| Literature DB >> 35267686 |
Pavel Yudaev1, Vladimir Chuev2, Bogdan Klyukin1, Andrey Kuskov1, Yaroslav Mezhuev1, Evgeniy Chistyakov1.
Abstract
This review aims to describe and critically analyze studies published over the past four years on the application of polymeric dental nanomaterials as antimicrobial materials in various fields of dentistry. Nanoparticles are promising antimicrobial additives to restoration materials. According to published data, composites based on silver nanoparticles, zinc(II), titanium(IV), magnesium(II), and copper(II) oxide nanoparticles, chitosan nanoparticles, calcium phosphate or fluoride nanoparticles, and nanodiamonds can be used in dental therapy and endodontics. Composites with nanoparticles of hydroxyapatite and bioactive glass proved to be of low efficiency for application in these fields. The materials applicable in orthodontics include nanodiamonds, silver nanoparticles, titanium(IV) and zinc(II) oxide nanoparticles, bioactive glass, and yttrium(III) fluoride nanoparticles. Composites of silver nanoparticles and zinc(II) oxide nanoparticles are used in periodontics, and nanodiamonds and silver, chitosan, and titanium(IV) oxide nanoparticles are employed in dental implantology and dental prosthetics. Composites based on titanium(IV) oxide can also be utilized in maxillofacial surgery to manufacture prostheses. Composites with copper(II) oxide nanoparticles and halloysite nanotubes are promising materials in the field of denture prosthetics. Composites with calcium(II) fluoride or phosphate nanoparticles can be used in therapeutic dentistry for tooth restoration.Entities:
Keywords: antibacterial activity; antimicrobial action; dentistry; nanomaterials; nanoparticles
Year: 2022 PMID: 35267686 PMCID: PMC8912874 DOI: 10.3390/polym14050864
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1Mechanism of antimicrobial effect of positively charged nanoparticles (using the example of chitosan nanoparticles).
Figure 2Number of articles on the antimicrobial activity of polymeric nanomaterials for dental applications (PubMed database).
Bacterial reduction rate for S. mutans on the surface of ZrO2 disks coated by glass–ceramic powder containing Ag NPs and NaF after 24 h of observation.
| Composition | Content, wt. % | Bacterial Reduction Rate, % |
|---|---|---|
| Ag | 5 | 0 |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 15 | 11.8 | |
| 20 | 15.4 | |
| NaF | 5 | 4.2 |
| 10 | 35.3 | |
| 15 | 65.4 | |
| 20 | 29.4 |
Figure 3Effects of ZnO NPs (lg CFU mL−1) on the growth of S. mutans (blue), S. mitis (red), and Lactobacillus spp. (green) in the thioglycolate broth after 18 h at 37 °C under microaerophilic conditions [72].
Diameters of zones of growth inhibition of microorganisms, mm.
| Microorganism | 20 nm ZnO NPs | 40 nm ZnO NPs | 140 nm ZnO NPs | Control |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 16 ± 0.00 | 14 ± 0.00 | 12.03 ± 0.57 | 21 ± 0.00 |
|
| 14.33 ± 0.57 | 13 ± 0.00 | 12 ± 1.00 | 26 ± 0.00 |
|
| 10 ± 0.00 | 9.33 ± 0.57 | 8.33 ± 0.57 | 23 ± 0.00 |
|
| 7.66 ± 2.08 | 6 ± 0.00 | 6 ± 0.00 | 16 ± 0.00 |
Antibacterial activity exhibited by ZnO NPs, chitosan ZnO NPs against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial strains.
| Nanoparticles | Microorganism | Zone of Inhibition |
|---|---|---|
| ZnO NPs |
| 7 ± 3 |
|
| 8 ± 3 | |
|
| 9 ± 3 | |
|
| 9 ± 3 | |
|
| 10 ± 3 | |
|
| 10 ± 3 | |
| Chitosan ZnO NPs |
| 9 ± 3 |
|
| 10 ± 3 | |
|
| 12 ± 3 | |
|
| 10 ± 3 | |
|
| 13 ± 3 | |
|
| 12 ± 3 |
Anti-cariogenic activity of adhesive disks containing different concentrations of ZnO NPs and chitosan ZnO NPs.
| Nanoparticles | Concentration of NPs, wt. % | Days | Mean CFU mL−1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZnO NPs | 0 (control) | 1 | 2.05 × 105 |
| 3 | 3.26 × 105 | ||
| 7 | 3.17 × 105 | ||
| 2 | 1 | 5.44 × 101 | |
| 3 | 4.91 × 101 | ||
| 7 | 3.81 × 101 | ||
| 5 | 1 | 5.25 × 101 | |
| 3 | 3.88 × 101 | ||
| 7 | 2.87 × 101 | ||
| 10 | 1 | 3.61 × 101 | |
| 3 | 3.26 × 101 | ||
| 7 | 3.28 × 101 | ||
| Chitosan ZnO NPs | 2 | 1 | 2.42 × 101 |
| 3 | 1.85 × 101 | ||
| 7 | 3.19 × 101 | ||
| 5 | 1 | 2.54 × 101 | |
| 3 | 1.41 × 101 | ||
| 7 | 2.84 × 101 | ||
| 10 | 1 | 1.46 × 101 | |
| 3 | 1.16 × 101 | ||
| 7 | 1.77 × 101 |
Width of the inhibition zone against S. mutans, mm.
