| Literature DB >> 30983829 |
Dipika V Raorane1, Ramesh S Chaughule1, Suhas R Pednekar2, Anushree Lokur3.
Abstract
The aim of this work was to obtain an efficient protocol with a green, fast and facile way to synthesize TiO2 NPs and its application as fillers for enhancement of desired dental properties of light curing dental composites. A comparative study comprised the fabrication of light curing restorative composite materials with incorporating different fillers with varying wt%, varying resin material composition, to determine optimal dental restoration by focusing on the physical properties of dental materials. It was observed that the as-prepared green synthesized TiO2 nanohybrid particles contributed to the improvement in physical properties, thus promoting the green and rapid synthesis of nanohybrid fillers. In addition, mechanical values for experimental cured resin materials with bare and surface modified fillers were obtained. The experimental light curing nanocomposites with 5 wt% (wt%) nanohybrid surface modified filler particles with BisGMA (60 wt%), TEGDMA (20 wt%) and UDMA (20 wt%) resin composition provided increased physical strength and durability with higher compressive stress 195.56 MPa and flexural stress 83.30 MPa. Furthermore, the dental property, such as polymerization shrinkage (PS) obtained from volumetric method was decreased up to 3.4% by the addition of nano-hybrid fillers. In addition to this, the biocompatible and antimicrobial nature of TiO2 and its aesthetics properties such as tooth-like color makes TiO2 favorable to use as fillers. This study presents a green and facile method for the synthesis of TiO2 nanohybrid particles that can be successfully used as fillers in an experimental light curing resin matrix for enhancing its dental properties. This describes the potential of the green synthesized TiO2 nanohybrid particles to use as fillers in restorative dentistry.Entities:
Keywords: Characterization; Green synthesis; Light curing resin materials; Mechanical strength; Microwave synthesizer; TiO2 fillers
Year: 2019 PMID: 30983829 PMCID: PMC6445524 DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.01.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi Dent J ISSN: 1013-9052
Fig. 1Reaction involved in surface modification of gTiO2 nanoparticles.
Fig. 2Schematic representation of fabrication of light curing dental composite materials.
Distribution of four sets with composition of resin, different fillers type, wt% of fillers and nature for the fabrication of experimental samples.
| Set | Resin Material | Filler Type | Wt% of Filler | Nature |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BisGMA 100 wt% | Micro, microhybrid, nano, nanohybrid | 10 | mTiO2 |
| 2 | BisGMA 100 wt% | Nanohybrid particles | 0, 1, 2, 510 | mTiO2 |
| 3 | Different composition of resins | Nanohybrid particles | 5 | mTiO2 |
| 4 | BisGMA 60 wt% + TEGDMA 20 wt% + UDMA 20 wt% | Nanohybrid particles | 5 | mTiO2 & bare gTiO2 |
gTiO2 = green synthesized TiO2 NPs; mTiO2 = surface modified gTiO2.
Set 1: Physical properties of dental materials with different types of fillers.
| Resin materials | Type of mTiO2 fillers | Wt% of fillers mTiO2 | Max. compressive stress (MPa) | Max. flexural stress (MPa) | % PS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BisGMA 100 wt% | Micro | 10 | 76.97 ± 0.27 | 32.12 ± 0.02 | 10.50 ± 0.18 |
| Microhybrid | 90.50 ± 0.43 | 31.50 ± 0.43 | 12.95 ± 0.52 | ||
| Nano | 91.25 ± 0.22 | 50.98 ± 0.23 | 6.82 ± 0.07 | ||
| Nanohybrid | 141.95 ± 0.91 | 52.92 ± 0.69 | 7.48 ± 0.14 |
mTiO2: surface modified gTiO2.
Mean of three readings ± S.D.
Set 2: Physical properties of dental materials with increase in wt% of fillers.
| Resin materials | Type of mTiO2 fillers | Wt% of mTiO2 fillers | Max. compressive stress (MPa) | Max. flexural stress (MPa) | % PS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BisGMA 100 wt% | Nanohybrid | 0 | 24.58 ± 0.47 | 3.82 ± 0.07 | 16.5 ± 0.21 |
| 1 | 54.09 ± 0.23 | 13.97 ± 0.13 | 12.5 ± 0.47 | ||
| 2 | 91.1 ± 1.47 | 18.90 ± 0.30 | 9.11 ± 0.08 | ||
| 5 | 158.28 ± 1.43 | 61.78 ± 1.20 | 8.17 ± 0.47 | ||
| 10 | 141.95 ± 0.91 | 52.92 ± 0.69 | 7.48 ± 0.14 |
mTiO2: surface modified gTiO2.
Mean of three readings ± S.D.
Set 3: Physical properties of dental materials with different resins composition.
| Resin materials | Type of mTiO2 fillers | Wt% of mTiO2 fillers | Max. compressive stress (MPa) | Max. flexural stress (MPa) | % PS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BisGMA 100 wt% | Nanohybrid | 5 | 158.28 ± 1.43 | 61.78 ± 1.20 | 8.17 ± 0.47 |
| BisGMA 60 wt% + TEGDMA 40 wt% | 155.28 ± 1.07 | 66.03 ± 0.28 | 5.21 ± 0.32 | ||
| BisGMA 60 wt% + UDMA 40 wt% | 199.78 ± 0.92 | 79.98 ± 0.18 | 6.15 ± 0.15 | ||
| BisGMA 60 wt% + TEGDMA 20 wt% + UDMA 20 wt% | 195.55 ± 0.75 | 83.30 ± 0.07 | 3.48 ± 0.29 |
mTiO2: surface modified gTiO2.
Mean of three readings ± S.D.
Set 4: Physical properties of dental materials with bare Vs surface modified fillers.
| Resin materials | Type of fillers | Max. compressive stress (MPa) | Max. flexural stress (MPa) | % PS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BisGMA 60 wt% + TEGDMA 20 wt% + UDMA 20 wt% | 5 wt% Nanohybrid Bare TiO2 | 100.32 ± 0.20 | 70.65 ± 0.55 | 4.12 ± 0.04 |
| BisGMA 60 wt% + TEGDMA 20 wt% + UDMA 20 wt% | 5 wt% Nanohybrid mTiO2 | 195.55 ± 0.75 | 83.30 ± 0.07 | 3.48 ± 0.29 |
mTiO2: surface modified gTiO2.
Mean of three readings ± S.D.
Fig. 3DLS spectrum of gTiO2 NPs.
Fig. 4XRD pattern of (a) bare gTiO2 NPs (b) APTES-coated gTiO2 NPs.
Fig. 5FTIR image of (a) bare gTiO2 NPs (b) APTES coated gTiO2 NPs.
Fig. 6(a) SEM image of green synthesized gTiO2 nanohybrid particles (b) EDS spectra for gTiO2 nanohybrid particles.
Fig. 7TEM images of (a) bare gTiO2 NPs (b) APTES coated gTiO2 NPs (c) SAED pattern of APTES coated gTiO2 NPs.
Final result of experimental composite material with the highest mechanical strength (direct measurement) and lowest % polymerization shrinkage.
| Resin material | Fillers | Max. compressive stress (MPa) | Max. flexural stress (MPa) | % PS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BisGMA 60 wt% + TEGDMA 20 wt% + UDMA 20 wt% | Nanohybrid 5 wt% mTiO2 | 195.56 | 83.30 | 3.48 |
mTiO2: surface modified gTiO2.
Mean of three readings.