Literature DB >> 35288029

Confronting Racism in All Forms of Pain Research: A Shared Commitment for Engagement, Diversity, and Dissemination.

Anna M Hood1, Staja Q Booker2, Calia A Morais3, Burel R Goodin4, Janelle E Letzen5, Lisa C Campbell6, Ericka N Merriwether7, Edwin N Aroke8, Claudia M Campbell5, Vani A Mathur9, Mary R Janevic10.   

Abstract

This third paper in the "Confronting Racism in All Forms of Pain Research" series discusses adopting an antiracism framework across all pain research disciplines and highlights the significant benefits of doing so. We build upon the previous call to action and the proposed reframing of study designs articulated in the other papers in the series and seek to confront and eradicate racism through a shared commitment to change current research practices. Specifically, we emphasize the systematic disadvantage created by racialization (ie, the Eurocentric social and political process of ascribing racialized identities to a relationship, social practice, or group) and discuss how engaging communities in partnership can increase the participation of racialized groups in research studies and enrich the knowledge gained. Alongside this critical work, we indicate why diversifying the research environment (ie, research teams, labs, departments, and culture) enriches our scientific discovery and promotes recruitment and retention of participants from racialized groups. Finally, we recommend changes in reporting and dissemination practices so that we do not stigmatize or reproduce oppressive forms of power for racialized groups. Although this shift may be challenging in some cases, the increase in equity, generalizability, and credibility of the data produced will expand our knowledge and reflect the pain experiences of all communities more accurately. PERSPECTIVE: In this third paper in our series, we advocate for a shared commitment toward an antiracism framework in pain research. We identify community partnerships, diversification of research environments, and changes to our dissemination practices as areas where oppressive forms of power can be reduced.
Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antiracism; bias; equity; inclusion; language

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35288029      PMCID: PMC9415432          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2022.01.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain        ISSN: 1526-5900            Impact factor:   5.383


  78 in total

1.  Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline.

Authors:  Valmi D Sousa; Wilaiporn Rojjanasrirat
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 2.431

2.  African Americans and Clinical Research: Evidence Concerning Barriers and Facilitators to Participation and Recruitment Recommendations.

Authors:  Travonia B Hughes; Vijay R Varma; Corinne Pettigrew; Marilyn S Albert
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2017-04-01

3.  The foundation of modern racial categories and implications for research on black/white disparities in health.

Authors:  Nina T Harawa; Chandra L Ford
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.847

4.  Anti-Racism Methods for Big Data Research: Lessons Learned from the HIV Testing, Linkage, & Retention in Care (HIV TLR) Study.

Authors:  Chandra L Ford; Lois M Takahashi; P Paul Chandanabhumma; Maria Elena Ruiz; William E Cunningham
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 1.847

5.  How Ancestral Trauma Informs Patients' Health Decision Making.

Authors:  Tina K Sacks; Katie Savin; Quenette L Walton
Journal:  AMA J Ethics       Date:  2021-02-01

6.  Recruitment of first-generation Latinos in a rural community: the essential nature of personal contact.

Authors:  Melanie Domenech Rodríguez; Jesús Rodríguez; Melissa Davis
Journal:  Fam Process       Date:  2006-03

7.  Physician-patient racial concordance and disparities in birthing mortality for newborns.

Authors:  Brad N Greenwood; Rachel R Hardeman; Laura Huang; Aaron Sojourner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Facilitating public and patient involvement in basic and preclinical health research.

Authors:  James Maccarthy; Suzanne Guerin; Anthony G Wilson; Emma R Dorris
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Engaging Caregivers and Providers of Children With Sickle Cell Anemia in Shared Decision Making for Hydroxyurea: Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Anna M Hood; Heather Strong; Cara Nwankwo; Yolanda Johnson; James Peugh; Constance A Mara; Lisa M Shook; William B Brinkman; Francis J Real; Melissa D Klein; Rogelle Hackworth; Sherif M Badawy; Alexis A Thompson; Jean L Raphael; Amber M Yates; Kim Smith-Whitley; Allison A King; Cecelia Calhoun; Susan E Creary; Connie M Piccone; Aimee K Hildenbrand; Steven K Reader; Lynne Neumayr; Emily R Meier; Amy E Sobota; Sohail Rana; Maria Britto; Kay L Saving; Marsha Treadwell; Charles T Quinn; Russell E Ware; Lori E Crosby
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2021-05-21

10.  Ten simple rules for building an antiracist lab.

Authors:  V Bala Chaudhary; Asmeret Asefaw Berhe
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  2 in total

1.  Confronting Racism in Pain Research: A Call to Action.

Authors:  Calia A Morais; Edwin N Aroke; Janelle E Letzen; Claudia M Campbell; Anna M Hood; Mary R Janevic; Vani A Mathur; Ericka N Merriwether; Burel R Goodin; Staja Q Booker; Lisa C Campbell
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 5.383

2.  Confronting Racism in All Forms of Pain Research: Reframing Study Designs.

Authors:  Janelle E Letzen; Vani A Mathur; Mary R Janevic; Michael D Burton; Anna M Hood; Calia A Morais; Staja Q Booker; Claudia M Campbell; Edwin N Aroke; Burel R Goodin; Lisa C Campbell; Ericka N Merriwether
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 5.383

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.