Literature DB >> 35210923

Pleocatenatachiangraiensis gen. et. sp. nov. (Pleosporales, Dothideomycetes) from medicinal plants in northern Thailand.

Ya-Ru Sun1,2,3, Ning-Guo Liu2,4, Kevin D Hyde2,3,5, Ruvishika S Jayawardena2,3, Yong Wang1.   

Abstract

Pleocatenata, a new genus, is introduced with its type species, Pleocatenatachiangraiensis, which was isolated from withered twigs of two medicinal plants, Clerodendrumquadriloculare (Blanco) Merr (Verbenaceae) and Tarennastellulata (Hook.f.) Ridl (Rubiaceae) in northern Thailand. The genus is characterized by mononematous, septate, brown or dark brown conidiophores, monotretic conidiogenous cells and catenate, obclavate, olivaceous to blackish brown conidia. Phylogenetic analysis of combined LSU, SSU, tef1-α, rpb2 and ITS sequence data showed Pleocatenata forms a distinct phylogenetic lineage in Pleosporales, Dothideomycetes. Therefore, we treat Pleocatenata as Pleosporales genera incertae sedis based on morphology and phylogenetic analyses. Descriptions and illustrations of the new taxa are provided, and it is compared with morphologically similar genera. Ya-Ru Sun, Ning-Guo Liu, Kevin D. Hyde, Ruvishika S. Jayawardena, Yong Wang.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genera incertae sedis; hyphomycetes; multi-gene phylogeny; taxonomy

Year:  2022        PMID: 35210923      PMCID: PMC8857139          DOI: 10.3897/mycokeys.87.79433

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MycoKeys        ISSN: 1314-4049            Impact factor:   2.984


Introduction

Medicinal plants are a rich source of natural products with biological and chemical properties. They are used in health care or treatment of human ailments and have been used since prehistoric times worldwide (Rasool-Hassan 2012). Many fungi have been found on medicinal plants and are members of and (Bhagat et al. 2012; Long et al. 2019; Ma et al. 2019; Hyde et al. 2020; Tennakoon et al. 2021). They form important associations with medicinal plants and as pathogens or saprobes (Long et al. 2019; Tennakoon et al. 2021), sources of medicines (Strobel et al. 1993; Huang et al. 2008; Hyde et al. 2019), involved in nutrient recycling (Bonnardeaux et al. 2007) and some are used in biological control (Hyde et al. 2019). is the largest order in , which accounts for about a quarter of the class (Zhang et al. 2012; Hyde et al. 2013; Hongsanan et al. 2020a). They have a worldwide distribution with diverse lifestyles, including saprobes, pathogens of plants and humans, endophytes, epiphytes and hyperparasites (Ramesh 2003; Kirk et al. 2008; Zhang et al. 2012; Hyde et al. 2013; Sun et al. 2019; Ferdinandez et al. 2021). Many species in Nees, Boedijn and Güssow, can invade medicinal plants and cause leaf spots and other diseases, as economically important plant pathogens (Mathiyazhagan et al. 2004; Abtahi and Nourani 2017; Zhang et al. 2020), and some also pose a threat to human health (Hyde et al. 2018; Iturrieta-González et al. 2020). Endophytes in also show important biocontrol value (Su et al. 2014; De Silva et al. 2019; Hyde et al. 2019), for example, an extract from R.R. Nelson has mosquito-larvicidal activity (Abutaha et al. 2015). The sexual morph of is characterized by uniloculate ascomata typically with papillae, ostioles and pseudoparaphyses, generally fissitunicate asci bearing mostly septate ascospores of different colours and shapes (Ramesh 2003; Kirk et al. 2008; Zhang et al. 2012; Hyde et al. 2013). and hyphomycetes are the asexual morphs of pleosporalean taxa (Zhang et al. 2012; Hongsanan et al. 2020a). Recent comprehensive studies on treated 91 families in (Hongsanan et al. 2020a). More than 40 genera are recognized as genera incertae sedis in (Hongsanan et al. 2020a; Wijayawardene et al. 2020, 2021). This uncertainty in genetic placement occurs for the following reasons: 1) some genera lack sufficient collections even though molecular data is available, they are not included in any families in phylogenetic analyses, eg. E.B.G. Jones & Abdel-Wahab, A. Hashim. & Kaz. Tanaka and Crous (Li et al. 2016; Abdel-Wahab et al. 2017; Crous et al. 2017); 2) due to the diverse morphology of hyphomycetous asexual morphs, it is difficult to determine their familial placement without the sexual morph and molecular data. Examples are R.F. Castañeda, Minter & Saikawa, Tzean & J.L. Chen, Sacc. & P. Syd and Naumov & Czerepan (Obrist 1959; Tóth 1975; Tzean and Chen 1990; Castañeda-Ruiz et al. 2004). During the examination of collections from medicinal plants in northern Thailand (Sun et al. 2021), two isolates representing a new species were obtained from and . Morphology and phylogenetic analyses confirmed that it was distinct in , but its familial placement was uncertain. Thus, we introduced a new genus, (, genera incertae sedis) to accommodate the new species, .

