| Literature DB >> 31419768 |
Edith V Sullivan1, Natalie M Zahr2, Manojkumar Saranathan3, Kilian M Pohl2, Adolf Pfefferbaum2.
Abstract
Recent advances in robust and reliable methods of MRI-derived cerebellar lobule parcellation volumetry present the opportunity to assess effects of Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) on selective cerebellar lobules and relations with indices of nutrition and motor functions. In pursuit of this opportunity, we analyzed high-resolution MRI data acquired in 24 individuals with AUD and 20 age- and sex-matched controls with a 32-channel head coil using three different atlases: the online automated analysis pipeline volBrain Ceres, SUIT, and the Johns Hopkins atlas. Participants had also completed gait and balance examination and hematological analysis of nutritional and liver status, enabling testing of functional meaningfulness of each cerebellar parcellation scheme. Compared with controls, each quantification approach yielded similar patterns of group differences in regional volumes: All three approaches identified AUD-related deficits in total tissue and total gray matter, but only Ceres identified a total white matter volume deficit. Convergent volume differences occurred in lobules I-V, Crus I, VIIIB, and IX. Coefficients of variation (CVs) were <20% for 46 of 56 regions measured and in general were graded: Ceres<SUIT<Hopkins. The most robust correlations were identified between poorer stability in balancing on one leg and smaller lobule VI and Crus I volumes from the Ceres atlas. Lower values of two essential vitamins-thiamine (vitamin B1) and serum folate (vitamin B9)-along with lower red blood cell count, which are dependent on adequate levels of B vitamins, correlated with smaller gray matter volumes of lobule VI and Crus I. Higher γ-glutamyl transferase (GGT) levels, possibly reflecting compromised liver function, correlated with smaller volumes of lobules VI and X. These initial results based on high resolution data produced with clinically practical imaging procedures hold promise for expanding our knowledge about the relevance of focal cerebellar morphology in AUD and other neuropsychiatric conditions.Entities:
Keywords: Alcohol; Balance; Cerebellum; Cognition; MRI; Nutrition
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31419768 PMCID: PMC6704050 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101974
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuroimage Clin ISSN: 2213-1582 Impact factor: 4.881
Characteristics of the study groups: mean ± SD / frequency count.
| Control ( | AUD ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| N (men/women) | 13 / 7 | 17 / 7 | 0.68 |
| Age (years) | 54.1 ± 9.3 | 53.7 ± 8.8 | 0.90 |
| Handedness (right/left) | 19 / 1 | 20 / 4 | 0.23 |
| Ethnicity | 8 / 5 / 7 | 14 / 9 / 1 | |
| Body Mass Index | 25.0 ± 3.6 | 28.9 ± 5.7 | |
| Education (years) | 16.2 ± 2.3 | 13.0 ± 1.8 | |
| Socioeconomic status | 25.4 ± 15.7 | 44.5 ± 13.2 | |
| Beck Depression Index (BDI) | 5.2 ± 5.2 | 14.7 ± 10.0 | |
| AUD onset age | – | 21.7 ± 6.6 | n.a. |
| Days since last drink | – | 105.7 ± 94.5 | n.a. |
| Lifetime alcohol consumption (kg) | 53.6 ± 81.2 | 1798.3 ± 1638.0 | |
| Alcohol consumption years | – | 32.0 ± 9.6 | n.a. |
| CIWA score | – | 23.2 ± 17.7 | n.a. |
| Smoker (never/past/current) | 18 / 0 / 2 | 4/6/2014 | |
| Nicotine (daily) | 1.1 ± 3.3 | 4.6 ± 3.9 | |
| Hematological Indices | |||
| Red blood count (RBC) | 4.90 ± 0.54 | 4.62 ± 0.39 | 0.066 |
| Whole blood thiamine (B1) | 111.4 ± 23.7 | 123.0 ± 31.8 | 0.295 |
| Folate (B9) | 14.9 ± 5.0 | 16.0 ± 6.3 | 0.557 |
| Cobalamins (B12) | 482.2 ± 171.1 | 570.1 ± 240.6 | 0.201 |
| γ-Glutamyl transferase (GGT) | 20.9 ± 13.5 | 38.0 ± 35.3 | 0.058 |
t-Tests used on continuous variables (e.g., age); |2 used on nominal variables (e.g., handedness).
