| Literature DB >> 35215188 |
Thiara Manuele Alves de Souza1, Raquel Curtinhas de Lima1, Victor Edgar Fiestas Solórzano1, Paulo Vieira Damasco2,3,4, Luiz José de Souza5, Juan Camilo Sanchez-Arcila1, Gabriel Macedo Costa Guimarães1, Iury Amâncio Paiva1, Monique da Rocha Queiroz Lima1, Fernanda de Bruycker-Nogueira6, Larissa Cristina Teixeira Tomé1, Mariana Rosa Inácio Coelho1, Sandro Patroca da Silva7, Luzia Maria de Oliveira-Pinto1, Elzinandes Leal de Azeredo1, Flavia Barreto Dos Santos1.
Abstract
The co-circulation of chikungunya virus (CHIKV), dengue virus (DENV) and Zika virus (ZIKV) in Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brazil, caused a challenging triple epidemic, as they share similar clinical signs and symptoms and geographical distribution. Here, we aimed to investigate the clinical and laboratorial aspects of chikungunya suspected cases assisted in RJ during the 2018 outbreak, focusing on the differential diagnosis with dengue and zika. All suspected cases were submitted to molecular and/or serological differential diagnostic approaches to arboviruses. A total of 242 cases suspected of arbovirus infection were investigated and 73.6% (178/242) were molecular and/or serologically confirmed as chikungunya. In RT-qPCR confirmed cases, cycle threshold (Ct) values ranged from 15.46 to 35.13, with acute cases presenting lower values. Chikungunya cases were mainly in females (64%) and the most frequently affected age group was adults between 46 to 59 years old (27%). Polyarthralgia affected 89% of patients, especially in hands and feet. No dengue virus (DENV) and Zika virus (ZIKV) infections were confirmed by molecular diagnosis, but 9.5% (23/242) had serological evidence of DENV exposure by the detection of specific anti-DENV IgM or NS1, and 42.7% (76/178) of chikungunya positive cases also presented recent DENV exposure reflected by a positive anti-DENV IgM or NS1 result. A significantly higher frequency of arthritis (p = 0.023) and limb edema (p < 0.001) was found on patients with CHIKV monoinfection compared to dengue patients and patients exposed to both viruses. Lastly, phylogenetic analysis showed that the chikungunya cases were caused by the ECSA genotype. Despite the triple arboviruses' epidemic in the state of RJ, most patients with fever and arthralgia investigated here were diagnosed as chikungunya cases, and the incidence of CHIKV/DENV co-detection was higher than that reported in other studies.Entities:
Keywords: ECSA genotype; arboviruses; chikungunya; differential laboratorial diagnosis; phylogeny; triple epidemic
Year: 2022 PMID: 35215188 PMCID: PMC8879879 DOI: 10.3390/pathogens11020245
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pathogens ISSN: 2076-0817
Figure 1Correlation between cycle threshold chikungunya virus (CHIKV) and number of days of illness. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (R) and p-value were calculated between variables (n = 48).
Demographic and clinical characteristics of Chikungunya cases according to the phase of the disease (n = 178), investigated during a triple arboviral epidemic in RJ, 2018.
