Literature DB >> 35284150

A scoping review of COVID-19-related stress coping resources among nurses.

Ashikur Rahman1,2.   

Abstract

Objective: The entire mental health hazard among the nurses dealing with COVID-19 is just the tip of the iceberg. The goal of this study was to find acceptable and adaptive coping techniques for nurses in order to keep the healthcare system resilient during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Method: The scoping review search took place from January 2020 to May 2021 published articles, and the results were saved in Endnote software. For data synthesis and review, the Joanna Briggs Institute manual and PRISMA-ScR principles were followed. Following backward and forward screening to exclude redundant, irrelevant, and ineligible studies, 13 studies (3,613 nurses) were finally selected for this review.
Results: The majorities of participants in these studies were female and had children, and worked in departments of critical care, emergency, and fever clinics. Safety concerns for family or colleagues, as well as a lack of safe working environment, were the primary causes of the mental illness. Professional responsibility attitude, COVID-19 training, workplace safety, team spirit, and a few relaxation activities such as deep breathing, reading books, watching movies, and praying, on the other hand, were found to be beneficial for stress coping among nurses.
Conclusion: Mentally fit nurses are more capable and flexible in the face of any life-threatening outbreak, even if it is very contagious. Several coping strategies were found to be effective for nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic, whereas problem-specific intervention trials might yield even better results. We should not delay specific mental health interventions to keep them viable and more efficient during a pandemic battlefield, whereas Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and suicide rates can destroy the entire health care system.
© 2022 The authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Health personnel; Mental health; Nurses; Pandemics; Psychological adaptation

Year:  2022        PMID: 35284150      PMCID: PMC8903132          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2022.02.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Nurs Sci        ISSN: 2352-0132


What is known?

Nurses are at a high risk of stress-related mental illness during any epidemics, as they are the key frontline health care workers in hospitals. Despite the overwhelming pressure in hospitals, nurses are willing to face outbreak management valiantly. Most of the time, nurses’ mental illness and their coping mechanisms go unacknowledged and unaddressed by the authorities due to neglect. Infection prevention training, hand washing and exercise are known as self coping techniques.

What is new?

Mental preparedness and a responsible professional attitude during the COVID-19 pandemic are crucial, which compromises an extra level of stress among the nurses. Nurses felt mentally relieved when their family members and colleagues were safe and did not show any COVID-19 symptoms. COVID-19 crisis management should not exclude nurses’ working flexibility, safe working environment, psychological support services, and infection prevention training. Emergency and critical care nurses are more vulnerable to having to deal with tremendous workloads during a pandemic, resulting in insomnia, stress, anxiety, depression, and fatigue. Nurses contributions to the fight against an unknown pandemic must be encouraged and recognized by family, community, and nationally.

