| Literature DB >> 35214036 |
Phuoc Vinh Nguyen1, Clémentine Aubry1, Narimane Boudaoud1, Alexandra Gaubert1, Marie-Hélène Langlois1, Mathieu Marchivie2, Karen Gaudin1, Corinne Arpin3, Philippe Barthélémy1, Tina Kauss1.
Abstract
Antibiotic resistance has become a major issue in the global healthcare system, notably in the case of Gram-negative bacteria. Recent advances in technology with oligonucleotides have an enormous potential for tackling this problem, providing their efficient intrabacterial delivery. The current work aimed to apply this strategy by using a novel nanoformulation consisting of DOTAU, a nucleolipid carrier, in an attempt to simultaneously deliver antibiotic and anti-resistance oligonucleotides. Ceftriaxone, a third-generation cephalosporin, was formulated with DOTAU to form an ion pair, and was then nanoprecipitated. The obtained solid nanocapsules were characterized using FT-IR, XRD, HPLC, TEM and DLS techniques and further functionalized by the anti-resistance ONα sequence. To obtain an optimal anti-resistance activity and encapsulation yield, both the formulation protocol and the concentration of ONα were optimized. As a result, monodispersed negatively charged nanoparticles of CFX-DOTAU-ONα with a molar ratio of 10:24:1 were obtained. The minimum inhibitory concentration of these nanoparticles on the resistant Escherichia coli strain was significantly reduced (by 75%) in comparison with that of non-vectorized ONα. All aforementioned results reveal that our nanoformulation can be considered as an efficient and relevant strategy for oligonucleotide intrabacterial delivery in the fight against antibiotic resistance.Entities:
Keywords: CTX-M15 ß-lactamase; ESBL-producing E. coli; antibiotic resistance; nanocapsules; nucleic acids; nucleolipid; oligonucleotides; solid nanoparticles
Year: 2022 PMID: 35214036 PMCID: PMC8876242 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14020299
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmaceutics ISSN: 1999-4923 Impact factor: 6.321
Figure 1Chemical structure of CFX and nucleolipids (DOTAU and diC16dT) ionized in aqueous medium at neutral pH.
Yield of ion pair formation at different ratios of CFX–DOTAU during formulation.
| Weight Ratio | Molar Ratio | Ion Pair Yield (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 1:1 | 1.3:1 | 68.9 ± 5.0 |
| 1:1.3 | 1:1 | 80.4 ± 3.7 |
| 1.9:1 | 2.3:1 | 32.6 ± 3.2 |
IR vibrational bands of CFX, DOTAU and CFX–DOTAU ion pair.
| Chemical Group Considered | DOTAU (cm−1) | CFX (cm−1) | Ion Pair (cm−1) |
|---|---|---|---|
| C=N—OCH3 | 1533 | 1536 | |
| C=N—OCH3 | 1533 | 1536 | |
| C=N | 1498 | 1500 | |
| C=N | 1602 | 1602 | |
| N-(C=O)-N | 1690 | 1690 | |
| CH2 | 1462 | 1464 | |
| CH3 | 1380 | 1382 |
Figure 2X-ray diffractogram of CFX (blue), DOTAU (red) and ion pair (green).
Nanoprecipitation protocol optimization in view of colloidal properties and encapsulation yield of CFX–DOTAU NP.
| V Methanol (µL) | V Water (mL) | Size ± SD (nm) | ZP ± SD (mV) | PDI ± SD | NP Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 300 | 10 | 150.1 ± 1.0 | 44.5 ± 6.5 | 0.141 ± 0.010 | 64 |
| 500 | 10 | 123.3 ± 0.7 | 39.4 ± 3.9 | 0.169 ± 0.004 | 64 |
| 300 | 5 | 137.4 ± 2.3 | 34.7 ± 1.3 | 0.127 ± 0.010 | 57 |
Figure 3Optimized formulation protocol and HPLC analysis results (in blue).
Physico-chemical properties of CFX–DOTAU NPs and ONα NPs.
| Formulation | Mean Size ± SD (nm) | Mean PDI ± SD | Mean Zeta ± SD (mV) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CFX–DOTAU NP | 157.6 ± 7.6 | 0.160 ± 0.050 | 35.9 ± 3.0 |
| ONα NP | 187.1 ± 21.1 | 0.191 ± 0.065 | −45.8 ± 11.2 |
Figure 4TEM images of (a) CFX–DOTAU NP and (b) Onα600 NP.
Figure 5Evolution of the effects of ONα NP size and zeta potential on ONα concentration during formulation (** p < 0.01, Student t-test).
Figure 6Impact of incubation time on ONα600 NP size, PDI and zeta potential, as compared to non-incubated CFX–DOTAU NP (at T0 time); * Student t-test was considered significant for p < 0.05.
Figure 7Colloidal stability of CFX–DOTAU and ONα600 NP characteristics (mean +/− SD): (left axis, expressed as % T0) size, zeta potential and (right axis) PDI.
Figure 8CFX MIC of ONα NP on ESBL-producing E. coli compared to CFX–DOTAU NP and control conditions (* p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 Student t-test; NB: the concentration cited in brackets is the ONα incubation concentration during NP preparation).