| Total | Acute | Subacute |
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| median, IQR | 44 | (28–56) | 42 | (26–56) | 51 | (33–62) | 0.063 |
| Age groups | |||||||
| ≤15 years | 12 | 7% | 11 | 7% | 1 | 3% | |
| 16–30 years | 42 | 24% | 38 | 26% | 4 | 13% | |
| 31–45 years | 42 | 24% | 34 | 23% | 8 | 26% | |
| 46–59 years | 48 | 27% | 39 | 27% | 9 | 29% | |
| ≥60 years | 34 | 19% | 25 | 17% | 9 | 29% | |
|
| |||||||
| Male | 64 | 36% | 56 | 38% | 8 | 26% | 0.195 |
| Female | 114 | 64% | 91 | 62% | 23 | 74% | |
|
| |||||||
| Overall | 42 | 24% | 32 | 22% | 10 | 32% | 0.211 |
|
| |||||||
| Hypertension | 25 | 14% | 18 | 12% | 7 | 23% | 0.155 |
| Diabetes | 8 | 4% | 5 | 3% | 3 | 10% | 0.145 |
| Sinusitis | 7 | 4% | 4 | 3% | 3 | 10% | 0.103 |
| Rhinitis | 4 | 2% | 3 | 2% | 1 | 3% | 0.538 |
| Asthma | 2 | 1% | 1 | 1% | 1 | 3% | 0.319 |
| Heart disease | 2 | 1% | 2 | 1% | 0 | 0% | 1.000 |
| Others | 5 | 3% | 4 | 3% | 1 | 3% | 1.000 |
|
| |||||||
| Fever | 178 | 100% | 147 | 100% | 31 | 100% | 1.000 |
| Polyarthralgia | 158 | 89% | 131 | 89% | 27 | 87% | 0.746 |
| Location not reported | 52 | 33% | 43 | 33% | 9 | 33% | |
| Location reported * | 106 | 67% | 88 | 67% | 18 | 67% | |
| Hand/wrist | 35 | 33% | 29 | 33% | 6 | 33% | |
| Foot/ankle | 28 | 26% | 22 | 25% | 6 | 33% | |
| knee | 21 | 20% | 19 | 22% | 2 | 11% | |
| shoulder | 14 | 13% | 12 | 14% | 2 | 11% | |
| elbow | 8 | 8% | 6 | 7% | 2 | 11% | |
| Myalgia | 123 | 69% | 101 | 69% | 22 | 71% | 0.805 |
| Headache | 111 | 62% | 93 | 63% | 18 | 58% | 0.587 |
| Exanthema | 95 | 53% | 78 | 53% | 17 | 55% | 0.857 |
| Prostration | 81 | 46% | 67 | 46% | 14 | 45% | 0.966 |
| Pruritus | 82 | 46% | 63 | 43% | 19 | 61% | 0.061 |
| Nausea | 67 | 38% | 57 | 39% | 10 | 32% | 0.496 |
| Retro-orbital pain | 66 | 37% | 57 | 39% | 9 | 29% | 0.307 |
| Hyporexia | 58 | 33% | 50 | 34% | 8 | 26% | 0.376 |
| Lower limb swelling | 57 | 32% | 46 | 31% | 11 | 35% | 0.649 |
| Lower back pain | 49 | 28% | 42 | 29% | 7 | 23% | 0.497 |
| Vomiting | 34 | 19% | 24 | 16% | 10 | 32% | 0.040 |
| Diarrhea | 31 | 17% | 23 | 16% | 8 | 26% | 0.175 |
| Asthenia | 27 | 15% | 23 | 16% | 4 | 13% | 1.000 |
| Conjunctival hyperemia | 26 | 15% | 23 | 16% | 3 | 10% | 0.577 |
| Dizziness | 27 | 15% | 23 | 16% | 4 | 13% | 1.000 |
| Abdominal pain | 24 | 13% | 21 | 14% | 3 | 10% | 0.772 |
| Arthritis | 14 | 8% | 11 | 7% | 3 | 10% | 0.714 |
| Cough | 14 | 8% | 14 | 10% | 0 | 0% | 0.134 |
| Paresthesia | 12 | 7% | 10 | 7% | 2 | 6% | 1.000 |
| Chills | 11 | 6% | 11 | 7% | 0 | 0% | 0.216 |
|
| |||||||
| Chikungunya/dengue | 76 | 43% | 62 | 42% | 14 | 45% | 0.760 |
(*) the relative percentage was calculated for the locations reported.
Figure 2Flowchart summarizing the diagnosis performed in the 242 samples analyzed in this study. CHIKV: Chikungunya virus; DENV: Dengue virus; ZIKV: Zika virus.
Demographic and clinical characteristics of chikungunya, dengue and chikungya/dengue cases investigated during a triple arboviral epidemic in RJ, 2018.