Introduction

The COVID-19 is a contagious disease [1,2] that has emerged as one of the most significant global and public health challenges [3] since the second world war [4]. The severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in 2002, the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) in 2012 and the COVID-19 were all caused by the Coronavirus [5,6]. However, the COVID-19 pandemic has broken all previous records, even compared to the Ebola virus disease (EVD) first described in 1976. This includes the duration of the pandemic, the number of individuals infected with, deceased from, or otherwise affected by this virus (e.g., loss of income, job, family/friends, and related mental health issues) [7]. COVID-19 has caused an unprecedented mental health crisis, so advanced that some have referred to it as a mental health pandemic or secondary pandemic within the COVID-19 pandemic [8]. Frontline health workers (FHWs) are particularly vulnerable to the effects of COVID-19. This includes the risk of infection and death because of their professional responsibility to care for patients infected with COVID-19 [9] and the resulting exposure to patients infected with COVID-19 [4]. In addition to these physical risks, the SARS and Ebola virus outbreaks [10,11], as well as the COVID-19 pandemic [12], have caused mental traumas among healthcare workers--so severe that many left their jobs. At the same time, as a result of their employment at COVID-19 institutions, health professionals endured prejudice and disregard from society; even their family members had to urge that they leave their area [13,14]. However, healthcare systems in general, especially those in developing countries, struggle with protecting their healthcare workers [[15], [16], [17]] due to the lack of personal protective equipment (PPE) [16], limited testing capacity [18], and insufficient oxygen supply [19]. This lack of preparedness and the stressful working conditions (lack of training, excessive workloads, staff shortages) causes fear and anxiety among healthcare workers and having to watch people die without support from their families or a friend causes frustration and anger [20]. Moreover, some nurses had been fired for refusing to work under stressful conditions and when asking for standard PPE and safety training [21]. Additionally, fear of infecting their family and children increased healthcare workers’ stress [22]. Therefore, many healthcare workers have isolated themselves from their families to protect them [23]. Studies have documented persistent mental problems among nurses [17,24]. In turn, physically and mentally exhausted nurses are at higher risk to make mistakes and becoming infected with COVID-19 [17]. Because of these reasons mentioned above, the COVID-19 pandemic has produced unparalleled fear among nurses [25]. According to a recent study, large numbers of hospital nurses suffered from stress (43%), anxiety (37%), sadness (35%), and sleep disturbance (43%). These proportions are significantly higher than in the general population during the same period [25,26]. Critical care nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic reported decreased appetite (59%), fatigue (55%), insomnia (45%), and suicidal thoughts (2%) [27]. An increasing concern noticed in a case study is nurses’ suicides due to COVID-19 [28]. Six nurses took their lives due to fear of transmitting the disease to their family members, social isolation, feeling guilty of infecting others and overwhelming death news in the newspapers and social media. At the same time, healthcare workers have been avoided by their families or community due to stigma or fear [29]. These issues have been going on for almost two years now, and we do not know when these will end. According to one study, 10%–40% of health workers would develop Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) symptoms between one and three years following a pandemic [30]. The nursing population mostly consists of female workers in whom social interaction is forbidden due to stigma and is at risk of post-COVID mental illness [31,32]. Depression and anxiety disorders are the leading cause of global years lost due to disability [33,34]. Long-term sick leaves are associated with psychiatric disorders, leading to loss of workplace productivity [[35], [36], [37]]. Physical health and mental health are intricately linked, and supporting healthcare workers to prevent or cope with these multiple impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic will be critical [38,39]. Problem-based and emotion-based coping are well-known strategies to retrieve unwanted stress, which motivate self to modify the behaviors [[40], [41], [42]]. To cope psychologically with the stress of the ongoing epidemic, nurses said they had to create new ways of coping or change their pre-existing routines [43]. Self-care strategies included quiet prayer and meditation, exercise, crafts, virtual meetings with friends, time spent with loved ones, and a commitment to continue one’s nursing education to make them resilient in the COVID-19 pandemic [44]. To date, to the best of our knowledge, few previous reviews have synthesized the available evidence on coping resources to help nurses prevent or mitigate the mental health impacts of COVID-19. Nurses are the core of health care delivery, and their contribution is key to overcoming the COVID-19 crisis. This review will also be essential in providing specific advice to policymakers on how to effectively support nurses’ mental health during the COVID-19 crisis--an essential component to ensuring a functional and powerful workforce to help overcome this pandemic.

Materials and methods

Overview

A mix studies review method was used for the synthesis of effective coping resources for the nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic. A specific search technique was used to filter the correct picture of the mental problems among the nurses, and relatively effective coping strategies were identified to ameliorate the psychological conditions. There are lots of data related to COVID-19 concerning mental health for the forefront health care staff. Despite this, few of them recommended good coping strategies for the nurses, leaving their problem ignored or unacknowledged, resulting in severe mental illness and, in some cases, suicide [31]. Effective coping strategies for retrieving COVID-19 related mental illness were obtained following the PRISMA extension (PRISMA-ScR) [46] for scoping review and Joanna Briggs Institute re-viewers guidelines [45].

