Literature DB >> 32387102

COVID-19-related prejudice toward Asian medical students: A consequence of SARS-CoV-2 fears in Poland.

Piotr Rzymski1, Michał Nowicki2.   

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak caused by SARS-CoV-2 has triggered global panic. We have conducted an anonymous online survey of Asian medical students in Poland to assess whether they experience any form of prejudice related to the ongoing pandemic. As demonstrated, the COVID-19 outbreak had triggered xenophobic reactions toward students of Asian-origin (n=85) before the first SARS-CoV-2 case was confirmed in Poland. Facing prejudice, including discrimination related to COVID-19, may add to feelings of isolation of students of Asian origin who study abroad, and affect career development, especially for students. We recommend that universities should proactively develop policies that support students, faculty, and staff affected by discriminatory behavior both during the current outbreak and in the future. However, preventing such behaviors should also be enforced by national authorities.
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Emerging infectious disease; Prejudice; SARS-CoV-2; Xenophobia

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32387102      PMCID: PMC7196414          DOI: 10.1016/j.jiph.2020.04.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infect Public Health        ISSN: 1876-0341            Impact factor:   3.718


Introduction

The outbreak caused by betacoronavirus SARS-CoV-2 that emerged in December 2019 in China and later spread to other countries has forced the World Health Organization to first declare a Public Health Emergency of International Concern at the end of January and then to announce a pandemic of COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) on March 11, 2020 [1], [2], [3]. The first cases in North America, Oceania, and Europe were reported in January 2020, while the spread of COVID-19 to Africa and South America was confirmed in February 2020 [4]. With epidemiological updates reported by different authorities daily, the outbreak has received enormous attention from the worldwide mass media [2]. However unavoidable, this has triggered an unintended backlash of public fear and panic, which in selected countries has preceded the emergence of the first confirmed COVID-19 cases [5], [6]. Considering that the majority of affected individuals, including those with fatal outcomes, are of Asian origin, one could, sadly, expect an increase in Asia-phobic reactions [7]. In the past, the epidemic of infectious diseases has also been associated with the backlash of discrimination and xenophobia, and this was also seen during the SARS outbreak in 2003 [8], [9], [10]. There is no doubt that the surgical masks, which have recently been in short supply in China, have become one of the symbols of the current outbreak. Wearing them has become very common in Asia, particularly following the SARS outbreak in 2002, and this practice has also crossed over into immigrant Asian populations [11]. Apart from preventing the spread of disease, they are worn for unrelated reasons such as to guard against air pollution and allergens, or as a social firewall [11]. However, the association between SARS-CoV-2 and the use of face masks may also be a potential source of public misassumption that any Asian individual wearing them constitutes a threat of COVID-19. To identify whether individuals of Asian origin may experience any prejudice related to SARS-CoV-2, we have conducted an anonymous online survey of Asian medicine students at Poznan University of Medical Sciences in Poland. The study, conducted before the first COVID-19 case was identified in Poland, explored the place and nature of such prejudice/xenophobic events, and determined the level at which they have affected the surveyed subjects. According to the Central Statistical Office in Poland, approximately 13,000 individuals of Asian origin study in Poland [12], and therefore, the experiences of prejudice reported here may represent a part of the much wider problem on the national level.

Materials and methods

The study was conducted in February 2020 before the first case of COVID-19 was confirmed in Poland on March 4, 2020. To explore whether Asian medical students in Poland may face any prejudice/xenophobia related to an outbreak of COVID-19, an anonymous, online survey based on a self-designed, structured questionnaire was conducted (Table 1 ). As previously indicated, research that is based on an online questionnaire creates the opportunity to swiftly reach specific groups of individuals and ensures the safety of surveyed individuals under pandemic conditions, which is a recommended approach [13], [14], [15]. The anonymity of the study assured the elimination of embarrassment often seen in subjects experiencing discrimination and stigma [16]. The selected group included Asian students at Poznan University of Medical Sciences in Poland who were directly invited to complete the survey via an e-mail message. All surveyed students were living in the city of Poznań (Greater Poland Voivodeship).
Table 1

The structure of the questionnaire used in this study to measure COVID-19 related prejudice in the group of Asian students in Poland.

