Literature DB >> 35257314

The impact of target positioning error and tumor size on radiobiological parameters in robotic stereotactic radiosurgery for metastatic brain tumors.

Takeshi Takizawa1,2, Satoshi Tanabe3, Hisashi Nakano3, Satoru Utsunomiya4, Madoka Sakai3, Katsuya Maruyama5, Shigekazu Takeuchi6, Toshimichi Nakano7, Atsushi Ohta3, Motoki Kaidu7, Hiroyuki Ishikawa7, Kiyoshi Onda6.   

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of target positioning error (TPE) on radiobiological parameters, such as tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP), in stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for metastatic brain tumors of different sizes using CyberKnife. The reference SRS plans were created using the circular cone of the CyberKnife for each spherical gross tumor volume (GTV) with diameters (φ) of 5, 7.5, 10, 15, and 20 mm, contoured on computed tomography images of the head phantom. Subsequently, plans involving TPE were created by shifting the beam center by 0.1-2.0 mm in three dimensions relative to the reference plans using the same beam arrangements. Conformity index (CI), generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD)-based TCP, and NTCP of estimated brain necrosis were evaluated for each plan. When the gEUD parameter "a" was set to - 10, the CI and TCP for the reference plan at the φ5-mm GTV were 0.90 and 80.8%, respectively. The corresponding values for plans involving TPE of 0.5-mm, 1.0-mm, and 2.0-mm were 0.62 and 77.4%, 0.40 and 62.9%, and 0.12 and 7.2%, respectively. In contrast, the NTCP for all GTVs were the same. The TCP for the plans involving a TPE of 2-mm was 7.2% and 68.8% at the φ5-mm and φ20-mm GTV, respectively. The TPEs corresponding to a TCP reduction rate of 3% at the φ5-mm and φ20-mm GTV were 0.41 and 0.99 mm, respectively. TPE had a significant effect on TCP in SRS for metastatic brain tumors using CyberKnife, particularly for small GTVs.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Japanese Society of Radiological Technology and Japan Society of Medical Physics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CyberKnife; Dosimetric comparison; Normal tissue complication probability; Stereotactic radiosurgery; Target positioning error; Tumor control probability

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35257314     DOI: 10.1007/s12194-022-00655-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol        ISSN: 1865-0333


  39 in total

Review 1.  The CyberKnife Robotic Radiosurgery System in 2010.

Authors:  W Kilby; J R Dooley; G Kuduvalli; S Sayeh; C R Maurer
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-10

2.  Stereotactic radiosurgery plus whole-brain radiation therapy vs stereotactic radiosurgery alone for treatment of brain metastases: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Hidefumi Aoyama; Hiroki Shirato; Masao Tago; Keiichi Nakagawa; Tatsuya Toyoda; Kazuo Hatano; Masahiro Kenjyo; Natsuo Oya; Saeko Hirota; Hiroki Shioura; Etsuo Kunieda; Taisuke Inomata; Kazushige Hayakawa; Norio Katoh; Gen Kobashi
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Experience with the CyberKnife for intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery: analysis of dosimetry indices.

Authors:  Alejandro Floriano; Iciar Santa-Olalla; Alberto Sanchez-Reyes
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 1.482

4.  Single dose radiosurgical treatment of recurrent previously irradiated primary brain tumors and brain metastases: final report of RTOG protocol 90-05.

Authors:  E Shaw; C Scott; L Souhami; R Dinapoli; R Kline; J Loeffler; N Farnan
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 5.  Dose-effect relation in stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases. A systematic review.

Authors:  Ruud Wiggenraad; Antoinette Verbeek-de Kanter; Henk B Kal; Martin Taphoorn; Thomas Vissers; Henk Struikmans
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  The dosimetric impact of the prescription isodose line (IDL) on the quality of robotic stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) plans.

Authors:  Qianyi Xu; Jiajin Fan; Jimm Grimm; Tamara LaCouture; Sucha Asbell; Joo Han Park; Gregory Kubicek
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Dosimetric comparison of fractionated radiosurgery plans using frameless Gamma Knife ICON and CyberKnife systems with linear accelerator-based radiosurgery plans for multiple large brain metastases.

Authors:  Eun Young Han; He Wang; Dershan Luo; Jing Li; Xin Wang
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  Comparing gamma knife and cyberknife in patients with brain metastases.

Authors:  Terence T Sio; Sunyoung Jang; Sung-Woo Lee; Bruce Curran; Anil P Pyakuryal; Edward S Sternick
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Improved effectiveness of stereotactic radiosurgery in large brain metastases by individualized isotoxic dose prescription: an in silico study.

Authors:  Jaap D Zindler; Jacqueline Schiffelers; Philippe Lambin; Aswin L Hoffmann
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 3.621

10.  Dosimetric quality and delivery efficiency of robotic radiosurgery for brain metastases: Comparison with C-arm linear accelerator based plans.

Authors:  Shuming Zhang; Ruijie Yang; Xin Wang
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.