Literature DB >> 10802351

Single dose radiosurgical treatment of recurrent previously irradiated primary brain tumors and brain metastases: final report of RTOG protocol 90-05.

E Shaw1, C Scott, L Souhami, R Dinapoli, R Kline, J Loeffler, N Farnan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose of single fraction radiosurgery in patients with recurrent previously irradiated primary brain tumors and brain metastases. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Adults with cerebral or cerebellar solitary non-brainstem tumors </= 40 mm in maximum diameter were eligible. Initial radiosurgical doses were 18 Gy for tumors </= 20 mm, 15 Gy for those 21-30 mm, and 12 Gy for those 31-40 mm in maximum diameter. Dose was prescribed to the 50-90% isodose line. Doses were escalated in 3 Gy increments providing the incidence of irreversible grade 3 (severe) or any grade 4 (life threatening) or grade 5 (fatal) Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) central nervous system (CNS) toxicity (unacceptable CNS toxicity) was < 20% within 3 months of radiosurgery. Chronic CNS toxicity was also assessed.
RESULTS: Between 1990-1994, 156 analyzable patients were entered, 36% of whom had recurrent primary brain tumors (median prior dose 60 Gy) and 64% recurrent brain metastases (median prior dose 30 Gy). The maximum tolerated doses were 24 Gy, 18 Gy, and 15 Gy for tumors </= 20 mm, 21-30 mm, and 31-40 mm in maximum diameter, respectively. However, for tumors < 20 mm, investigators' reluctance to escalate to 27 Gy, rather than excessive toxicity, determined the maximum tolerated dose. In a multivariate analysis, maximum tumor diameter was one variable associated with a significantly increased risk of grade 3, 4, or 5 neurotoxicity. Tumors 21-40 mm were 7.3 to 16 times more likely to develop grade 3-5 neurotoxicity compared to tumors < 20 mm. Other variables significantly associated with grade 3-5 neurotoxicity were tumor dose and Karnofsky Performance Status. The actuarial incidence of radionecrosis was 5%, 8%, 9%, and 11% at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months following radiosurgery, respectively. Forty-eight percent of patients developed tumor progression within the radiosurgical target volume. A multivariate analysis revealed two variables that were significantly associated with an increased risk of local progression, i.e. progression in the radiosurgical target volume. Patients with primary brain tumors (versus brain metastases) had a 2.85 greater risk of local progression. Those treated on a linear accelerator (versus the Gamma Knife) had a 2.84 greater risk of local progression. Of note, 61 % of Gamma Knife treated patients had recurrent primary brain tumors compared to 30% of patients treated with a linear accelerator.
CONCLUSIONS: The maximum tolerated doses of single fraction radiosurgery were defined for this population of patients as 24 Gy, 18 Gy, and 15 Gy for tumors </= 20 mm, 21-30 mm, and 31-40 mm in maximum diameter. Unacceptable CNS toxicity was more likely in patients with larger tumors, whereas local tumor control was most dependent on the type of recurrent tumor and the treatment unit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10802351     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(99)00507-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  451 in total

1.  Central nervous system cancers, version 2.2014. Featured updates to the NCCN Guidelines.

Authors:  Louis Burt Nabors; Jana Portnow; Mario Ammirati; Henry Brem; Paul Brown; Nicholas Butowski; Marc C Chamberlain; Lisa M DeAngelis; Robert A Fenstermaker; Allan Friedman; Mark R Gilbert; Jona Hattangadi-Gluth; Deneen Hesser; Matthias Holdhoff; Larry Junck; Ronald Lawson; Jay S Loeffler; Paul L Moots; Maciej M Mrugala; Herbert B Newton; Jeffrey J Raizer; Lawrence Recht; Nicole Shonka; Dennis C Shrieve; Allen K Sills; Lode J Swinnen; David Tran; Nam Tran; Frank D Vrionis; Patrick Yung Wen; Nicole R McMillian; Maria Ho
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 11.908

2.  Stereotactic radiosurgery and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy: comparison of efficacy and toxicity in 260 patients with brain metastases.

Authors:  Emmanouil Fokas; Martin Henzel; Gunnar Surber; Gabriele Kleinert; Klaus Hamm; Rita Engenhart-Cabillic
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2012-04-15       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Significance of target location relative to the depth from the brain surface and high-dose irradiated volume in the development of brain radionecrosis after micromultileaf collimator-based stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Ohtakara; Shinya Hayashi; Noriyuki Nakayama; Naoyuki Ohe; Hirohito Yano; Toru Iwama; Hiroaki Hoshi
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  [Radiotherapy and re-irradiation of breast cancer patients with brain metastases: Survival in the trastuzumab era].

Authors:  C Nieder
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 5.  Whole-brain radiation therapy in breast cancer patients with brain metastases.

Authors:  Cyrus Chargari; François Campana; Jean-Yves Pierga; Lionel Védrine; Damien Ricard; Sylvestre Le Moulec; Alain Fourquet; Youlia M Kirova
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 66.675

6.  Local progression and pseudo progression after single fraction or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for large brain metastases. A single centre study.

Authors:  R Wiggenraad; A Verbeek-de Kanter; M Mast; R Molenaar; H B Kal; G Lycklama à Nijeholt; C Vecht; H Struikmans
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 3.621

7.  External validity of two nomograms for predicting distant brain failure after radiosurgery for brain metastases in a bi-institutional independent patient cohort.

Authors:  Roshan S Prabhu; Robert H Press; Danielle M Boselli; Katherine R Miller; Scott P Lankford; Robert J McCammon; Benjamin J Moeller; John H Heinzerling; Carolina E Fasola; Kirtesh R Patel; Anthony L Asher; Ashley L Sumrall; Walter J Curran; Hui-Kuo G Shu; Stuart H Burri
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 8.  Radiation Toxicity in the Central Nervous System: Mechanisms and Strategies for Injury Reduction.

Authors:  DeeDee Smart
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 5.934

9.  The risk of radiation necrosis following stereotactic radiosurgery with concurrent systemic therapies.

Authors:  Joseph M Kim; Jacob A Miller; Rupesh Kotecha; Roy Xiao; Aditya Juloori; Matthew C Ward; Manmeet S Ahluwalia; Alireza M Mohammadi; David M Peereboom; Erin S Murphy; John H Suh; Gene H Barnett; Michael A Vogelbaum; Lilyana Angelov; Glen H Stevens; Samuel T Chao
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 4.130

10.  A nomogram for predicting distant brain failure in patients treated with gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery without whole brain radiotherapy.

Authors:  Diandra N Ayala-Peacock; Ann M Peiffer; John T Lucas; Scott Isom; J Griff Kuremsky; James J Urbanic; J Daniel Bourland; Adrian W Laxton; Stephen B Tatter; Edward G Shaw; Michael D Chan
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 12.300

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.