| Literature DB >> 32695871 |
Sean A P Clouston1, Yael Deri2, Megan Horton3, Cheuk Tang4,5, Erica Diminich1, Christine DeLorenzo6, Minos Kritikos1, Alison C Pellecchia7, Stephanie Santiago-Michels7, Melissa A Carr7, Samuel Gandy5,8, Mary Sano8, Evelyn J Bromet6, Roberto G Lucchini3, Benjamin J Luft2,7.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: This study examined cortical thickness (CTX) in World Trade Center (WTC) responders with cognitive impairment (CI).Entities:
Keywords: World Trade Center responders; cognitive impairment; cortical thickness
Year: 2020 PMID: 32695871 PMCID: PMC7364857 DOI: 10.1002/dad2.12059
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Alzheimers Dement (Amst) ISSN: 2352-8729
Sample characteristics
| Characteristic | Overall (N = 99) | Cognitively unimpaired (N = 51) | Cognitively impaired (N = 48) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 56.38 (0.52) | 56.42 (0.63) | 56.32 (0.86) | .926 |
| Intracranial volume | 1516.23 (15.51) | 1532.05 (18.58) | 1498.72 (25.36) | .292 |
| Cognitive domains | ||||
| Response speed | 0.08 (0.01) | 0.08 (0.01) | 0.07 (0.01) | 8.61E‐05 |
| Processing speed | 0.06 (0.01) | 0.07 (0.00) | 0.06 (0.01) | 2.32E‐04 |
| Episodic memory | 0.64 (0.17) | 0.72 (0.19) | 0.56 (0.10) | 2.68E‐06 |
| Intra‐individual response variability | 0.10 (0.04) | 0.09 (0.03) | 0.12 (0.04) | 2.34E‐05 |
| Visuospatial function | 75.08 (47.36) | 57.08 (15.42) | 95.04 (61.21) | 4.40E‐05 |
| Visuospatial memory | 13.28 (9.09) | 9.47 (4.33) | 17.5 (10.99) | 5.42E‐06 |
| Throughput | 0.32 (0.04) | 0.33 (0.04) | 0.30 (0.03) | 3.74E‐05 |
| Working memory | 0.95 (0.12) | 0.99 (0.12) | 0.91 (0.10) | 3.39E‐04 |
| Posttraumatic stress disorder | ||||
| No | 52.5% | 53.9% | 51.1% | .782 |
| Yes | 47.5% | 46.2% | 48.9% | |
| Posttraumatic stress symptomatology | ||||
| Re‐experiencing | 17.48 (6.73) | 17.16 (7.02) | 17.83 (6.45) | .620 |
| Avoidance | 24.07 (9.54) | 24.18 (10.56) | 23.96 (8.44) | .910 |
| Hyperarousal | 17.76 (6.73) | 17.45 (7.25) | 18.08 (6.21) | .643 |
| Negative experiences | 12.23 (4.59) | 12.41 (4.83) | 12.04 (4.36) | .691 |
| Severe WTC exposure | ||||
| No | 87.4% | 90.2% | 84.1% | .172 |
| Yes | 12.6% | 9.8% | 15.9% | |
| Sex | ||||
| Male | 85.3% | 80.8% | 76.6% | .612 |
| Female | 14.7% | 19.2% | 23.4% | |
| Minority status | ||||
| White | 77.8% | 86.5% | 68.1% | .087 |
| Black | 10.1% | 5.8% | 14.9% | |
| Hispanic | 12.1% | 7.7% | 17.0% | |
| Occupation | ||||
| NYPD | 56.6% | 60.8% | 52.1% | .383 |
| Other | 43.4% | 39.2% | 47.9% | |
| Education | ||||
| High school or less | 23.2% | 17.7% | 29.2% | .359 |
| Some college | 47.5% | 49.0% | 45.8% | |
| University degree | 29.3% | 33.3% | 25.0% |
Note: Means (standard deviations) or percentages (%) reported. P‐values examine the extent to which noted characteristics differ across cognitive status and were derived using χ2 tests for categorical variables, and Student's t‐tests for continuous variables. All significant effects passed the false discovery rate.
Abbreviations: NYPD, New York Police Department; WTC, World Trade Center.