| Sample | 24 h | 2 Weeks | 6 Weeks | 12 Weeks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Filtek Z250 microhybrid composite resin | 6.0 ± 0.0 | 6.0 ± 0.0 | 6.0 ± 0.0 | 6.0 ± 0.0 |
| Resin + ZnO NPs | 18.0 ± 0.71 | 16.0 ± 1.58 | 14.0 ± 0.71 | 8.0 ± 0.71 |
| Resin + Cs NPs | 18.0 ± 1.87 | 10.0 ± 1.0 | 6.0 ± 0.0 | 6.0 ± 0.0 |
| Resin + Cs NPs/ZnO NPs | 15.80 ± 1.48 | 10.0 ± 0.71 | 6.0 ± 0.0 | 6.0 ± 0.0 |
|
| <0.001 * | <0.001 * | <0.001 * | <0.001 * |
* Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05.
Results of biofilm inhibition tests for S. mutans, S. sanguis, and L. acidophilus for composite disks containing Ag NPs and control group.
| Sample | Microorganism | CFU | CFU mL−1 Decrease (%) Compared to the Control Group |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control |
| 56,666 ± 30,550 | - |
|
| 446,666 ± 117,189 | - | |
|
| 146,666 ± 32,145 | - | |
| Composite disks containing 1 wt. % Ag NPs |
| 7000 ± 1000 | 87.64 |
|
| 8333 ± 1527 | 98.13 | |
|
| 27,000 ± 7549 | 81.59 | |
| Composite disks containing 2 wt. % Ag NPs |
| 2000 ± 1000 | 96.47 |
|
| 2333 ± 1527 | 99.47 | |
|
| 13,333 ± 2516 | 90.9 | |
| Composite disks containing 5 wt. % Ag NPs |
| 133 ± 57 | 99.76 |
|
| 300 ± 100 | 99.93 | |
|
| 566 ± 251 | 99.61 |
The mean absorbance observed for resin disk samples with different wt. % powder concentrations (0–9 wt. %), exposed to different surface treatments (unpolished, plasma treated, polished, and polished with plasma treatment) under light conditions.
| Surface Treatment | Concentration of Nitrogen-Doped TiO2 NPs, wt. % | Absorbance (a.u.) |
|---|---|---|
| Untreated | 0 | 0.072 ± 0.002 |
| 1 | 0.069 ± 0.005 | |
| 3 | 0.066 ± 0.002 | |
| 5 | 0.060 ± 0.004 | |
| 7 | 0.058 ± 0.004 | |
| 9 | 0.056 ± 0.004 | |
| Plasma treated | 0 | 0.072 ± 0.002 |
| 1 | 0.067 ± 0.004 | |
| 3 | 0.066 ± 0.005 | |
| 5 | 0.060 ± 0.004 | |
| 7 | 0.056 ± 0.004 | |
| 9 | 0.055 ± 0.004 | |
| Polished treated | 0 | 0.072 ± 0.001 |
| 1 | 0.067 ± 0.005 | |
| 3 | 0.056 ± 0.004 | |
| 5 | 0.055 ± 0.004 | |
| 7 | 0.052 ± 0.004 | |
| 9 | 0.049 ± 0.004 | |
| Polished with plasma treated | 0 | 0.072 ± 0.001 |
| 1 | 0.066 ± 0.004 | |
| 3 | 0.052 ± 0.004 | |
| 5 | 0.047 ± 0.004 | |
| 7 | 0.044 ± 0.004 | |
| 9 | 0.041 ± 0.004 |
Sizes of the inhibition zones of bacterial growth by orthodontic adhesives containing photoactivated 7.5 wt. % ZnO NPs/cCur, mm.
| Microorganisms | Days | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 | 30 | 60 | 90 | 120 | 150 | 180 | |
|
| 13 | 13 | 13 | 11 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 6 |
|
| 13 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 6 |
|
| 10 | 10 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
Figure 4The mean value and its standard deviation of Young’s modulus, evaluated for control (PMMA), PMMA + 1% TiO2 NPs, PMMA + 3% TiO2 NPs, PMMA + 1% HNTs, and PMMA + 3% HNTs, are represented. Reported results were considered statistically significant respect to control (PMMA) for a p-value < 0.005.
Figure 5Histograms reporting the colonization assay measurements of C. albicans on (PMMA) and different PMMA-based substrates. The colonized area was expressed as a percentage rate representing the area covered by C. albicans in respect to the entire surface at two time points (24 h and 48 h). Reported results were calculated as average ± SD for three different areas of each sample, and the values were considered statistically significant in respect to control (PMMA at corresponding time point) for a p-value < 0.005.