Bold = statistically significant at p ≤ .05 (2-tailed).
Self-defined.
Lower score = higher status.
Fig. 1A. An example of volBrain/Ceres cerebellum output of quantification of a 58 year-old control woman from our study. The top row of images demonstrates the quality of the lobules parcellation. Lobules V-X are visible on the middle (coronal) slice and lobules III-IX are visible on the right (sagittal) slice; the left (axial) slice is not labeled. The bottom row of images displays the gray-white tissue classification of the three planes. The violin plots display the regional gray matter volumes (adjusted for age, sex, and ICV with the mean added back in for display) of the 12 Ceres parcellations of the controls (black) and alcoholics (red).
*p ≤ .05, **p ≤ .01, ***p < .001. B. Top half: The SUIT atlas parcellation in axial, coronal, and sagittal planes. The violin plots below the images display the regional gray matter volumes (adjusted for age, sex, and ICV with the mean added back in for display) of the 10 SUIT parcellations of the controls (black) and alcoholics (red).
Bottom half: An example of the Johns Hopkins atlas parcellation in axial, coronal, and sagittal planes of a participant our study. The violin plots below the images display the regional gray matter volumes (adjusted for age, sex, and ICV with the mean added back in for display) of the 8 Hopkins lobule parcellations of the controls (black) and alcoholics (red).
*p ≤ .05, **p ≤ .01, ***p < .001.
Fig. 2The violin plots of total cerebellum tissue, total gray matter, and total white matter volumes (adjusted for age, sex, and ICV with the mean added back in for display) quantified with the three analysis approaches: Ceres (top), SUIT (middle), and Hopkins (bottom). The control values are the left of a color pair and the AUD values are the right of a pair. *p ≤ .05, **p ≤ .01.
Cerebellar volumes by tissue type and region for 3 analysis approaches: mean (SD) volumes adjusted for ICV, sex, and age with linear regression.
Coefficients of variation (CV) for each measurement approach.
Mean ± SD score on neuropsychological tests.
| Control | AUD | p-Value | Cohen's d | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WTAR IQ (scaled score) | 106.6 ± 13.74 | 93.9 ± 14.36 | 2.850 | 0.906 | |
| MoCA | 26.0 ± 3.16 | 23.5 ± 2.34 | 3.030 | 0.899 | |
| Ataxia: Eyes Open | |||||
| Stand heel-to-toe | −0.019 ± 1.031 | −0.274 ± 1.153 | 0.724 | 0.474 | 0.077 |
| Walk heel-to-toe | −0.018 ± 1.041 | −0.738 ± 1.012 | 2.185 | 0.544 | |
| Stand on left leg | −0.009 ± 1.027 | −0.709 ± 1.022 | 2.124 | 0.683 | |
| Stand on right leg | −0.012 ± 1.031 | −0.984 ± 1.006 | 2.973 | 0.954 | |
| Ataxia: Eyes Closed | |||||
| Stand heel-to-toe | 0.000 ± 1.032 | −0.045 ± 1.069 | 0.136 | 0.893 | 0.043 |
| Walk heel-to-toe | 0.001 ± 1.019 | 0.275 ± 2.139 | −0.498 | 0.622 | 0.164 |
| Stand on left leg | −0.014 ± 1.010 | −0.430 ± 0.640 | 1.558 | 0.128 | 0.492 |
| Stand on right leg | −0.010 ± 1.017 | −0.398 ± 0.650 | 1.440 | 0.158 | 0.452 |
Bold font indicates difference at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
Correlations between regional cerebellar volumes and balance scores and hematological indices.
Fig. 3Correlations between ataxia scores and Ceres-based cerebellar lobular volumes of gray matter (residual scores in cc adjusted for age, sex, and ICV).
Fig. 4Correlations between hematological indices of nutrition and Ceres-based cerebellar lobular volumes of gray matter (residual scores in cc adjusted for age, sex, and ICV).
Fig. 5Correlations between age at onset of AUD diagnosis and Ceres-based cerebellar lobular volumes of gray matter (residual scores in cc adjusted for age, sex, and ICV).