Materials and methods

Collection, examination and isolation

The isolates used in this study were collected from decaying twigs of and from Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, Thailand during June to July 2020 in terrestrial habitat. The samples were packaged in envelopes and returned to the laboratory as described in Senanayake et al. (2020). The fruiting bodies on natural substrates were observed and photographed using a stereo-microscope (SteREO Discovery, V12, Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmBH, Germany). Morphological characters were observed using a Nikon ECLIPSE Ni compound microscope (Nikon, Japan) and photographed with a Nikon DS-Ri2 digital camera (Nikon, Japan). The Adobe Photoshop CS6 Extended v. 13.0 software was used to make photo-plates. Measurements were done with the Tarosoft (R) Image Frame Work software. Single spore isolations were used to obtain pure cultures following the methods described by Senanayake et al. (2020). Germinated conidia were transferred to new potato dextrose agar (PDA) plates and incubated at 26 °C for four weeks. The pure cultures obtained were deposited in Mae Fah Luang University Culture Collection (MFLUCC), Chiang Rai, Thailand. Herbaria materials were deposited in the herbarium of Mae Fah Luang University (MFLU), Chiang Rai, Thailand. Facesoffungi (FoF) and Index Fungorum numbers were acquired as described in Jayasiri et al. (2015) and Index Fungorum (2022).

DNA extraction, PCR amplification and sequencing

Fresh fungal mycelia grown on PDA medium for 4 weeks at 26 °C were scraped with a sterile scalpel. Genomic DNA was extracted from scraped mycelia using the BIOMIGA Fungus Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (GD2416, BIOMIGA, San Diego, California, USA) following the manufacture’s protocol. Five genes were selected in this study: the 28S subunit rDNA (LSU), the 18S subunit rDNA (SSU), the internal transcribed spacers (ITS), the translation elongation factor 1 (), and the RNA polymerase II subunit 2 (). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was carried out in 20 μL reaction volume which contained 10 μL 2 × PCR Master Mix, 7 μL ddH2O, 1 μL of each primer, and 1 μL template DNA. The PCR thermal cycle program and primers are given (Table 1). Purification and sequencing of PCR products were carried out at SinoGenoMax (Beijing) Co., China.
Table 1.

Primers and PCR procedures used in this study.

LocusPrimersPCR proceduresReferences
NameSequence (5’–3’)
Large subunit (LSU)LR0RACCCGCTGAACTTAAGC94 °C 3 min; 35 cycles of 94 °C 30 s, 52 °C 30 s, 72 °C 1 min; 72 °C 8 min; 4 °C on holdVilgalys and Hester (1990), Rehner and Samuels (1994)
LR5TCCTGAGGGAAACTTCG
Small subunit (SSU)NS1GTAGTCATATGCTTGTCTC White et al. (1990)
NS4CTTCCGTCAATTCCTTTAAG
Internal transcribed spacer (ITS)ITS5GGAAGTAAAAGTCGTAACAAGG
ITS4TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC
Elongation factor-1 alpha (tef1-α)EF1-983FGCYCCYGGHCAYCGTGAYTTYAT94 °C 2 min; 36 cycles of 66 °C – 56 °C (touchdown 9 cycles), 94 °C 30 sec, 56 °C 1 min, 72 °C 1 min; 72 °C 10 min; 4 °C on hold Rehner and Buckley (2005)
EF1-2218RATGACACCRACRGCRACRGTYTG
RNA polymerase II subunit (rpb2)fRPB2-5FGAYGAYMGWGATCAYTTYGG94 °C 3 min; 40 cycles of 94 °C 20 sec, 55 °C 30 sec, 72 °C 1 min; 72 °C 10 min; 4 °C on hold Liu et al. 1999
fRPB2-7cRCCCATRGCTTGYTTRCCCAT
Primers and PCR procedures used in this study.

Phylogenetic analyses

BLASTn (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov//Blast.cgi) was used to evaluate closely related strains to our new taxa. Other sequences used in this study were obtained from GenBank referring to Zhang et al. (2012, 2018) and Hongsanan et al. (2020a, 2021) (Table 2). The single gene sequences were viewed using BioEdit v. 7.0.9.0 (Hall 1999). Alignments for each locus were generated with MAFFT v.7 (https://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server/) and manually improved using AliView (Larsson 2014) for maximum alignment and minimum gaps. The final single gene alignments were combined by SequenceMatrix 1.7.8 (Vaidya et al. 2011).
Table 2.

Taxa of used in the phylogenetic analysis with the corresponding GenBank accession numbers. The newly generated strains are indicated in bold. N/A: Not available.