| Chikungunya Cases | Recent Dengue Cases | Chikungunya/Dengue Cases |
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| median, IQR | 43 | (28–59) | 44 | (38–56) | 44 | (28–56) | 0.833 |
|
| |||||||
| Male | 36 | 35% | 14 | 61% | 28 | 37% | 0.068 |
| Female | 66 | 65% | 9 | 39% | 48 | 63% | |
|
| |||||||
|
| 32 | 31% | 2 | 9% | 10 | 13% | 0.004 |
|
| |||||||
| Hypertension | 20 | 20% | 1 | 4% | 5 | 7% | 0.013 |
| Diabetes | 5 | 5% | 1 | 4% | 3 | 4% | 1.000 |
| Sinusitis | 7 | 7% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0.026 |
| Rhinitis | 4 | 4% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0.233 |
| Asthma | 1 | 1% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 1% | 1.000 |
| Heart disease | 2 | 2% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0.614 |
| Others | 4 | 4% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 1% | 0.543 |
|
| |||||||
| Fever | 102 | 100% | 23 | 100% | 76 | 100% | 1.000 |
| Polyarthralgia | 92 | 90% | 17 | 74% | 66 | 87% | 0.109 |
| Location not reported | 24 | 26% | 12 | 71% | 28 | 42% | |
| Location reported * | 68 | 74% | 5 | 29% | 38 | 58% | |
| Hand/wrist | 23 | 34% | 2 | 40% | 12 | 32% | |
| Foot/ankle | 17 | 25% | 1 | 20% | 11 | 29% | |
| Knee | 13 | 19% | 0 | 0% | 8 | 21% | |
| Shoulder | 8 | 12% | 0 | 0% | 6 | 16% | |
| Elbow | 7 | 10% | 2 | 40% | 1 | 3% | |
| Myalgia | 72 | 71% | 15 | 65% | 51 | 67% | 0.824 |
| Exanthema | 60 | 59% | 12 | 52% | 35 | 46% | 0.239 |
| Headache | 66 | 65% | 13 | 57% | 45 | 46% | 0.654 |
| Prostration | 51 | 50% | 7 | 30% | 30 | 39% | 0.147 |
| Pruritus | 54 | 53% | 9 | 39% | 28 | 37% | 0.084 |
| Nausea | 41 | 40% | 7 | 30% | 26 | 34% | 0.570 |
| Retro-orbital pain | 45 | 44% | 8 | 35% | 21 | 28% | 0.077 |
| Hyporexia | 37 | 36% | 3 | 13% | 21 | 28% | 0.074 |
| Lower limb swelling | 40 | 39% | 0 | 0% | 17 | 22% | <0.001 |
| Lower back pain | 33 | 32% | 6 | 26% | 16 | 21% | 0.244 |
| Vomiting | 22 | 22% | 6 | 26% | 12 | 16% | 0.464 |
| Diarrhea | 15 | 15% | 7 | 30% | 16 | 21% | 0.183 |
| Asthenia | 17 | 17% | 2 | 9% | 10 | 13% | 0.570 |
| Conjunctival hyperemia | 15 | 15% | 1 | 4% | 11 | 14% | 0.397 |
| Dizziness | 20 | 20% | 3 | 13% | 7 | 9% | 0.151 |
| Abdominal pain | 17 | 17% | 0 | 0% | 7 | 9% | 0.054 |
| Arthritis | 12 | 12% | 0 | 0% | 2 | 3% | 0.023 |
| Cough | 11 | 11% | 3 | 13% | 3 | 4% | 0.189 |
| Paresthesia | 9 | 9% | 0 | 0% | 3 | 4% | 0.238 |
| Chills | 7 | 7% | 0 | 0% | 4 | 5% | 0.559 |
(*) the relative percentage was calculated for the locations reported.
Figure 3Phylogenetic analysis of the complete coding sequence of representative CHIKV strains from Campos dos Goytacazes and Rio de Janeiro during 2018. Maximum likelihood (MV) method, bootstrap of 1000 replications. The analyzed CHIKV sequences are represented in red color and designated as follows: strain name/country/city/year). Sequences representing the ECSA, Indian Ocean, Asian and West African genotypes obtained from GenBank were used as reference. ECSA: East-Central-South African genotype; IOG: Indian Ocean lineage/genotype; WAG: West African genotype.
Figure 4Map of Rio de Janeiro, highlighting the city Rio de Janeiro (yellow) and Campos dos Goytacazes (Orange) and the Hospital Plantadores de Cana and Hospital Rio Laranjeiras’ location (red cross). (The map was prepared in QGIS software. Maps from IBGE, Brazillian base map: https://www.ibge.gov.br/geociencias/organizacao-do-territorio/malhas-territoriais.html, accessed on 20 December 2021).