Demographic questions
1. The Asian country of origin
2. Gender
3. Age
4. How long have you been studying in Poznań?



Face-masks questions
1. Do you tend to wear a face-mask when in Poznań? (yes/no)
 1a. Please select the purpose(s) for which you are wearing a face-mask in Poznań
(multiple answer question)
  - to protect me from air pollution
  - to protect me from catching an infection from other people
  - to protect me from allergens
  - protect others from catching an infection from you when you are symptomatic
  - other, please specify
 1b. Please select month(s) during which you usually wear a face-mask (Jan–Dec)



Prejudice questions
1. Have you ever experienced any form of prejudice related to the 2019nCoV outbreak in public transportation or on the street in Poznań/Poland? (yes/no)
 1a. Please describe your experience(s)
 1b. Did it affect you negatively? (0 – not at all; 5 – it affected me very much)
2. Have you ever experienced any form of prejudice related to the 2019nCoV outbreak at restaurants in Poznań/Poland? (yes/no)
 2a. Please describe your experience(s)
 2b. Did it affect you negatively? (0 – not at all; 5 – it affected me very much)
3. Have you ever experienced any form of prejudice related to the 2019nCoV outbreak in shops in Poznań/Poland? (yes/no)
 3a. Please describe your experience(s)
 3b. Did it affect you negatively? (0 – not at all; 5 – it affected me very much)
4. Have you ever experienced any form of prejudice related to the 2019nCoV outbreak at medical service units in Poznań/Poland? (yes/no)
 4a. Please describe your experience(s)
 4b. Did it affect you negatively? (0 – not at all; 5 – it affected me very much)
5. Have you ever experienced any form of prejudice related to the 2019nCoV outbreak at Poznan University of Medical Sciences? (yes/no)
 5a. Please describe your experience(s)
 5b. Did it affect you negatively? (0 – not at all; 5 – it affected me very much)
6. Have you ever experienced any form of prejudice related to the 2019nCoV outbreak under any other circumstances in Poznań/Poland? (yes/no)
 6a. Please describe your experience(s)
 6b. Did it affect you negatively? (0 – not at all; 5 – it affected me very much)
The structure of the questionnaire used in this study to measure COVID-19 related prejudice in the group of Asian students in Poland. The survey data collected anonymously do not require approval by the local bioethical committee in Poland. Potential respondents were informed in the invitation message about the general subject matter of the survey, its voluntary and fully anonymous character (including no IP tracking). The students were asked to provide answers to questions exploring whether they have faced any prejudice during their stay in Poland (on the street, at restaurants, during shopping, at health service units, and at university) since the outbreak began in China and if such was the case, to briefly describe their experiences and to indicate how much it affected them on 0–5 Likert scale (0 – not at all; 5 – very much). Considering that wearing the face mask could play a potential role in COVID-19-related prejudice, we have identified the frequency and primary cause of their use. Demographic data on gender, age, and time of stay in Poznań was also collected.

Results and discussion

The survey was completed by eighty-five medical students from Asia (mean ± SD age 23.8 ± 3.8; 49 females, 36 males), mostly from Taiwan (75.3%), who study at Poznan University of Medical Sciences in Poland. All of them have been living in Poznań for at least half a year (with a mean ± SD of 2.7 ± 1.4 years). Wearing the face mask was relatively common within the studied group, with 43.5% of students declaring that they wear them regularly, particularly in December, January and February (Fig. 1 ). The primary reason behind their use was self-protection from catching infections from other people but also to prevent others from infection when the wearers themselves experienced symptoms; protection from air pollutants was also a frequently indicated motivation (Fig. 1). In Poland, seasonal influenza and the lowest air quality peak in the December-February period, which in 2019–2020 coincided with the time of the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak in China, its further spread and associated media coverage. Wearing a face mask in public is rarely practiced in Poland. Therefore, the sight of individuals of Asian origin who use them may not be well understood by the general public as regards the reasons behind this use and incorrectly interpreted as a sign of some highly contagious disease, in this instance, COVID-19.
Fig. 1

Months during which Asian students (n = 37) wear the face mask (A) and motivations behind their use (B).