Review stages

To synthesize the findings and gain a deep understanding of the existing evidence, a scoping review of previously published articles was conducted, which included five stages: identification of the review goal, extensive literature search and protocol development, data screening, data analysis, and presentation [47]. Stage-1(Identification of review aim): Given priority in COVID-19 mental illness, the first problem was selected and focused on the nurses directly dealing with COVID-19 management, not student nurses or intern nurses. Then, outlined the specific aims and significance of this study. Stage-2 (Extensive literature search for protocol development): Gross literature searches in electronic databases, grey literature, and manual completion of this stage. At the same time, after reading a few papers, selection criteria were finalized, in which health care practitioners, student nurses, and even non-medical professionals were eliminated. Stage-3 (Data screening): The search methodology was used to find publications relevant to COVID-19 mental illness and coping styles among nurses in databases, grey literature, and manuals. In the EndNote software, duplicate articles were eliminated, and the retrieved studies were exported. The review process and selection procedure were independently reviewed by the author and an expert. All of the included papers’ reference lists were examined for additional relevant publications that were not found during the database searches to avoid any chance of missing them. Stage-4 (Data analysis): The author created a data extraction table in Microsoft Word with the following elements: first and corresponding author, journal name, years, research objectives, target population, sampling technique, validity, reliability, key findings, mental illness, the scale of measurements, journal language, and coping styles. The author double-checked and re-checked the article’s aims, research results, target population, and quality evaluation. On the other hand, discrepancies were carefully resolved through conversation with an expert. Stage-5 (Data presentation): Finally, after careful synthesis of qualitative and quantitative data, it is presented in the form of tables and figures. A list of coping resources for the nurse to effectively recover from mental stress during the COVID-19 outbreak was systematically sorted out.

Scoping review protocol

To step up with scoping review, Arksey H & O’Malley [48] scoping review guidelines were followed, and a structure was developed for successful completion of this study, including study objectives, research questions, inclusion and exclusion criteria, search strategy, data sources and quality appraisal (Table 1).
Table 1

Literature review protocol.

Research questions
Which nursing department is dealing with COVID-19 and practicing coping mechanisms?
What are the most typical mental health stressors and their outcomes among the nurses dealing with COVID-19 patients in the hospitals?
How do nurses handle the stress of caring for COVID-19 patients in hospitals?
Review objectives
Evidence synthesis on nurses in the working department and their COVID-19 coping strategies.
Identification of prevalent mental health stressors and their consequences in the context of COVID-19 management.
Evidence synthesis for nurses dealing with COVID-19 on stress-coping resources.
Search strategy
Inclusion criteriaNurses coping strategies
Working for COVID-19 management
Full text peer-reviewed journal, grey literature and reference list
Language: Bengali, English
Exclusion CriteriaStudent nurses coping styles
Unspecified health care workers
Time frame
January 2020 to May 2021
Data sources
Bibliographic SearchesPubMed, HINARI, Scopus, Cochrane, Web science, Google Scholar, and Research Gate.
Grey LiteratureWHO website, CDC website, social media sites, and preprints on MedRxiv
Manual Search
Reference lists
Quality appraisalHigh quality
Literature review protocol.

Data extraction and analysis

The search keywords for electronic databases (Table 2) were set and recorded in EndNote software based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. For data extraction, synthesis, analysis, and comparison, appropriate tools were chosen: COREQ for qualitative research [49], and STROBE for observational studies [50].
Table 2

Key terms to be used for searching electronic databases.

A: Health problem (Combined by “OR”)B: Relieving ways (Combined by “OR”)C: Care providers (Combined by “OR”)D: Diseases (Combined by “OR”)
Stress, Mental illness, Psychological illness, Mental impact,Anxiety, Depression.Coping resources, Coping strategies. Coping behavior, Coping resilience, Resilience strategy, Mental health management.Nurses, Nursing, Care giver, Midwife, health worker, Front-line.COVID-19, SARS-COV-2, COVID pandemic.

Note: A, B, C, D groups were combined with Boolean operator “AND”.

Key terms to be used for searching electronic databases. Note: A, B, C, D groups were combined with Boolean operator “AND”.

Quality appraisal

The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) Checklist was used to determine the quality of data included in this study [51]. Each checklist systematically allowed the reviewer to assess the validity of the results by determining whether the study clearly stated the purpose, reviewed relevant background, reasonably justified its analysis and results, and so on. The CASP Cohort Study checklist scored quantitative studies from 0 to 12, with 10–12 indicating high quality and 6–9 indicating moderate quality. The CASP qualitative study checklist was used to provide ratings to qualitative studies, with 8–10 representing the high quality research and 5–7 suggesting moderate. Overall, all of the papers were found at a high quality level.

