| Literature DB >> 35215000 |
Faryad Khan1, Mohammad Shariq1, Mohd Asif2, Mansoor Ahmad Siddiqui1, Pieter Malan3, Faheem Ahmad1.
Abstract
The key pathways for synthesizing nanoparticles are physical and chemical, usually expensive and possibly hazardous to the environment. In the recent past, the evaluation of green chemistry or biological techniques for synthesizing metal nanoparticles from plant extracts has drawn the attention of many researchers. The literature on the green production of nanoparticles using various metals (i.e., gold, silver, zinc, titanium and palladium) and plant extracts is discussed in this study. The generalized mechanism of nanoparticle synthesis involves reduction, stabilization, nucleation, aggregation and capping, followed by characterization. During biosynthesis, major difficulties often faced in maintaining the structure, size and yield of particles can be solved by monitoring the development parameters such as temperature, pH and reaction period. To establish a widely accepted approach, researchers must first explore the actual process underlying the plant-assisted synthesis of a metal nanoparticle and its action on others. The green synthesis of NPs is gaining attention owing to its facilitation of the development of alternative, sustainable, safer, less toxic and environment-friendly approaches. Thus, green nanotechnology using plant extract opens up new possibilities for the synthesis of novel nanoparticles with the desirable characteristics required for developing biosensors, biomedicine, cosmetics and nano-biotechnology, and in electrochemical, catalytic, antibacterial, electronics, sensing and other applications.Entities:
Keywords: biosynthesis; eco-friendly; green chemistry; nanoparticle; plant extract; sustainable application
Year: 2022 PMID: 35215000 PMCID: PMC8878231 DOI: 10.3390/nano12040673
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1Different types of nanotechnologies.
Figure 2Different methods of nanoparticle synthesis.
Figure 3The schematic diagram for the biosynthesis of nanoparticles (NPs) via a green route using plant extract.
Figure 4Mechanism of nanoparticle synthesis using phytoextracts.
Plant-assisted synthesis of silver nanoparticles.
| Plant Name | Parts Used | Size (nm) | Shapes | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leaves, fruit pulp, seeds | 3–11 | Spherical | [ | |
|
| Leaves | 15 ± 5 | Spherical | [ |
|
| Leaves | 23 | Spherical | [ |
|
| Leaves | 9 | Spherical | [ |
|
| Leaves | 12–30 | Spherical | [ |
|
| Leaves extract | 35 | Spherical | [ |
|
| Latex | 10–20 | Face-centered cubic | [ |
|
| Leaves extract | 20–30 | Spherical | [ |
|
| Leaves | 14 | Spherical/prism | [ |
|
| Leaves | 2–6 | Spherical | [ |
|
| Leaves extract | 5–40 | Spherical | [ |
|
| Leaves | 31 | Spherical | [ |
|
| Leaves | 35–55 | Cubical | [ |
|
| Leaves extract | 10–20 | Spherical | [ |
|
| Leaves | 25–40 | Spherical | [ |
|
| Leaves | 15–500 | Cubic | [ |
|
| Fruit | 16 | Spherical | [ |
|
| Leaves extract | 30 | Spherical, hexagonal | [ |
|
| Callus extract | 5–20 | Spherical | [ |
|
| Leaves and seed | 29–92 | Spherical | [ |
|
| Sun dried leaves | 3.2–20 | Cubic hexagonal crystalline | [ |
|
| Leaves | 78 | Spherical | [ |
|
| Flower extract | 25–40 | Spherical | [ |
|
| Leaves extract | 15–30 | Crystalline | [ |
|
| Fruit | 16–28 | Spherical | [ |
|
| Leaves | 31 | Spherical | [ |
Plant-assisted synthesis of gold nanoparticles.
| Plant Name | Parts Used | Size (nm) | Shapes | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Leaves | 1–35 | Truncated, pentagonal, spherical, triangular | [ |
|
| Rhizome | 20 | Spherical | [ |
|
| Leaves | 20 | Spherical | [ |
| Cinnamon | Bark | 35 | Spherical | [ |
|
| Leaves | 20 | Spherical | [ |
|
| Leaves | 20–40 | Triangle | [ |
|
| Plant extract | 50/350 | Crystalline | [ |
|
| Leaves | 3–16 | Spherical | [ |
|
| Leaves and flower | 30–130 | Polymorphic/stable | [ |
|
| Leaves | 20 | Spherical | [ |
|
| Leaves | 4–10 | Spherical | [ |
|
| Rose petals | 10 | Cubic | [ |
|
| Plant extract | 6–60 | Anisotropic | [ |
|
| Fruit | 30–40 | Cubical | [ |
|
| Leaves | 65–99 | Cubic | [ |
|
| Leaves | 17–20 | Spherical | [ |
|
| Leaves | 8–20 | Octahedral | [ |
|
| Flower extract | 19.8 | Spherical, hexagonal | [ |
|
| Leaves | 15–25 | Spherical | [ |
|
| Fruit | 11 | Triangular | [ |
|
| Seeds | 1–10 | Spherical | [ |
|
| Leaf extract | 16–18 | Spherical, triangular, hexagonal | [ |
Plant-assisted synthesis of zinc nanoparticles.
