Literature DB >> 24431790

Evaluation of dimensional stability and accuracy of autoclavable polyvinyl siloxane impression material.

Subash M Reddy1, D Vijitha1, S Karthikeyan1, R Balasubramanian1, A Satish1.   

Abstract

Dimensionally stable autoclavable impressions will be effective in controlling the cross-infection and contamination caused by patient's saliva and other oral secretions. The accuracy of newly introduced autoclavable polyvinyl siloxane impression material was assessed for its dimensional stability and accuracy. A standard metal model (Dentoform, U-501, Columbia) was customised for impression making. The impressions were made using the newly introduced polyvinyl siloxane impression materials (AFFINIS, Coltene/Whaledent AG, 9450 Alstalten, Switzerland). Fifty impressions were made and were divided into two groups A and B of 25 each. Group A was the control sample (non-autoclaved impressions) and group B was the test sample (autoclaved impressions), which was subjected to the steam autoclave procedure at 134 °C for 18 min, casts were poured in type IV gypsum products. The customised metal model, casts obtained from control and test group were subjected to laboratory evaluation with help of a travelling microscope (×10 magnification), and digital vernier calliper (0.01 mm/10 μm accuracy). Data analysis was done using one-way ANOVA and One-Sample t test to evaluate the overall accuracy (P < 0.005). As a result, there was an average reduction of 0.016 μm in overall dimension between the test and the control group when compared with the master model, which is not statistically or clinically significant. The newly introduced polyvinyl siloxane impression material is accurate and dimensional stable for clinical use when steam autoclaved at 134 °C for 18 min.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autoclavable impressions; Polyvinyl siloxane; Sterilization of impression

Year:  2012        PMID: 24431790      PMCID: PMC3792331          DOI: 10.1007/s13191-012-0168-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc        ISSN: 0972-4052


  16 in total

1.  Dimensional stability of a polyvinylsiloxane impression material following ethylene oxide and steam autoclave sterilization.

Authors:  J R Holtan; P S Olin; J D Rudney
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 3.426

2.  Improving the fit of crowns with die spacers.

Authors:  R Grajower; Y Zuberi; I Lewinstein
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.426

3.  Reproducibility of sterilized rubber impressions.

Authors:  Khalid M Abdelaziz; Ahmed M Hassan; J S Hodges
Journal:  Braz Dent J       Date:  2005-03-18

4.  Accuracy of impression and pouring techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis.

Authors:  Marcelo Antonialli Del'Acqua; João Neudenir Arioli-Filho; Marco Antonio Compagnoni; Francisco de Assis Mollo
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Sergio Caputi; Giuseppe Varvara
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.426

6.  A comparative study of inter-abutment distance of dies made from full arch dual-arch impression trays with those made from full arch stock trays: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Jagan Mohan Reddy; E Prashanti; G Vinay Kumar; M C Suresh Sajjan; Xavier Mathew
Journal:  Indian J Dent Res       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec

7.  Disinfection method for impression materials: freedom from fear of hepatitis B and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome.

Authors:  S Minagi; K Fukushima; N Maeda; K Satomi; S Ohkawa; Y Akagawa; Y Miyake; H Suginaka; H Tsuru
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.426

8.  Dimensional changes of elastomers during cold sterilization.

Authors:  R E Johansen; J A Stackhouse
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.426

9.  The accuracy of stone dies made from rubber impression materials.

Authors:  J A Stackhouse
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1970-10       Impact factor: 3.426

10.  Antimicrobial effect of 4 disinfectants on alginate, polyether, and polyvinyl siloxane impression materials.

Authors:  Osama Al-Jabrah; Yousef Al-Shumailan; Manhal Al-Rashdan
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.681

View more
  4 in total

1.  Effect of Core Materials on the Dimensional Accuracy of Casts Made of Two Different Silicone Impression Materials: An Experimental Study.

Authors:  Mitra Farzin; Reza Derafshi; Rashin Giti; Mohammad-Hassan Kalantari
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2020-03-05

2.  Effect of heat sterilization and chemical method of sterilization on the polyvinyl siloxane impression material. A comparative study.

Authors:  Swati Joshi Asopa; U Narendra Padiyar; Sumit Verma; Prerna Suri; Nagaveni S Somayaji; Indu Cherangapadath Radhakrishnan
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2020-03-26

Review 3.  Effect of chemical, microwave irradiation, steam autoclave, ultraviolet light radiation, ozone and electrolyzed oxidizing water disinfection on properties of impression materials: A systematic review and meta-analysis study.

Authors:  Sahar AlZain
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2019-12-23

4.  Comparative evaluation of elastic recovery of three different elastomeric impression materials on chemical disinfection and autoclaving: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Garima Gothwal; Sudhir Meena; U Narendra Padiyar; Hemant Kumar Sharma; Pragati Kaurani; Devendra Pal Singh
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2019-10-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.