Species namesStrain number LSU SSU ITS tef1 rpb2
Acrocalymmaaquatica MFLUCC 11-0208 JX276952 JX276953 JX276951 N/AN/A
Acrocalymmapterocarpi MFLUCC 17-0926 MK347949 MK347840 MK347732 MK360040 N/A
Acuminatisporapalmarum MFLUCC 18-0264 MH390437 MH390401 NR_163327 MH399248 N/A
MFLUCC 18-0460 MH390438 MH390402 MN749106 MH399249 N/A
Aigialusgrandis BCC 20000 GU479775 GU479739 N/A GU479839 N/A
Alternariaalternata AFTOL ID-1610 DQ678082 KC584507 KF465761 KC584634 KC584375
Amniculicolaaquatica MFLUCC 16-1123 MK106096 MK106108 N/A MK109800 N/A
Amorocoelophomacassia MFLUCC 17-2283 MK347956 NG_065775 MK347739 MK360041 MK434894
Angustimassarinalonicerae MFLUCC 15-0087 KY496724 N/A KY496759 N/AN/A
Anteagloniumparvulum SMH5223 GQ221909 N/AN/A GQ221918 N/A
Aquasubmersajaponica HHUF 30469 NG_057138 NG_062426 NR_154739 LC194384 LC194421
Aquasubmersamircensis MFLUCC 11-0401 NG_042699 NG_061141 JX276954 N/AN/A
Ascocylindricamarina MD6011 KT252905 KT252907 N/AN/AN/A
MF416 MK007123 MK007124 N/AN/AN/A
Astragalicolavasilyevae MFLUCC 17-0832 MG828986 MG829098 NR_157504 MG829193 MG829248
Astrosphaeriellafusispora MFLUCC 10-0555 KT955462 KT955443 N/A KT955425 KT955413
Atrocalyxacutisporus KT 2436 LC194341 LC194299 LC194475 LC194386 LC194423
Bahusandhikaindica GUFCC 18001 KF460274 N/A KF460273 N/AN/A
Bambusicolabambusae MFLUCC 11-0614 JX442035 JX442039 JX442031 N/A KP761718
Berkleasmiumcrunisia BCC 17023 DQ280271 N/A DQ280265 N/AN/A
Berkleasmiumtyphae BCC 12536 DQ280275 N/A DQ280264 N/AN/A
Brevicollumhyalosporum MFLUCC 17-0071 MG602200 MG602202 MG602204 MG739516 N/A
Brevicollumversicolor HHUF 30591 NG_058716 NG_065124 NR_156335 LC271246 LC271250
Camarosporidiellacaraganicola MFLUCCC 14-0605 KP711381 KP711382 KP711380 N/AN/A
Camarosporiumquaternatum CPC 31081 NG_064442 KY929123 NR_159756 KY929201 N/A
Camarosporomycesflavigenus CBS 314.80 GU238076 NG_061093 MH861266 N/AN/A
Coniothyriumpalmarum CBS 400.71 JX681084 EU754054 MH860184 N/A KT389592
Corynesporacassiicola CBS 100822 GU301808 GU296144 N/A GU349052 GU371742
Corynesporatorulosa CPC 15989 KF777207 N/A NR_145181 N/AN/A
Crassiperidiumoctosporum MAFF 246406 LC373116 LC373092 LC373104 LC373128 LC373140
Cryptocoryneumjaponicum HHUF 30482 NG_059035 NG_065118 NR_153938 LC096144 LC194438
Cryptocoryneumpseudorilstonei CBS 113641 NG_059036 LC194322 NR_153941 LC096152 LC194446
Cucurbitariaberberidis MFLUCC 11-0387 KC506796 KC506800 N/AN/AN/A
Cyclothyriellarubronotata CBS 141486 KX650544 NG_061252 NR_147651 KX650519 KX650574
Cylindroaseptosporaleucaenicola MFLUCC 17-2424 MK347966 MK347856 NR_163333 MK360047 N/A
Dacampiaengeliana Hafellner 72868 KT383791 N/AN/AN/AN/A
Dacampiahookeri Hafellner 73897 KT383792 N/AN/AN/AN/A
Delitschiachaetomioides SMH 3253.2 GU390656 N/AN/A GU327753 N/A
Delitschiawinteri AFTOL ID-1599 DQ678077 DQ678026 N/A DQ677922 DQ677975
Dendryphionfluminicola MFLUCC 17-1689 MG208141 N/A NR_157490 MG207992 N/A
Dictyocheirosporabannica KH 332 AB807513 AB797223 LC014543 AB808489 N/A
Dictyosporiumelegans NBRC 32502 DQ018100 DQ018079 DQ018087 N/AN/A
Didymellaexigua CBS 183.55 MH868977 GU296147 MH857436 N/AN/A
Didymellarumicicola CBS 683.79 MH873007 N/A KT389503 N/A KT389622
Didymosphaeriarubi-ulmifolii MFLUCC 14-0023 KJ436586 KJ436588 MK646049 N/AN/A
Dimorphosporicolatragani CBS 570.85 KU728536 N/A KU728497 N/AN/A
Dothidotthiaaceris MFLUCC 16-1183 MK751816 MK751761 MK751726 N/AN/A
Fissuromacalami MFLUCC 13-0836 MF588993 NG_062430 N/A MF588975 N/A
Flammeascomabambusae MFLU 11-0143 NG_059553 KP753952 NR_132915 N/AN/A
Flavomycesfulophazii CBS 135761 NG_058131 NG_061191 NR_137960 N/AN/A
Foliophomafallens CBS 161.78 GU238074 GU238215 KY940772 N/A KC584502
CBS 284.70 GU238078 GU238218 MH859609 N/AN/A
Fuscostagonosporacytisi MFLUCC 16-0622 KY770978 KY770977 N/A KY770979 N/A
Fuscostagonosporasasae HHUF 29106 AB807548 AB797258 AB809636 AB808524 N/A
Fusculinaeucalypti CBS 120083 DQ923531 N/A DQ923531 N/AN/A
Fusculinaeucalyptorum CBS 145083 MK047499 N/A NR_161140 N/AN/A
Halojulellaavicenniae BCC 20173 GU371822 GU371830 N/A GU371815 GU371786
Halotthiaposidoniae BBH 22481 GU479786 GU479752 N/AN/AN/A
Hazslinszkyomycesaloes CBS 136437 KF777198 N/A KF777142 N/AN/A
Helminthosporiumvelutinum L131 KY984352 KY984432 KY984352 KY984463 KY984413
Hermatomycesiriomotensis HHUF 30518 LC194367 LC194325 LC194483 LC194394 LC194449
Hermatomycestectonae MFLUCC 14-1140 KU764695 KU712465 KU144917 KU872757 KU712486
Hypsostromacaimitalense GKM1165 GU385180 N/AN/AN/AN/A
Hypsostromasaxicola SMH5005 GU385181 N/AN/AN/AN/A
Hysteriumangustatum CBS 123334 FJ161207 N/AN/AN/AN/A
Hysterobreviumsmilacis CBS 114601 FJ161174 FJ161135 N/A FJ161091 FJ161114
Latoruacaligans CBS 576.65 NG_058180 N/AN/AN/AN/A
Latoruagrootfonteinensis CBS 369.72 NG_058181 N/AN/AN/AN/A
Lentimurisporaurniformis MFLUCC 18-0497 MH179144 MH179160 N/A MH188055 N/A
Lentitheciumclioninum HHUF 28199 NG_059391 NG_064845 NR_154137 AB808515 N/A
