A Hashimoto1,2, M Matsumura1,3, K Hirayama4, K Tanaka1,3. 1. Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Hirosaki University, 3 Bunkyo-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8561, Japan. 2. Research Fellow of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, 5-3-1 Kojimachi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 102-0083, Japan. 3. The United Graduate School of Agricultural Sciences, Iwate University, 18-8 Ueda 3 chome, Morioka 020-8550, Japan. 4. Apple Experiment Station, Aomori Prefectural Agriculture and Forestry Research Center, 24 Fukutami, Botandaira, Kuroishi, Aomori 036-0332, Japan.
Abstract
The family Lophiotremataceae (Pleosporales, Dothideomycetes) is taxonomically revised on the basis of morphological observations and phylogenetic analyses of sequences of nuclear rDNA SSU, ITS, and LSU regions and tef1 and rpb2 genes. A total of 208 sequences were generated from species of Lophiotremataceae and its relatives. According to phylogenetic analyses, Lophiotremataceae encompasses the genus Lophiotrema and five new genera: Atrocalyx, Crassimassarina, Cryptoclypeus, Galeaticarpa, and Pseudocryptoclypeus. These genera are characterised by ascomata with or without a slit-like ostiole and pycnidial conidiomata. Three new families, Aquasubmersaceae, Cryptocoryneaceae, and Hermatomycetaceae, are proposed. Two genera previously recognised as members of Lophiotremataceae, namely, Aquasubmersa having ascomata with a papillate ostiolar neck and pycnidial conidiomata and Hermatomyces possessing sporodochial conidiomata and dimorphic (lenticular and cylindrical) conidia, are included in Aquasubmersaceae and Hermatomycetaceae, respectively. Cryptocoryneum, characterised by the presence of stromatic sporodochia, cheiroid conidia, and conidial arms developed downward from the cap cells, is placed in Cryptocoryneaceae. Two new genera, Antealophiotrema and Pseudolophiotrema, are established, but their familial placements remain unresolved. Antealophiotrema bears ascomata morphologically similar to those of Lophiotrema, but is differentiated from the latter by having ascomata with a well-developed peridium and a monodictys-like asexual morph. Pseudolophiotrema is also similar to Lophiotrema, but can be distinguished by ascomata with a thin peridium. A total of three new families, seven new genera, eight new species, and two new combinations are described and illustrated.
The family Lophiotremataceae (Pleosporales, Dothideomycetes) is taxonomically revised on the basis of morphological observations and phylogenetic analyses of sequences of nuclear rDNA SSU, ITS, and LSU regions and tef1 and rpb2 genes. A total of 208 sequences were generated from species of Lophiotremataceae and its relatives. According to phylogenetic analyses, Lophiotremataceae encompasses the genus Lophiotrema and five new genera: Atrocalyx, Crassimassarina, Cryptoclypeus, Galeaticarpa, and Pseudocryptoclypeus. These genera are characterised by ascomata with or without a slit-like ostiole and pycnidial conidiomata. Three new families, Aquasubmersaceae, Cryptocoryneaceae, and Hermatomycetaceae, are proposed. Two genera previously recognised as members of Lophiotremataceae, namely, Aquasubmersa having ascomata with a papillate ostiolar neck and pycnidial conidiomata and Hermatomyces possessing sporodochial conidiomata and dimorphic (lenticular and cylindrical) conidia, are included in Aquasubmersaceae and Hermatomycetaceae, respectively. Cryptocoryneum, characterised by the presence of stromatic sporodochia, cheiroid conidia, and conidial arms developed downward from the cap cells, is placed in Cryptocoryneaceae. Two new genera, Antealophiotrema and Pseudolophiotrema, are established, but their familial placements remain unresolved. Antealophiotrema bears ascomata morphologically similar to those of Lophiotrema, but is differentiated from the latter by having ascomata with a well-developed peridium and a monodictys-like asexual morph. Pseudolophiotrema is also similar to Lophiotrema, but can be distinguished by ascomata with a thin peridium. A total of three new families, seven new genera, eight new species, and two new combinations are described and illustrated.
Lophiotremataceae was originally established as a monotypic family comprising the type genus Lophiotrema (Hirayama & Tanaka 2011). This genus is relatively common, known from throughout the world, and new species are continually being discovered (Mathiassen 1993, Tanaka & Harada 2003, Zhang et al. 2009, Liu et al. 2015, Hyde et al. 2016). Species in Lophiotrema are characterised by immersed ascomata with a crest-like ostiolar neck and cylindrical asci. Although the taxonomic validity of Lophiotremataceae has been confirmed by molecular studies, only a few of its members have been confirmed based on DNA studies (Hyde et al. 2013).Several major taxonomic and phylogenetic investigations have been carried out to discover missing lineages in Ascomycota (Zhang et al. 2012, Ariyawansa et al. 2015, Liu et al. 2015, Doilom et al. 2016, Hashimoto et al. 2016, Hyde et al. 2016). In these studies, three interesting genera, Aquasubmersa, Cryptocoryneum, and Hermatomyces, were analysed phylogenetically suggesting a close relationship to Lophiotremataceae. Aquasubmersa was initially described as a coelomycetous genus (Zhang et al. 2012). Later, a second species of this genus, A. japonicum with sexual and asexual morphs, was reported (Ariyawansa et al. 2015). The asexual genus Hermatomyces is characterised by having sporodochial conidiomata and dimorphic, i.e., lenticular and cylindrical, conidia (Chang 1995). Phylogenetic analyses using sequences of nuclear rDNA small subunit (18S; SSU), internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and large subunit (28S; LSU) regions and translation elongation factor 1-α (tef1) and DNA-directed RNA polymer-ase II second largest subunit (rpb2) genes have suggested that Aquasubmersa and Hermatomyces are closely related to Lophiotrema (Doilom et al. 2016, Tibpromma et al. 2016). On the basis of their phylogenetic studies, Doilom et al. (2016) and Tibpromma et al. (2016) proposed that Aquasubmersa and Hermatomyces are additional members of Lophiotremataceae. Another genus, Cryptocoryneum, is characterised by having stromatic sporodochia and cheiroid conidia (Schoknecht & Crane 1977). Recently, Hashimoto et al. (2016) assessed the taxonomic placement of Cryptocoryneum species on the basis of morphological observations and the results of a molecular phylogenetic analysis. Although their BLAST search of NCBIs GenBank nucleotide database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/) suggested that the genus is also related to Lophiotremataceae (Hashimoto et al. 2016), they could not resolve the familial position of Cryptocoryneum. Many genera related to the family Lophiotremataceae still need to be re-evaluated.During our on-going studies of ascomycetous fungi in Japan (Tanaka et al. 2010, 2011, 2015, Hashimoto et al. 2015a, b, 2016), we have collected 57 strains morphologically or phylogenetically related to Lophiotremataceae. The main objectives of the present study were to establish a taxonomic framework within Lophiotremataceae s.lat. and to evaluate the circumscription of this family based on morphological observations and phylogenetic analyses of SSU, ITS, and LSU nuclear rDNA and tef1 and rpb2 gene sequences.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Isolation and morphological observation
All fungal structures were observed in preparations mounted in distilled water. Morphological characters were observed by differential interference and phase contrast microscopy (Olympus BX53), with images captured with an Olympus digital camera (DP21). A total of 57 single-spore isolates were used for morphological observations and phylogenetic analyses (Table 1). Colony characteristics of cultures grown on potato dextrose agar (PDA; Difco) were observed after 3 wk cultivation at 20 °C in the dark. Colours were noted as described by Rayner (1970). To induce sexual or asexual fructification in culture, 5-mm squares of mycelial agar were placed on wateragar including sterilised natural substrate, such as rice straws and pine needles, and the plates were incubated at 20 °C for 2 wk in the dark. When the substrate was colonised, the plates were incubated at 20 °C under blacklight blue illumination for 2 mo to observe sporulation. Cultures were deposited in the Japan Collection of Microorganisms (JCM), the NITE Biological Resource Centre (NBRC), and the GeneBank Project, NARO, Japan (MAFF). Specimens were deposited in the fungus herbarium of Hirosaki University (HHUF).
Table 1
Specimens, isolates and new sequence accessions used in this study.
Species
Family
Original no.
Specimen no.a
Strain no.
GenBank Accession no.b
SSU
LSU
tef1
rpb2
ITS
Antealophiotrema brunneosporum
incertae sedis
–
CBS H-20222H
CBS 123095
LC194298
LC194340
LC194382
LC194419
LC194474
Aquasubmersa japonica
Aquasubmersaceae
KT 2813
HHUF 30468P
MAFF 245218
LC0615811
LC0615861
LC194383
LC194420
LC0615911
Aquasubmersaceae
KT 2862
HHUF 30469H
MAFF 245219
LC0615821
LC0615871
LC194384
LC194421
LC0615921
Aquasubmersaceae
KT 2863
HHUF 30470P
MAFF 245220
LC0615831
LC0615881
LC194385
LC194422
LC0615931
Atrocalyx acutisporus
Lophiotremataceae
KT 2436
HHUF 30504H
MAFF 245613 = NBRC 112316
LC194299
LC194341
LC194386
LC194423
LC194475
A. lignicola
Lophiotremataceae
–
CBS H-20221H
CBS 122364
LC194300
LC194342
LC194387
LC194424
LC194476
Crassimassarina macrospora
Lophiotremataceae
KH 152
HHUF 30512P
MAFF 245617
LC194301
LC194343
LC194388
LC194425
LC194477
Lophiotremataceae
KT 1764
HHUF 29084H
JCM 13096 = MAFF 239606
LC194302
LC194344
LC194389
LC194426
LC194478
Cryptoclypeus oxysporus
Lophiotremataceae
KT 2772
HHUF 30507H
MAFF 245614 = NBRC 112317
LC194303
LC194345
LC194390
LC194427
LC194479
C. ryukyuensis
Lophiotremataceae
AH 342
HHUF 30510P
MAFF 245616
LC194304
LC194346
LC194391
LC194428
LC194480
Lophiotremataceae
KT 3534
HHUF 30509H
MAFF 245615 = NBRC 112318
LC194305
LC194347
LC194392
LC194429
LC194481
Cryptocoryneum akitaense
Cryptocoryneaceae
KT 3019
HHUF 30477H
MAFF 245365 = NBRC 111758
LC194306
LC194348
LC0961362
LC194430
LC0961542
C. brevicondensatum
Cryptocoryneaceae
yone 152
HHUF 30478H
MAFF 245366 = NBRC 111759
LC194307
LC194349
LC0961372
LC194431
LC096155 2
C. condensatum
Cryptocoryneaceae
–
UPS F-632989
CBS 113959
LC194308
LC194350
LC0961382
LC194432
LC0961562
Cryptocoryneaceae
–
–
CBS 122629
LC194309
LC194351
LC0961392
LC194433
LC0961572
Cryptocoryneaceae
–
–
CBS 122633
LC194310
LC194352
LC0961402
LC194434
LC096158 2
Cryptocoryneaceae
KT 2892
HHUF 30479H
MAFF 245367 = NBRC 111760
LC194311
LC194353
LC0961412
LC194435
LC096159 2
C. japonicum
Cryptocoryneaceae
KT 2961
HHUF 30480P
MAFF 245368
LC194312
LC194354
LC0961422
LC194436
LC0961602
Cryptocoryneaceae
KT 3291
HHUF 30481P
MAFF 245369
LC194313
LC194355
LC0961432
LC194437
LC0961612
Cryptocoryneaceae
KT 3300
HHUF 30482H
MAFF 245370 = NBRC 111761
LC194314
LC194356
LC0961442
LC194438
LC0961622
Cryptocoryneaceae
KT 3413
HHUF 30483P
MAFF 245371
LC194315
LC194357
LC0961452
LC194439
LC0961632
Cryptocoryneaceae
yone 36
HHUF 30484P
MAFF 245372
LC194316
LC194358
LC0961462
LC194440
LC0961642
Cryptocoryneaceae
yone 157
HHUF 30485P
MAFF 245373
LC194317
LC194359
LC0961472
LC194441
LC0961652
C. longicondensatum
Cryptocoryneaceae
KT 2913
HHUF 30486H
MAFF 245374 = NBRC 111762
LC194318
LC194360
LC0961482
LC194442
LC0961662
Cryptocoryneaceae
KT 3487
HHUF 30487P
MAFF 245375
LC194319
LC194361
LC0961492
LC194443
LC0961672
C. paracondensatum
Cryptocoryneaceae
KT 3071
HHUF 30488P
MAFF 245376
LC194320
LC194362
LC0961502
LC194444
LC0961682
Cryptocoryneaceae
KT 3241
HHUF 30489H
MAFF 245377 = NBRC 111763
LC194321
LC194363
LC0961512
LC194445
LC0961692
C. pseudorilstonei
Cryptocoryneaceae
–
HHUF 30490H
CBS 113641
LC194322
LC194364
LC0961522
LC194446
LC0961702
Cryptocoryneum sp.