Months during which Asian students (n = 37) wear the face mask (A) and motivations behind their use (B). We have found that 61.2% of the surveyed students have experienced prejudice in Poland related to the current coronavirus epidemic, and it was more frequently witnessed by those wearing face masks than those who do not (71.2% vs 28.2%). The prejudice most commonly encountered, by 47.1%, in public transportation and on the street. Reported reactions to Asian students under these circumstances included stepping away, changing seats on the bus, being asked to keep the safe distance, covering mouth and nose, showing judgmental facial expressions, pointing with a finger and whispering comments in Polish, spitting, tossing a beer bottle and using offensive language. When indicating how much these situations affected the surveyed students using a Likert scale, a score of 5 was the most frequently selected (median; IQR: 3; 2–5). A lower percentage of Asian students also reported prejudice at restaurants (12.9%) and during shopping (21.2%). This was mostly manifested by people staring at them, pointing with a finger and asking them if they carry coronavirus. Some were also asked to leave restaurants due to other customers’ complaints or felt some public pressure in the form of discouragement from touching products available in the market. The most frequently selected score on a Likert scale for situations at restaurants and shops was respectively 5 (median; IQR: 5; 4–5) and 2 (median; IQR: 3; 2–4). Prejudice was also experienced in health service units in which medical students have classes or which they visit as patients. Approximately one-fifth of those surveyed (21.2%) reported the terrified reactions of other patients after encountering them, and being asked whether they carry coronavirus. Some patients also questioned the supervising medical doctors for allowing Asian students to do clinical rounds and some students were also told to remove a face masks when they visit patients to avoid unnecessary tension. Moreover, medical staff, namely one nurse, expressed her fear over catching a virus when withdrawing a student's blood for lab tests. These reactions had an obvious negative effect on Asian students, since 5 was the most frequently selected score when evaluating them on the Likert scale (median; IQR: 3; 2–5). Last but not least, nearly one quarter (24.7%) of Asian students have faced preconceptions related to COVID-19 at the university where they study. The observed reactions included other students stepping away, starring continuously, making xenophobic comments, assuming that wearing a face mask is equal to being positive for SARS-CoV-2 and opening the doors with a tissue after an Asian student has touched the handle. Moreover, some lecturers have made some jokes about coronavirus which were not considered funny or have asked students to remove the face masks despite explanations that the mask was due to flu symptoms and for the protection of classmates. Again, these situations had a negative effect on most of the surveyed students - a score of 5 was most frequently selected (median; IQR: 4; 3–5). In conclusion, the reactions presented here clearly show that Asian students in regions yet unaffected by SARS-CoV-2 could have already experienced an uncomfortable level of prejudice in the public spaces encompassing transport, gastronomy, shopping, health services and university. Such behaviors can particularly affect those individuals of Asian origin who are tending to wear face masks. Overall, these findings underscore the responsibility of different parties in overcoming and preventing discrimination during outbreaks of infectious diseases. Firstly, universities that host Asian students and staff from abroad should support their students during the outbreak (and any other future epidemic emerging from Asian region) and protect them from harmful misconceptions. This may be achieved by providing reinforcing statements as well as educational campaigns related both to the outbreak and the true reasons behind the use of face masks [17]. The preventive measures, as well as policy development and implementation, should also be undertaken by those involved in the management of international student exchange programs, and by national and international authorities for higher education. To maximally increase output, mass and social media should be employed in undertaken actions [18]. The successful implementation of anti-discriminatory practices requires to follow advice on intercultural communication, also when reporting and visualizing public health risks [19], [20].