Lentitheciumpseudoclioninum HHUF 29055 NG_059392 NG_064847 AB809633 AB808521 N/A
Lepidosphaerianicotiae AFTOL ID-1576 DQ678067 N/AN/A DQ677910 DQ677963
Leptosphaeriacichorium MFLUCC 14-1063 KT454712 KT454728 KT454720 N/AN/A
Leucaenicolaphraeana MFLUCC 18-0472 MK348003 NG_065784 MK347785 MK360060 MK434867
Libertasomycesmyopori CPC 27354 NG_058241 N/A KX228281 N/AN/A
Ligninsphaeriajonesii MFLUCC 15-0641 NG_059642 N/AN/AN/AN/A
Lindgomycescigarospora G619 KX655804 KX655805 KX655794 N/AN/A
Lindgomycesingoldianus ATCC 200398 AB521736 NG_016531 NR_119938 N/AN/A
Longiostiolumtectonae MFLUCC 12-0562 KU764700 N/A KU712447 N/AN/A
Longipedicellataaptrootii MFLU 10-0297 KU238894 KU238895 KU238893 KU238892 KU238891
Lophiostomamacrostomum KT508 AB619010 AB618691 N/A LC001751 N/A
Lophiotremaeburnoides KT 1424.1 LC001707 LC001706 LC001709 LC194403 LC194458
Macrodiplodiopsisdesmazieri CBS 140062 NG_058182 N/A NR_132924 N/AN/A
Massariaanomia CBS 59178 GU301839 GU296169 N/AN/A GU371769
Massariainquinans M19N/A HQ599444 HQ599402 HQ599342 HQ599460
Melanommajaponicum MAFF 239634 NG_060360 NG_065122 NR_154215 LC203367 LC203395
Melanommapulvispyrius CBS 124080 MH874873 GU456302 MH863349 GU456265 GU456350
Misturatosphaeriaaurantonotata GKM 1238 NG_059927 N/AN/A GU327761 N/A
Morosphaeriamuthupetensis NFCCI4219 MF614796 MF614797 MF614795 MF614798 N/A
Morosphaeriavelatispora KH221 AB807556 AB797266 LC014572 AB808532 N/A
Multiloculariabambusae MFLUCC 11-0180 KU693438 KU693442 KU693446 N/AN/A
Murisporagalii MFLUCC 13-0819 KT709175 KT709182 KT736081 KT709189 N/A
Neocamarosporiumgoegapense CPC 23676 KJ869220 N/A KJ869163 N/AN/A
Neoconiothyriumpersooniae CBS 143175 MG386094 N/A MG386041 N/AN/A
Neomassariafabacearum MFLUCC 16-1875 KX524145 NG_061245 N/A KX524149 N/A
Neomassariaformosana NTUCC 17-007 MH714756 MH714759 N/A MH714762 MH714765
Neomassarinathailandica MFLU 11-0144 NG_059718 N/A NR154244 N/AN/A
MFLUCC 17-1432 MT214467 MT214420 MT214373 N/AN/A
Neopaucisporarosaecae MFLUCC 17-0807 MG829033 NG_061293 MG828924 MG829217 N/A
Neophaeosphaeriaagaves CPC 21264 KF777227 N/A KF777174 N/AN/A
Neophaeosphaeriafilamentosa CBS 102202 GQ387577 GQ387516 JF740259 GU349084 GU371773
Neophaeosphaeriaphragmiticola KUMCC 16-0216 MG837009 NG_065735 N/A MG838020 N/A
Neoplatysporoidesaloes CPC 36068 MN567619 N/A NR_166316 N/AN/A
Neopyrenochaetacercidis MFLUCC 18-2089 MK347932 MK347823 MK347718 N/A MK434908
Neopyrenochaetopsishominis UTHSC DI16 238 LN907381 N/A LT592923 N/A LT593061
Neoroussoellabambusae MFLUCC 11-0124 KJ474839 N/A KJ474827 KJ474848 KJ474856
Neotestudinarosatii CBS 690.82 DQ384107 DQ384069 N/AN/AN/A
Neoyrenochaetaacicola CBS 812.95 GQ387602 GQ387541 NR_160055 N/A LT623271
Nigrogranafuscidula CBS 141556 KX650550 N/A NR_147653 KX650525 N/A
Nigrogranamackinnonii CBS 674.75 GQ387613 NG_061081 NR_132037 KF407986 KF015703
Occultibambusabambusae MFLUCC 13-0855 KU863112 N/A KU940123 KU940193 KU940170
Occultibambusajonesii GZCC 16-0117 KY628322 KY628324 N/A KY814756 KY814758
Parabambusicolabambusina KH 139 AB807537 AB797247 LC014579 AB808512 N/A
Paradictyoarthriniumaquatica MFLUCC 16-1116 NG_064501 N/A NR_158861 N/AN/A
Paradictyoarthriniumdiffractum MFLUCC 13-0466 KP744498 KP753960 KP744455 N/A KX437764
Paralophiostomahysterioides PUFNI 17617 MT912850 MN582762 MN582758 N/A MT926117
Parapyrenochaetaprotearum CBS 131315 JQ044453 N/A JQ044434 N/A LT717683
Periconiadelonicis MFLUCC 17-2584 NG_068611 NG_065770 N/AN/A MK434901
Periconiapseudodigitata KT 1395 AB807564 AB797274 LC014591 N/AN/A
Phaeoseptummali MFLUCC 17-2108 MK625197 N/A MK659580 MK647990 MK647991
Phaeoseptumterricola MFLUCC 10-0102 MH105779 MH105780 MH105778 MH105781 MH105782
Phaeosphaeriaoryzae CBS 110110 KF251689 GQ387530 KF251186 N/A KF252193
Phaeosphaeriopsistriseptata MFLUCC 13-0271 KJ522479 KJ522484 KJ522475 MG520919 KJ522485
Plenodomussalvia MFLUCC 13-0219 KT454717 KT454732 KT454725 N/AN/A
Pleocatenatiumchiangraiense MFLUCC 21-0222 OL986398 N/A OL986396 OM240638 OM117709
MFLUCC 21-0223 OL986399 N/A OL986397 OM240637 OM117708
Pleohelicoonrichonis CBS 282.54N/A AY856952 MH857332 N/AN/A
Pleomonodictysdescalsii FMR 12716 KY853522 N/A KY853461 N/AN/A
Preussiafuniculate CBS 659.74 GU301864 GU296187 N/A GU349032 GU371799
Pseudoastrosphaeriellalongicolla MFLUCC 11-0171 KT955476 N/AN/A KT955438 KT955420
Pseudoastrosphaeriellathailandensis MFLUCC 11-0144 KT955478 KT955457 N/A KT955440 KT955416
Pseudoberkleasmiumchiangmaiense MFLUCC 17-1809 MK131260 N/A MK131259 MK131261 N/A
Pseudoberkleasmiumpandanicola KUMCC 17-0178 MH260304 MH260344 MH275071 N/AN/A
Pseudocoleodictyosporatectonae MFLUCC 12-0385 KU764709 NG_061232 NR_154338 N/A KU712491
Pseudocoleodictyosporathailandica MFLUCC 12-0565 KU764701 NG_062417 NR_154337 N/A KU712494
Pseudodidymosphaeriaspartii MFLUCC 13-0273 KP325436 KP325438 KP325434 N/AN/A