Cryptocoryneaceae
–
–
CBS 114518
LC194323
LC194365
LC0961532
LC194447
LC0961712
Galeaticarpa aomoriensis
Lophiotremataceae
KT 2563
HHUF 30505H
MAFF 245618 = NBRC 112319
LC194324
LC194366
LC194393
LC194448
LC194482
Hermatomyces iriomotensis
Hermatomycetaceae
KH 361
HHUF 30518H
MAFF 245730 = NBRC 112471
LC194325
LC194367
LC194394
LC194449
LC194483
H. tectonae
Hermatomycetaceae
KT 2450
HHUF 30520
MAFF 245731
LC194326
LC194368
LC194395
LC194450
LC194484
Hermatomycetaceae
AH 276
HHUF 30521
MAFF 245732
LC194327
LC194369
LC194396
LC194451
LC194485
Hermatomycetaceae
AH 314
HHUF 30522
MAFF 245733
LC194328
LC194370
LC194397
LC194452
LC194486
Hermatomycetaceae
KH 329
HHUF 30523
MAFF 245734
LC194329
LC194371
LC194398
LC194453
LC194487
Hermatomycetaceae
KH 356
HHUF 30524
MAFF 245735
LC194330
LC194372
LC194399
LC194454
LC194488
Hermatomycetaceae
KH 390
HHUF 30525
MAFF 245736
LC194331
LC194373
LC194400
LC194455
LC194489
Hermatomycetaceae
KH 409
HHUF 30526
MAFF 245737
LC194332
LC194374
LC194401
LC194456
LC194490
‘Lophiotrema’ boreale
incertae sedis
–
–
CBS 114422 = JCM 14136
LC194333
LC194375
LC194402
LC194457
LC194491
L. eburnoides
Lophiotremataceae
KT 1424-1
HHUF 30079H
JCM 17826 = MAFF 242970
LC0017063
LC0017073
LC194403
LC194458
LC0017093
L. fallopiae
Lophiotremataceae
KT 2748
HHUF 30506H
MAFF 245612
LC1499114
LC1499154
LC194404
LC194459
LC149913 4
L. neoarundinaria
Lophiotremataceae
KT 856
HHUF 27547
MAFF 239461
AB5244555
AB5245965
AB5391096
AB539096
AB5247865
Lophiotremataceae
KT 1034
HHUF 30015
NBRC 106239
AB524457 5
AB5245985
LC194405
LC194460
LC194492
Lophiotremataceae
KT 2200
HHUF 30014
NBRC 106238
AB524456 5
AB5245975
AB539110 6
AB5390976
AB5247875
Lophiotremataceae
KH 17
HHUF 30511
MAFF 245619
LC194334
LC194376
LC194406
LC194461
LC194493
Lophiotremataceae
KT 588
HHUF 27368
MAFF 245620
LC194335
LC194377
LC194407
LC194462
LC194494
Lophiotremataceae
KT 713
HHUF 27328
JCM 17673
AB6187017
AB6190197
LC194408
LC194463
LC194495
Lophiotremataceae
KT 756
HHUF 27330
MAFF 239457
AB6187027
AB6190207
LC194409
LC194464
LC194496
L. nucula
Lophiotremataceae
–
–
CBS 627.86 = JCM 14132
AB6187037
AB6190217
LC194410
LC194465
LC194497
L. vagabundum
Lophiotremataceae
KH 164
HHUF 30077
JCM 17674
AB618704 7
AB619022 7
LC194411
LC194466
LC194498
Lophiotremataceae
KH 172
HHUF 30078
JCM 17675
AB618705 7
AB619023 7
LC194412
LC194467
LC194499
Lophiotremataceae
KT 664
HHUF 27323
MAFF 239456
AB618706 7
AB6190247
LC194413
LC194468
LC194500
Lophiotremataceae
KT 3310
HHUF 30508
MAFF 245621
LC194336
LC194378
LC194414
LC194469
LC194501
Lophiotremataceae
–
F-634236
CBS 113975 = JCM 14138
AB618707 7
AB6190257
LC194415
LC194470
LC194502
‘Massarina albocarnis’
Lophiotremataceae
–
–
CBS 119345
LC194337
LC194379
LC194416
LC194471
LC194503
Pseudocryptoclypeus yakushimensis
Lophiotremataceae
KT 2186
HHUF 30503H
MAFF 245622 = NBRC 112320
LC194338
LC194380
LC194417
LC194472
LC194504
Pseudolophiotrema elymicola
incertae sedis
KT 1450
HHUF 28984H
JCM 13090 = MAFF 239600
LC194339
LC194381
LC194418
LC194473
LC194505
a H = holotype; P = paratype.
b Sequences obtained in this study are shown in bold.
Sequences with 1 from Ariyawansa et al. (2015),
2 from Hashimoto et al. (2016),
3 from Liu et al. (2015),
4 from Hyde et al. (2016),
5 from Tanaka et al. (2009),
6 from Schoch et al. (2009),
7 from Hirayama & Tanaka (2011).
Phylogenetic analyses
DNA extraction was carried out with an ISOPLANT II kit (Nippon Gene, Japan) in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol. Partial SSU, complete ITS, and partial LSU nuclear rDNA regions and partial tef1 and partial rpb2 genes were amplified by PCR with the primer pairs NS1/NS4, ITS1/ITS4 (White et al. 1990), LR0R/LR7 (Rehner & Samuels 1994, Vilgalys & Hester 1990), EF1-983F/EF1-2218R (Rehner & Buckley 2005), and fRPB2-5F/fRPB2-7cR (Liu et al. 1999), respectively. Amplifications were performed in 25 μL volumes consisting of 2 μL DNA extract, 2.5 μL of 10× TEMPase Buffer I, 10 mM dNTP mix, 1 μL of each 20-pM primer, 25 mM MgCl2, 14.5 μL MilliQ water, and 0.5 μL TEMPase Hot Start DNA polymerase (Ampliqon, Denmark). PCRs were carried out on a PC 320 thermocycler (ASTEC, Japan) as follows: 95 °C for 15 min, followed by 35 cycles of 1 min at 94 °C, 1 min at the designated annealing temperature (42.2 °C for SSU, 61.5 °C for ITS, 46 °C for LSU, 60 °C for tef1, and 58 °C for rpb2), and 1 min at 72 °C, with a final denaturation step of 7 min at 72 °C. The PCR products were sequenced directly at SolGent (South Korea).Newly generated sequences were deposited in GenBank (Table 1). Sequences of 32 taxa from Amniculicolaceae, Anteagloniaceae, Aquasubmersaceae, Hermatomycetaceae, Lophiotremataceae, Pseudoastrosphaeriellaceae, Testudinaceae, and Tetraplosphaeriaceae were also phylogenetically analysed (Table 2). Lophiostoma crenatum and L. arundinis (Lophiostomataceae) were used as outgroups. All sequences were aligned using the MUSCLE algorithm as implemented in MEGA v. 5 (Tamura et al. 2011). Phylogenetic analyses were conducted using maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian methods. The optimum substitution models for each dataset were estimated by Kakusan4 (Tanabe 2011) based on the Akaike information Criterion (AIC; Akaike 1974) for the ML analysis and the Bayesian information Criterion (BIC; Schwarz 1978) for the Bayesian analysis. The ML analysis was performed using TreeFinder Mar 2011 (Jobb 2011) based on the models selected with the AICc4 parameter (proportional model among genes and proportional model among codons), namely, TN93ef+G for SSU, TN93+G for LSU, J2ef+G for ITS, F81+G for the tef1 first codon position, TIMef+G for the tef1 second codon position, J2+G for the tef1 third codon position, J2+G for the rpb2 first codon position, JC69+G for the rpb2 second codon position, and TN93ef+G for the rpb2 third codon position. Bootstrap proportions (BPs) were obtained by 1 000 bootstrap replications. Bayesian analysis was performed with MrBayes v. 3.2.2 (Ronquist et al. 2012) with substitution models for different regions selected with the BIC4 parameter (i.e., proportional model among loci and among codons): K80+G for SSU, SYM+G for LSU, SYM+G for ITS, F81+G for the tef1 first codon position, GTR+G for the tef1 second codon position, GTR+G for the tef1 third codon position, GTR+G for the rpb2 first codon position, HKY85+G for the rpb2 second codon position, and SYM+G for the rpb2 third codon position. Two simultaneous, independent Metropolis-coupled Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) runs were performed for 2 M generations with trees sampled every 1 000 generations. Convergence of the MCMC procedure was assessed from the average standard deviation of split frequencies (< 0.01) and effective sample size scores (all > 100) using MrBayes and Tracer v. 1.6 (Rambaut et al. 2014), respectively. The first 25 % of trees were discarded as burn-in, and the remaining trees were used to calculate 50 % majority rule trees and to determine posterior probabilities (PPs) for individual branches. The alignment was submitted to TreeBASE under study number S19310.
Table 2
Specimens, isolates and GenBank accession numbers of species used in the phylogenetic study.
Species
Family
Specimen no.a
Strain no.
GenBan k Accession no.
SSU
LSU
tef1
rpb2
ITS
Amniculicola immersa
Amniculicolaceae
CBS H-20226H
CBS 123083
GU456295
FJ795498
GU456273
GU456358
–
A. parva
Amniculicolaceae
CBS H-20227H
CBS 123092
GU296134
GU301797
GU349065
–
–
Anteaglonium abbreviatum
Anteagloniaceae
ANM 925.1
–
–
GQ221877
GQ221924
–
–
A. globosum
Anteagloniaceae
ANM 925.2H
–
–
GQ221879
GQ221925
–
–
Anteagloniaceae
SMH 5283P
–
–
GQ221911
GQ221919
–
–
A. parvulum
Anteagloniaceae
MFLU 16-0473
MFLUCC 14-0815
KU922912
KU922911
KU922919
–
–
Anteagloniaceae
MFLU 16-0472
MFLUCC 14-0817
KU922914
KU922913
–
–
–
Anteagloniaceae
MFLU 16-0474
MFLUCC 14-0821
KU922916
KU922915
KU922921
–
–
Anteagloniaceae
MFLU 16-0470
MFLUCC 14-0823
KU922918
KU922917
KU922922
–
–
A. thailandicum
Anteagloniaceae
MFLU 16-0471H
MFLUCC 14-0816
KU922910
KU922909
KU922920
–
–
Aquasubmersa mircensis
Aquasubmersaceae
MFLU 111001H
MFLUCC 11-0401 = IFRDCC 2572
JX276956
JX276955
–
–
JX276954
Byssolophis sphaerioides
incertae sedis
–
IFRDCC 2053
GU456296
GU456318
GU456263
GU456348
–
Hermatomyces tectonae
Hermatomycetaceae
MFLU 15-3437H
MFLUCC 14-1140
KU712465
KU764695
KU872757
KU712486
KU144917
Hermatomycetaceae
MFLU 15-3438 P
MFLUCC 14-1141
KU712466
KU764696
KU872758
–
KU144918
Hermatomycetaceae
MFLU 15-3439 P
MFLUCC 14-1142
KU712467
KU764697
–
KU712487
KU144919
H. thailandica
Hermatomycetaceae
MFLU 15-3440H
MFLUCC 14-1143
KU712468
KU764692
KU872754
KU712488
KU144920
Hermatomycetaceae
MFLU 15-3441P
MFLUCC 14-1144
KU712469
KU764693
KU872755
KU712489
KU144921
Hermatomycetaceae
MFLU 15-3442P
MFLUCC 14-1145
KU712470
KU764694
KU872756
KU712490
KU144922
Lepidosphaeria nicotiae
Testudinaceae
–
CBS 101341
–
DQ678067
DQ677910
DQ677963
–
Lophiostoma arundinis
Lophiostomataceae
–
CBS 621.86
DQ782383
DQ782384
DQ782387
DQ782386
AJ496633
‘Lophiotrema’ bambusae
Lophiotremataceae
MFLU 11-0150
MFLUCC 10-0558
KX672159
KX672154
KX672162
KX672161
KX672149
L. crenatum
Lophiostomataceae
–
CBS 629.86
DQ678017
DQ678069
DQ677912
DQ677965
–
Polyplosphaeria fusca
Tetraplosphaeriaceae
HHUF 29399H
JCM 13175 = MAFF 239685
AB524463
AB524604
–
–
AB524789
Pseudoastrosphaeriella bambusae
Pseudoastrosphaeriellaceae
MFLU 11-0155H
MFLUCC 11-0205
KT955455
KT955475
KT955437
KT955414
–
P. longicolla
Pseudoastrosphaeriellaceae
MFLU 11-0207H
MFLUCC 11-0171
–
KT955476
KT955438
KT955420
–
P. thailandensis
Pseudoastrosphaeriellaceae
MFLU 11-0145H
MFLUCC 10-0553
KT955456
KT955477
KT955439
KT955411
–
Pseudotetraploa curviappendiculata
Tetraplosphaeriaceae
HHUF 28582H
JCM 12852 = MAFF 239495
AB524467
AB524608
–
–
AB524792
Quadricrura septentrionalis
Tetraplosphaeriaceae
HHUF 28781P
CBS 125429
AB524474
AB524615
–
–
AB524799
Tetrapla sasicola
Tetraplosphaeriaceae
HHUF 27566H
JCM 13167 = MAFF 239677
AB524490
AB524631
–
–
AB524807
Triplosphaeria maxima
Tetraplosphaeriaceae
HHUF 29390H
JCM 13172 = MAFF 239682
AB524496
AB524637
–
–
AB524812
Ulospora bilgramii
Testudinaceae
–
CBS 101364
DQ678025
DQ678076
DQ677921
DQ677974
–
Verruculina enalia
Testudinaceae
–
BCC 18402
GU479771
GU479803
GU479864
GU479836
–
a H = holotype, P = paratype.
