| Literature DB >> 35269121 |
Simonetta D'Ercole1, Francesco De Angelis1, Virginia Biferi1, Chiara Noviello1, Domenico Tripodi1, Silvia Di Lodovico2, Luigina Cellini2, Camillo D'Arcangelo1.
Abstract
Antibacterial and antibiofilm properties of restorative dental materials may improve restorative treatment outcomes. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate Streptococcus mutans capability to adhere and form biofilm on the surface of three commercially available composite resins (CRs) with different chemical compositions: GrandioSO (VOCO), Venus Diamond (VD), and Clearfil Majesty (ES-2). Disk-shaped specimens were manufactured by light-curing the CRs through two glass slides to maintain a perfectly standardized surface topography. Specimens were subjected to Planktonic OD600nm, Planktonic CFU count, Planktonic MTT, Planktonic live/dead, Adherent Bacteria CFU count, Biomass Quantification OD570nm, Adherent Bacteria MTT, Concanavalin A, and Scanning Electron Microscope analysis. In presence of VOCO, VD, and ES2, both Planktonic CFU count and Planktonic OD600nm were significantly reduced compared to that of control. The amount of Adherent CFUs, biofilm Biomass, metabolic activity, and extracellular polymeric substances were significantly reduced in VOCO, compared to those of ES2 and VD. Results demonstrated that in presence of the same surface properties, chemical composition might significantly influence the in vitro bacterial adhesion/proliferation on resin composites. Additional studies seem necessary to confirm the present results.Entities:
Keywords: Streptococcus mutans; bacterial adhesion; biofilm formation; composite resins; dental caries
Year: 2022 PMID: 35269121 PMCID: PMC8911767 DOI: 10.3390/ma15051891
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Composite resins included in the study.
| Group | Material | Manufacturer | Lot Number | Composition |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VOCO | GrandioSO | Voco GmbH | 1847313 | 89% ( |
| VD | Venus DiamondShade A2 | Kulzer GmbH | K010070 | 80–82% ( |
| ES-2 | Clearfil Majesty ES-2 Classic | Kuraray | 7D008 | 78% ( |
* Bis-GMA = Bisphenol A-glycidyl methacrylate; Bis-EMA = Bisphenol A-glycidyl methacrylate ethoxylated; TEGDMA = Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate; TCD-UA = Tricyclodecane-urethane acrylate; UDMA = Urethane Dimethacrylate.
Streptococcus mutans detection on three resin composites investigated.
| Streptococcus Mutans CH02 | VOCO | VD | ES2 | CTRL+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Planktonic OD600nm | 0.3054 b | 0.2931 b | 0.3117 b | 0.3978 a |
| (0.0567) | (0.0540) | (0.0532) | (0.0491) | |
| Planktonic CFU count (×105 CFU/mL) | 583.0 b | 281.0 c | 273.0 c | 1900.0 a |
| (53.4) | (26.4) | (14.1) | (353.3) | |
| Planktonic MTT | 0.451 a | 0.549 a | 0.448 a | 0.442 a |
| (0.094) | (0.136) | (0.085) | (0.120) | |
| Adherent Bacteria CFU count (×103 CFU) | 150.0 b | 252.0 a | 248.3 a | |
| (29.4) | (39.7) | (47.8) | ||
| Biomass Quantification OD570nm | 0.4775 b | 0.6364 b | 1.6040 a | |
| (0.1548) | (0.2376) | (0.2075) | ||
| Adherent Bacteria MTT | 0.003 b | 0.040 b | 0.035 b | 0.367 a |
| (0.004) | (0.013) | (0.021) | (0.274) |
VOCO, VD and ES2 are the experimental groups, based on the materials described in Table 1. CTRL+ indicates the positive control group. Same superscript letters indicate not statistically significant differences.
Figure 1Representative live/dead images of Streptococcus mutans in planktonic phase of (a) control, (b) VOCO, (c) VD, and (d) ES2.
Figure 2Concanavalin A assay. (a) VOCO shows a compact matrix, less than ES2, correlated with quantification of biomass produced by Streptococcus mutans biofilm; (b) VD shows a compact matrix, less than ES2, correlated with quantification of biomass produced by Streptococcus mutans biofilm; and (c) ES2 shows increased production of sugars from biofilm matrix.
Figure 3Representative SEM images (10.00 KX) of Streptococcus mutans biofilm formed on disk-shaped specimens from VOCO (a), VD (b), and ES2 (c) groups.