| Plant Name | Parts Used | Size (nm) | Shapes | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Leaves along with stem | 50–100 | Hexagonal | [ |
|
| Leaves | 52.24 | Spherical | [ |
|
| Leaves | 20–50 | Spherical | [ |
|
| Leaves | 52–70 | Spherical, elongated | [ |
|
| Leaves | 70–75 | Spherical | [ |
|
| Root | 30–50 | Spherical | [ |
|
| Leaves | 50 | Spindle shaped | [ |
|
| Leaves | 23–57 | Spherical | [ |
|
| Leaves | 20–30 | Hexagonal | [ |
|
| Leaves | 18–30 | Crystalline | [ |
|
| Leaves | 25 | Crystalline | [ |
|
| Flowers | 12–32 | Crystalline | [ |
|
| Leaves | 30–35 | Crystal, spongy | [ |
|
| Stem | 28 | Spherical | [ |
|
| Leaves | 22.18 | Hexagonal | [ |
|
| Leaves | 11–25 | Hexagonal | [ |
|
| Leaves | 30–57 | Hexagonal | [ |
|
| Leaves | 1.5–8.5 | Spherical | [ |
|
| Root | 52–76 | Hexagonal | [ |
|
| Root | 20–80 | Hexagonal | [ |
|
| Peel | 20 | Spherical | [ |
|
| Fruit | 50 | Spherical | [ |
|
| Leaves | 2 | Spherical | [ |
|
| Leaves | 1–100 | Spherical and sheet shaped | [ |
|
| Leaves | 100–200 | Cube | [ |
|
| Leaves | 20–50 | Crystalline | [ |
|
| Rhizome | 2.9–25.2 | Spherical and rod shaped | [ |
|
| Rhizome | 23–26 | Crystalline | [ |
Plant-assisted synthesis of titanium nanoparticles.
| Plant Name | Parts Used | Size (nm) | Shapes | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Bulb | 47 | Tetragonal | [ |
|
| Leaves | 73–140 | Spherical | [ |
|
| Leaves | 22 | Spherical round | [ |
|
| Leaves | 20–70 | Spherical | [ |
|
| Leaves | 15–50 | Spherical | [ |
|
| Leaves | 32.58 | Spherical | [ |
|
| Leaves | 100–150, 100–200 | Cubic, crystalline, Spherical | [ |
|
| Flower | 10–52 | Crystalline, Spherical oval | [ |
|
| Leaves | 15–20 | Spherical | [ |
|
| Leaves | 70 | Spherical, oval | [ |
|
| Leaves | 124 | Spherical | [ |
|
| Leaves | 40–60 | Spherical | [ |
|
| Leaves | 25–50 | Spherical | [ |
|
| Latex | 25–50 | Spherical, uneven | [ |
|
| Leaves | 81–84 | Spherical | [ |
|
| Fruit peel | 19 | Tetragonal | [ |
|
| Leaves | 38 | Spherical | [ |
|
| Leaves | 50 | Hexagonal | [ |
|
| Petals | 7–24 | Spherical | [ |
|
| Leaves | 39 | Crystalline, spherical | [ |
Plant-assisted synthesis of palladium nanoparticles.
| Plant Name | Parts Used | Size (nm) | Shapes | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Seed | 22.5 ± 5.7 | Spherical | [ |
|
| Leaves | 40–50 | Spherical | [ |
|
| Gum ghatti | 4.8 ± 1.6 | Spherical | [ |
|
| Leaves | 2–22 | Spherical | [ |
|
| Leaves | 3.2–6 | Multiple | [ |
|
| Leaves | 3–5 | Spherical | [ |
|
| Peeled banana | 50 | Crystalline | [ |
|
| Bark | 15–20 | Crystalline | [ |
|
| Leaves | 38 | Spherical | [ |
|
| Tuber | 10–15 | Spherical | [ |
|
| Leaves | 15 | Spherical | [ |
Figure 5Factors affecting plant-assisted synthesis of nanoparticles.
Figure 6An overview diagram shows synthesized nanoparticles (NPs) produced via the green route for various biological applications. The different sizes, shapes and surface bio-functionalized NPs are developed in a controlled way for the target application.