RESULTS
The ML and Bayesian phylogenetic analyses were conducted using an aligned sequence dataset comprising 970 nucleotide positions from SSU, 1 275 from LSU, 340 from ITS, 909 from tef1, and 1 023 from rpb2. The alignment contained a total of 89 taxa, which consisted of 84 taxa (94.4 %) in SSU, 89 (100 %) in LSU, 71 (79.8 %) in ITS, 81 (91 %) in tef1, 73 (82 %) in rpb2 (Table 1, 2). No significant conflict was observed among individual gene phylogenies, allowing the five genes to be combined into a single dataset. This combined dataset provided higher confidence values for the familial level than did those of the individual gene trees (data not shown). ITS1 was excluded from the analyses because it contained too many ambiguously aligned regions. Of the 4 517 characters included in the alignment, 1 307 were variable and 3 189 were conserved. The ML tree with the highest log likelihood (–31261.0019) is shown in Fig. 1. The Bayesian likelihood score was –31334.0529. The topology recovered by the Bayesian analysis was almost identical to that of the ML tree except for the position of Anteagloniaceae.
Fig. 1
Maximum-likelihood (ML) tree of Aquasubmersaceae, Cryptocoryneaceae, Hermatomycetaceae, and Lophiotremataceae based on SSU-ITS-LSU-tef1-rpb2 sequences. ML bootstrap proportion (BP) > 60 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) > 0.95 are presented at the nodes as ML BP/Bayesian PP. A hyphen (‘-’) indicates values < 60 % BP or 0.95 PP, and a node not present in the Bayesian analysis is shown with ‘x’. Ex-holotype strains are indicated with a superscript H. The newly obtained sequences are shown in bold and red. The scale bar represents nucleotide substitutions per site.
In the phylogenetic tree shown in Fig. 1, Lophiotremataceae forms a moderately supported clade (77 % ML BP/1.00 Bayesian PP) (Fig. 1). The clade corresponding to Lophiotrema s.str. includes L. eburnoides, L. fallopiae, L. neoarundinaria, L. neohysterioides, L. nucula, and L. vagabundum. The results of the phylogenetic analyses suggest that four species previously placed in Lophiotrema, i.e., L. boreale, L. brunneosporum, L.lignicola, and L. bambusae (Mathiassen 1993, Zhang et al. 2009, Hyde et al. 2016), should be excluded from the genus. The first two species, L. boreale and L. brunneosporum, lie outside of Lophiotremataceae, but their familial placements are unresolved (Fig. 1). On the basis of these results, a new genus, Antealophiotrema, is established for L. brunneosporum. Lophiotrema lignicola is transferred to the new genus Atrocalyx, and a new combination, Atrocalyx lignicola, is proposed. The generic placement of L. bambusae and L. boreale remains unresolved because we were unable to examine any material of these species.Four families, including the three new families, Aquasubmersaceae, Cryptocoryneaceae, and Hermatomycetaceae, 10 genera including seven new genera, nine species including seven new species, and two new combinations are described below.A. Hashim. & Kaz. Tanaka, fam. nov. — MycoBank MB819235Type genus. Aquasubmersa K.D. Hyde & Huang Zhang, Cryptog. Mycol. 33: 340. 2012.Saprobic on woody plants.Sexual morph: Ascomata scattered to grouped, subglobose, semi-immersed, with a papillate ostiolar neck. Peridium composed of flattened, thin-walled, polygonal cells. Pseudoparaphyses septate, branched. Asci bitunicate, cylindrical, with a short pedicel, 8-spored. Ascospores hyaline, broadly fusiform with rounded ends, septate.Asexual morph: Conidiomata pycnidial, globose to subglobose, scattered, semi-immersed, ostiolate. Conidiophores absent. Conidiogenous cells holoblastic, lageniform, hyaline, smooth. Conidia hyaline, ellipsoidal, smooth.Notes — Previous phylogenetic studies using SSU and LSU rDNA sequences placed Aquasubmersa in Pleosporales (Zhang et al. 2012, Ariyawansa et al. 2015). This genus was treated as a member of Lophiotremataceae in a recent study (Doilom et al. 2016). The results of our phylogenetic analyses based on SSU-ITS-LSU-tef1-rpb2 sequences strongly support (99 % ML BP/1.00 Bayesian PP) this genus as sister to a clade comprising Lophiotremataceae and Cryptocoryneaceae (Fig. 1). To accommodate the genus Aquasubmersa, we introduce a new family, Aquasubmersaceae. Species in Aquasubmersa ceae share several common features, such as ascomata having a papillate ostiolar neck and pycnidial conidiomata. Lophiotremataceae differs from Aquasubmersaceae in having ascomata with a compressed, slit-like ostiole. Cryptocoryneaceae and Hermatomycetaceae, whose sexual morphs are still undetermined, can be easily distinguished from Aquasubmersaceae, which has ellipsoidal conidia, because two families have sporodochial conidiomata and cheiroid or lenticular conidia, respectively.K.D. Hyde & Huang Zhang, Cryptog. Mycol. 33: 340. 2012Type species. Aquasubmersa mircensis Huang Zhang & K.D. Hyde, Cryptog. Mycol. 33: 340. 2012.Notes — The type species of this genus, A. mircensis, was reported only as an asexual morph (Zhang et al. 2012). Ariyawansa et al. (2015) subsequently introduced the second species, A. japonica, with sexual and asexual morphs. Both species occurred on submerged woody plants.A. Hashim. & Kaz. Tanaka, fam. nov. — MycoBank MB819237Type genus. Cryptocoryneum Fuckel, Fungi Rhenani Exsicc. XV–XVI: 25. 1865.Saprobic on various plants.Sexual morph: Undetermined.Asexual morph: Conidiomata sporodochial, pulvinate, often confluent, dark brown to black. Conidiophores arising from stromatic cells, simple, septate, hyaline to pale brown. Conidiogenous cells monoblastic, cylindrical to oblong, terminal, determinate, hyaline to pale brown. Conidia solitary, acrogenous, branched, cheiroid, with dark brown to black cap cells firmly united together, multi-armed; basal cells brown, cuneiform, smooth, thin-walled; arms cylindrical, pale brown, branched at base, smooth, multi-septate.Notes — Cryptocoryneum is characterised by having stromatic sporodochia, cheiroid conidia, and conidial arms that are developed downward from the cap cells (Schoknecht & Crane 1977). This genus was recently taxonomically and phylogenetically reassessed by Hashimoto et al. (2016). A BLAST search with ITS sequences of species in this genus suggested a close relationship with Lophiotremataceae, but their familial position remains unresolved (Hashimoto et al. 2016). According to our results, Cryptocoryneum forms a lineage that is phylogenetically distinct from Lophiotremataceae (Fig. 1). Although the sexual morph of Cryptocoryneum has not been determined, asexual morphs of this genus are phenotypically different from the coelomycetous asexual morph of Lophiotremataceae (Leuchtmann 1985, this study). We therefore introduce the new family Cryptocoryneaceae to accommodate the genus Cryptocoryneum.Fuckel, Fungi Rhenani Exsicc. XV–XVI: 25. 1865Type species. Cryptocoryneum fasciculatum Fuckel, Fungi Rhenani Exsicc. XV–XVI: 25. Fung. Rhen. 1527. 1865. (= Cryptocoryneum hysterioides (Corda) Peyronel, Nuovo Giorn. Bot. Ital. 25: 449. 1918.)Notes — For further information on this genus, see Hashimoto et al. (2016).Locq. ex A. Hashim. & Kaz. Tanaka, fam. nov. — MycoBank MB819238Hermatomycetaceae Locq., Mycologie générale et structural: 202. 1984. nom. inval. (Art. 36.1, Melbourne Code).Type genus. Hermatomyces Speg., Anales Mus. Nac. Buenos Aires, ser. 3, 13: 445. 1911.Saprobic on various plants.Sexual morph: Undetermined.Asexual morph: Conidiomata sporodochial, pulvinate, dark brown to black. Conidiophores mononematous, pale brown. Conidiogenous cells monoblastic, integrated, terminal, cylindrical. Conidia dimorphic; lenticular conidia ellipsoidal, muriform; cylindrical trans-septate, hyaline to brown.Notes — The family Hermatomycetaceae sensu Locq. was informally proposed as a provisional name (Locquin 1984). Hermatomycetaceae is established here to accommodate the single genus Hermatomyces. Two of the most striking features of Hermatomyces are the sporodochial conidiomata and the dimorphic conidia, the latter existing in lenticular and cylindrical forms (Chang 1995). As a sexual morph of this genus has not been reported and a phylogenetic study has not been performed, this genus has long been treated as ‘incertae sedis’ within Ascomycota (Wijayawardene et al. 2012). Doilom et al. (2016) and Tibpromma et al. (2016) have suggested that this genus belongs to Lophiotremataceae on the basis of their phylogenetic analyses using SSU, LSU, tef1, and rpb2. Our analyses using additional species of Lophiotremataceae and its related taxa revealed that Hermatomyces is distantly related to Lophiotremataceae (Fig. 1).Speg., Anales Mus. Nac. Buenos Aires, ser. 3, 13: 445. 1911Type species. Hermatomyces tucumanensis Speg., Anales Mus. Nac. Buenos Aires, ser. 3, 13: 446. 1911.Saprobic on various plants.Sexual morph: Undetermined.Asexual morph: Conidiomata sporodochial, pulvinate, often confluent, dark brown to black. Conidiophores mononematous, septate, pale brown. Conidiogenous cells monoblastic, integrated, terminal, cylindrical. Conidia dimorphic; lenticular conidia ellipsoidal, muriform, dark brown to black at central cells, pale brown at peripheral cells; cylindrical conidia composed of black peripheral cells and dark brown upper cells, hyaline at lower cells.Notes — This genus was established by Spegazzini (1911) to accommodate H. tucumanensis. Since its establishment, 10 additional taxa have been described worldwide (Spegazzini 1911, Hughes 1953, Rao & De Hoog 1986, Castañeda-Ruiz & Heredia 2000, Leão-Ferreira et al. 2013, Prasher & Prasher 2014, Doilom et al. 2016, Tibpromma et al. 2016). Most species of this genus occur on angiosperms and monocots, with a few rarely reported from ferns (Castañeda-Ruiz & Heredia 2000) or gymnosperms (Mel’nik 2000). The most widespread species in the genus, H. sphaericus, has been reported from Africa, Eurasia, and Central and South America (Spegazzini 1911, Hughes 1953, Chang 1995, Matsushima 1993, Mel’nik 2000, Barbosa & Gusmão 2011).A. Hashim. & Kaz. Tanaka, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB819239; Fig. 2a, 3
Fig. 2
Colony characters of lophiotremataceous species used in this study on PDA within 3 wk at 20 °C in the dark (left: upper, right: reverse). a. Hermatomyces iriomotensis (MAFF 245730 = NBRC 112471, ex-holotype culture); b. Atrocalyx acutisporus (MAFF 245613 = NBRC 112316, ex-holotype culture); c. A. lignicola (CBS 122364, ex-holotype culture); d. Crassimassarina macrospora (JCM 13096 = MAFF 239606, ex-holotype culture); e. C. macrospora (MAFF 245617, ex-paratype culture); f. Cryptoclypeus oxysporus (MAFF 245614 = NBRC 112317, ex-holotype culture); g. C. ryukyuensis (MAFF 245615 = NBRC 112318, ex-holotype culture); h. C. ryukyuensis (MAFF 245616, ex-paratype culture); i. Galeaticarpa aomoriensis (MAFF 245618 = NBRC 112319, ex-holotype culture); j. Pseudocryptoclypeus yakushimensis (MAFF 245622 = NBRC 112320, ex-holotype culture); k. Antealophiotrema brunneosporum (CBS 123095, ex-holotype culture); l. Pseudolophiotrema elymicola (JCM 13090 = MAFF 239600, ex-holotype culture). — Scale bar = 1 cm.