Pseudopyrenochaetalycopersici FMR 15746 EU754205 NG_062728 NR_103581 N/A LT717680
Pseudopyrenochaetaterretris FMR 15327 LT623216 N/A LT623228 N/A LT623287
Pseudotetraploalongissima HC 4933 AB524612 AB524471 AB524796 AB524827 N/A
Pseudoxylomyceselegans KT 2887 AB807598 AB797308 LC014593 AB808576 N/A
Pyrenochaetopsisleptospora CBS 101635 GQ387627 NG_063097 JF740262 MF795881 LT623282
Pyrenochaetopsistabarestanensis IBRC M 30051 KF803343 NG_065034 NR_155636 N/AN/A
Quadricrurabicornis yone 153 AB524613 AB524472 AB524797 AB524828 N/A
Quercicolafusiformis MFLUCC 18-0479 MK348009 MK347898 MK347790 MK360085 MK434864
Quercicolaguttulospora MFLUCC 18-0481 MK348010 MK347899 MK347791 MK360086 N/A
Quixadomycescearensis HUEFS 238438 MG970695 N/A NR_160606 N/AN/A
Roussoellanitidula MFLUCC 11-0634 KJ474842 N/A KJ474834 KJ474851 KJ474858
Salsugineaphoenicis MFLU 19-0015 MK405280 N/AN/A MK404650 N/A
Salsuginearamicola KT 2597.2 GU479801 GU479768 N/A GU479862 GU479834
Seltsamiaulmi CBS 143002 MF795794 MF795794 MF795794 MF795882 MF795836
Shiraiabambusicola GZAAS2.629 KC460980 N/A GQ845415 N/AN/A
Splanchnonemaplatani CBS 222.37 KR909316 KR909318 MH855895 KR909319 KR909322
Sporormiafimetaria UPS Dissing Gr.81.194 GQ203729 N/A GQ203769 N/AN/A
Sporormiellaisomera CBS 166.73 MH872355 N/A AY943053 N/AN/A
Stemphyliumherbarum CBS 191.86 GU238160 GU238232 NR_111243 KC584731 DQ247794
Striatiguttulanypae MFLUCC 18-0265 MK035992 MK035977 MK035969 MK034432 MK034440
Striatiguttulaphoenicis MFLUCC 18-0266 MK035995 MK035980 MK035972 MK034435 MK034442
Sublophiostomathailandica MFLUCC 11-0185 KX534216 KX534222 MW136275 KX550080 MW088718
MFLUCC 11-0207 KX534212 KX534218 MW136257 KX550077 MW088714
Subplenodomusviolicola CBS 306.68 MH870849 GU238231 MH859138 N/AN/A
Sulcatisporaacerina KT 2982 LC014610 LC014605 LC014597 LC014615 N/A
Sulcatisporaberchemiae KT 1607 AB807534 AB797244 AB809635 AB808509 N/A
Sulcosporiumthailandica MFLUCC 12-0004 KT426563 KT426564 MG520958 N/AN/A
Teichosporatrabicola C134 KU601591 N/A KU601591 KU601601 KU601600
Tetraplosphaeriasasicola KT 563 AB524631 AB524490 AB524807 AB524838 N/A
Thyridariaacaciae CBS 138873 NG_058127 N/A KP004469 N/AN/A
Thyridariabroussonetiae TB1 KX650568 KX650515 KX650568 KX650539 KX650586
Torulaaquatica MFLUCC 16-1115 MG208146 N/A MG208167 N/A MG207977
Torulapluriseptata MFLUCC 14-0437 KY197855 KY197862 MN061338 KY197875 KY197869
Tremateiaarundicola MFLU 16-1275 KX274248 KX274254 KX274241 KX284706 N/A
Trematosphaeriagrisea CBS 332.50 NG_057979 NG_062930 NR_132039 KF015698 KF015720
Trematosphaeriapertusa CBS 122368 NG_057809 FJ201991 NR_132040 KF015701 FJ795476
Tzeananiataiwanensis NTUCC 17-006 MH461121 MH461127 MH461124 MH461131 N/A
Wicklowiaaquatica CBS 125634 MH875044 NG_061099 N/AN/AN/A
Wicklowiasubmersa MFLUCC 18-0373 MK637644 MK637643 N/AN/AN/A
Xenopyrenochaetopsispratorum CBS 445.81 GU238136 NG_062792 MH861363 N/A KT389671
Taxa of used in the phylogenetic analysis with the corresponding GenBank accession numbers. The newly generated strains are indicated in bold. N/A: Not available. The single locus and combined analyses were carried out for maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian posterior probability (BYPP). The ML analyses were carried out using IQ-TREE (Nguyen et al. 2015; Trifinopoulos et al. 2016) on the IQ-TREE web server (http://iqtree.cibiv.univie.ac.at, 30 September 2021) under partitioned models. The best-fit substitution models were determined by WIQ-TREE (Chernomor et al. 2016): SYM+I+G4 for LSU and SSU; TIM+F+I+G4 for tef1-α; GTR+F+I+G4 for ; TIM2+F+I+G4 for ITS. Ultrafast bootstrap analysis was implemented with 1,000 replicates (Minh et al. 2013; Hoang et al. 2018). The BYPP analyses were performed in CIPRES (Miller et al. 2010) with MrBayes on XSEDE 3.2.7a (Ronquist et al. 2012). The best nucleotide substitution model for each data partition was evaluated by MrModeltest 2.2 (Nylander 2004). The substitution model GTR+I+G was decided for LSU, SSU, ITS, tef1-α and sequences. The Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling approach was used to calculate posterior probabilities (PP) (Rannala and Yang 1996). Six simultaneous Markov chains were run for 10 million generations and trees were sampled every 1,000th generation. The first 20% of trees, representing the burn-in phase of the analyses, were discarded and the remaining trees were used for calculating posterior probabilities (PP) in the majority rule consensus tree. Phylogenetic trees were viewed using FigTree v1.4.0 (Rambaut and Drummond 2008) and modified in Microsoft Office PowerPoint 2010 and converted to jpg file using Adobe Photoshop CS6 Extended 10.0 (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA, USA). The new sequences derived from this study were deposited in GenBank. The final alignment and tree were deposited in TreeBase (http://purl.org/phylo/treebase/phylows/study/TB2:S29199).

