| Literature DB >> 35252082 |
Pinghao Ye1, Liqiong Liu1, Joseph Tan2.
Abstract
Following COVID-19 outbreak, Internet public opinion has tended to proliferate. From a theoretical perspective, however, the spread law of Internet public opinion in major epidemic prevention and control may provide optimization strategies on how best to channel Internet public opinion. Specifically, this article aims at exploring key factors affecting our theoretical understanding on the spread of Internet public opinion on a major epidemic situation amongst college students. A questionnaire survey on college students was conducted via online research data collection platform located in Changsha, China, amassing three hundred and nineteen valid questionnaires. Smart PLS was applied to verify a theoretical model vis-à-vis the reliability and validity of the measuring instrument. Results show that adult attachment and social motivation have significant positive influences on the consciousness of social participation. Evidently, adult attachment, emotional orientation and risk perception also have significant positive influences on emotional motivation. Emotional motivation plays a mediating role in the relationship between affective disposition and dissemination willingness. Additionally, social motivation, consciousness of social participation and emotional motivation significantly influence one's dissemination willingness in a positive way. The consciousness of social participation plays a mediating role in the relationship between social motivation and dissemination willingness. Social motivation plays a moderating role in the relationship between risk perception and dissemination willingness. Altogether, theoretical rationalization to enhance understanding and guide the initiation and spread of Internet public opinion of major public health emergencies accurately has now been provided by this work.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; adult attachment (AA); emotional motivation (EM); epidemic prevention; public opinion; social motivation (SM)
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35252082 PMCID: PMC8894182 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.772833
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Demographic characteristics of valid samples.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | 155 | 48.6% |
| Female | 164 | 51.4% | |
| Grade | Freshmen | 92 | 28.8% |
| Sophomore | 113 | 35.4% | |
| Junior | 79 | 24.8% | |
| Senior | 35 | 11% | |
| Specialized subject | Liberal arts | 117 | 36.7% |
| Science | 111 | 34.8% | |
| Engineering | 84 | 26.3% | |
| Arts and sports | 7 | 2.2% | |
| Online time every day | 1–2 h | 13 | 4.1% |
| 3–4 h | 91 | 28.5% | |
| 5–6 h | 121 | 37.9% | |
| More than 6 h | 94 | 29.5% | |
| Frequency of paying attention to public opinion | Every day | 91 | 28.5% |
| Often | 174 | 54.5% | |
| Occasionally | 52 | 16.3% | |
| Less | 2 | 0.6% |
Reliability analysis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Affective disposition of information (ADI) | ADI 1 | 0.821 | 0.677 | 0.858 | 0.752 |
| ADI 2 | 0.911 | ||||
| Dissemination willingness (DW) | DW 1 | 0.852 | 0.776 | 0.870 | 0.690 |
| DW 2 | 0.855 | ||||
| DW 3 | 0.783 | ||||
| Emotional motivation (EM) | EM 1 | 0.788 | 0.656 | 0.847 | 0.736 |
| EM 2 | 0.922 | ||||
| Adult attachment (AA) | AA 1 | 0.852 | 0.792 | 0.877 | 0.703 |
| AA 2 | 0.820 | ||||
| AA 3 | 0.844 | ||||
| Social motivation (SM) | SM 1 | 0.844 | 0.622 | 0.841 | 0.726 |
| SM 2 | 0.860 | ||||
| Consciousness of social participation (CSP) | CSP 1 | 0.855 | 0.734 | 0.849 | 0.654 |
| CSP 2 | 0.839 | ||||
| CSP 3 | 0.726 | ||||
| Risk perception (RP) | RP 1 | 0.878 | 0.707 | 0.872 | 0.773 |
| RP 2 | 0.881 |
Validity analysis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dissemination willingness | 0.831 | ||||||
| Affective disposition of information | 0.121 | 0.867 | |||||
| Emotional motivation | 0.199 | 0.418 | 0.858 | ||||
| Adult attachment | 0.036 | 0.360 | 0.405 | 0.839 | |||
| Social motivation | 0.309 | 0.019 | 0.078 | −0.005 | 0.852 | ||
| Consciousness of social participation | 0.295 | −0.004 | −0.006 | −0.142 | 0.322 | 0.809 | |
| Risk perception | 0.086 | 0.178 | 0.335 | 0.284 | 0.058 | −0.009 | 0.879 |
Figure 1Model path and significance level. **p < 0.05, ***p < 0.01.
Hypothesis test results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1 | AA → CSP | −0.160 | 0.063 | 2.483 | 0.013 |
| H2 | SM → CSP | 0.324 | 0.051 | 6.323 | 0.000 |
| H3 | ADI → CSP | 0.048 | 0.060 | 0.774 | 0.439 |
| H4 | ADI → EM | 0.293 | 0.057 | 5.114 | 0.000 |
| H5 | AA → EM | 0.241 | 0.057 | 4.182 | 0.000 |
| H6 | RP → EM | 0.218 | 0.058 | 3.678 | 0.000 |
| H7 | SM → DW | 0.205 | 0.056 | 3.636 | 0.000 |
| H8 | CSP → DW | 0.240 | 0.060 | 3.890 | 0.000 |
| H9 | EM → DW | 0.159 | 0.054 | 2.967 | 0.003 |
| H10 | RP → DW | 0.024 | 0.055 | 0.409 | 0.683 |
Figure 2Distribution plot of hypothesis testing.
Mediating effect of emotional motivation and consciousness of social participation.
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||
| Affective disposition of information → emotional motivation → dissemination willingness | 0.051 | 0.014 | 0.088 | Mediation effect |
| Social motivation → consciousness of social participation → dissemination willingness | 0.070 | 0.038 | 0.127 | Mediation effect |
Figure 3Moderating effect of risk perception on the relationship between social motivation and dissemination willingness.