Fig. 3
Hermatomyces iriomotensis. a–b. Conidiomata on substrate; c. conidiogenous cell and immature lenticular conidium; d–f. lenticular conidia (f. lateral view); g. conidiogenous cells and immature cylindrical conidium; h–j. cylindrical conidia (all: HHUF 30518, holotype). — Scale bars: a = 1 mm; b = 200 μm; c, e–j = 5 μm; d = 10 μm.
Etymology. Referring to the collection site.Saprobic on woody plants.Sexual morph: Undetermined.Asexual morph: Conidiomata sporodochial, pulvinate, often confluent, dark brown to black. Conidiophores mononematous, short, pale brown, smooth, 2.5–3 μm wide, 17.5–22 μm high, sometimes reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells monoblastic, terminal, integrated. Conidia dimorphic, lenticular and cylindrical. Lenticular conidia solitary, elliptical to almost round in one plane, smooth, muriform, with pale peripheral cells surrounding central dark brown to black cells, 30–36 × 20–27 μm (av. = 33.6 × 23.5 μm, n = 50), 18–24 μm thick (av. = 21.9 μm, n = 30) in lateral view. Cylindrical conidia straight to curved, with one to two columns, 3–7-septate, hyaline, sometimes pale brown at apical cell, constricted at the septa, 20.5–33 × 7–12.5 μm (av. = 28.7 × 9.6 μm, n = 20).Culture characteristics — Colonies on PDA attaining 24–28 mm diam within 21 d at 20 °C in the dark, floccose, centrally raised, straw (46: Rayner 1970) to grey olivaceous (107); reverse smoke grey (105) to grey olivaceous (107) (Fig. 2a); no sporulation observed.Specimen examined. Japan, Okinawa, Isl. Iriomote, near Tropical botanic garden, on dead twigs of woody plant, 13 July 2011, K. Hirayama & K. Tanaka, KH 361 (HHUF 30518 holotype designated here, ex-holotype living culture MAFF 245730 = NBRC 112471).Notes — Lenticular conidia of this species resemble those of H. uniseriatum, but H. iriomotensis can be distinguished from the latter species by the presence of 3–7-septate cylindrical conidia arranged in 1–2 columns (vs 2–3-septate and one row in the latter; Leão-Ferreira et al. 2013). Hermatomyces iriomotensis differs from H. krabiensis, which has cylindrical conidia with swollen lower cells (Tibpromma et al. 2016). Additionally, ITS sequences between these two taxa differed at seven positions.K. Hiray. & Kaz. Tanaka, Mycoscience 52: 405. 2011Type genus. Lophiotrema Sacc., Michelia 1 (no. 3): 338. 1878.Saprobic on various plants.Sexual morph: Ascomata immersed, erumpent at the apex, subglobose. Ostiolar neck crest-like or rarely papillate, mostly elongated and laterally compressed. Peridium composed of rectangular to globose cells. Pseudoparaphyses septate, branched and anastomosed. Asci bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical, with a short stipe, 8-spored. Ascospores fusiform to broadly fusiform, hyaline, smooth.Asexual morph: Conidiomata pycnidial, globose to subglobose, scattered, semi-immersed, ostiolate. Peridium composed of subglobose to angular, brown cells. Conidiophores absent. Conidiogenous cells holoblastic or phialidic, cylindrical to ampliform, hyaline. Conidia ellipsoidal to cylindrical with rounded ends, hyaline, smooth, aseptate or multi-septate.Notes — As originally circumscribed Lophiotremataceae was a monotypic family comprising the genus Lophiotrema (Zhang et al. 2009, Hirayama & Tanaka 2011, Hyde et al. 2013). A somewhat broader familial concept for Lophiotremataceae was adopted by Doilom et al. (2016) and Tibpromma et al. (2016), who considered the family to comprise Aquasubmersa, Hermatomyces, and Lophiotrema on the basis of phylogenetic studies. However, the results of our morphological examination and phylogenetic analyses using SSU, ITS, LSU, tef1, and rpb2 sequences suggest that this family encompasses Lophiotrema and five new genera.Because Aquasubmersa and Hermatomyces were placed outside of Lophiotremataceae in our phylogenetic tree (Fig. 1), we treat these genera as belonging to the families Aquasubmersaceae and Hermatomycetaceae, respectively. One species of Lophiotrema (L. lignicola) grouped with Atrocalyx, a new genus in Lophiotremataceae, while two species (Lophiotrema boreale and L. brunneosporum) were placed outside of Lophiotremataceae entirely.Marincowitz et al. (2008) have suggested that ‘Massarina albocarnis’ (CBS 119345) has a phylogenetic affinity with Lophiotrema based on BLAST results involving ITS and LSU sequences. However, Beier et al. (2015), who observed the holotype specimen of M. albocarnis, has indicated that this species belongs to Diaporthe (Sordariomycetes). The isolate CBS 119345 may thus be misidentified. Unfortunately, we were unable to examine any morphological features of CBS 119345 because it did not sporulate in culture.Sacc., Michelia 1 (no. 3): 338. 1878Type species. Lophiotrema nucula (Fr.) Sacc., Michelia 1 (no. 3): 338. 1878.Notes — For further information on this genus, see Holm & Holm (1988), Tanaka & Harada (2003), Zhang et al. (2009), and Hirayama & Tanaka (2011). In the present study, we found that Lophiotrema s.str. should be limited to species having ascomata with a slit-like ostiole and an ascomatal wall of uniform thickness, asci with a short stipe, and pycnidial asexual morphs. Although L. brunneosporum with a monodictys-like asexual morph was sister to ‘Lophiotrema’ boreale in our phylogenetic tree (Fig. 1), these two taxa were distinct from Lophiotremataceae s.str. (Fig. 1). Consequently, they should be treated as distinct lineages in Dothideomycetes. We were unable to morphologically examine L. boreale from an isolate of this species (CBS 114422) or the original specimen used for isolation. Further examination is required to clarify the taxonomic placement of this species.A. Hashim. & Kaz. Tanaka, gen. nov. — MycoBank MB819240Etymology. From the Latin atro-, meaning black, and calyx, meaning cap.Type species. Atrocalyx acutisporus A. Hashim. & Kaz. Tanaka.Saprobic on woody plants.Sexual morph: Ascomata solitary to grouped, semi-immersed to immersed. Ostiolar neck crest-like, elongated and laterally compressed, surrounded by dark brown hyphae. Peridium composed of 2 zones at side. Pseudoparaphyses septate, branched and anastomosed. Asci bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical, 8-spored. Ascospores broadly fusiform, hyaline, 1-septate, smooth.Asexual morph: Conidiomata pycnidial, globose to subglobose, superficial, black, ostiolate. Peridium composed of elongated, brown cells. Conidiophores absent. Conidiogenous cells holoblastic, ampliform to cylindrical, hyaline. Conidia ellipsoidal, hyaline, smooth, aseptate.Notes — The new genus Atrocalyx is established to accommodate A. lignicola (formerly L. lignicola) and a new species, A. acutisporus. These two species are characterised by a crest-like, elongated and laterally compressed ostiolar neck (Fig. 4b, 5b) surrounded by a well-developed peridium (up to 62.5 μm) (Fig. 4c, 5c). ‘Lophiotrema’ bambusae, which was recently introduced as a species in Lophiotrema (Hyde et al. 2016), was nested within a moderately supported clade (67 % ML BP/1.00 Bayesian PP) along with these two species in our phylogenetic tree (Fig. 1). Because we could not observe any material of ‘Lophiotrema’ bambusae, the generic placement of this species is pending.
Fig. 4
Atrocalyx acutisporus. a–b. Appearance of ascomata on substrate; c. ascoma in longitudinal section; d. peridium of ascoma; e. pseudoparaphyses; f–g. asci; h. ascus apex; i. ascus stipe; j–k. ascospores; l. germinating ascospore; m–n. conidiomata in culture; o. conidioma in longitudinal section; p. peridium of conidioma; q–r. conidiogenous cells; s–t. conidia; u. germinating conidium (a–l: HHUF 30504, holotype; m–u: MAFF 245613, ex-holotype culture). — Scale bars: a = 500 μm; b = 200 μm; c, o = 20 μm; d–g, p = 10 μm; h–l, q–u = 5 μm; m = 1 mm; n = 250 μm.
Fig. 5
Atrocalyx lignicola. a–b. Appearance of ascomata on substrate; c. ascoma in longitudinal section; d. peridium of ascoma; e–f. asci; g. ascus apex; h. ascus stipe; i. pseudoparaphyses; j–n. ascospores (all: CBS H-20221, holotype). — Scale bars: a = 1 mm; b = 250 μm; c = 20 μm; d–f, i = 10 μm; g, h, j–n = 5 μm.