Results

Study’s characteristics

A total of 479 articles were retrieved from PubMed (141 articles), HINARI (70 articles), Scopus (18 articles), Cochrane (46 articles), Web of Science (83 articles), Google Scholar (92 articles), ResearchGate (21 articles) and Manual search (8 articles). After a careful analysis, 147 articles had been removed for duplication, and the titles and abstracts of 332 articles were catiously screened for relevance. Of these, 64 full texts were comprehensively assessed for the proposed inclusion and exclusion criteria. Finally, 13 studies eventually satisfied the review requirements (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Flow diagram of the study selection.

Flow diagram of the study selection.

Research domains

In the 13 research studies included in the scoping review (Table 3), 3,613 nurses expressed their thoughts and praised coping techniques. The papers included 7 cross-sectional studies [[52], [53], [54], [55], [56],58,61], 2 qualitative study [57,59], 2 mixed-method studies [60,62], 1 comparative study [64], and 1 pilot-based study [63]. Of these, 4 studies are from China [53,[57], [58], [59],64], and 3 from America [55,60,61]. The research covered both males and females. However, the majority of the participants in each research were female. It is worth mentioning that nearly half (6/13) of the studies were carried out among emergency nurses [[53], [54], [55], [56],59,63] followed by critical care nurses (5/13) [54,55,[59], [60], [61]], and the rest of them were from fever clinic, isolation ward, OT, oncology department. Nearly one-third of the included studies (4/13) did not mention their participants’ working department [52,58,63,64].
Table 3

Socio-demographic and methodological features (n = 13).

Author, yearCountryWorking departmentStudy DesignSample sizeKey findings
Lorente et al., 2021 [52]SpainNGCross-sectional421Overwork, inadequate preparedness, lack of support, and fear of infection exhibited a positive relationship with psychological stress.The PFC and EFC were found to have a favorable relationship with the avoidance of mental distress.
Cui et al., 2021 [53]ChinaEmergency, Fever-ClinicCross-sectional453Anxiety disorders were linked with fears of infecting family members, regretting being a nurse, and having children.Professional attitude and infection control training were both favorably connected with stress coping ability.
Franco et al., 2020 [54]EcuadorEmergencyICUCross-sectional123The nurses’ feelings were mostly focused on their professional responsibilities.The likelihood of transmission to family, workplace safety, lack of PPE, getting COVID-19 death news via television or social media, watching terrified coworkers, and witnessing suspected COVID-19 symptoms were all variables that contributed to stress.Nurses felt ease when all of their coworkers in worked together, and no one in their family or circle of friends was sick.The coping strategies included strictly personal protection measures, acquiring greater knowledge about the disease, communication strategies with their relatives and friends, nutrition, physical exercise.
Ali et al., 2020 [55]USAICU,General,Emergency,Cross-sectional109Senior nurses were less stressed and ICU and Emergency nurses were more stressed.Around 74% of nursing staff are concerned about becoming sick, 70% are concerned about their coworkers becoming ill, 82% of nurses are concerned that the virus may spread to their families.Overtime job avoidance and the elimination of COVID-19 death news enhanced the capacity to cope. When protective measures were in place, over 75% of nurses said they felt safe, and 37% said COVID-19 prevention training helped them manage with stress.Other relaxation activities include prayer, meditation, reading books, watching movies, and exercise.
Labrague and Santos, 2020 [56]PhilippineNGCross-sectional325When it came to being prepared to care for COVID-19 patients, 8.6% said they were prepared, 32% were somewhat prepared, and almost half (45.2%) were unsure.The COVID-19 Anxiety Scale scores were linked to social support, organizational support, and personal resilience indicators.
Zhang et al., 2020 [57]ChinaFever ClinicQualitative10Nurses had negative emotional reactions in the early stages of isolation and positive emotions gradually increased during home isolation.Six categories of coping strategies were identified, including reasoned cognition, autosuggestion, develop healthy protective behaviors, shifting attention, social support, and the power of a role model.
Zhang et al., 2021 [58]ChinaNGCross-sectional107Participants with longer working hours in COVID-19 quarantine units presented higher emotional exhaustion.A small proportion of participants reported the need to see a psychiatrist.Support from team leaders, sufficient material supply, allowance, career promotion, nutrition supply and sufficient training were considered the most important measures.
Zhao et al., 2021 [59]ChinaICU, Emergency TriageQualitative215Managers faced enormous challenges to lead staff in the prevention and control of COVID-19 in a context of limited resources and support from their organization and the government.
Al Muharraq, 2021 [60]Saudi-ArabiaNursing homesMixed method374Even if the epidemic worsened, 88% of nurses were committed to carry with their professional obligations. When their infected patients died in front of them, 62.8% of nurses were stressed.Strict preventive measures (93.5%) and gaining more awareness about COVID-19 (82.3%) were used as coping strategies.
Shahrour and Dardas, 2020 [61]JordanNGCross-sectional448The majority of nurses (64%) were suffering from ASD as a result of the COVID-19 epidemic, putting them at risk for PTSD.Younger nurses were more likely to endure psychological discomfort than older ones.Self-efficacy in coping as a defense against psychological suffering.
Grey et al., 2021 [62]USAAcute Medicine,Critical care,OthersMixed-method110Measuring precautionary steps (washing hands, wearing a mask, taking one’s own temperature), limiting one’s exposure to COVID-19 news, and actively learning more about COVID-19 were all found to be strongly linked with coping.
Latimer, A., 2021 [63]USAICU, Operating,Emergency, Oncology departmentsPilot study544Insecurity in the family, a lack of equipment or bed capacity, and a lack of administrative action had all contributed to moral distress.
Huang et al., 2020 [64]ChinaNGComparative374Problem-focused coping was utilized by much more women than males. Nurses in secondary hospitals cope with their emotions better than those in tertiary hospitals.Higher awareness leads to better coping, and the more concerned the nurse is, the more he or she will try to solve the situation.

