| Literature DB >> 35264202 |
Wei Song1, Zhibo Zhang2, Ying Jiang3, Yang Cao2, Bo Zhang1, Yujie Wang1, Honghui Shi4, Lan Zhu5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Uterine adenomyosis is a common gynecologic disease in premenopausal women, the pathological mechanism of which remains largely unknown. The aim of this study was to identify metabolic biomarkers significantly altered in the myometrium of adenomyosis patients.Entities:
Keywords: Adenomyosis; Metabolic biomarkers; Metabolomics; Myometrium
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35264202 PMCID: PMC8905769 DOI: 10.1186/s12958-022-00914-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Reprod Biol Endocrinol ISSN: 1477-7827 Impact factor: 5.211
Clinical characteristics of patients recruited in this study
| Characteristic | Adenomyosis group | Control group | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ||
| Age (year) | 44.18 ± 3.66 | 42.36 ± 4.25 | 0.16 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.25 ± 2.61 | 22.8 ± 2.82 | 0.53 |
| Gravidity | 2.06 ± 0.83 | 1.92 ± 0.95 | 0.63 |
| Parity | 1.23 ± 0.44 | 1.36 ± 0.50 | 0.40 |
| Menstrual phase | |||
| Follicular phase | 7 (41%) | 10 (40%) | |
| Luteal phase | 6 (35%) | 12 (48%) | |
| Unknown | 4 (24%) | 3 (12%) | |
Value was expressed as mean ± standard deviation or number (percentage). P value was from Student’s t-test
Fig. 1The workflow of this study
Fig. 2Overview of the metabolomic data. PLS-DA score plots (A) with corresponding permutation test plots (B) from GC–MS and LC–MS metabolic profiles. The proportion of metabolites’ chemical species which were significantly different between the adenomyosis and control groups (C). The number in the brackets represents the amount of corresponding metabolite class
Fig. 3The top 30 differed metabolites between the adenomyosis group and control group. ****, p < 0.001 and q < 0.01; ***, p < 0.01 and q < 0.05; **, p < 0.05 and q < 0.1; *, p < 0.05 and 0.1 < q < 0.15
Significantly dysregulated pathways predicted by pathway enrichment analysis
| Pathway | Raw | Impact | Hit metabolites |
|---|---|---|---|
| Purine metabolism | 0.001 | 0.159 | xanthine, phosphoribosyl formamidocarboxamide, adenylsuccinic acid, adenosine, inosine, adenine, hypoxanthine, guanine, 5-aminoimidazole ribonucleotide |
| Taurine and hypotaurine metabolism | 0.020 | 0.353 | taurine, 2-hydroxyethanesulfonate, pyruvic acid |
| Glycerophospholipid metabolism | 0.026 | 0.204 | citicoline, O-phosphoethanolamine, glycerylphosphorylethanolamine, CDP-ethanolamine |
| Nicotinate and nicotinamide metabolism | 0.039 | 0.105 | quinolinic acid, maleamate, NAD, pyruvic acid |
| Cysteine and methionine metabolism | 0.081 | 0.172 | 5’-methylthioadenosine, S-adenosylhomocysteine, glutathione, pyruvic acid |
Fig. 4Heat map of the significant altered metabolites between adenomyosis group and control group
Fig. 5A putative model depicts the metabolic changes in myometrium of adenomyosis patients. Red text represents significantly elevated metabolites (e.g., inosine), and blue text represents significantly depleted metabolites (e.g., ribose). AIR, 5-aminoimidazole ribonucleotide; FAICAR, phosphoribosyl formamidocarboxamide; PE, phosphatidylethanolamine; PS, phosphatidylserine; PC, phosphatidylcholine; LPC, lysoPC; TMA, trimethylamine; TMAO, trimethylamine N-oxide; GSH, glutathione; GSSG, oxidized glutathione; TCA, tricarboxylic acid; *, metabolites significantly elevated in the serum of adenomyosis patients according to a previous report [12]