The genus is morphologically similar to Lophiotrema, but can be distinguished from the latter by its well-developed peridium around the ostiolar neck and base (vs a poorly developed peridium up to 25 μm thick; Holm & Holm 1988).A. Hashim. & Kaz. Tanaka, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB819241; Fig. 2b, 4Etymology. Referring to the ascospores with acute ends.Saprobic on dead twigs of woody plants.Sexual morph: Ascomata ellipsoidal, solitary to 2–4-grouped, immersed, 110–140 μm high, 190–210 μm diam. Ostiolar neck crest-like, elongated and laterally compressed, surrounded by dark brown hyphae. Peridium 20–30 μm thick at side, composed of 2 zones; outer zone 11–17 μm thick, composed of elongated, thin-walled, 8.5–12.5 × 2.5–3 μm, brown cells; inner zone 15–17 μm thick, composed of globose to rectangular, 7.5–9 × 4–5 μm, hyaline cells; near the ostiole 37.5–45 μm thick, composed of globose, brown to black cells; 19–37.5 μm thick at the base, composed of globose to rectangular, 1.8–2.5 μm diam cells. Pseudoparaphyses numerous, 1–1.5 μm wide, septate, branched and anastomosed. Asci bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical, (66.5–)75–89.5 × 8–11 μm (av. = 80.8 × 9.2 μm, n = 10), with a short stipe (4–7.5 μm long, av. = 5.5 μm, n = 10), apically rounded with an ocular chamber, 8-spored. Ascospores broadly fusiform with acute ends, 13.5–18(–20) × 3–4(–5.5) μm (av. = 15.9 × 3.7 μm, n = 50), l/w 3.7–5.1 (av. = 4.4, n = 50), hyaline, with a septum nearly median (0.44–0.59, av. = 0.51, n = 50), slightly constricted at the septum, smooth, with an entire gelatinous sheath up to 2 μm thick.Asexual morph: Conidiomata pycnidial, globose to subglobose, up to 145 μm high, 60–130 μm diam, 2–3-grouped, superficial, black, with a papillate ostiolar neck. Peridium 7.5–10 μm thick, composed of 3–4 layers of 7.5–13 × 1.5–3 μm, elongated, brown cells. Conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells holoblastic, 7.5–12 × 1.5–3 μm, ampliform to cylindrical, hyaline, smooth. Conidia ellipsoidal, 3–4 × 1.9–2 μm (av. = 3.5 × 2.0 μm, n = 50), l/w 1.5–2.1 (av. = 1.8, n = 50), hyaline, smooth, aseptate, guttulate when young. Culture characteristics — Colonies on PDA attaining 24–25 mm diam within 21 d at 20 °C in the dark, floccose, radiately, smoke grey (105); reverse olivaceous grey to olivaceous black (108) (Fig. 2b); asexual morph formed.Specimen examined. Japan, Okinawa, Isl. Iriomote, Sono trail, on dead twigs of woody plant, 29 Sept. 2007, K. Tanaka & H. Yonezawa, KT 2436 (HHUF 30504 holotype designated here, ex-holotype living culture MAFF 245613 = NBRC 112316).Notes — Atrocalyx acutisporus superficially resembles A. lignicola, but can be distinguished from the latter by its smaller ascospores (13.5 –18(–20) × 3 – 4(– 5.5) μm vs 20 – 26 × 4–5.5(–6) μm, respectively). ITS sequence differences between these two species were found at 16 of 529 nucleotide positions, with two gaps.(Ying Zhang, J. Fourn. & K.D. Hyde) A. Hashim. & Kaz. Tanaka, comb. nov. — MycoBank MB819242; Fig. 2c, 5Basionym. Lophiotrema lignicola Ying Zhang, J. Fourn. & K.D. Hyde, Fung. Diversity 38: 238. 2009.Saprobic on dead twigs of Populus sp.Sexual morph: Ascomata ellipsoidal, 330 – 380 μm high, 350–600 μm long, 230–400 μm wide, solitary to 4–5-grouped, semi-immersed. Ostiolar neck crest-like, elongated and laterally compressed, surrounded by dark brown hyphae. Peridium 27.5–42 μm thick at side, composed of 2 zones; outer zone 15–20 μm thick, composed of elongated, thin-walled, 10–12.5 × 3.5–5 μm, brown cells; inner zone 15–22 μm thick, composed of globose to rectangular, 5–6.5 μm diam, hyaline cells; near the ostiole 57–62.5 μm thick, composed of dark brown cells; at base 35–46 μm thick, composed of globose to rectangular, 2.5–4(–6) μm diam, brown to black cells. Pseudoparaphyses numerous, 1–1.5 μm wide, septate, branched and anastomosed. Asci bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical, 100–146 × 12.5– 17 μm (av. = 125.2 × 13.4 μm, n = 11), with a short stipe (4–18 μm long, av. = 8.4 μm, n = 11), apically rounded with an ocular chamber, 8-spored. Ascospores broadly fusiform with rounded ends, 20–26 × 6.5–9.5 μm (av. = 22.3 × 7.4 μm, n = 50), hyaline, with a septum nearly median (0.45–0.54, av. = 0.50, n = 50), slightly constricted at the septum, smooth, with an entire gelatinous sheath up to 2 μm thick. Senescent ascospores 3-septate, yellowish.Asexual morph: Undetermined.Culture characteristics — Colonies on PDA attaining 23–26 mm diam within 21 d at 20 °C in the dark, velvety, plane, smoke grey (105); reverse olivaceous black (108) (Fig. 2c); no sporulation observed.Specimen examined. Belgium, Hainaut, Orval, ruisseau de Williers, on decorticated trunk of Populus sp., 29 Sept. 2006, J. Fournier (CBS H-20221 holotype, ex-holotype living culture CBS 122364).Notes — Atrocalyx lignicola was first described as a species of Lophiotrema on the basis of its 1-septate, hyaline, strongly constricted ascospores (Zhang et al. 2009). According to our morphological observations of the holotype specimen, however, this species is not typical for the genus Lophiotrema; in particular, A. lignicola possesses ascomata with well-developed peridium (Fig. 5c).A. Hashim. & Kaz. Tanaka, gen. nov. — MycoBank MB819243Etymology. After its morphological similarity to Massarina, but with well-developed ascomatal wall.Type species. Crassimassarina macrospora A. Hashim. & Kaz. Tanaka.Saprobic on dead twigs of woody plants.Sexual morph: Ascomata solitary to grouped, immersed to erumpent, subglobose. Ostiolar neck papillate, without slit-like ostiole, composed of carbonaceous, thick-walled, black cells. Peridium composed of rectangular, thin-walled cells. Pseudoparaphyses trabeculate, septate, branched and anastomosed. Asci bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical, 8-spored. Ascospores broadly fusiform with rounded ends, straight, 1-septate, hyaline, smooth.Asexual morph: Conidiomata pycnidial, globose to subglobose, scattered, semi-immersed, solitary, black, ostiolate. Peridium composed of subglobose to rectangular, brown cells. Conidiophores absent. Conidiogenous cells holoblastic, cylindrical, hyaline. Conidia cylindrical with rounded ends, hyaline, smooth, multi-septate.A. Hashim. & Kaz. Tanaka, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB819244; Fig. 2d–e, 6
Fig. 6
Crassimassarina macrospora. a–b. Appearance of ascomata on substrate; c. ascoma in longitudinal section; d. peridium of ascoma; e. pseudoparaphyses; f–g. asci; h. ascus apex; i. ascus stipe; j–m. ascospores; n. ascospore with a gelatinous sheath (in India ink); o–p. conidiomata in culture; q. conidioma in longitudinal section; r. peridium of conidioma; s. conidiogenous cells; t–v. conidia (u in Trypan Blue) (a, c–f, j–k, n: HHUF 29084, holotype; b, g–i, l–m: HHUF 30512, paratype; o–s, u–v: JCM 13096 = MAFF 239606, ex-holotype culture; t: MAFF 245617, ex-paratype culture). — Scale bars: a, o = 1 mm; b, p = 250 μm; c, q = 20 μm; d–g, m–n, r = 10 μm; h–l, s–v = 5 μm.
Etymology. Referring to the large ascospores.Saprobic on dead twigs of Cornus controversa.Sexual morph: Ascomata solitary to 4–5-grouped, immersed, erumpent at the apex, subglobose in section, 450–620 μm high, 380–700 μm diam. Ostiolar neck papillate, without slit-like ostiole, composed of carbonaceous, thick-walled, black cells. Peridium 25–60 μm thick, composed of 6–8 layers of rectangular, thin-walled, 5–12.5 μm diam cells, surrounded by brown hyphae (2–3 μm thick). Pseudoparaphyses numerous, trabeculate, 1–1.5 μm wide, septate, branched and anastomosed. Asci numerous, bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical, 165–200 × 25–33 μm (av. = 183.5 × 27.9 μm, n = 7), with a short stipe (7.5–26 μm long, av. = 16.8 μm, n = 7), apically rounded with an ocular chamber, 8-spored. Ascospores broadly fusiform with rounded ends, straight, (29.5–)33–42 × 9–15 μm (av. = 37.8 × 13.0 μm, n = 55), l/w 2.1–4.0 (av. = 2.9, n = 55), 1(–3)-septate, with a submedian primary septum (0.51–0.58(–0.71), av. = 0.53, n = 55), strongly constricted at the septum and midpoints of each cell, hyaline, smooth, guttulate when young, with an entire gelatinous sheath (1–3 μm wide at sides).Asexual morph: Conidiomata pycnidial, globose to subglobose, up to 240 μm high, 190–250 μm diam, scattered, semi-immersed, solitary, black, with a papillate ostiolar neck. Peridium 15–20 μm thick, composed of 4–6 layers of 4–7 μm diam, subglobose to rectangular, brown cells. Conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells holoblastic, 6–14 × 3–5 μm, cylindrical, hyaline, smooth. Conidia cylindrical with rounded ends, (32–)36–55(–58) × 6–8 μm (av. = 44.1 × 7.2 μm, n = 50), l/w 4.7–8.1 (av. = 6.2, n = 50), hyaline, smooth, 3(–7)-septate, guttulate when young.Culture characteristics — Colonies on PDA attaining 36–40 mm diam within 21 d, velvety, plane, smoke grey (105), grey olivaceous (107) at margin; reverse olivaceous black (108) (Fig. 2d–e); asexual morph formed.Specimens examined. Japan, Ibaraki, Tsukuba, Amakubo, Tsukuba botanical garden, on dead twigs of Cornus controversa, 20 Nov. 2004, Y. Ooki, KT 1764 (HHUF 29084 holotype designated here, ex-holotype living culture JCM 13096 = MAFF 239606); ibid., KT 1765 (HHUF 29085 paratype); Aomori, Minamitsugaru, Owani, on dead twigs of woody plant, 28 June 2008, K. Hirayama & K. Tanaka, KH 152 (HHUF 30512 paratype, ex-paratype living culture MAFF 245617).Notes — This genus is morphologically similar to Massarina and genera in Pleomassariaceae s.lat. (Barr 1982, Tanaka et al. 2005, 2015) in having large, immersed ascomata with a short papillate ostiolar neck and relatively large ascospores. However, Crassimassarina is different from Massarina in having a well-developed ascomatal wall; it differs from pleomassariaceous genera in having trabeculate pseudoparaphyses and hyaline ascospores. The asexual morph of Crassimassarina resembles that of Stagonospora in regards to its pycnidial conidiomata, conidiophores with reduced conidiogenous cells, and multi-septate cylindrical conidia; however, the latter genus differs from Crassimassarina in having phialidic conidiogenous cells (Quaedvlieg et al. 2013, Tanaka et al. 2015). Massarina and Stagonospora (Pleosporales, Massarinaceae) are phylogenetically distinct lineages from Lophiotremataceae containing Crassimassarina.Crassimassarina can be distinguished from other genera in Lophiotremataceae by its ascomata lacking a slit-like ostiole, an ascomatal peridium composed of carbonaceous cells (Fig. 6c), and multi-septate, large conidia (Fig. 6t–v).ITS sequences of the two examined isolates of C. macrospora differed at only two positions, with two gaps. Morphological features and culture characteristics of these isolates were completely identical (Fig. 2d–e, 6k–l).A. Hashim. & Kaz. Tanaka, gen. nov. — MycoBank MB819245Etymology. Referring to the ascomata covered by a less-developed clypeus.Type species. Cryptoclypeus ryukyuensis A. Hashim. & Kaz. Tanaka.Saprobic on dead twigs of bamboo.Sexual morph: Ascomata solitary to grouped, immersed. Ostiolar neck crest-like, elongated, laterally compressed, with a slit-like ostiole and less-developed clypeus. Peridium composed of rectangular, thin-walled, pale brown cells. Pseudoparaphyses septate, branched and anastomosed. Asci bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical, 8-spored. Ascospores fusiform, multi-septate, hyaline, smooth.Asexual morph: Conidiomata pycnidial, globose to subglobose, grouped, immersed, ostiolate. Peridium composed of subglobose to rectangular, brown cells. Conidiophores absent. Conidiogenous cells phialidic, ampliform to cylindrical. Conidia cylindrical with slightly angular ends, hyaline, smooth, 1-septate.Notes — Two species of Cryptoclypeus share common characteristics, e.g., ascomata with a less-developed clypeus (up to 450 μm wide), and a peridium composed of rectangular cells (Fig. 7c–d, 8c–d). In the phylogenetic tree, they formed a well-supported clade in Lophiotremataceae (99 % ML BP/1.00 Bayesian PP) (Fig. 1).
