| Literature DB >> 25976325 |
Marcio Roberto Teixeira Nunes1, Nuno Rodrigues Faria2, Janaina Mota de Vasconcelos3, Nick Golding4, Moritz U G Kraemer5, Layanna Freitas de Oliveira6, Raimunda do Socorro da Silva Azevedo7, Daisy Elaine Andrade da Silva8, Eliana Vieira Pinto da Silva9, Sandro Patroca da Silva10, Valéria Lima Carvalho11, Giovanini Evelim Coelho12, Ana Cecília Ribeiro Cruz13, Sueli Guerreiro Rodrigues14, Joao Lídio da Silva Gonçalves Vianez15, Bruno Tardelli Diniz Nunes16, Jedson Ferreira Cardoso17, Robert B Tesh18, Simon I Hay19,20, Oliver G Pybus21, Pedro Fernando da Costa Vasconcelos22,23.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In December 2013, an outbreak of Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) caused by the Asian genotype was notified in the Caribbean. The outbreak has since spread to 38 regions in the Americas. By September 2014, the first autochthonous CHIKV infections were confirmed in Oiapoque, North Brazil, and in Feira de Santana, Northeast Brazil.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25976325 PMCID: PMC4433093 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-015-0348-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med ISSN: 1741-7015 Impact factor: 8.775
Demographic characteristics of CHIKV confirmed cases in Brazil 2014
|
| |
|---|---|
|
| |
| 0–19 | 8 (11.8%) |
| 20–39 | 39 (57.4%) |
| 40–59 | 15 (22.1%) |
| 60–70 | 5 (7.4%) |
| Unknown | 1 (1.5%) |
|
| |
| Female | 30 (60%) |
| Male | 20 (40%) |
| Unknown | 18 (27%) |
|
| |
| Amapa | 16 (23.5%) |
| Bahia | 14 (20.6%) |
| Ceara | 5 (7.4%) |
| Brasilia | 2 (2.9%) |
| Goiania | 2 (2.9%) |
| Maranhao | 1 (1.5%) |
| Para | 1 (1.5%) |
| Paraná | 2 (2.9%) |
| Rio de Janeiro | 3 (4.4%) |
| Rio Grande do Sul | 2 (2.9%) |
| Roraima | 5 (7.4%) |
| Sao Paulo | 15 (22.1%) |
|
| |
| Brazil | 65 (95.6%) |
| Outside Brazil | 3 (4.4%) |
|
| |
| Imported | 41 (60.3%) |
| Autochthonous | 27 (39.7%) |
|
| |
| Amapa state | 13 (48.2%) |
| Bahia state | 14 (51.8%) |
|
| |
| Haitia | 21 (51.2%) |
| French Guiana | 1 (2.4%) |
| British Guiana | 2 (4.9%) |
| Dominican Republicb | 10 (24.4%) |
| Guadalupec | 2 (4.9%) |
| Venezuela | 3 (7.3%) |
| Unknownd | 2 (4.9%) |
Data was collated between April and September 2014 from the Evandro Chagas Institute and reports from the National Program for Dengue Control. Patient’s epidemiological and clinical details can be found in Additional file 1: Table S1.
aIncludes two travellers from Haiti; bIncludes one case that also travelled to Haiti; cIncludes one traveller from Guadalupe; dIncludes one patient that was infected in an unspecified Caribbean island.
Figure 1Timeline of laboratory confirmed CHIKV cases in Brazil 2014. Shown are imported (black) and autochthonous (red and blue) CHIKV cases in Brazil between April and September 2014 (A). As of September, autochthonous cases had been reported in Feira de Santana, a municipality in Bahia state, north-eastern Brazil (red) and in Amapa state, north Brazil, bordering French Guiana. Also shown is the timeline of confirmed CHIKV in Amapa and Bahia state (B), along with patients’ travel history and municipality of residence. Grey circles indicate imported cases, while blue and red circles indicate localized transmission. Filled squares indicate patient samples whose viruses were sequenced. (C) Map of confirmed cases and federal states with confirmed cases.
Figure 2Dated phylogenetic reconstruction of CHIKV including Brazilian genomes. The genotypes involved in autochthonous Brazilian transmission in Oiapoque and Feira de Santana are highlighted in blue (A) and red (B), respectively. On the right, isolates sampled in Feira de Santana and Oiapoque are depicted as red and blue circles, whilst isolates from the Caribbean outbreak are shown in grey circles. The inset shows the posterior density of the age of the most recent common ancestor (MRCA) of the Caribbean outbreak (A, grey) and the Feira de Santana cluster (B, red). The arrows highlight the dates of the first notifications of CHIKV cases in the Caribbean and in Feira de Santana, respectively. The index case of the ECSA genotype in Brazil arrived in Feira de Santana in June (grey bar). A ML tree with tip information can be found in Additional file 1: Figure S1.
Figure 3Risk maps for CHIKV spread from Oiapoque and Feira de Santana, Brazil. Shown is the relative risk of CHIKV spread from Oiapoque (A) and Feira de Santana (B). Black circles denote the locations of these municipalities.
Figure 4Retrospective analysis of dengue virus transmission to identify municipalities where CHIKV is expected to circulate. Spatial dengue virus monthly incidence (averaged between 2001 and 2013) is shown in Brazilian municipalities.