Note: PFC = Problem Focused Coping. EFC = Emotion Focused Coping . ASD = Acute Stress Disorder. PTSD = Post Traumatic Stress Disorder.

Socio-demographic and methodological features (n = 13). Note: PFC = Problem Focused Coping. EFC = Emotion Focused Coping . ASD = Acute Stress Disorder. PTSD = Post Traumatic Stress Disorder.

Mental health stressors and outcomes

This study outlined common mental health stressors among nurses during COVID-19, with the majority of nurses believing that high workload, fear of infecting family members, having children, working in an emergency or intensive care unit, lack of knowledge, media news, poor standard of PPE, and insufficient medical supplies were the main causes of psychological illness (Table 4). It is also illustrated the commonest mental health problems: fatigue, anxiety, stress, depression, fear, burnout, insomnia and restlessness.
Table 4

Common mental health stressors and outcomes by the nurses.

Mental Health Stressors (MHS)Mental Health Outcomes (MHO)

High workload

Fear of infecting family members

Having children

Working at emergency room or ICU

Lack of COVID-19 knowledge

Health workers death reports

Restricted family visitations

Lack of COVID-19 specific treatment

Uncertainty of pandemic duration

Lack of standard PPE, ventilator, facemask etc.

COVID-19 like symptoms development

Restricted outdoor activities

Infected patients died in front of them

Daily news of the death

Less resting time

Limited resources

Fatigue

Anxiety

Stress

Sadness

Depression

Fear

Burn out

Panic

Restlessness

Insomnia

Nervousness

Common mental health stressors and outcomes by the nurses. High workload Fear of infecting family members Having children Working at emergency room or ICU Lack of COVID-19 knowledge Health workers death reports Restricted family visitations Lack of COVID-19 specific treatment Uncertainty of pandemic duration Lack of standard PPE, ventilator, facemask etc. COVID-19 like symptoms development Restricted outdoor activities Infected patients died in front of them Daily news of the death Less resting time Limited resources Fatigue Anxiety Stress Sadness Depression Fear Burn out Panic Restlessness Insomnia Nervousness

Coping resources

Nurses’ coping resources are similar to those of physicians in one point of view while their extensive workload, socio-demographic position and the administration’s ignorance place them at a greater risk of mental illness than doctors or other health care providers. So the one of the goals of this study was to figure out the nurse’s mental health problems and their coping mechanisms in the COVID-19 pandemic situation, shortly portrayed in Fig. 2.
Fig. 2

Overall stress coping resources for nurses responding to COVID-19.

Overall stress coping resources for nurses responding to COVID-19.