Fig. 7
Cryptoclypeus oxysporus. a–b. Appearance of ascomata on substrate; c. ascoma in longitudinal section; d. peridium of ascoma; e–f. asci; g. ascus apex; h. ascus stipe; i. pseudoparaphyses; j–n. ascospores (all: HHUF 30507, holotype). — Scale bars: a = 1 mm; b = 250 μm; c = 20 μm; d–f, i = 10 μm; g–h, j–n = 5 μm.
Fig. 8
Cryptoclypeus ryukyuensis. a–b. Appearance of ascomata on substrate; c. ascoma in longitudinal section; d. peridium of ascoma; e. pseudoparaphyses; f–g. asci (g in Trypan Blue); h. ascus apex; i. ascus stipe; j–m. ascospores (m in Trypan Blue); n. germinating ascospore; o–p. conidiomata on substrate; q. conidioma in longitudinal section; r. peridium of conidioma; s–t. conidiogenous cells; u–y. conidia (y in Trypan Blue); z. germinating conidium (a–n: HHUF 30509, holotype; o–z: HHUF 30510, paratype). — Scale bars: a, o = 1 mm; b, p = 250 μm; c, q = 20 μm; d–g, j, n, r, u = 10 μm; h–i, k–m, s–t, v–z = 5 μm.
The sexual morph of Cryptoclypeus is similar to that of Tetraploa (Tetraplosphaeriaceae), which also has ascomata with a clypeus and narrowly fusiform ascospores (Tanaka et al. 2009). Cryptoclypeus, however, can be distinguished from the latter genus by having a well-developed neck with a slit-like ostiole. The asexual morph of Cryptoclypeus superficially resembles that of Bambusicola (Bambusicolaceae), but is easily distinguishable from the latter by having phialidic conidiogenous cells rather than annellidic ones (Dai et al. 2012).A. Hashim. & Kaz. Tanaka, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB819246; Fig. 2f, 7Etymology. Referring to the sharp ascospores.Saprobic on dead culm of Sasa sp.Sexual morph: Ascomata ellipsoidal, solitary, immersed, 245–310 μm high, 180–240 μm diam. Ostiolar neck crest-like, elongated, laterally compressed, with less-developed clypeus (230–320 μm wide). Peridium uniform, 15–17.5 μm thick, composed of rectangular, thin-walled, 6.5–14 × 2.5–4.5 μm, pale brown cells. Pseudoparaphyses numerous, 0.5–1 μm wide, septate, branched and anastomosed. Asci bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical, 71–100 × 6–9 μm (av. = 85.8 × 7.7 μm, n = 10), with a short stipe (5.5–11 μm long, av. = 7.8 μm, n = 10), apically rounded with an ocular chamber, 8-spored. Ascospores fusiform with acute ends, straight, 19–27 × 3–4.5 μm (av. = 23.3 × 3.2 μm, n = 50), l/w 5.5–8.9 (av. = 7.2, n = 50), 3-septate, slightly constricted at the primary septum nearly median (0.46–0.55, av. = 0.50, n = 50), hyaline, smooth.Asexual morph: Undetermined.Culture characteristics — Colonies on PDA attaining 24–28 mm diam within 21 d at 20 °C in the dark, velvety, radiately, centrally raised, smoke grey (105) to grey olivaceous (107); reverse olivaceous black (108) (Fig. 2f); no sporulation observed.Specimen examined. Japan, Iwate, Hanamaki, near Dai spa, on dead culm of Sasa sp., 25 June 2011, K. Tanaka, KT 2772 (HHUF 30507 holotype designated here, ex-holotype living culture MAFF 245614 = NBRC 112317).Notes — This species can be distinguished from C. ryukyuensis by its slightly larger ascospores with acute ends (Fig. 7k–n) (19–27 × 3–4.5 μm vs 15–24 × 3–4.5 μm, with rounded ends in the latter species; Fig. 8k–m). ITS sequences between these two species differed at 17–18 positions, with eight gaps.A. Hashim. & Kaz. Tanaka, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB819247; Fig. 2g–h, 8Etymology. Referring to the collection site.Saprobic on dead twigs of Pleioblastus linearis.Sexual morph: Ascomata ellipsoidal, solitary to 3–5-grouped, immersed, 220–240 μm high, 330–380 μm diam. Ostiolar neck crest-like, elongated, laterally compressed, with less-developed black clypeus (380–450 μm wide). Peridium uniform, 22.5–25 μm thick at side, composed of rectangular, thin-walled, 10–22.5 × 5–6.5 μm, pale brown cells. Pseudoparaphyses numerous, 1–1.5 μm wide, septate, branched and anastomosed. Asci bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical, 72.5–100.5 × 6–10 μm (av. = 87.0 × 7.8 μm, n = 20), with a short stipe (4–9 μm long, av. = 6.5 μm, n = 20), apically rounded with an ocular chamber, 8-spored. Ascospores fusiform with rounded ends, straight, 15–24 × 3–4.5 μm (av. = 19.7 × 3.8 μm, n = 50), l/w (3.8–)4.3–6.6 (av. = 5.2, n = 50), 3-septate, slightly constricted at the primary septum nearly median (0.45–0.53, av. = 0.50, n = 50), hyaline, smooth, guttulate when young.Asexual morph: Conidiomata pycnidial, globose to subglobose, up to 230 μm high, 230–340 μm diam, 3–5-grouped, immersed. Ostiolar neck up to 50 μm high, carbonaceous, papillate. Peridium 17.5–27.5 μm thick, composed of 7–10 layers of 4–8 × 2.5–6.5 μm, subglobose to rectangular, brown cells. Conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells holoblastic, 7–12 × 2–3 μm, ampliform to cylindrical, hyaline, smooth. Conidia cylindrical with slightly angular ends, 11.5–15 × 2–2.5 μm (av. = 12.9 × 2.1 μm, n = 50), l/w 5.1–7.0(–8.3) (av. = 6.3, n = 50), hyaline, smooth, 1-septate, guttulate when young.Culture characteristics — Colonies on PDA attaining 28–30 mm diam within 21 d at 20 °C in the dark, velvety, radiately, centrally raised, smoke grey (105) to grey olivaceous (107); reverse greenish black (124) (Fig. 2g–h); no sporulation observed.Specimens examined. Japan, Okinawa, Kunigami-son, Okuma, Mt Yonaha, on dead culm of Pleioblastus linearis, 18 May 2015, A. Hashimoto et al., AH 342 (HHUF 30510 paratype, ex-paratype living culture MAFF 245616); Yona, Mt Fuenchiji, on dead culm of Pleioblastus linearis, 19 May 2015, K. Tanaka et al., KT 3534 (HHUF 30509 holotype designated here, exholotype living culture MAFF 245615 = NBRC 112318).Notes — Ex-holotype and ex-paratype isolates of C. ryukyuensis are derived from sexual and asexual morphs, respectively. Unfortunately, a connection between sexual and asexual forms of this species could not be confirmed in culture. Nonetheless, rpb2 sequences were completely identical between the two strains, while ITS sequences differed at only one position and tef1 sequences differed at two, neither of which caused an amino acid substitution. Culture characteristics were also identical (Fig. 2g–h). We therefore regard these isolates as conspecific.A. Hashim. & Kaz. Tanaka, gen. nov. — MycoBank MB819248Etymology. From the Latin galea, meaning helmet, and carpa, meaning fruiting body.Type species. Galeaticarpa aomoriensis A. Hashim. & Kaz. Tanaka.Saprobic on woody plants.Sexual morph: Ascomata solitary to grouped, immersed to erumpent, subglobose. Ostiolar neck elongated, laterally compressed, surrounded by well-developed clypeus. Peridium composed of rectangular, brown cells. Pseudoparaphyses septate, branched and anastomosed. Asci bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical, 8-spored. Ascospores fusiform, multi-septate, hyaline, smooth.Asexual morph: Conidiomata pycnidial, globose to subglobose, grouped, immersed. Ostiolar neck carbonaceous, papillate. Peridium composed of rectangular, pale brown to brown cells. Conidiophores absent. Conidiogenous cells holoblastic, cylindrical, hyaline, smooth. Conidia ellipsoidal with rounded ends, hyaline, smooth, aseptate.A. Hashim. & Kaz. Tanaka, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB819249; Fig. 2i, 9
Fig. 9
Galeaticarpa aomoriensis. a–c. Appearance of ascomata on substrate; d. ascoma in longitudinal section; e. peridium of ascoma; f. pseudoparaphyses; g–h. asci; i. ascus apex; j. ascus stipe; k–m. ascospores; n–o. conidiomata in culture; p. conidioma in longitudinal section; q. peridium of conidioma; r. conidiogenous cells; s–t. conidia; u. germinating conidium (a–m: HHUF 30505, holotype; n–u: MAFF 245618 = NBRC 112319, ex-holotype culture). — Scale bars: a, n = 1 mm; b–c, o = 250 μm; d, p = 20 μm; e–h, q = 10 μm; i–m, r–u = 5 μm.
Etymology. Referring to the collection site.Saprobic on dead twigs of woody plants.Sexual morph: Ascomata ellipsoidal, solitary to 4–5-grouped, immersed to erumpent, subglobose, 265 – 285 μm high, 370–400 μm diam. Ostiolar neck crest-like, elongated, laterally compressed, surrounded by well-developed clypeus (620–750 μm wide). Peridium uniform, 15–26 μm thick, composed of 3–5 layers of rectangular, thin-walled, 7.5 × 3–6.5 μm, brown cells. Pseudoparaphyses numerous, 1–1.5 μm wide, septate, branched and anastomosed. Asci numerous, bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical, 78–102 × 8.5–11 μm (av. = 93.5 × 9.7 μm, n = 11), with a short stipe (4–11 μm long, av. = 7.2 μm, n = 11), apically rounded with an ocular chamber, 8-spored. Ascospores fusiform with acute ends, straight, 31–47 × 4–5.5 μm (av. = 40.6 × 4.7 μm, n = 50), l/w (5.8–)7.2–10.5 (av. = 8.7, n = 50), 5-septate, with a primary septum nearly median (0.46–0.57, av. = 0.51, n = 50), slightly constricted at the primary septum, hyaline, smooth.Asexual morph: Conidiomata pycnidial, flask-shaped, up to 135 μm high in section, 210–250(–420) μm diam, 3–5-grouped, semi-immersed. Ostiolar neck 32–50 μm high, carbonaceous, papillate. Peridium 10–12.5 μm wide, composed of 2–3 layers of 10–12 × 3–4 μm, rectangular, pale brown to brown cells. Conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells holoblastic, 5.5 –11 × 2.5 – 3 μm, cylindrical, hyaline, smooth. Conidia ellipsoidal with rounded ends, 3.5–6 × 1.8–2.2 μm (av. = 4.5 × 2.0 μm, n = 50), l/w 1.8–3.0 (av. = 2.2, n = 50), hyaline, smooth, aseptate, guttulate when young.Culture characteristics — Colonies on PDA attaining 17–19 mm diam within 21 d at 20 °C in the dark, velvety, plane, smoke grey (105); reverse chestnut (40), brown vinaceous (84) pigment produced (Fig. 2i); asexual morph formed.Specimen examined. Japan, Aomori, Nishimeya, Shirakami, Ooshirosawa stream, on dead twigs of dead woody plant, 30 Aug. 2008, K. Tanaka et al., KT 2563 (HHUF 30505 holotype designated here, ex-holotype living culture MAFF 245618 = NBRC 112319).Notes — A new monotypic genus, Galeaticarpa, is proposed here for species having ascomata with a clypeus, cylindrical asci with a short stipe, and fusiform, multi-septate, hyaline ascospores. These morphological characters are similar to those of Astrosphaeriella, but Galeaticarpa can be distinguished from Astrosphaeriella by its crest-like ostiolar neck and uniformly developed peridium (vs a poorly developed peridium at the base in Astrosphaeriella; Chen & Hsieh 2004, Phookamsak et al. 2015). These two genera are distantly related and belong to the families Lophiotremataceae and Astrosphaeriellaceae, respectively.Cryptoclypeus, Galeaticarpa, and Pseudocryptoclypeus are morphologically similar to one another in having ascomata with a clypeus, but Galeaticarpa can be distinguished from these other genera by its most striking features – a well-developed clypeus (up to 750 μm wide) (Fig. 9a–d) and flask-shaped conidiomata (Fig. 9p). In addition to phenotypic differences, Cryptoclypeus and Pseudocryptoclypeus tend to occur exclusively on bamboos, while Galeaticarpa occurs on woody plant hosts. Several bambusicolous fungi have been reported to be phylogenetically unrelated to genera and species on other host plants, even though they have morphological similarities with those groups (Tanaka et al. 2009, Hashimoto et al. 2015b). Further discovery of new lineages related to these genera is needed to clarify the relationship between their evolution and host preference.A. Hashim. & Kaz. Tanaka, gen. nov. — MycoBank MB819250Etymology. After its morphological similarity to Cryptoclypeus.Type species. Pseudocryptoclypeus yakushimensis A. Hashim. & Kaz. Tanaka.Saprobic on bamboo.Sexual morph: Ascomata scattered to grouped, immersed. Ostiolar neck crest-like, elongated, laterally compressed, with less-developed clypeus. Peridium composed of compressed, rectangular, thin-walled, brown cells. Pseudoparaphyses septate, branched and anastomosed. Asci bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical, 8-spored. Ascospores fusiform with acute ends, multi-septate, hyaline, smooth.Asexual morph: Conidiomata pycnidial, globose to subglobose, grouped, immersed, ostiolate. Peridium composed of rectangular, pale brown cells. Conidiophores absent. Conidiogenous cells holoblastic, ampliform to cylindrical, hyaline. Conidia cylindrical with rounded ends, hyaline, smooth, 1-septate.A. Hashim. & Kaz. Tanaka, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB819251; Fig. 2j, 10
Fig. 10
Pseudocryptoclypeus yakushimensis. a–b. Appearance of ascomata on substrate; c. ascoma in longitudinal section; d. peridium of ascoma; e. pseudoparaphyses; f. ascus; g. ascus apex; h. ascus stipe; i–j. ascospores (j arrowheads indicate gelatinous pad); k–l. conidiomata in culture; m. conidioma in longitudinal section; n. peridium of conidioma; o. conidiogenous cells; p–r. conidia; s. germinating conidium (a–j: HHUF 30503, holotype; k–s: MAFF 245622 = NBRC 112320, ex-holotype culture). — Scale bars: a, k = 1 mm; b = 200 μm; c, m = 20 μm; d–f, n = 10 μm; g–j, o–s = 5 μm; l = 250 μm.