Oligonucleotide primers used for the amplification of the complete genome coding region of the CHIKV strains.
| Primer Identification | Primer Sequence (5′-3′) | * Position in the Genome |
|---|---|---|
| CHIK 1A | ACT GCT CTA CTC TGC AAA GC | 39_F |
| CHIK 1B | CTC CGG CGT GAC TTC TGT A | 1136_R |
| CHIK 2A | CCG TGT GCT GTT CTC AGT AG | _788_F |
| CHIK 2B | GTT CTG CTT CTC GTT CTT CC | 1590_R |
| CHIK 3A | AGG AGT GCC GGA AAG ACA TG | 1264_F |
| CHIK 3B | CCT GCA GCT TCT TCC TTC | 2128_R |
| CHIK 4A | TGG TAC TTT CCC CGC AGA C | 1756_F |
| CHIK 4B | TCA CAG GCA GTG TAC ACC | 2634_R |
| CHIK 5A | GGC AAG ACC TGG TGA CTA GC | 2287_F |
| CHIK 5B | ATA GGG ACC AAG CTC TTA GC | _3139_R |
| CHIK 6A | GTG CTT CAG AGG GTG GGT TA | 2756_F |
| CHIK 6B | GTG ACT CTC TTA GTA GGC AG | 3637_R |
| CHIK 7A | CCT GAA TGA AAT ATG CAC GCG C | 3233_F |
| CHIK 7B | TTC TTC GCG ATG TCC ATG C | 4117_R |
| CHIK 8A | ACG CAA TGA AAC TGC AAA TG | 3784_F |
| CHIK 8B | CGT GGT GCT GTA TCC TTT TC | 4655_R |
| CHIK 9A | CCT ATC GAG AAG TCG CAA AG | 4339_F |
| CHIK 9B | ATT ACC CAG TCA GAC ACG G | 5257_R |
| CHIK 10A | GAG CAA GTC TGC CTA TAT GC | 4758_F |
| CHIK 10B | ACG TGG ACC AGT CGC TAT C | 5622_R |
| CHIK 11A | ACT GGG TAA TGA GCA CCG TAC | 5248_F |
| CHIK 11B | TGA CGG ATT GAA TGT CGC TC | 6167_R |
| CHIK 12A | ACG AGG AGA AGT GTT ACC CAC | 5758_F |
| CHIK 12B | GCC TGT ATA ACC TGC ACC | 6607_R |
| CHIK 13A | GCA ACG TCA CAC AGA TGA GG | 6286_F |
| CHIK 13B | CCA TCA ATT CAT CGG AGA CG | 7104_R |
| CHIK 14A | AGC CGC ACA CTT TAA GCC AG | 6737_F |
| CHIK 14B | AGG CTG GTA CCT CCT ATT G | 7615_R |
| CHIK 15A | ATC AGA TGG CAA CGA ACA GG | 7329_F |
| CHIK 15B | GTG GTG CCA GTT GTA GTA C | 8140_R |
| CHIK 16A | CGG AAG AAT AAG AAG CAA AAG C | 7760_F |
| CHIK 16B | AGT GCC CTT CTC CAC AGT C | 8621_R |
| CHIK 17A | AAT GAA GGA GCC CGT ACA GC | 8264_F |
| CHIK 17B | TTG CCG GAC TGT TGT GAC | 9102_R |
| CHIK 18A | ACC GTG CAC GAT TAC TGG AAC | 8809_F |
| CHIK 18B | CAG AAT TAT CTC ATG CGG GTG G | 9613_R |
| CHIK 19A | TGC AGG GTG CCT AAA GCA AG | 9338_F |
| CHIK 19B | GTA ATC AAG CGA TAG CGT TGG | 10132_R |
| CHIK 20A | TAC CGT CCC TTT CCT GCT TA | 9760_F |
| CHIK 20B | AAT TGT CCT GGT CTT CCT GC | 10593_R |
| CHIK 21A | GAA GTC CGA ATC ATG CAA AAC | 10321_F |
| CHIK 21B | GTG TAC TTG TGT AGA ACA GAC | 11119_R |
| CHIK 22A | AGC AAC AAA CCC GGT AAG AG | 10777_F |
| CHIK 22B | TAG TTG TCA AGT TAG TGC CTG C | 11325_R |
| CHIK 23A | ATG GGT GCA GAA GAT CAC G | 11218_F |
| CHIK 23B ECSA | GTA TAG CCC TTT GAA CTA CTT C | 11613_R |
| CHIK 23B ASIAN | GCT ATA TAT GGT GTG TCT CTT AGG | 11522_R |
* According to CHIKV strain Genbank accession number KP164570.1. F: Forward; R: Reverse.