Professional responsibility attitude

A responsible mindset is necessary to perform during an outbreak, according to the nurse job description. Out of 13 studies, 3 studies mentioned professional practice as a significant factor for dealing with outbreak management. COVID-19 is a global emergency, and nurses must retain their commitment as a matter of professional practice in the face of it [53,57]. The nurses, who were most motivated to tackle COVID-19, had a beneficial impact on their coping [54,59]. Positive verbalizations like self-motivation enhanced coping levels significantly [57,61].

COVID-19 knowledge and awareness

Nearly two-thirds of the 13 studies found that COVID-19 training improved nurses’ coping through awareness. As a result, a better comprehension of COVID-19 is needed [[57], [58], [59], [60],64], as well as emergency preparedness training [53,58,62,63] and learning preventative approaches significantly improved mental health of the nurses [53,55,57].

Strict protective measures

Over half of the participants in surveys ranked personal safety in hospital settings as the most important factor in managing their stress. To justify, developing healthy protective behaviors (handwashing, strengthening indoor ventilation, use serving chopsticks and spoons at meal times), strict personal PPE management [53,54,57,58,60], handwashing [55,58], at the workplace all improved coping [55,62]. At the same time, this workplace behavior ensures self-preservation and reduces the risk of SARS COV-2 among colleagues and household members.

Flexible working hours

Working hours were a critical component in the field of coping with mental illness. It was noticed that people who worked for extended periods of time in order to combat COVID-19 survival were more prone to developing mental illness. In this aspect, the majority of nurses stated that the flexibility of working hours, sufficient manpower, and flexible duty schedules help to overcome negative emotional disturbances [54,55,57,58].

Relaxation activities

Relaxation activities were one of the most prominent coping strategies utilized by nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic, mentioned in more than half of the studies. Relaxing activities were preferred by nearly two-thirds of nurses, assist in eliminating mental illness [58]. Exercise, yoga, meditation, and dance are among some of the coping activities that manage stress and anxiety among nurses [55]. It was also noticed that a lot of the nurses exercised: deep breathing exercises strengthen the parasympathetic nervous system [54,57,62]; skipping rope daily to build up a resistance [57,62]. To relieve overwhelmed stress, the nurses watched their favorite movies during leisure time [55,57,62], listened to music [57], read books and occupied themselves with cooking and cleaning [57]. According to Ali et al. (2020), nearly half of the nurses choose religious and spiritual activities such as prayer to make them more mentally healthy [55]. However, it was less evident that weeping and screaming to alleviate emotional intolerance might help nurses stay free of mental anxiety, stress and depression [54].

Family and colleagues support

In each study, the majority of the nurses concluded that they felt confident when they received mutual support and a warm environment from colleagues and supervisors [[57], [58], [59]], as well as when they worked as a team member [54,58]. It was also found that due to isolation after working at the COVID-19 unit, nurses had to stay in nursing homes while peers passed their loneliness and leisure activities by developing stronger bonds and work relationships, which acted as tension relievers [58,59,62]. By sharing and maintaining good communication with family members, family members can play an important role in reducing mental illness. Spending time with family and friends [54,[57], [58], [59],62], husband [57], and children [54] were significantly associated with defending mental illness for the nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Address recognition and compensation

Fighting against an incurable virus (SARS-COV-2) puts the nurses’ lives at risk, while most of the nurses expected national and social acknowledgment for their sacrifices, compromises and success [63]. It was observed that the majority of the nurses identified government allowance and compensation for lost life were the key factors for mitigating mental illness due to COVID-19 [54,58].

Seeking psychological support

Nurses should require counseling from a medical psychiatrist, therapist, or mental health support team to cope with unavoidable stress [54]. They emphasized the need for them to put to use [58]. When nurses sought help dealing with mental illness, the management team took the required measures and taught coping methods [57]. Problem-focused coping is the best solution for the retrieval of psychological distress [52,64]. More than a quarter of the nurses said that consulting with a psychologist is necessary for coping. Having a friendly authority to communicate everyday psychological difficulties might be safer and more relaxing [63]. COVID-19 like symptoms might get intensified mental illness and it can be relieved through RT-PCR test and clear the doubt. In a qualitative study, a nurse said that she felt relaxed when she found the normal test report [57].

Ignore COVID-19 media news

Avoiding COVID-19 fatalities news on media could help the nurses to stay out of the panic [57], while news updates on death published by the electronic media could increase the chances of stress and anxiety. It also suggested that keep busy with family chores and other activities to distract from the COVID-19 surge information [54]. More than half of the nurses admitted that they had avoided media news about the high mortality and morbidity rate resulting from COVID-19 for relieving stress [55,57,58] as well as reducing the use of virtual networks [62].