Etymology. Referring to the collection site.Saprobic on dead culms of bamboo.Sexual morph: Ascomata ellipsoidal, 4–5-grouped, immersed, 325–380 μm high, 250–260 μm diam. Ostiolar neck crest-like, elongated, laterally compressed, with less-developed clypeus (200–315 μm wide). Peridium 17.5–25 μm thick of 2 zones at side; outer zone 10–17.5 μm thick of compressed, thin-walled, 12–17 × 1.5–4.2 μm, brown cells; inner zone of 7.5–10 μm thick, rectangular, 5–9 × 4–6 μm, pale brown cells. Pseudoparaphyses 0.5–1 μm wide, septate, branched, anastomosed. Asci bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical, 92.5–127 × 7.5–10 μm (av. = 104.8 × 8.2 μm, n = 15), with a short stipe (5–15 μm long, av. = 8.2 μm, n = 15), apically rounded with an ocular chamber, 8-spored. Ascospores fusiform with acute ends, straight, 20–32.5 × 3–5 μm (av. = 25.4 × 4.0 μm, n = 50), l/w 4.7–8.1 (av. = 6.4, n = 50), 5-septate, with a primary septum nearly median (0.44–0.57, av. = 0.50, n = 50), slightly constricted at the primary septum, hyaline, smooth, with gelatinous pad at each end.Asexual morph: Conidiomata pycnidial, globose to subglobose, up to 375 μm high, 400–480 μm diam, 5–6-grouped, immersed. Ostiolar neck carbonaceous, papillate, 47.5–77.5 μm high. Peridium 10–15 μm thick, composed of 3–4 layers of 7.5–10 × 0.8–1.0 μm, rectangular, pale brown cells. Conidiophores absent. Conidiogenous cells holoblastic, 12–16 × 2.5–3 μm, ampliform to cylindrical, hyaline, smooth. Conidia cylindrical with rounded ends, 9–14 × 2.5–3.5 μm (av. = 12.0 × 3.0 μm, n = 50), l/w 3.3–4.8 (av. = 4.0, n = 50), hyaline, smooth, 1-septate, guttulate when young.Culture characteristics — Colonies on PDA attaining 32–52 mm diam within 21 d at 20 °C in the dark, floccose, plane, smoke grey (105); reverse grey olivaceous (107) to olivaceous black (108) (Fig. 2j); asexual morph formed.Specimen examined. Japan, Kagoshima, Isl. Yakushima, Nagata, on dead culms of bamboo, 16 Mar. 2007, K. Tanaka & H. Yonezawa, KT 2186 (HHUF 30503 holotype designated here, ex-holotype living culture MAFF 245622 = NBRC 112320).Notes — Pseudocryptoclypeus is similar to Cryptoclypeus in having a less-developed clypeus in ascomata, multi-septate ascospores, pycnidial conidiomata, and 1-septate, hyaline conidia. Pseudocryptoclypeus has an ascomatal peridium composed of 2 zones and holoblastic conidiogenous cells (Fig. 10d, o) rather than the ascomatal wall with 1 zone and phialidic conidiogenous cells of Cryptoclypeus (Fig. 8d, s–t). Although these two genera constituted a highly supported clade (90 % ML BP/1.00 Bayesian PP) in our phylogenetic tree (Fig. 1), they had 43–45 base differences with 61–63 gaps in their ITS regions.
INCERTAE SEDIS
A. Hashim. & Kaz. Tanaka, gen. nov. — MycoBank MB819252Etymology. Formerly belonging to Lophiotrema.Type species. Antealophiotrema brunneosporum (Ying Zhang, J. Fourn. & K.D. Hyde) A. Hashim. & Kaz. Tanaka.Saprobic on woody plants.Sexual morph: Ascomata subglobose to depressed ellipsoidal. Ostiolar neck crest-like, elongated, laterally compressed. Peridium composed of globose to rectangular, hyaline to brown cells, with brown hyphae at side. Pseudoparaphyses septate, branched and anastomosed. Asci bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical to clavate, 4–8-spored. Ascospores narrowly fusiform, 1-septate, brown, smooth.Asexual morph: Mycelium superficial, brown. Conidiophores absent. Conidiogenous cells holoblastic, integrated, terminal, brown, truncate, solitary, acrogenous. Conidia globose to obovoid, black, muriform.(Ying Zhang, J. Fourn. & K.D. Hyde) A. Hashim. & Kaz. Tanaka, comb. nov. — MycoBank MB819253; Fig. 2k, 11
Fig. 11
Antealophiotrema brunneosporum. a–b. Appearance of ascomata on substrate; c. ascoma in longitudinal section; d. peridium of ascoma near ostiole; e. peridium of ascoma at side; f. ascus; g. ascus apex; h. ascus stipe; i. pseudoparaphyses; j. ascospore; k–l. conidia in culture; m–n. conidiogenous cells and immature conidia; o–q. conidia; r. germinating conidium (a–j: CBS H-20222, holotype; k–r: CBS 123095, ex-holotype culture). — Scale bars: a, k = 1 mm; b, l = 250 μm; c, o, r = 20 μm; d–f, i, p–q = 10 μm; g–h, j, m–n = 5 μm.
Basionym. Lophiotrema brunneosporum Ying Zhang, J. Fourn. & K.D. Hyde, Fung. Diversity 38: 240. 2009.Saprobic on decorticated wood of Salix sp.Sexual morph: Ascomata subglobose to depressed ellipsoidal, up to 380 μm high, 460–530 μm diam. Ostiolar neck crest-like, elongated, laterally compressed. Peridium ununiform, 42.5–62.5 μm thick, composed of 2 zones; outer zone 22.5–25 μm thick, composed of moderately thick-walled, rectangular, (5–)7–9 × 5–7.5 μm, brown cells, with brown hyphae; inner zone 20–32.5 μm thick of thin-walled, rectangular, 7–9 × 4–7.5 μm, hyaline to pale brown cells; at base 27.5–35 μm thick, of globose to rectangular, 3.5–7 × 3.5–4 μm, pale brown cells. Pseudoparaphyses numerous, 0.8 –1.5 μm wide, septate, branched and anastomosed. Asci bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical to clavate, 119–148 × 13–15 μm (av. = 138.2 × 14.3 μm, n = 8), with a short stipe (8.5–16 μm long, av. = 10.9 μm, n = 8), apically rounded with an ocular chamber, with biseriate 4–8 ascospores. Ascospores narrowly fusiform with slightly rounded ends, 34.5–48 × 6.5–10 μm (av. = 39.8 × 8.0 μm, n = 32), l/w 4.1–6.1 (av. = 5.0, n = 32), with a septum nearly median (0.44–0.54, av. = 0.49, n = 50), strongly constricted at the septum, brown, smooth.Asexual morph: Mycelium superficial, brown. Conidiophores absent. Conidiogenous cells holoblastic, integrated, terminal, brown, truncate, solitary, acrogenous. Conidia globose to obovoid, black, 27.5–85 μm diam (av. = 52.0 μm, n = 57), muriform.Culture characteristics — Colonies on PDA attaining 12–17 mm diam within 21 d at 20 °C in the dark, floccose, centrally raised, grey olivaceous (107); reverse olivaceous black (108) (Fig. 2k); asexual morph formed.Specimen examined. France, Ariège, Rimont, Las Muros, on decorticated wood of Salix sp., 24 Sept. 2006, J. Fournier & K.D. Hyde (CBS H-20222 holotype, ex-holotype culture CBS 123095).Notes — The transfer of L. brunneosporum to Antealophiotrema is based on its morphological features, as it differs from Lophiotrema s.str. in having a well-developed peridium (up to 62.5 μm thick, Fig. 11c) as well as a monodictys-like asexual morph (Fig. 11k – r). In our phylogenetic tree, this species and ‘Lophiotrema’ boreale (CBS 114422) formed a fully supported clade (100 % ML BP/1.00 Bayesian PP) outside of Lophiotremataceae and are recognised as a lineage distinct from Lophiotrema s.str. (Fig. 1). We treat Antealophiotrema as ‘incertae sedis’ in Pleosporales at present; additional taxa related to this monotypic genus will be required to resolve its familial placement.A. Hashim. & Kaz. Tanaka, gen. nov. — MycoBank MB819254Etymology. After its morphological similarity to Lophiotrema.Type species. Pseudolophiotrema elymicola A. Hashim. & Kaz. Tanaka.Saprobic on herbaceous plants.Sexual morph: Ascomata grouped, immersed, globose. Ostiolar neck crest-like, elongated, laterally compressed. Peridium composed of compressed, thin-walled, pale brown cells. Pseudoparaphyses numerous, septate, branched and anastomosed. Asci bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical, 8-spored. Ascospores fusiform, 1-septate, hyaline, smooth.Asexual morph: Undetermined.A. Hashim. & Kaz. Tanaka, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB819255; Fig. 2l, 12
Fig. 12
Pseudolophiotrema elymicola. a–b. Appearance of ascomata on substrate; c–d. ascomata in longitudinal section; e. peridium of ascoma; f. pseudoparaphyses; g–h. asci; i. ascus apex; j. ascus stipe; k–n. ascospores; o. ascospore with a gelatinous sheath (in India ink); p. germinating ascospore (a–m, o–p: HHUF 28984, holotype; n: JCM 13090 = MAFF 239600, ex-holotype culture). — Scale bars: a = 500 μm; b = 250 μm; c–d = 20 μm; e–h, k, o–p = 10 μm; i–j, l–n = 5 μm.