Results

Blast searches of LSU, tef1-α, and ITS sequences data in NCBI showed that our sequences were related to , , and . One hundred and seventy-six taxa, representing all families in , with Alb. & Schwein (CBS 123334) and (Schwein.) E. Boehm & C.L. Schoch (CBS 114601) as the outgroups, were selected for the analyses. The final combined dataset consisted of 4,953 characters (LSU: 1–850 bp, SSU: 851–1,851 bp, tef1-α: 1,852–2,720 bp, : 2,721–3,701 bp, ITS: 3,702–4,953 bp), including alignment gaps. Among them, 2,336 characters were constant, 608 variable characters were parsimony-uninformative, and 2,009 characters were parsimony informative. The most likely tree (-ln = 98,965.704) is presented (Figure. 1) to show the phylogenetic placement of the newly introduced genus and its relationship with other members in . Maximum likelihood tree generated by IQ-Tree, based on analysis of a combined dataset of LSU, SSU, tef1-α, and ITS sequence data. Bootstrap support values for ML greater than 75% and Bayesian posterior probabilities greater than 0.95 are given near nodes, respectively. Ex-type strains are in bold, the new isolates are in red. Analyses of both ML and BYPP (not shown) yielded almost identical results, and the topology of the trees were similar to previous studies (Zhang et al. 2018; Hongsanan et al. 2020a, 2021). The combined analyses showed that two suborders and were well-supported and formed an upper clade in . Our two newly obtained fungal isolates (MFLUCC 21-0222 and MFLUCC 21-0223) clustered together and formed a distinct clade with maximum support (ML-BS = 100%, BYPP = 1.00) and they grouped with , and with weak support.

Taxonomy

Y.R. Sun, Yong Wang bis & K.D. Hyde gen. nov. 402C64E6-8895-5501-81E8-069D0B58EF71 Index Fungorum number:IF559457 Facesoffungi number: FoF 10630

Etymology.

“Pleo-” an abbreviation of , the order in which this fungus is classified; “-catenata” refers to the catenate conidia of this fungus.

Description.

Saprobic on decaying twigs in terrestrial habitats. Asexual morph: Hyphomycetous. Colonies on natural substrate effuse, dark, velvety. Conidiophores macronematous, mononematous, straight or slightly curved, cylindrical, unbranched, septate, brown or dark brown. Conidiogenous cells monotretic, integrated, terminal, cylindrical, brown to dark brown. Conidia catenate, formed in acropetal chains, straight or bent, obclavate, olivaceous to dark brown, multi-euseptate, slightly constricted at septa, distal conidia rounded at apex, truncate at base, intercalary conidia truncate at both ends, with thickened and darkened scars at base or both ends. Sexual morph: Undetermined.

Type species.

Y.R. Sun, Yong Wang bis & K.D. Hyde

Notes.

The morphology of is distinguished from members in other families in by its tretic conidiogenous cells and catenate, euseptate conidia, and phylogenic analyses indicated it does not belong to any existing families. To avoid establishing a new family with only one species, is introduced as a new genus and assigned to , genera incertae sedis. is a monotypic genus reported from terrestrial habitats but without a known sexual morph. Further discovery of other species in or phylogenetic related genera with supported monophyly will determine the familial level of . Y.R. Sun, Yong Wang bis & K.D. Hyde sp. nov. 6151EB30-06BB-56B1-A35A-7ACD4BB5427B Index Fungorum number:IF559458 Facesoffungi number: FoF 10631 Fig. 2
Figure 2.

