Travonia B Hughes1, Vijay R Varma2, Corinne Pettigrew3, Marilyn S Albert3. 1. Department of Pharmacy Practice, Hampton University School of Pharmacy, Hampton, Virginia. 2. Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland. 3. Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Abstract
Purpose of the Study: The goal of the study was to examine barriers and facilitators to clinical research participation among African Americans, as well as recommendations for overcoming these. Design and Methods: Eight focus groups were conducted consisting of 64 individuals. These focus groups targeted 2 groups of individuals: (a) community members, including both individuals involved in research and individuals not involved in research, and (b) community leaders, including clergy, community health care providers and service providers who may influence decisions to participate in research. Results: Among participants in both groups, the most common barriers to participation included fear and mistrust of research due to multiple factors, such as a lack of information about research and prevailing knowledge of historical occurrences. Facilitators to research participation included intrinsic factors, such as a desire to help others, and extrinsic factors, such as familiarity with the research recruiter. The focus groups also directly engaged participants in discussions of strategies that might improve recruitment, such as the importance of providing personal stories that enable community members to understand the potential benefits of research. Implications: Findings from these focus groups address the mandate from funding agencies that emphasize the importance of including racially diverse populations in clinical research studies, and offer potential solutions for increasing the recruitment and retention of minority participants.
Purpose of the Study: The goal of the study was to examine barriers and facilitators to clinical research participation among African Americans, as well as recommendations for overcoming these. Design and Methods: Eight focus groups were conducted consisting of 64 individuals. These focus groups targeted 2 groups of individuals: (a) community members, including both individuals involved in research and individuals not involved in research, and (b) community leaders, including clergy, community health care providers and service providers who may influence decisions to participate in research. Results: Among participants in both groups, the most common barriers to participation included fear and mistrust of research due to multiple factors, such as a lack of information about research and prevailing knowledge of historical occurrences. Facilitators to research participation included intrinsic factors, such as a desire to help others, and extrinsic factors, such as familiarity with the research recruiter. The focus groups also directly engaged participants in discussions of strategies that might improve recruitment, such as the importance of providing personal stories that enable community members to understand the potential benefits of research. Implications: Findings from these focus groups address the mandate from funding agencies that emphasize the importance of including racially diverse populations in clinical research studies, and offer potential solutions for increasing the recruitment and retention of minority participants.
Authors: Monique M Williams; Darcell P Scharff; Katherine J Mathews; Jonathan S Hoffsuemmer; Pamela Jackson; John C Morris; Dorothy F Edwards Journal: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord Date: 2010 Jul-Sep Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: Ilene H Zuckerman; Priscilla T Ryder; Linda Simoni-Wastila; Thomas Shaffer; Masayo Sato; Lirong Zhao; Bruce Stuart Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Adebowale Odulana; Mimi M Kim; Melissa Green; Yhenneko Taylor; Daniel L Howard; Paul Godley; Giselle Corbie-Smith Journal: J Relig Health Date: 2014-04
Authors: Eseosa T Ighodaro; Peter T Nelson; Walter A Kukull; Frederick A Schmitt; Erin L Abner; Allison Caban-Holt; Shoshana H Bardach; Derrick C Hord; Crystal M Glover; Gregory A Jicha; Linda J Van Eldik; Alexander X Byrd; Anita Fernander Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2017 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Charles R Rogers; Michael J Rovito; Musse Hussein; Ogechi Jessica Obidike; Rebekah Pratt; Mark Alexander; Jerica M Berge; Marc Dall'Era; Jeffrey W Nix; Christopher Warlick Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Jong-Sung Yoon; Nelson A Roque; Ronald Andringa; Erin R Harrell; Katharine G Lewis; Thomas Vitale; Neil Charness; Walter R Boot Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2019-01-31 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: M Smirnoff; I Wilets; D F Ragin; R Adams; J Holohan; R Rhodes; G Winkel; E M Ricci; C Clesca; L D Richardson Journal: AJOB Empir Bioeth Date: 2018-02-16
Authors: Elizabeth P Handing; Stephen R Rapp; Shyh-Huei Chen; W Jack Rejeski; Marie Wiberg; Karen Bandeen-Roche; Suzanne Craft; Dalane Kitzman; Edward H Ip Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2021-03-31 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: LaPrincess C Brewer; Eleshia J Morrison; Joyce E Balls-Berry; Patrick Dean; Kandace Lackore; Sarah Jenkins; Consuelo Cohen; Jacqueline Johnson; Frances Ellis; D C Mangum; Sharonne N Hayes; Christi Patten Journal: J Health Psychol Date: 2017-02-01
Authors: Linda Behar-Horenstein; Rueben C Warren; V Wendy Setiawan; Corey Perkins; Thomas D Schmittgen Journal: Cancer Health Disparities Date: 2020-12