Literature DB >> 11696906

Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature.

C M Bollen1, P Lambrechts, M Quirynen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The roughness of intraoral hard surfaces can influence bacterial plague retention. The present review evaluates the initial surface roughness of several intraoral hard materials, as well as changes in this surface roughness as a consequence of different treatment modalities.
METHODS: Articles found through Medline searches were included in this review if they met the following criteria: 1) stated threshold surface roughness values and reputed change in surface roughness due to different manipulation techniques; or 2) included standardized surface conditions that could be compared to the treated surface.
RESULTS: Recently, some in vivo studies suggested a threshold surface roughness for bacterial retention (Ra = 0.2 micron) below which no further reduction in bacterial accumulation could be expected. An increase in surface roughness above this threshold roughness, however, resulted in a simultaneous increase in plaque accumulation, thereby increasing the risk for both caries and periodontal inflammation. The initial surface roughness of different dental materials (e.g., teeth, abutments, gold, amalgam, acrylic resin, resin composite, glass ionomer or compomer and ceramics) and the effect of different treatment modalities (e.g., polishing, scaling, brushing, condensing, glazing or finishing) on this initial surface roughness were analyzed and compared to the threshold surface roughness of 0.2 micron. The microbiological effects of these treatment modalities, if reported, are also discussed and compared to recent in vivo data. SIGNIFICANCE: Based on this review, the range in surface roughness of different intraoral hard surfaces was found to be wide, and the impact of dental treatments on the surface roughness is material-dependent. Some clinical techniques result in a very smooth surface (compressing of composites against matrices), whereas others made the surface rather rough (application of hand instruments on gold). These findings indicated that every dental material needs its own treatment modality in order to obtain and maintain a surface as smooth as possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 11696906     DOI: 10.1016/s0109-5641(97)80038-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater        ISSN: 0109-5641            Impact factor:   5.304


  226 in total

1.  Surface roughness of a novel "ceramic restorative cement" after treatment with different polishing techniques in vitro.

Authors:  Karin Sunnegårdh-Grönberg; J W V van Dijken
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2003-02-15       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Effect of Cigarette Smoke on Surface Roughness of Different Denture Base Materials.

Authors:  Hamada Zaki Mahross; Mahmoud Darwish Mohamed; Ahmed Mohammed Hassan; Kusai Baroudi
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-09-01

3.  Influence of biofilm formation on the optical properties of novel bioactive glass-containing composites.

Authors:  Hong-Keun Hyun; Jack L Ferracane
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 5.304

4.  Evaluation of surface characteristics of dental composites using profilometry, scanning electron, atomic force microscopy and gloss-meter.

Authors:  A Kakaboura; M Fragouli; C Rahiotis; N Silikas
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Effects of hydrophilicity and microtopography of titanium implant surfaces on initial supragingival plaque biofilm formation. A pilot study.

Authors:  F Schwarz; A Sculean; M Wieland; N Horn; E Nuesry; C Bube; J Becker
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2007-12

6.  Effects of aging on surface properties and adhesion of Streptococcus mutans on various fissure sealants.

Authors:  Ralf Bürgers; Tashiana Cariaga; Rainer Müller; Martin Rosentritt; Udo Reischl; Gerhard Handel; Sebastian Hahnel
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Metal stain on monolithic zirconia restoration: A case report.

Authors:  Min-Sang Cha; Sang-Woon Lee; Yoon-Hyuk Huh; Lee-Ra Cho; Chan-Jin Park
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 1.904

8.  Tridimensional surface roughness analysis after resin infiltration of (deproteinized) natural subsurface carious lesions.

Authors:  Ina Ulrich; Jan Mueller; Michael Wolgin; Wilhelm Frank; Andrej M Kielbassa
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Candida albicans adhesion to composite resin materials.

Authors:  Ralf Bürgers; Wulf Schneider-Brachert; Martin Rosentritt; Gerhard Handel; Sebastian Hahnel
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Influence of artificial ageing on surface properties and Streptococcus mutans adhesion to dental composite materials.

Authors:  Sebastian Hahnel; Anne Henrich; Martin Rosentritt; Gerhard Handel; Ralf Bürgers
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 3.896

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.