(MFLU 22-0002, holotype) a host () b, c colonies on natural substrate d, e conidiophores with conidia f conidiogenous cells g–k conidia l germinated conidium m, n colonies on PDA (upper view and lower view). Scale bars: 1 mm (b); 100 μm (c); 20 μm (d–l).

The epithet referring to the location in which the fungus was collected.

Holotype.

MFLU: 22-0002 Saprobic on twigs of and . Asexual morph: Hyphomycetous. Colonies on natural substrate effuse, dark, velvety. Mycelium immersed, composed of septate, branched, hyaline to subhyaline hyphae. Conidiophores macronematous, mononematous, erect, straight or slightly curved, cylindrical, unbranched, robust, 4–6-septate, brown or dark brown, rough, 35–100 µm long, 5.5–8.5 µm wide. Conidiogenous cells monotretic, integrated, terminal, determinate, cylindrical, dark brown. Conidia catenate, formed in acropetal chains of 2–3, straight or curved, obclavate, olivaceous to brown when young, blackish brown when mature, 5–8-euseptate, slightly constricted at septa, distal conidia rounded at apex, truncate at base, intercalary conidia truncate at both ends, with thickened and darkened scars at base or both ends, 34–70 µm long, 6.5–12 µm at the widest. Sexual morph: Unknown. (MFLU 22-0002, holotype) a host () b, c colonies on natural substrate d, e conidiophores with conidia f conidiogenous cells g–k conidia l germinated conidium m, n colonies on PDA (upper view and lower view). Scale bars: 1 mm (b); 100 μm (c); 20 μm (d–l).

Culture characteristics.

Conidia germinated on PDA within 12 hours at 26 °C. Germ tubes were produced from both ends. Colony reached 20–25 mm diameter after 4 weeks at room temperature on PDA media. Mycelia superficial, irregularly circular, entire edge, dark brown from above, black from below, pigment produced which turns the media reddish brown.

Material examined.

Thailand, Chiang Rai Province, Mae Fah Luang University, on twigs of , 3 July 2020, Y.R. Sun, MFU5 (MFLU 22-0002, holotype, ex-type living culture MFLUCC 21-0222). Thailand, Chiang Rai Province, Medicinal Plants Garden, on twigs of , 7 June 2020, Y.R. Sun, B45 (MFLU 22-0001, living culture MFLUCC 21-0223). Two isolates collected from different hosts share similar morphology and clustered together in the phylogenic tree. There are no base pair differences in LSU and tef1-α genes between these two isolates. One base pair and two base pair differences (without gaps) are observed in ITS and , respectively. Therefore, the two isolates MFLUCC 21-0222 and MFLUCC 21-0223 are identified as conspecific.

Discussion

is phylogenetically related to , , and in our multi-gene analyses, but their monophyly was not well-supported, indicating their uncertain phylogenetic affinities. No hyphomycetous asexual morph has been reported in or (Hongsanan et al. 2020a, 2021). However, in , only two known hyphomycetous genera, and , are characterized by micronematous to semimacronematous, pale brown conidiophores, monoblastic conidiogenous cells, and single, elongate-clavate conidia (Mantle et al. 2006; Thambugala et al. 2015; Hongsanan et al. 2020a). can be distinguished from these two genera by having monotretic conidiogenous cells and catenate, obclavate conidia. A recently introduced species, Jian Ma, X.G. Zhang & R.F. Castañeda, resembles in its unbranched, cylindrical conidiophores and monotretic, terminal conidiogenous cells that produce catenate, obclavate conidia (Xu et al. 2020). Morphologically, is more similar to than to the type species of , (Berk. & M.A. Curtis) C.T. Wei (Wei 1950). Since (, ) is a polyphyletic genus (Schoch et al. 2009; Voglmayr and Jaklitsch 2017), and there is no available sequence data for , we presume that may belong to . However, due to lack of molecular data, and since morphology-based classification is not reliable for many hyphomycetous genera (Shenoy et al. 2006; Su et al. 2016; Yang et al. 2018), we retain the current classification. Sequences of are needed to resolve its phylogenetic placement. Detailed morphological comparison among , and is provided (Table 3).
Table 3.

Comparison between , , and .

SpeciesConidiophoresConidiogenous cellsConidiaReferences
Corynesporacassiicola Unbranched, cylindrical proliferations, pale to mid brown, up to 9 septate, 110–850 × 4–11 µmMonotretic, cylindrical, pale to mid brownSolitary or in chains of 2–6, obclavate to cylindrical, subhyaline to pale olivaceous brown or brown, 4–20 distoseptate, 40–220 × 9–22 µm Wei 1950
Corynesporasinensis (HJAUP M0156)Unbranched, cylindrical, brown to dark, 4–8-septate, 53–96.5 × 7–8.5 µmMonotretic, cylindrical, brown,In chains of 2, primary conidia obclavate or fusiform, 3(–4)-distoseptate, 31.5–42 × 8–9.5 µm. secondary conidia ellipsoid, 3-distoseptate, 21–28.5 × 8–9.5 µm Xu et al. 2020
Pleocatenatachiangraiensis (MFLU 21-0222)Unbranched, cylindrical, brown or dark brown, 4–6-septate, 35–100 × 5.5–8.5 µmMonotretic, cylindrical, dark brownIn chains of 2–3, obclavate, olivaceous to brown when young, blackish brown when mature, 5–8-euseptate, 34–70 µm × 6.5–12 µmThis study
Comparison between , , and . is similar to sensu stricto, which is characterized by distinctive, unbranched conidiophores, monoblastic, determinate or proliferating conidiogenous cells, and acrogenous, solitary, transversely septate conidia (Ellis 1958, 1971; Shenoy et al. 2006; Boonmee et al. 2012; Su et al. 2016; Yang et al. 2018). However, is different from by having catenate conidia. Additionally, is phylogenetically distinct from , supporting the introduction of the new genus. The catenate, obclavate phragmoconidia of are similar to capnodendron asexual morph of Woron (, ) (Hughes 1976, 2000; Seifert et al. 2011). Although sequence data of is not available, morphological characters, such as holoblastic conidiogenous cells and branched conidiophores of , support its separation from (Hughes 1976, 2000; Seifert et al. 2011). is also similar to Subram (, incertae sedis) in having unbranched, robust conidiophores and catenate conidia (Seifert et al. 2011). However, they differ in that the distoseptate conidia form in basipetal chains in and euseptate conidia form in acropetal chains in .
  27 in total

