| Literature DB >> 29410629 |
Jingjie Li1, Yue Gao2, Lihuan Guan2, Huizhen Zhang2, Jiahong Sun2, Xiao Gong3, Dongshun Li2, Pan Chen4, Zheng Ma5, Xiaoyan Liang1, Min Huang2, Huichang Bi2.
Abstract
The sensitivity and specificity of clinical diagnostic indicators and non-invasive diagnostic methods for endometriosis at early stage is not optimal. Previous studies demonstrated that abnormal lipid metabolism was involved in the pathological development of endometriosis. Our cross-sectional study included 21 patients with laparoscopically confirmed endometriosis at stage I-II and 20 infertile women who underwent diagnostic laparoscopy combined with hysteroscopy from January 2014 to January 2015. Eutopic endometrium was collected by pipelle endometrial biopsy. Lipid metabolites were quantified by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray ionization high-resolution mass spectrometry (UHPLC-ESI-HRMS). Lipid profiles of endometriosis patients at early stage (I-II) was characterized by a decreased concentration of phosphatidylcholine (18:1/22:6), (20:1/14:1), (20:3/20:4), and phosphatidylserine (20:3/23:1) and an increased concentration of phosphatidic acid (25:5/22:6) compared with control. The synthesized predicting strategy with 5 biomarkers has a specificity of 75.0% and a sensitivity of 90.5%. Lipid profile of eutopic endometrium in endometriosis was effectively characterized by UHPLC-ESI-HRMS-based metabolomics. Our study demonstrated the alteration of phosphatidic acid, phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylserine metabolites in endometriosis and provided potential biomarkers for semi-invasive diagnose of endometriosis at early stage.Entities:
Keywords: UHPLC-ESI-HRMS; early diagnosis; endometriosis; eutopic endometrium; lipid profiling
Year: 2018 PMID: 29410629 PMCID: PMC5787104 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00014
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Characteristics of participant.
| Age (years) | 29.71 ± 3.117 | 30.45 ± 3.034 | 0.4487 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 20.76 ± 1.716 | 21.24 ± 2.882 | 0.5198 |
| AMH (ng/ml) | 4.417 ± 2.990 | 6.117 ± 5.079 | 0.2189 |
| Endometriosis stage | |||
| I stage | 14 | N/A | |
| II stage | 7 | N/A | |
| Ovarian endometriomas | N/A | N/A |
Figure 1Mirror plot of representative total ion chromatograms (TIC) under positive (A) and negative mode (B). TIC in red: healthy controls; TIC in blue: endometriosis patients.
Figure 2OPLS-DA plots of patients with endometriosis (n = 21, red diamonds) and healthy controls (n = 20, blue diamonds) under (A) positive (R2Y = 0.712; Q2 = 0.412) mode and (B) negative (R2Y = 0.728; Q2 = 0.602) mode. (C) S-plot under positive mode with selected PCs highlighted in red. (D) S-plot under negative mode with selected PE and PA highlighted in red.
Detailed information of significantly changed lipids between endometriosis patients and healthy controls.
| PC(18:1/22:6) | C48H8O8N1P1 | M+H | 832.5815 | 11.7155 | 0.012 | 1.1382 | 1.1120 |
| PC(20:1/14:1) | C42H80O8N1P1 | M+H | 758.5690 | 12.7660 | 0.005 | 1.0215 | 1.6466 |
| PC(20:3/20:4) | C48H82O8N1P1 | M+H | 832.5851 | 11.4469 | 0.03 | 2.8718 | 1.4716 |
| PA(25:5/22:6) | C50H77O8P1 | M–H | 835.5275 | 11.9538 | 0.037 | 3.7783 | 1.6479 |
| PS(20:3/23:1) | C49H88O10N1P1 | M–H | 880.6049 | 11.7765 | 0.028 | 2.1203 | 1.2424 |
Figure 3Scatter diagram of five selected lipids. PCs and PS in endometriosis patients were significant decreased compared to healthy controls, while PA in endometriosis patients was higher than healthy controls. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, endometriosis patients (EMS, n = 21) vs. healthy controls (Control, n = 20).
Figure 4Receiver operating characteristic curves for endometriosis at minimal-mild stage.