Literature DB >> 23790281

Mechanical properties of contemporary composite resins and their interrelations.

Socratis Thomaidis1, Afrodite Kakaboura, Wolf Dieter Mueller, Spiros Zinelis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To characterize a spectrum of mechanical properties of four representative types of modern dental resin composites and to investigate possible interrelations.
METHODS: Four composite resins were used, a microhybrid (Filtek Z-250), a nanofill (Filtek Ultimate), a nanohybrid (Majesty Posterior) and an ormocer (Admira). The mechanical properties investigated were Flexural Modulus and Flexural Strength (three point bending), Brinell Hardness, Impact Strength, mode I and mode II fracture toughness employing SENB and Brazilian tests and Work of Fracture. Fractographic analysis was carried out in an SEM to determine the origin of fracture for specimens subjected to SENB, Brazilian and Impact Strength testing. The results were statistically analyzed employing ANOVA and Tukey post hoc test (a=0.05) while Pearson correlation was applied among the mechanical properties.
RESULTS: Significant differences were found between the mechanical properties of materials tested apart from mode I fracture toughness measured by Brazilian test. The latter significantly underestimated the mode I fracture toughness due to analytical limitations and thus its validity is questionable. Fractography revealed that the origin of fracture is located at notches for fracture toughness tests and contact surface with pendulum for Impact Strength testing. Pearson analysis illustrated a strong correlation between modulus of elasticity and hardness (r=0.87) and a weak negative correlation between Work of Fracture and Flexural Modulus (r=-0.46) and Work of Fracture and Hardness (r=-0.44). Weak correlations were also allocated between Flexural Modulus and Flexural Strength (r=0.40), Flexural Strength and Hardness (r=0.39), and Impact Strength and Hardness (r=0.40). SIGNIFICANCE: Since the four types of dental resin composite tested exhibited large differences among their mechanical properties differences in their clinical performance is also anticipated.
Copyright © 2013 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brazilian test; Composite resin; Flexural Strength; Fractography; Fracture toughness; Hardness; IZOD impact test; Modulus; Resin-composites; SENB

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23790281     DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2013.04.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater        ISSN: 0109-5641            Impact factor:   5.304


  6 in total

1.  The effect of aging methods on the fracture toughness and physical stability of an oxirane/acrylate, ormocer, and Bis-GMA-based resin composites.

Authors:  Hamad Algamaiah; Robert Danso; Jeffrey Banas; Steve R Armstrong; Kyumin Whang; H Ralph Rawls; Erica C Teixeira
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-05-18       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Impact of thio-urethane additive and filler type on light-transmission and depth of polymerization of dental composites.

Authors:  André Luis Faria-E-Silva; Carmem Silvia Pfeifer
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 5.304

3.  Marginal quality of a full-body bulk-fill composite placed with an universal adhesive system in etch-and-rinse and self-etch mode: An in vitrostudy.

Authors:  Antonio Signore; Luca Solimei; Marianna-Georgievna Arakelyan; Alina-Vladimirova Arzukanyan; Nicola De Angelis; Andrea Amaroli
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2021-08-01

4.  How the translucency of direct anatomic fiber posts affects the bond strength and microhardness of a self-adhesive luting agent in flared roots.

Authors:  Camilo Pulido; Osnara Mongruel Gomes; Alessandro Dourado Loguercio; Andrés Dávila-Sánchez; Fernando Camilotti; Gerson Kniphoff da Cruz; Cesar Augusto Galvão Arrais
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Properties of Three Resin-Based Dental Composites against Streptococcus mutans.

Authors:  Simonetta D'Ercole; Francesco De Angelis; Virginia Biferi; Chiara Noviello; Domenico Tripodi; Silvia Di Lodovico; Luigina Cellini; Camillo D'Arcangelo
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Bulk Fill Composites Have Similar Performance to Conventional Dental Composites.

Authors:  Håvard J Haugen; Danijela Marovic; Matej Par; Minh Khai Le Thieu; Janne E Reseland; Gaute Floer Johnsen
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 6.208

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.