| Literature DB >> 33646156 |
Chuan Huang1,2, Minos Kritikos3,4, Sean A P Clouston3,4, Yael Deri5,6, Mario Serrano-Sosa7, Lev Bangiyev2, Stephanie Santiago-Michels5,6, Sam Gandy8,9,10,11, Mary Sano7,8, Evelyn J Bromet1, Benjamin J Luft5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Individuals who participated in response efforts at the World Trade Center (WTC) following 9/11/2001 are experiencing elevated incidence of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) at midlife.Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; World Trade Center responders; diffusion spectrum imaging; incident mild cognitive impairment; midlife; white matter connectivity
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33646156 PMCID: PMC8150516 DOI: 10.3233/JAD-201237
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Alzheimers Dis ISSN: 1387-2877 Impact factor: 4.472
Characteristics of World Trade Center responders with incident mild cognitive impairment [MCI] (n = 10) versus cognitively unimpaired responders (n = 10). Values expressed as mean (SD) or percentages
| Characteristic | Incident MCI | Cognitively unimpaired | |
| Age | 56.30 (5.27) | 55.70 (4.37) | 0.785 |
| Body mass, kg/m2 | 30.65 (3.08) | 30.67 (4.13) | 0.990 |
| PTSD symptoms: | |||
| Re-experiencing | 14.50 (4.88) | 15.20 (4.10) | 0.733 |
| Avoidance | 16.50 (4.90) | 19.20 (6.14) | 0.292 |
| Hyperarousal | 14.10 (5.99) | 15.40 (5.15) | 0.609 |
| Intracranial volume, cm3 | 1506.28 (182.20) | 1553.98 (149.75) | |
| Total brain volume, cm3 | 1239.54 (147.09) | 1140.73 (89.52) | |
| Gray matter volume, cm3 | 46.65 (21.93) | 36.65 (17.54) | |
| Law enforcement, % | 40.0 | 70.0 | 0.178 |
| Female, % | 10.0 | 10.0 | 1.000 |
| Black, % | 10.0 | 10.0 | 1.000 |
Fig. 1Connectometry analysis examining associations between incident MCI and white matter connectivity. Decreased connectivity (left) was found in the corpus callosum, corticothalamic pathways and cortico-striatal pathway. Increased connectivity (right) was also found in the corticothalamic pathway and cortico-striatal pathway.
Fig. 2Image of ten k-means clusters created from tracts with increased connectivity (five clusters on top) and decreased connectivity (five clusters on bottom). Group means are shown in the accompanying table with p-values derived from GLM analyses with age correction.
Spearman’s rank correlation tests between cognitive measures and diffusion metrics in ROIs that were significantly different at the group level (see Table 2), in all 20 WTC responders in this study, with significance set at α= 0.05
| Right Rostral Anterior Cingulate (FA) | Right Caudal Anterior Cingulate (FA) | Left Accumbens (FA) | Right Accumbens (FA) | Left Cortical Anterior Circular Insula (FA) | Right Rostral Anterior Cingulate (MD) | Left Cortex of the Anterior Middle Cingulate (MD) | Left Accumbens (MD) | Left Pallidum (MD) | Left Cortical Inferior Circular Insula (MD) | |
| Aphasia | 0.23 | 0.15 | 0.38 | 0.36 | 0.20 | –0.22 | –0.41 | –0.32 | –0.39 | –0.15 |
| Response speed | 0.40 | –0.22 | 0.02 | 0.24 | 0.11 | –0.19 | 0.03 | – | 0.01 | |
| Processing speed | –0.23 | 0.08 | –0.10 | –0.21 | –0.32 | –0.02 | 0.14 | 0.01 | 0.30 | –0.01 |
| Verbal fluency | –0.14 | –0.30 | –0.26 | –0.06 | 0.23 | 0.22 | 0.14 | 0.16 | –0.03 | –0.16 |
| Overall verbal learning | –0.10 | –0.19 | 0.02 | –0.06 | 0.04 | –0.17 | 0.05 | –0.16 | –0.07 | |
| Retention rate | 0.06 | –0.33 | –0.03 | –0.32 | 0.20 | 0.01 | 0.19 | –0.16 | 0.32 | |
| Recognition | –0.20 | 0.16 | –0.20 | –0.09 | –0.12 | 0.18 | –0.10 | 0.04 | –0.12 | –0.05 |
| e-Response speed | –0.09 | 0.17 | –0.27 | –0.38 | –0.05 | 0.26 | 0.13 | 0.30 | 0.13 | 0.16 |
| e-Processing speed | –0.24 | 0.13 | –0.16 | –0.11 | –0.24 | 0.00 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.11 | 0.13 |
| e-Memory | 0.06 | –0.24 | –0.13 | 0.05 | –0.22 | –0.08 | 0.09 | –0.01 | 0.13 | 0.19 |
| e-Throughput | –0.05 | 0.43 | –0.24 | –0.19 | –0.24 | –0.21 | –0.04 | 0.08 | 0.18 | –0.01 |
| e-Paired-associate learning | 0.15 | 0.18 | –0.22 | –0.17 | 0.15 | 0.07 | 0.02 | 0.25 | –0.04 | –0.08 |
| e-Visuospatial learning | 0.25 | 0.44 | 0.03 | 0.21 | –0.07 | – | –0.26 | –0.24 | 0.12 | –0.33 |
| e-Visuospatial memory | –0.02 | –0.05 | 0.28 | –0.12 | 0.24 | –0.03 | –0.12 | –0.12 | –0.17 | –0.28 |
Bolded numbers are statistically significant (p < 0.05). Italicized notes are statistically significant upon adjusting for the False discovery rate (FDR = 0.05).
Comparison of white matter connectivity in responders with in-cident mild cognitive impairment (MCI) versus cognitively unimpaired responders using Student’s t-test. Diffusion tensor image (DTI) and diffusion spectrum image (DSI) metrics are displayed with corresponding ROI showing results for mean values in incident MCI and Cognitively unimpaired. Significant, uncorrected values are bolded and defined by p < 0.05
| Metric ROI | Incident MCI | Cognitively unimpaired | |
| Fractional Anisotropy (FA) | |||
| Right rostral anterior cingulate | 0.277 | 0.234 | |
| Right anterior cingulate | 0.256 | 0.227 | |
| Left accumbens | 0.424 | 0.292 | |
| Right accumbens | 0.464 | 0.355 | |
| Mean Diffusivity (MD) | |||
| Left rostral anterior cingulate | 0.651 | 0.695 | |
| Left accumbens | 0.483 | 0.616 | |
| Left pallidum | 0.533 | 0.611 | |
| Quantified Anisotropy (QA) | |||
| Left amygdala | 0.363 | 0.326 | 0.090 |
*Statistically significant upon adjusting for the false discovery rate. (FDR = 0.2); none of the associations pass correction for the FDR.