1.  Two new Kirschsteiniothelia species with Dendryphiopsis anamorphs cluster in Kirschsteiniotheliaceae fam. nov.

Authors:  Saranyaphat Boonmee; Thida Win Ko Ko; Ekachai Chukeatirote; Kevin D Hyde; Hang Chen; Lei Cai; Eric H C McKenzie; E B Gareth Jones; Rampai Kodsueb; Bahkali A Hassan
Journal:  Mycologia       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 2.696

2.  W-IQ-TREE: a fast online phylogenetic tool for maximum likelihood analysis.

Authors:  Jana Trifinopoulos; Lam-Tung Nguyen; Arndt von Haeseler; Bui Quang Minh
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  A Beauveria phylogeny inferred from nuclear ITS and EF1-alpha sequences: evidence for cryptic diversification and links to Cordyceps teleomorphs.

Authors:  Stephen A Rehner; Ellen Buckley
Journal:  Mycologia       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.696

4.  Polyphasic identification of three new species in Alternaria section Infectoriae causing human cutaneous infection.

Authors:  Isabel Iturrieta-González; Isabel Pujol; Simona Iftimie; Dania García; Vanesa Morente; Rosana Queralt; Marcela Guevara-Suarez; Ana Alastruey-Izquierdo; Frederic Ballester; Margarita Hernández-Restrepo; Josepa Gené
Journal:  Mycoses       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 4.377

5.  Naming and outline of Dothideomycetes-2014 including proposals for the protection or suppression of generic names.

Authors:  Nalin N Wijayawardene; Pedro W Crous; Paul M Kirk; David L Hawksworth; Saranyaphat Boonmee; Uwe Braun; Dong-Qin Dai; Melvina J D'souza; Paul Diederich; Asha Dissanayake; Mingkhuan Doilom; Singang Hongsanan; E B Gareth Jones; Johannes Z Groenewald; Ruvishika Jayawardena; James D Lawrey; Jian-Kui Liu; Robert Lücking; Hugo Madrid; Dimuthu S Manamgoda; Lucia Muggia; Matthew P Nelsen; Rungtiwa Phookamsak; Satinee Suetrong; Kazuaki Tanaka; Kasun M Thambugala; Dhanushka N Wanasinghe; Saowanee Wikee; Ying Zhang; André Aptroot; H A Ariyawansa; Ali H Bahkali; D Jayarama Bhat; Cécile Gueidan; Putarak Chomnunti; G Sybren De Hoog; Kerry Knudsen; Wen-Jing Li; Eric H C McKenzie; Andrew N Miller; Alan J L Phillips; Marcin Piątek; Huzefa A Raja; Roger S Shivas; Bernad Slippers; Joanne E Taylor; Qing Tian; Yong Wang; Joyce H C Woudenberg; Lei Cai; Walter M Jaklitsch; Kevin D Hyde
Journal:  Fungal Divers       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 20.372

6.  Revision of Lophiotremataceae (Pleosporales, Dothideomycetes): Aquasubmersaceae, Cryptocoryneaceae, and Hermatomycetaceae fam. nov.

Authors:  A Hashimoto; M Matsumura; K Hirayama; K Tanaka
Journal:  Persoonia       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 11.051

7.  Corynespora, Exosporium and Helminthosporium revisited - New species and generic reclassification.

Authors:  H Voglmayr; W M Jaklitsch
Journal:  Stud Mycol       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 16.097

8.  Introducing a new pleosporalean family Sublophiostomataceae fam. nov. to accommodate Sublophiostoma gen. nov.

Authors:  Sinang Hongsanan; Rungtiwa Phookamsak; Ishani D Goonasekara; Kasun M Thambugala; Kevin D Hyde; Jayarama D Bhat; Nakarin Suwannarach; Ratchadawan Cheewangkoon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Diaporthe species in south-western China.

Authors:  Hui Long; Qian Zhang; Yuan-Yuan Hao; Xian-Qiang Shao; Xiao-Xing Wei; Kevin D Hyde; Yong Wang; De-Gang Zhao
Journal:  MycoKeys       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Diseases of Cymbopogon citratus (Poaceae) in China: Curvularia nanningensis sp. nov.

Authors:  Qian Zhang; Zai-Fu Yang; Wei Cheng; Nalin N Wijayawardene; Kevin D Hyde; Zhuo Chen; Yong Wang
Journal:  MycoKeys       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 2.984

View more
  1 in total

1.  Morpho-Phylogenetic Evidence Reveals Novel Pleosporalean Taxa from Sichuan Province, China.

Authors:  Xian-Dong Yu; Sheng-Nan Zhang; Jian-Kui Liu
Journal:  J Fungi (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-09
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.