Healthy food

More vitamin and nutrition supplements were recommended by the nurses to help establish a healthy immune system and combat COVID-19. A few nurses believed that consuming more nutritious foods might relieve mental stress by increasing body autoimmunity [54,58].

Social support

It was worth noting that familial immunity to the COVID-19 outbreak might provide mental relief from tension, anxiety and panic. Nurses became happier when their family and friends were not infected with COVID-19, according to two studies [54,58]. For ensuring family and residential safety from infections, nurses had to avoid visitations. Social support, organizational support, and personal resilience measures were associated with decreased scores in the COVID-19 anxiety [56].

Discussions

Nurses working in the emergency rooms, critical care units, and fever clinics were found to be the most likely to use coping styles as a result of their heavy workload, fear of infecting family members, news of health workers’ deaths, and a lack of workplace infection safety, which resulted in stress, anxiety, depression, fatigue, insomnia, and other symptoms, making the situation more difficult to combat the pandemic. During the COVID-19 pandemic, an assessment of coping techniques for nurses found that everyone on the pandemic battlefield desires to remain emotionally safe and bold. To become a devoted nurse, mental health preparation for the COVID-19 stress coping was a top focus. Before caring for infectious patients, the majority of nurses in half of the studies highlighted positive expressions and professional attitudes, minimizing negative feelings. It cultivates personal strength through sacrifice, compromise, and commitment. Furthermore, COVID-19 management and prevention training boosts nurses’ confidence, leading to improved stress management. A training session for health care professionals was held during a SARS COV-1 outbreak, and participants reported feeling competent about coping with a pandemic following the training [65]. Almost all of the nurses in the research were concerned about their job safety, particularly the availability of basic PPE such as masks, gloves, gowns, and face shields. Those determined to have adequate workplace security during highly infectious illness management in the hospital had less mental stress. PPE shortages caused nurses dread and terror when interacting with patients in the hospital, according to a qualitative research [66]. Nearly a third of nurses thought that having more flexible working hours at COVID-19 institutions meant they would have less workload, which would save them from unwelcome psychological sickness. Nearly all nurses favored various types of relaxation techniques to manage negative emotions in order to overcome mental stress. Nurses frequently mentioned exercise, meditation, watching movies, deep breathing, listening to music, reading books, and religious activities as ways to cope with stress. Another research [67] found that participants’ faith in God and frequent prayer contributed to their serenity, which was important in reducing stress. This study also discovered that connecting with family and colleagues was an essential factor in reducing abnormal stress. Two-thirds of respondents expressed fear for their own or their family’s health due to SARS [68], and communication through video chat or phone helps them relax [69]. Throughout COVID-19, team assistance during patient management at the hospital and assisting each other ensured that no unintended mental trauma occurred. Even if the family contact takes the focus away from the psychological illness, on the other hand, most nurses feel terrible if close family members or acquaintances afflicted with COVID-19 claim responsibility. During the epidemic, family safety became yet another important stress reliever. The current study discovered that nurses feel more positive when social and national recognition and compensation are ensured. Nearly one-third of the nurses thought that they had the right to get a risk allowance, which would save their family’s future as well. Considering the medical attention given in this study, nurses thought that hospital authorities should screen the mental health status of every nurse working at the COVID-19 department periodically and help to easily cope with mental problems. An almost similar study found that staff feedback facilitates health care workers to contribute to decision making and design self-resilience [70]. Another study discovered that workplace stress management strategy is one of the prominent ways of cutting stress at hospitals [71]. In this study, it was also found that repeated COVID-19 news made the nurses more restless, panicked and depressed. They identified that avoiding the regular COVID-19 update on news helped them get rid of negative thoughts. In another study in Pakistan, among the health care workers pointed out that limiting media exposure, which poorly aggravates anxiety; consequently, participants feel better [67]. The current study figured out that healthy nutritious food, crying and yelling, and the COVID-19 test, if any doubt, sometimes helped them to overcome unnecessary stress. Nitrous food boosts the immune system, which makes the nurses more energetic and immune. Limitations of the Study. This study is mainly focused on the nurses instead of all health care workers. Moreover, since all are non-experimental study designs, no RCT-based study was found to evaluate the methodological significance. Another limitation was that the articles searched and retrieved had a certain time frame; however, maximum information gathering was ensured. In addition, restricted access to some premium electronic databases made incomplete the range of articles. The selected articles were appraised critically, but they lacked weighted ratings.

