Literature DB >> 25604698

Influence of matrix and filler fraction on biofilm formation on the surface of experimental resin-based composites.

Andrei Ionescu1, Eugenio Brambilla, Daniel S Wastl, Franz J Giessibl, Gloria Cazzaniga, Sibylle Schneider-Feyrer, Sebastian Hahnel.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of resin matrix chemistry and filler fraction on biofilm formation on the surface of experimental resin-based composites (RBCs). Specimens were prepared from eight experimental RBC formulations differing in resin matrix blend (BisGMA/TEGDMA in a 7:3 wt% ratio or UDMA/aliphatic dimethacrylate in a 1:1 wt% ratio) and filler fraction (no fillers; 65 wt% dental glass with an average diameter of 7 or 0.7 µm or 65 wt% SiO2 with an average diameter of 20 nm). Surface roughness, surface free energy, and chemical surface composition were determined; surface topography was visualized using atomic force microscopy. Biofilm formation was simulated under continuous flow conditions for a 48 h period using a monospecies Streptococcus mutans and a multispecies biofilm model. In the monospecies biofilm model, the impact of the filler fraction overruled the influence of the resin matrix, indicating lowest biofilm formation on RBCs with nano-scaled filler particles and those manufactured from the neat resin blends. The multispecies model suggested a more pronounced effect of the resin matrix blend, as significantly higher biofilm formation was identified on RBCs with a UDMA/dimethacrylate matrix blend than on those including a BisGMA/TEGDMA matrix blend but analogous filler fractions. Although significant differences in surface properties between the various materials were identified, correlations between the surface properties and biofilm formation were poor, which highlights the relevance of surface topography and chemistry. These results may help to tailor novel RBC formulations which feature reduced biofilm formation on their surface.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25604698     DOI: 10.1007/s10856-014-5372-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  26 in total

Review 1.  Oral microbial biofilms and plaque-related diseases: microbial communities and their role in the shift from oral health to disease.

Authors:  Ludovico Sbordone; Claudia Bortolaia
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2003-11-04       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Mutans streptococci in plaque from margins of amalgam, composite, and glass-ionomer restorations.

Authors:  M Svanberg; I A Mjör; D Orstavik
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 3.  Dental plaque biofilms: communities, conflict and control.

Authors:  Philip D Marsh; Annette Moter; Deirdre A Devine
Journal:  Periodontol 2000       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 7.589

4.  Rate of elution of leachable components from composite.

Authors:  J L Ferracane; J R Condon
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 5.304

5.  Hydrophilicity of dentin bonding systems influences in vitro Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation.

Authors:  Eugenio Brambilla; Andrei Ionescu; Annalisa Mazzoni; Milena Cadenaro; Massimo Gagliani; Monica Ferraroni; Franklin Tay; David Pashley; Lorenzo Breschi
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 5.304

6.  Longevity of posterior dental restorations and reasons for failure.

Authors:  Simen E Kopperud; Anne Bjørg Tveit; Torunn Gaarden; Leiv Sandvik; Ivar Espelid
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.612

7.  An in vitro evaluation of hydrolytic enzymes as dental plaque control agents.

Authors:  Ruth G Ledder; Tejal Madhwani; Prem K Sreenivasan; William De Vizio; Andrew J McBain
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.472

8.  Adsorption of salivary and serum proteins, and bacterial adherence on titanium and zirconia ceramic surfaces.

Authors:  Emilena Maria Castor Xisto Lima; Hyun Koo; Anne M Vacca Smith; Pedro Luiz Rosalen; Altair Antoninha Del Bel Cury
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.977

9.  Influence of surface properties of resin-based composites on in vitro Streptococcus mutans biofilm development.

Authors:  Andrei Ionescu; Elisabeth Wutscher; Eugenio Brambilla; Sibylle Schneider-Feyrer; Franz J Giessibl; Sebastian Hahnel
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 2.612

10.  Salivary proteins promote proteolytic activity in Streptococcus mitis biovar 2 and Streptococcus mutans.

Authors:  C Kindblom; J R Davies; M C Herzberg; G Svensäter; C Wickström
Journal:  Mol Oral Microbiol       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 3.563

View more
  9 in total

1.  Streptococcus mutans adherence and biofilm formation on experimental composites containing dicalcium phosphate dihydrate nanoparticles.

Authors:  Andrei C Ionescu; Sebastian Hahnel; Gloria Cazzaniga; Marco Ottobelli; Roberto Ruggiero Braga; Marcela Charantola Rodrigues; Eugenio Brambilla
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Physico-mechanical properties and bacterial adhesion of resin composite CAD/CAM blocks: An in-vitro study.

Authors:  Mohamed M Mokhtar; Dina S Farahat; Waleed Eldars; Manal F Osman
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2022-05-01

3.  Effect of different polishing techniques on surface properties and bacterial adhesion on resin-ceramic CAD/CAM materials.

Authors:  Merve Özarslan; Dilber Bilgili Can; Nermin Hande Avcioglu; Seçil Çalışkan
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 3.606

4.  Effect of 2 Bleaching Agents with a Content of High Concentrated Hydrogen Peroxide on Stained 2 CAD/CAM Blocks and a Nanohybrid Composite Resin: An AFM Evaluation.

Authors:  İzgen Karakaya; Esra Cengiz
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Adherence of Streptococcus Mutans to Microhybrid and Nanohybrid Resin Composites and Dental Amalgam: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Fariba Motevasselian; Ensieh Zibafar; Esmail Yassini; Mansoreh Mirzaei; Naser Pourmirhoseni
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2017-11

6.  Laser microtextured titanium implant surfaces reduce in vitro and in situ oral biofilm formation.

Authors:  Andrei C Ionescu; Eugenio Brambilla; Francesco Azzola; Marco Ottobelli; Gaia Pellegrini; Luca A Francetti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Influence of Dental Prosthesis and Restorative Materials Interface on Oral Biofilms.

Authors:  Yu Hao; Xiaoyu Huang; Xuedong Zhou; Mingyun Li; Biao Ren; Xian Peng; Lei Cheng
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-10-14       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Properties of Three Resin-Based Dental Composites against Streptococcus mutans.

Authors:  Simonetta D'Ercole; Francesco De Angelis; Virginia Biferi; Chiara Noviello; Domenico Tripodi; Silvia Di Lodovico; Luigina Cellini; Camillo D'Arcangelo
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 3.623

9.  Surface-modified nanoparticles as anti-biofilm filler for dental polymers.

Authors:  Nathan Zaltsman; Andrei C Ionescu; Ervin I Weiss; Eugenio Brambilla; Shaul Beyth; Nurit Beyth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.