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
  12 in total

1.  Risk, ritual and health responsibilisation: Japan's 'safety blanket' of surgical face mask-wearing.

Authors:  Adam Burgess; Mitsutoshi Horii
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2012-03-23

2.  Preventing COVID-19 prejudice in academia.

Authors:  Piotr Rzymski; Michał Nowicki
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  'No one is allowed to go out': your stories from the coronavirus outbreak.

Authors:  Emma Stoye
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Prevalence, Patterns and Self-Perceived Effects of Pornography Consumption in Polish University Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Aleksandra Diana Dwulit; Piotr Rzymski
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  2019-nCoV, fake news, and racism.

Authors:  Kazuki Shimizu
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Corrigendum to "World Health Organization declares Global Emergency: A review of the 2019 Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19)" [Int. J. Surg. 76 (2020) 71-76].

Authors:  Catrin Sohrabi; Zaid Alsafi; Niamh O'Neill; Mehdi Khan; Ahmed Kerwan; Ahmed Al-Jabir; Christos Iosifidis; Riaz Agha
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 6.071

7.  A novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) causing pneumonia-associated respiratory syndrome.

Authors:  Shibo Jiang; Shuai Xia; Tianlei Ying; Lu Lu
Journal:  Cell Mol Immunol       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 22.096

8.  Historical linkages: epidemic threat, economic risk, and xenophobia.

Authors:  Alexandre I R White
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  COVID-19: fighting panic with information.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  WHO Declares COVID-19 a Pandemic.

Authors:  Domenico Cucinotta; Maurizio Vanelli
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2020-03-19
View more
  28 in total

1.  Priming COVID-19 salience increases prejudice and discriminatory intent against Asians and Hispanics.

Authors:  Yao Lu; Neeraj Kaushal; Xiaoning Huang; S Michael Gaddis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  The Psychological Well-Being of University Students amidst COVID-19 Pandemic: Scoping review, systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ahmed H Ebrahim; Ali Dhahi; Mohamed A Husain; Haitham Jahrami
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2022-05-26

3.  Impact of mild COVID-19 on balance function in young adults, a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Agnieszka Guzik; Andżelina Wolan-Nieroda; Maciej Kochman; Lidia Perenc; Mariusz Drużbicki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Prejudicial beliefs and COVID-19 disruptions among sexual minority men living with and not living with HIV in a high SARS-CoV-2 prevalence area.

Authors:  Seth C Kalichman; Renee El-Krab; Bruno Shkembi; Moira O Kalichman; Lisa A Eaton
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Dietary Choices and Habits during COVID-19 Lockdown: Experience from Poland.

Authors:  Aleksandra Sidor; Piotr Rzymski
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 5.717

6.  Addressing the Covid-19 Burden on Medical Education and Training: The Role of Telemedicine and Tele-Education During and Beyond the Pandemic.

Authors:  Divyansh Sharma; Sonu Bhaskar
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2020-11-27

7.  Causes of anxiety among teachers giving face-to-face lessons after the reopening of schools during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Wakui; Shinichiro Abe; Shunsuke Shirozu; Yuuki Yamamoto; Miho Yamamura; Yasuyo Abe; Souichi Murata; Mizue Ozawa; Takahiro Igarashi; Takahiro Yanagiya; Yoshiaki Machida; Mayumi Kikuchi
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Conflating culture with COVID-19: Xenophobic repercussions of a global pandemic.

Authors:  Tiffany Karalis Noel
Journal:  Soc Sci Humanit Open       Date:  2020-07-07

Review 9.  Taking a lesson from the COVID-19 pandemic: Preventing the future outbreaks of viral zoonoses through a multi-faceted approach.

Authors:  Dariusz Halabowski; Piotr Rzymski
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-11-14       Impact factor: 7.963

10.  The COVID-19 Infodemic: Infodemiology Study Analyzing Stigmatizing Search Terms.

Authors:  Zhiwen Hu; Zhongliang Yang; Qi Li; An Zhang
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.