| Literature DB >> 35237686 |
Giovanna Elisiana Carpagnano1, Todor A Popov2, Giulia Scioscia3,4, Nicoletta Pia Ardò4,5, Donato Lacedonia3,4, Mario Malerba6, Pasquale Tondo3, Piera Soccio3,4, Domenico Loizzi4,5, Maria Pia Foschino Barbaro3,4, Francesco Sollitto4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Exhaled breath temperature (EBT) has been shown to reflect airway inflammation as well as increased vascularization, both involved in the pathogenesis of lung cancer. The aim of this study was to look for evidence that continuous EBT monitoring by such a device may help the early detection of relapse of lung cancer in patients with NSCLC who have been subjected to surgery with radical intent. Case Series. We included 11 subjects, who had been subjected to lung resection with radical intent for NSCLC in a prospective observational study. All patients received individual devices for EBT measurement and used them daily for 24 months after surgery. Subjects were also followed up by means of regular standard-of-care clinical and radiologic monitoring for lung cancer at four intervals separated by 6 months (T0, T1, T2, T3, and T4). In 5 patients, relapse of lung cancer was documented by means of lung biopsies. All of them recorded an elevation of their EBT at least one-time interval (T1), corresponding to 6 months, before the relapse was diagnosed at T4. The individual EBT graphs over time differed among these patients, and their mean EBT variability increased by +4% towards the end of 24 months of monitoring. By contrast, patients without a relapse did not document an elevation of their EBT and their variability decreased by -1.4%.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35237686 PMCID: PMC8885209 DOI: 10.1155/2022/1515274
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1“X-halo Home” device.
Anthropometric and clinical characteristics of patients.
| Age (mean) (yr) | 62.9 (range 29-77) |
|---|---|
| Gender (male/female) | 9 : 2 |
| Smoking (current/past/never)% | 36.4% past (45 ± 4 pack/year)∗/18.2% never |
| FEV1 (mean ± standard deviation) | 81.6% ± 16.6 |
| FVC (mean ± standard deviation) | 89.1% ± 11.1 |
| DLCO (mean ± standard deviation) | 73.1% ± 10.5 |
| Cardiac comorbidities (50% of pts) | Hypertension (50% of pts) |
| Other comorbidities (80% of pts) | COPD (63.6%) |
| Extent of lung resection∗∗ | Lobectomy ( |
| Histology (%) | Adenocarcinoma (63.6%) |
| p-stage∗∗∗∗∗ | IA (36.4%) |
∗Past smokers quit at least 1 year before. ∗∗The lung resection was always associated with systematic mediastinal lymphadenectomy. After surgery, four patients received adjuvant chemotherapy and two patients received radiation therapy. ∗∗∗One patient submitted to lobectomy had been submitted to a previous, homolateral, lobectomy. ∗∗∗∗The patient submitted to (lingular) segmentectomy had been previously submitted to bilobectomy. ∗∗∗∗∗Pathological staging was established according to the Eighth Edition of the IASLC TNM Staging System for Lung Cancer.
Figure 2EBT °C at T0-T1-T2-T3-T4 in all patients enrolled.
Follow-up results and outcome of the patients enrolled.
| Follow-up period | 24 months | |
|---|---|---|
| Outcome | Alive/deceased | 9/2 |
| Recurrence | No 54.6% | |
| Median disease-free interval | 20 months | |
| Patients non-R | 0 months (T0) | 6 months (T1) | 12 months (T2) | 18 months (T3) | 24 months (T4) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 33.88 | 33.84 | 33.23 | 33.7 | 33.81 |
| 2 | 33.81 | 33.27 | 32.58 | 32.39 | 32.48 |
| 3 | 32.51 | 31.93 | 31.98 | 32.01 | 32.19 |
| 4 | 32.47 | 32.5 | 32.54 | 31.88 | 32.18 |
| 5 | 32.26 | 32.84 | 32.88 | 32.49 | 32.75 |
| 8 | 32.04 | 32.01 | 31.58 | 31.87 | 31.82 |
| PatientsR | 0 months (T0) | 6 months (T1) | 12 months (T2) | 18 months (T3) | 24 months (T4) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 33.15 | 33.19 | 33.89 | 34.45 | 34.78 |
| 7 | 33.06 | 33.37 | 32.45 | 32.66 | 33.06 |
| 9 | 32.39 | 32.03 | 32.03 | 33.801 | 34.76 |
| 10 | 32.67 | 32.69 | 32.90 | 33.40 | 34.90 |
| 11 | 32.44 | 32.01 | 31.58 | 31.87 | 33.55 |