Conclusion

This study outlined the mental health problem-based strategies against COVID-19 for nurses in a variety of situations from various nationalities and study designs. The study portrayed and summarized the common coping resources by the nurses during the pandemic situation. Detailed analysis of previous studies from a different angle showed that more or less mental health exaggerating factors and their counter-coping resources were the same. In a broad sense, mental health readiness, positive professional attitude, safe working environment, COVID-19 specific training, relaxation activities, and family and colleague support significantly incorporate to healing negative emotions. However, psychological intervention would provide the perfect sketch for crisis management by the nurses. Government and non-government health organizations should come forward to build a strong, productive and functional health care system by providing adequate coping spaces for nurses.

Funding

This study did not receive any specific support from government, commercial, or non-profit funding bodies.

Declaration of competing interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.
  60 in total

1.  The integrative review: updated methodology.

Authors:  Robin Whittemore; Kathleen Knafl
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.187

2.  Mental health problems as a cause of long-term sick leave in the Norwegian workforce.

Authors:  P Nystuen; K B Hagen; J Herrin
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.021

3.  The psychological impact of COVID-19 pandemic on health care workers in a MERS-CoV endemic country.

Authors:  Mohamad-Hani Temsah; Fahad Al-Sohime; Nurah Alamro; Ayman Al-Eyadhy; Khalid Al-Hasan; Amr Jamal; Ibrahim Al-Maglouth; Fadi Aljamaan; Maha Al Amri; Mazin Barry; Sarah Al-Subaie; Ali Mohammed Somily
Journal:  J Infect Public Health       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 3.718

Review 4.  Prevalence of stress, depression, anxiety and sleep disturbance among nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mohammed Al Maqbali; Mohammed Al Sinani; Badriya Al-Lenjawi
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 3.006

5.  The Psychological Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 on Nurses in Saudi Arabia and Their Coping Strategies.

Authors:  Essa H Al Muharraq
Journal:  SAGE Open Nurs       Date:  2021-04-20

6.  Author Correction: Years of life lost to COVID-19 in 81 countries.

Authors:  Héctor Pifarré I Arolas; Enrique Acosta; Guillem López-Casasnovas; Adeline Lo; Catia Nicodemo; Tim Riffe; Mikko Myrskylä
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Psychological Distress among Ebola Survivors Discharged from an Ebola Treatment Unit in Monrovia, Liberia - A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Ionara Rabelo; Virginia Lee; Mosoka P Fallah; Moses Massaquoi; Iro Evlampidou; Rosa Crestani; Tom Decroo; Rafael Van den Bergh; Nathalie Severy
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2016-07-04

8.  An appeal for practical social justice in the COVID-19 global response in low-income and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Maureen Kelley; Rashida A Ferrand; Kui Muraya; Simukai Chigudu; Sassy Molyneux; Madhukar Pai; Edwine Barasa
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 26.763

9.  COVID-19 pandemic and mental health consequences: Systematic review of the current evidence.

Authors:  Nina Vindegaard; Michael Eriksen Benros
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2020-05-30       Impact factor: 7.217

10.  Emotional responses and coping strategies in nurses and nursing students during Covid-19 outbreak: A comparative study.

Authors:  Long Huang; Wansheng Lei; Fuming Xu; Hairong Liu; Liang Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Cognitive appraisals and coping strategies of registered nurses in the emergency department combating COVID-19: A scoping review.

Authors:  Chia-Hung Lin; Shu-Fen Siao; You-Jie Lin; Pin-Hsien Hsin; Mack Shelley; Yen-Han Lee
Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 3.928

2.  Working Conditions and Wellbeing among Prison Nurses during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Comparison to Community Nurses.

Authors:  Megan Guardiano; Paul Boy; Grigoriy Shapirshteyn; Lisa Dobrozdravic; Liwei Chen; Haiou Yang; Wendie Robbins; Jian Li
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 4.614

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.