.1% | 5.9% | 14.6% | ||||
| Other | 4.0% | 2.0% | 6.3% | ||||
| Post-traumatic stress disorder | 47.5% | 47.1% | 47.9% | 0.932 | |||
P-values determined using Welch’s t-test and tests of proportions to compare CU to CI group.
CU cognitively unimpaired, CI cognitively impaired, SPBB Short Physical Performance Battery, IRV intraindividual response variability, SD standard deviation, cm centimeter, mm millimeter, lbs pounds.
Fig. 1Cerebellar cortical thickness map.
Example of sagittal and coronal cerebellar cortical thickness estimate maps employed in this present study using a rainbow colormap to visually identify regional asymmetry in cortical thickness, such as in the cerebellar crus in this example of a responder with Cognitive Impairment.
Diagnostic grouping as defined by regional differences in cerebellar atrophy.
| Model 1: Raw Scores | Model 2: Orthogonalized Scores | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Multi-Region Score | D | 95% C.I. | AUC | 95% C.I. |
| Mean cerebellar cortical thickness | 0.68 | 0.58–0.77 | 0.68 | 0.58–0.77 |
| Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis | 0.68 | 0.57–0.79 | 0.45 | 0.35–0.56 |
| Alzheimer’s disease | 0.66 | 0.56–0.77 | 0.49 | 0.39–0.60 |
| Multisystem atrophy | 0.58 | 0.47–0.70 | 0.49 | 0.39–0.60 |
| Progressive supranuclear palsy | 0.65 | 0.54–0.76 | 0.49 | 0.38–0.59 |
| Frontotemporal dementia | 0.68 | 0.57–0.78 | 0.52 | 0.41–0.62 |
This table shows the overall capability for multi-region risk scores to accurately detect cognitive impairment.
D standardized mean difference, AUC area under the receiver operating curve, 95% C.I. 95% confidence interval.
Fig. 2Reductions in mean bilateral cortical thickness (mm) in the whole cerebellum and across 12 cerebellar regions of interest in World Trade Center responders with cognitive impairment (n = 48) when compared to WTC responders who were cognitively unimpaired (n = 51).
Confidence intervals are shown using error bars. Reductions with confidence intervals not crossing the base line were nominally significant, while those marked with * survived adjustment for the false discovery rate.
Asymmetric differences in cortical thickness by cerebellar subregion and whole cerebellum.
| Right | Left | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Region | B | SE | FDR | B | SE | FDR | ||
| Lobule I/II | −0.15 | 0.12 | 0.210 | −0.17 | 0.12 | 0.165 | ||
| Lobule III | −0.02 | 0.08 | 0.834 | −0.06 | 0.08 | 0.458 | ||
| Lobule IV | −0.07 | 0.04 | 0.069 | −0.05 | 0.04 | 0.196 | ||
| Lobule V | −0.06 | 0.04 | 0.171 | −0.03 | 0.04 | 0.477 | ||
| Lobule VI | −0.08 | 0.04 | 0.070 | −0.08 | 0.04 | 0.032 | b | |
| Crus I | −0.20 | 0.08 | 0.010 | a | −0.17 | 0.08 | 0.034 | b |
| Crus II | −0.20 | 0.10 | 0.038 | b | −0.21 | 0.10 | 0.048 | b |
| Lobule VIIb | −0.15 | 0.05 | 0.005 | a | −0.14 | 0.06 | 0.027 | b |
| Lobule VIIIa | −0.11 | 0.04 | 0.005 | a | −0.09 | 0.04 | 0.021 | b |
| Lobule VIIIb | −0.09 | 0.04 | 0.019 | b | −0.08 | 0.04 | 0.061 | |
| Lobule IX | −0.14 | 0.07 | 0.051 | −0.16 | 0.07 | 0.027 | b | |
| Lobule X | −0.18 | 0.12 | 0.117 | −0.11 | 0.09 | 0.240 | ||
| Whole Cerebellum | −0.14 | 0.05 | 0.011 | a | −0.13 | 0.05 | 0.016 | a |
B regression coefficient, SE standard error, P p-value.
aIndicates that the regional analysis passed correction for the false discovery rate <0.05.
bIndicates that the regional analysis was nominally significant but did not pass correction for the false discovery rate.
Fig. 3Association between cerebellar cortical thickness (mm) and episodic memory (coefficient = 0.35, standard error = 0.15, p-value = 0.021) adjusted for gender.
Males: small red circles and solid green line; females: large blue squares and dashed line; 95% confidence intervals shown using transparent gray boxes.
Interpretation of evidence in comparison to previously published meta-analysis.
| Region | Functioning | Reduced thickness pattern | WTC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lobule I/II | Motor, vestibular | MSA (R, L), PSP (L) | |
| Lobule III | Motor, vestibular | MSA (R, L), PSP (L) | |
| Lobule IV | Motor, vestibular | ||
| Lobule V | Motor, somatosensory | ALS (R) | L |
| Lobule VI | Motor, language, spatial | ALS (L), AD (R) | L |
| Crus I | Language (R), working memory, executive function, affective | PSP (L), ALS (L), | |
| Crus II | Language (R), working memory, executive function, affective | AD (R), FTD (R, L), PSP (L), ALS (L) | S |
| Lobule VIIb | Executive, language, affective | ||
| Lobule VIIIa | Motor, working memory, language | ||
| Lobule VIIIb | Motor, somatosensory | ALS (R) | R, L |
| Lobule IX | Visuomotor, memory, affective | PSP (R) | L |
| Lobule X | Vestibular |
Hemispheric results are listed using L for left and R for right. Boldface cortical thickness patterns denote results that overlap with WTC-related regions shown in the rightmost column. WTC patterns that were nominally significant are listed, while regions that passed the false discovery rate.
MSA multiple system atrophy, PSP progressive supranuclear palsy, ALS amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, AD Alzheimer’s disease, FTD frontotemporal dementia, WTC World Trade Center responder.