Literature DB >> 3522878

Clinically oriented evaluation of the accuracy of commonly used impression materials.

A H Tjan, S B Whang, A H Tjan, R Sarkissian.   

Abstract

The elastomeric impression materials used in this study exhibited comparable clinical accuracy when properly handled. In general, they were significantly more accurate than reversible hydrocolloid. In fact, because of their excellent dimensional stability, impressions made with addition curing silicone-base or polyether rubber impression materials remained accurate even after 1 week. Elastomeric impression materials have established themselves with reversible hydrocolloids as elastic impression materials that are capable of producing clinically accurate dies with an excellent replication of surface detail.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3522878     DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(86)90272-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  12 in total

1.  Dimensional accuracy of two rubber base impression materials as a function of spacer design and techniques in custom trays for fixed partial dentures.

Authors:  Pankaj Kaushik; R K Dhiman; Dinesh Kumar
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2013-08-02

2.  Evaluation of effect of tray space on the accuracy of condensation silicone, addition silicone and polyether impression materials: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Varun Kumar; Himanshu Aeran
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2012-06-04

3.  Evaluation of dimensional stability and accuracy of autoclavable polyvinyl siloxane impression material.

Authors:  Subash M Reddy; D Vijitha; S Karthikeyan; R Balasubramanian; A Satish
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2012-08-07

4.  [The importance of the choice of materials and their design for the efficacy of orthodontic appliances].

Authors:  H Newesely
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1989-04

5.  A Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy of Addition Silicone of Different Consistencies with Two Different Spacer Designs - In-vitro Study.

Authors:  Suprabha Rathee; B Eswaran; Ma Eswaran; R Prabhu; Kr Geetha; Gp Krishna
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-07-20

6.  Accuracy of the One-Stage and Two-Stage Impression Techniques: A Comparative Analysis.

Authors:  Ladan Jamshidy; Hamid Reza Mozaffari; Payam Faraji; Roohollah Sharifi
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2016-11-24

7.  Viscosity effects of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials on the accuracy of the stone die produced.

Authors:  Warren Ho; Liang Lin Seow; Ammar Musawi
Journal:  J Clin Transl Res       Date:  2018-04-12

8.  Impression Making and Lab Work Authorization Forms in Fixed Prosthodontics: A Preclinical Exercise.

Authors:  Tarek El-Kerdani; Arthur Nimmo
Journal:  MedEdPORTAL       Date:  2016-11-09

9.  Comparing the Accuracy of Three Different Impression Materials in Making Duplicate Dies.

Authors:  Farshad Bajoghli; Mahmoud Sabouhi; Saeid Nosouhian; Amin Davoudi; Zeynab Behnamnia
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2015-07

10.  Accuracy of different putty-wash impression techniques with various spacer thickness.

Authors:  Anshul Chugh; Aman Arora; Vijay Pratap Singh
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2012-02-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.