PURPOSE: In order to aid the development of patient-tailored therapeutics, we attempted to identify a relapse-related signature that allows selection of a group of adenocarcinoma patients with a high probability of relapse. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Whole-genome expression profiles were analyzed in 117 lung adenocarcinoma samples using microarrays consisting of 41,000 probes. A weighted voting classifier for identifying patients with a relapse-related signature was constructed with an approach that allowed no information leakage during each training step, using 10-fold cross-validation and 100 random partitioning procedures. RESULTS: We identified a relapse-related molecular signature represented by 82 probes (RRS-82) through genome-wide expression profiling analysis of a training set of 60 patients. The robustness of RRS-82 in the selection of patients with a high probability of relapse was then validated with a completely blinded test set of 27 adenocarcinoma patients, showing a clear association of high risk RRS-82 with very poor patient prognosis regardless of disease stage. The discriminatory power of RRS-82 was further validated using an additional independent cohort of 30 stage I patients who underwent surgery at a distinct period of time as well as with the Duke data set on a different platform. Furthermore, completely separate training and validation procedures using another data set recently reported by the Director's Challenge Consortium also successfully confirmed the predictive power of the genes comprising RRS-82. CONCLUSION: RRS-82 may be useful for identifying adenocarcinoma patients at very high risk for relapse, even those with cancer in the early stage.
PURPOSE: In order to aid the development of patient-tailored therapeutics, we attempted to identify a relapse-related signature that allows selection of a group of adenocarcinomapatients with a high probability of relapse. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Whole-genome expression profiles were analyzed in 117 lung adenocarcinoma samples using microarrays consisting of 41,000 probes. A weighted voting classifier for identifying patients with a relapse-related signature was constructed with an approach that allowed no information leakage during each training step, using 10-fold cross-validation and 100 random partitioning procedures. RESULTS: We identified a relapse-related molecular signature represented by 82 probes (RRS-82) through genome-wide expression profiling analysis of a training set of 60 patients. The robustness of RRS-82 in the selection of patients with a high probability of relapse was then validated with a completely blinded test set of 27 adenocarcinomapatients, showing a clear association of high risk RRS-82 with very poor patient prognosis regardless of disease stage. The discriminatory power of RRS-82 was further validated using an additional independent cohort of 30 stage I patients who underwent surgery at a distinct period of time as well as with the Duke data set on a different platform. Furthermore, completely separate training and validation procedures using another data set recently reported by the Director's Challenge Consortium also successfully confirmed the predictive power of the genes comprising RRS-82. CONCLUSION: RRS-82 may be useful for identifying adenocarcinomapatients at very high risk for relapse, even those with cancer in the early stage.
Authors: Dung-Tsa Chen; Ying-Lin Hsu; William J Fulp; Domenico Coppola; Eric B Haura; Timothy J Yeatman; W Douglas Cress Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2011-12-08 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Yulong Chen; Masahiko Terajima; Yanan Yang; Li Sun; Young-Ho Ahn; Daniela Pankova; Daniel S Puperi; Takeshi Watanabe; Min P Kim; Shanda H Blackmon; Jaime Rodriguez; Hui Liu; Carmen Behrens; Ignacio I Wistuba; Rosalba Minelli; Kenneth L Scott; Johannah Sanchez-Adams; Farshid Guilak; Debananda Pati; Nishan Thilaganathan; Alan R Burns; Chad J Creighton; Elisabeth D Martinez; Tomasz Zal; K Jane Grande-Allen; Mitsuo Yamauchi; Jonathan M Kurie Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2015-02-09 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Yanan Yang; Young-Ho Ahn; Yulong Chen; Xiaochao Tan; Lixia Guo; Don L Gibbons; Christin Ungewiss; David H Peng; Xin Liu; Steven H Lin; Nishan Thilaganathan; Ignacio I Wistuba; Jaime Rodriguez-Canales; Georgia McLendon; Chad J Creighton; Jonathan M Kurie Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2014-04-24 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Alexander Augustyn; Mark Borromeo; Tao Wang; Junya Fujimoto; Chunli Shao; Patrick D Dospoy; Victoria Lee; Christopher Tan; James P Sullivan; Jill E Larsen; Luc Girard; Carmen Behrens; Ignacio I Wistuba; Yang Xie; Melanie H Cobb; Adi F Gazdar; Jane E Johnson; John D Minna Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-09-29 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Elena Martínez-Terroba; Carmen Behrens; Fernando J de Miguel; Jackeline Agorreta; Eduard Monsó; Laura Millares; Cristina Sainz; Miguel Mesa-Guzman; José Luis Pérez-Gracia; María Dolores Lozano; Javier J Zulueta; Ruben Pio; Ignacio I Wistuba; Luis M Montuenga; María J Pajares Journal: J Pathol Date: 2018-06-20 Impact factor: 7.996