FIGURE 1Absolute differences in mean whole‐brain mean cortical thickness expressed in mm by patient diagnostic group. Note: Group differences were evident across groups when using one‐way analysis of variance across all group profiles (P = .002) that was concentrated in cognitively impaired responders. 95% confidence intervals shown using capped error bars. *Statistically significant at P < .05; o P = .055
Regional estimates of mean cortical thickness and estimated standardized mean differences among cognitively impaired and cognitively unimpaired responders
|
|
Note: Because there were no significant positive results, only negative associations are reported. Standardized mean differences (Cohen's D) shown using blue bars with 95% confidence intervals. *Statistically significant in bivariate analyses after adjusting for the false discovery rate.
FIGURE 2Heat map showing levels of association between dimensional measures of cognition and posttraumatic stress disorder and regional measures of cortical thickness (CTX). Note: Coefficients were transformed so that increases in dimensional scores are consistent with worse outcomes. Stanardized Mean Differences (Cohen's D) were estimated from generalized linear modeling; all coefficients deemed statistically significant upon adjusting for the false discovery rate (FDR = 0.05) were reported. Red indicates reduced CTX; blue indicates increased CTX.
FIGURE 3Group‐wise analyses using surface‐based morphometry comparing cognitively impaired to cognitively unimpaired responders
Note: Group‐wise analyses using surface‐based morphometry identified areas of reduced cortical thickness (CTX) are shown since no regions with increased cortical thickness were identified. Regions lacking significant differences in CTX between groups are shown in gray; cluster locations provided in Table S2 in supporting information. Figure generated using Computational Anatomy Toolbox (CAT12)
Region‐based standardized mean differences comparing cognitively unimpaired and cognitively impaired responders to norms from 2799 cognitively normal individuals in the general population
| CU versus norms | CI versus norms | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Region | D |
| D |
|
| Banks superior temporal sulcus | −0.26 | .362 | −0.80 | .007 |
| Caudal anterior | 0.71 | .015 | 0.32 | .262 |
| Caudal middle frontal | 0.77 | .009 | −0.17 | .543 |
| Cuneus | 1.29 | <.001 | −0.05 | .874 |
| Entorhinal | −3.33 | <.001 | −2.64 | <.001 |
| Fusiform | −1.75 | <.001 | −2.25 | <.001 |
| Inferior parietal | 0.92 | .002 | −0.28 | .332 |
| Inferior temporal | −0.98 | .001 | −1.92 | <.001 |
| Isthmus cingulate | 0.77 | .009 | 0.07 | .796 |
| Lateral occipital | 1.26 | <.001 | 0.00 | .998 |
| Lateral orbitofrontal | 0.39 | .173 | −0.45 | .122 |
| Lingual | 0.71 | .015 | −0.53 | .066 |
| Medial orbitofrontal | 0.20 | .489 | −0.92 | .002 |
| Middle temporal | −1.22 | <.001 | −2.12 | <.001 |
| Parahippocampal | −1.16 | <.001 | −1.71 | <.001 |
| Para‐central | 0.72 | .014 | −0.11 | .706 |
| Pars opercularis | 0.23 | .418 | −0.85 | .004 |
| Pars orbitalis | −0.01 | .981 | 0.11 | .687 |
| Pars triangularis | 0.44 | .130 | −0.09 | .747 |
| Pericalcarine | 0.41 | .148 | −0.44 | .125 |
| Postcentral | 1.28 | <.001 | 0.08 | .772 |
| Posterior cingulate | 0.82 | .006 | 0.15 | .596 |
| Precentral | 0.40 | .160 | −1.11 | <.001 |
| Precuneus | 0.77 | .009 | −0.49 | .088 |
| Rostral anterior cingulate | 0.03 | .905 | −0.58 | .047 |
| Rostral middle frontal | 1.05 | .001 | −0.23 | .412 |
| Superior frontal | 0.99 | .001 | −0.31 | .276 |
| Superior parietal | 1.04 | .001 | −0.15 | .603 |
| Superior temporal | −0.95 | .002 | −2.23 | <.001 |
| Supramarginal | 0.72 | .014 | −0.74 | .012 |
| Frontal pole | 1.06 | <.001 | −0.14 | .625 |
| Temporal pole | −1.15 | <.001 | −1.50 | <.001 |
| Transverse temporal | 0.60 | .039 | −0.73 | .013 |
| Insula | 0.32 | .260 | −0.81 | .006 |
Note: P‐values provided in the rightmost column were derived from one‐sample t‐tests. Regions where cortical thickness was significantly reduced upon accounting for the false discovery rate were highlighted in Bold. Codes to abbreviations are provided in Table 2.
Abbreviations: CU, cognitively unimpaired; CI, Cognitively impaired; D, Standardized Mean Differences (Cohen's D).