Literature DB >> 29753843

Using temporal ICA to selectively remove global noise while preserving global signal in functional MRI data.

Matthew F Glasser1, Timothy S Coalson2, Janine D Bijsterbosch3, Samuel J Harrison3, Michael P Harms4, Alan Anticevic5, David C Van Essen2, Stephen M Smith3.   

Abstract

Temporal fluctuations in functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) have been profitably used to study brain activity and connectivity for over two decades. Unfortunately, fMRI data also contain structured temporal "noise" from a variety of sources, including subject motion, subject physiology, and the MRI equipment. Recently, methods have been developed to automatically and selectively remove spatially specific structured noise from fMRI data using spatial Independent Components Analysis (ICA) and machine learning classifiers. Spatial ICA is particularly effective at removing spatially specific structured noise from high temporal and spatial resolution fMRI data of the type acquired by the Human Connectome Project and similar studies. However, spatial ICA is mathematically, by design, unable to separate spatially widespread "global" structured noise from fMRI data (e.g., blood flow modulations from subject respiration). No methods currently exist to selectively and completely remove global structured noise while retaining the global signal from neural activity. This has left the field in a quandary-to do or not to do global signal regression-given that both choices have substantial downsides. Here we show that temporal ICA can selectively segregate and remove global structured noise while retaining global neural signal in both task-based and resting state fMRI data. We compare the results before and after temporal ICA cleanup to those from global signal regression and show that temporal ICA cleanup removes the global positive biases caused by global physiological noise without inducing the network-specific negative biases of global signal regression. We believe that temporal ICA cleanup provides a "best of both worlds" solution to the global signal and global noise dilemma and that temporal ICA itself unlocks interesting neurobiological insights from fMRI data.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29753843      PMCID: PMC6237431          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.04.076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  82 in total

1.  Network anticorrelations, global regression, and phase-shifted soft tissue correction.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Anderson; T Jason Druzgal; Melissa Lopez-Larson; Eun-Kee Jeong; Krishnaji Desai; Deborah Yurgelun-Todd
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  The inferential impact of global signal covariates in functional neuroimaging analyses.

Authors:  G K Aguirre; E Zarahn; M D'Esposito
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Functional connectivity during rested wakefulness predicts vulnerability to sleep deprivation.

Authors:  B T Thomas Yeo; Jesisca Tandi; Michael W L Chee
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  The global signal in fMRI: Nuisance or Information?

Authors:  Thomas T Liu; Alican Nalci; Maryam Falahpour
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Differentiating BOLD and non-BOLD signals in fMRI time series using multi-echo EPI.

Authors:  Prantik Kundu; Souheil J Inati; Jennifer W Evans; Wen-Ming Luh; Peter A Bandettini
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  On Global fMRI Signals and Simulations.

Authors:  Jonathan D Power; Timothy O Laumann; Mark Plitt; Alex Martin; Steven E Petersen
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Altered global brain signal in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Genevieve J Yang; John D Murray; Grega Repovs; Michael W Cole; Aleksandar Savic; Matthew F Glasser; Christopher Pittenger; John H Krystal; Xiao-Jing Wang; Godfrey D Pearlson; David C Glahn; Alan Anticevic
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Functional System and Areal Organization of a Highly Sampled Individual Human Brain.

Authors:  Timothy O Laumann; Evan M Gordon; Babatunde Adeyemo; Abraham Z Snyder; Sung Jun Joo; Mei-Yen Chen; Adrian W Gilmore; Kathleen B McDermott; Steven M Nelson; Nico U F Dosenbach; Bradley L Schlaggar; Jeanette A Mumford; Russell A Poldrack; Steven E Petersen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Functional connectivity networks with and without global signal correction.

Authors:  Satoru Hayasaka
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Multimodal population brain imaging in the UK Biobank prospective epidemiological study.

Authors:  Karla L Miller; Fidel Alfaro-Almagro; Neal K Bangerter; David L Thomas; Essa Yacoub; Junqian Xu; Andreas J Bartsch; Saad Jbabdi; Stamatios N Sotiropoulos; Jesper L R Andersson; Ludovica Griffanti; Gwenaëlle Douaud; Thomas W Okell; Peter Weale; Iulius Dragonu; Steve Garratt; Sarah Hudson; Rory Collins; Mark Jenkinson; Paul M Matthews; Stephen M Smith
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  83 in total

Review 1.  Bring the Noise: Reconceptualizing Spontaneous Neural Activity.

Authors:  Lucina Q Uddin
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Cerebral cortical folding, parcellation, and connectivity in humans, nonhuman primates, and mice.

Authors:  David C Van Essen; Chad J Donahue; Timothy S Coalson; Henry Kennedy; Takuya Hayashi; Matthew F Glasser
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Nuisance effects in inter-scan functional connectivity estimates before and after nuisance regression.

Authors:  Alican Nalci; Wenjing Luo; Thomas T Liu
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-07-20       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  A comparison of denoising pipelines in high temporal resolution task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging data.

Authors:  Andrew R Mayer; Josef M Ling; Andrew B Dodd; Nicholas A Shaff; Christopher J Wertz; Faith M Hanlon
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Brain network profiling defines functionally specialized cortical networks.

Authors:  Simone Di Plinio; Sjoerd J H Ebisch
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-08-04       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 6.  Parcellating Cerebral Cortex: How Invasive Animal Studies Inform Noninvasive Mapmaking in Humans.

Authors:  David C Van Essen; Matthew F Glasser
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  On the analysis of rapidly sampled fMRI data.

Authors:  Jingyuan E Chen; Jonathan R Polimeni; Saskia Bollmann; Gary H Glover
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 8.  Challenges and future directions for representations of functional brain organization.

Authors:  Janine Bijsterbosch; Samuel J Harrison; Saad Jbabdi; Mark Woolrich; Christian Beckmann; Stephen Smith; Eugene P Duff
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Changes in global and thalamic brain connectivity in LSD-induced altered states of consciousness are attributable to the 5-HT2A receptor.

Authors:  Franz X Vollenweider; Alan Anticevic; Katrin H Preller; Joshua B Burt; Jie Lisa Ji; Charles H Schleifer; Brendan D Adkinson; Philipp Stämpfli; Erich Seifritz; Grega Repovs; John H Krystal; John D Murray
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Task-evoked activity quenches neural correlations and variability across cortical areas.

Authors:  Takuya Ito; Scott L Brincat; Markus Siegel; Ravi D Mill; Biyu J He; Earl K Miller; Horacio G Rotstein; Michael W Cole
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.