Etymology. Referring to the generic name of the host plant.Saprobic on dead leaves of Leymus mollis.Sexual morph: Ascomata grouped, immersed, globose, 200–300 μm high, 190–340 μm diam. Ostiolar neck crest-like, elongated, laterally compressed. Peridium uniform, 10–12.5 μm thick composed of compressed, thin-walled, 5–12 × 2–3.5 μm, pale brown cells. Pseudoparaphyses numerous, 1.5–2 μm wide, septate, branched and anastomosed. Asci bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical, 82–108 × 10–17 μm (av. = 92.4 × 13.9 μm, n = 11), with a short stipe (5–8 μm long, av. = 6.3 μm, n = 10), apically rounded with an ocular chamber, 8-spored. Ascospores fusiform with acute ends, straight, 20–28 × 4.5–7 μm (av. = 22.7 × 5.5 μm, n = 50), l/w 3.2–5.1 (av. = 4.2, n = 50), with a septum nearly median (0.47–0.56, av. = 0.51, n = 50), strongly constricted at the septum and midpoint of each cell, hyaline, smooth, with a gelatinous sheath.Asexual morph: Undetermined.Culture characteristics — Colonies on PDA attaining 18–19 mm diam within 21 d at 20 °C in the dark, velvety, plane, radiately, smoke grey (105); reverse grey olivaceous (107) (Fig. 2l); sexual morph formed.Specimen examined. Japan, Hokkaido, Yufutsu, on dead leaves of Leymus mollis, 1 Sept. 2003, Y. Harada, KT 1450 (HHUF 28984 holotype designated here, ex-holotype culture JCM 13090 = MAFF 239600).Notes — Pseudolophiotrema is quite similar to Lophiotrema in having a crest-like ostiolar neck, a peridium of uniform thickness, cylindrical asci with a short stipe, and 1-septate hyaline ascospores with a gelatinous sheath. However, it can be separated from the latter genus by its thinner ascomatal wall (10–12.5 μm thick; Fig. 12d–e) composed of compressed cells vs the 20–30 μm thick wall made up of rectangular cells in Lophiotrema (Holm & Holm 1988).In our phylogenetic tree, the genus Pseudolophiotrema was placed completely outside of Lophiotremataceae, and was also separate from the families Cryptocoryneaceae and Aquasubmersaceae (Fig. 1). The familial placement of Pseudolophiotrema remains unclear. Additional taxa belonging to this genus are needed to fully understand its taxonomic affiliations within Pleosporales.
DISCUSSION
Lophiotremataceae was established by Hirayama & Tanaka (2011) to accommodate Lophiotrema. Subsequently, Aquasubmersa and Hermatomyces were recognised as additional members of this family on the basis of molecular phylogenetic analyses (Ariyawansa et al. 2015, Doilom et al. 2016, Hyde et al. 2016). A phylogenetic relationship between Cryptocoryneum and Lophiotremataceae was also suggested by a BLAST search of ITS sequences of species in that genus (Hashimoto et al. 2016). Although tree topologies generated in previous molecular studies have suggested that the above-mentioned genera might be members of Lophiotremataceae, statistical support for a Lophiotremataceae s.lat. clade has been relatively weak (Ariyawansa et al. 2015, Doilom et al. 2016, Hashimoto et al. 2016, Hyde et al. 2016). Our results do not support the monophyly of Lophiotremataceae s.lat. as recognised in several previous studies (Fig. 1). Instead, the various asexual morphs found in Aquasubmersa, Cryptocoryneum, and Hermatomyces belong to separate families whose monophyly is strongly supported (Fig. 1). We thus consider Lophiotremataceae to be restricted to Lophiotrema and five new genera (Atrocalyx, Crassimassarina, Cryptoclypeus, Galeaticarpa, and Pseudocryptoclypeus), all of which have ascomata with or without slit-like ostioles and pycnidial conidiomata. We also conclude that Aquasubmersa (a freshwater lineage having papillate ascomatal ostioles and pycnidial conidiomata with 1-celled conidia), Cryptocoryneum (having sporodochial conidiomata with cheiroid conidia), and Hermatomyces (having sporodochial conidiomata with lenticular and/or cylindrical conidia), which have provisionally been regarded as genera of Lophiotremataceae, should be placed in their own families given their different asexual morphs.Except for Crassimassarina, genera accepted in the present study as members of Lophiotremataceae (i.e., Lophiotrema s.str. and the newly introduced genera Atrocalyx, Cryptoclypeus, Galeaticarpa, and Pseudocryptoclypeus) have features that are generally consistent with traditional generic concepts of Lophiotrema s.lat. (Holm & Holm 1988, Tanaka & Harada 2003, Zhang et al. 2009, Hirayama & Tanaka 2011). In contrast, Crassimassarina has some characteristics atypical of Lophiotremataceae: large, immersed ascomata with a papillate ostiolar neck, resembling those of genera in Pleomassariaceae s.lat. (Barr 1982, Tanaka et al. 2005), as well as pycnidial conidiomata with multi-septate cylindrical conidia resembling those of Stagonospora (Quaedvlieg et al. 2013, Tanaka et al. 2015). The phylogenetic placement of this morphologically distinct lineage in Lophiotremataceae led us to conduct detailed observations of the above lophiotremataceous genera. These observations revealed morphological variations among ascomata with slit-like ostioles in Lophiotremataceae, such as ascomata with a distinct clypeus around the ostiolar neck (in Cryptoclypeus, Galeaticarpa and Pseudocryptoclypeus, Fig. 7c, 8c, 9d, 10c), ascomata with a well-developed peridium (Atrocalyx, Fig. 4c, 5c), and ascomata with a less-developed peridium of a uniform thickness up to 25 μm (Lophiotrema; Holm & Holm 1988). These morphologically distinguishable groups constitute phylogenetically distinct lineages that also correspond to their differing asexual morphs (Fig. 4o, 6q, 8q, 9p, 10m). For example, the sexual morphs of Cryptoclypeus, Galeaticarpa, and Pseudocryptoclypeus have similar morphological features, but these genera can be separated from one another according to the morphology of their conidiomata or conidiogenous cells (see Notes on each genus). Consequently, we treat these five genera as separate from Lophiotrema s.str. on the basis of holomorph morphology and phylogenetic relationships. Antealophiotrema brunneosporum, originally misidentified as a species in Lophiotrema because of its morphological resemblance to that genus (Zhang et al. 2009), is only distantly related to Lophiotremataceae. This species is clearly different from Lophiotrema in regard to the anatomical characteristics of its peridium and its monodictys-like asexual morph. The result of our present study strongly confirms that the presence of a slit-like ostiole is an unreliable character for delimitation of generic relationships.Traditionally, the slit-like ostiole of the ascomata has been especially emphasised as a useful character for familial circumscription in ascomycetes (Chesters & Bell 1970). In earlier studies, Lophiotrema was placed in Lophiostomataceae according to this criterion (Chesters & Bell 1970, Leuchtmann 1985, Holm & Holm 1988, Barr 1992). Zhang et al. (2009) suggested that Lophiotrema is phylogenetically distinct from Lophiostomataceae but could not find any morphological differences between their sexual morphs. Hirayama & Tanaka (2011) re-evaluated the phylogenetic significance of several morphological features used for characterisation of each genus in previous studies. After determining that ascus shape and length of ascus stipe are reliable taxonomic indicators to delineate these two genera, they established Lophiotremataceae to accommodate Lophiotrema (Hirayama & Tanaka 2011). Our results, however, strongly confirm that several lophiotrema-like species, i.e., Antealophiotrema brunneosporum, ‘Lophiotrema’ boreale, and Pseudolophiotrema elymicola, deviate from Lophiotremataceae. These species were originally misidentified or provisionally identified as species in Lophiotrema on the basis of their morphological resemblance to the genus (Mathiassen 1989, 1993, Zhang et al. 2009), but were found to be phylogenetically separate from Lophiotrema s.str. in this study. Previous morphological circumscriptions of Lophiotremataceae and Lophiotrema (Holm & Holm 1988, Mathiassen 1989, 1993, Tanaka & Harada 2003, Zhang et al. 2009, Hirayama & Tanaka 2011, Ariyawansa et al. 2015, Doilom et al. 2016, Hyde et al. 2016) were obviously fairly broad concepts that did not reflect their phylogenetic relationships. We additionally discovered several morphological variants of ascomata having slit-like ostioles (e.g. Atrocalyx, Cryptoclypeus, Galeaticarpa, and Pseudocryptoclypeus), revealed the phylogenetic position of a genus without slit-like ostioles in Lophiotremataceae (i.e., Crassimassarina), and observed asexual morphs of genera belonging to Lophiotremataceae. More precise morphological examination of both sexual and asexual morphs in this family will be needed to define familial concepts of Lophiotremataceae and its relatives. The phylogenetic significance of slit-like ostioles of ascomata should also be re-evaluated because this phenotypic character is now known in several families, such as Aigialaceae (Suetrong et al. 2009), Ligninsphaeriaceae (Zhang et al. 2016), and Lophiostomataceae (Thambugala et al. 2015). The slit-like ostiole should be regarded as a character that has evolved multiple times independently within Dothideomycetes, similar to the parallel evolution of hysterothecial ascomata in Anteagloniaceae (Mugambi & Huhndorf 2009), Gloniaceae (Boehm et al. 2009), Hysteriaceae (Boehm et al. 2009), Lophiostomataceae (Thambugala et al. 2015), and Mytilinidiaceae (Boehm et al. 2009).Recent molecular studies on Dothideomycetes have revealed hidden lineages and prompted revision of several families in this class (Crous et al. 2015, Guatimosim et al. 2015, Knapp et al. 2015, Tanaka et al. 2015, Jaklitsch & Voglmayr 2016, Van Nieuwenhuijzen et al. 2016). Although multiple molecular systematic studies, mainly of pathogenic fungi of woody plants (Phillips et al. 2013, Slippers et al. 2013, Alves et al. 2014, Fan et al. 2015, Trakunyingcharoen et al. 2015), have generated a robust phylogeny for Botryosphaeriales, many additional new lineages in this group, including endophytes and saprophytes, have been discovered from various niches (Thambugala et al. 2014, Crous et al. 2015, 2016, Wyka & Broders 2016, Osorio et al. 2017, Yang et al. 2017). Drawing on many recent collections, our study has revealed previously unrecognised diversity within Lophiotremataceae and its relatives and the potential taxonomic importance of the asexual morphs in defining families. To build a comprehensive taxonomic framework, further morphological surveys based on additional collections together with more molecular data are needed.
Authors: K Tanaka; K Hirayama; H Yonezawa; G Sato; A Toriyabe; H Kudo; A Hashimoto; M Matsumura; Y Harada; Y Kurihara; T Shirouzu; T Hosoya Journal: Stud Mycol Date: 2015-11-18 Impact factor: 16.097
Authors: P W Crous; M J Wingfield; T I Burgess; G E St J Hardy; C Crane; S Barrett; J F Cano-Lira; J J Le Roux; R Thangavel; J Guarro; A M Stchigel; M P Martín; D S Alfredo; P A Barber; R W Barreto; I G Baseia; J Cano-Canals; R Cheewangkoon; R J Ferreira; J Gené; C Lechat; G Moreno; F Roets; R G Shivas; J O Sousa; Y P Tan; N P Wiederhold; S E Abell; T Accioly; J L Albizu; J L Alves; Z I Antoniolli; N Aplin; J Araújo; M Arzanlou; J D P Bezerra; J-P Bouchara; J R Carlavilla; A Castillo; V L Castroagudín; P C Ceresini; G F Claridge; G Coelho; V R M Coimbra; L A Costa; K C da Cunha; S S da Silva; R Daniel; Z W de Beer; M Dueñas; J Edwards; P Enwistle; P O Fiuza; J Fournier; D García; T B Gibertoni; S Giraud; M Guevara-Suarez; L F P Gusmão; S Haituk; M Heykoop; Y Hirooka; T A Hofmann; J Houbraken; D P Hughes; I Kautmanová; O Koppel; O Koukol; E Larsson; K P D Latha; D H Lee; D O Lisboa; W S Lisboa; Á López-Villalba; J L N Maciel; P Manimohan; J L Manjón; S Marincowitz; T S Marney; M Meijer; A N Miller; I Olariaga; L M Paiva; M Piepenbring; J C Poveda-Molero; K N A Raj; H A Raja; A Rougeron; I Salcedo; R Samadi; T A B Santos; K Scarlett; K A Seifert; L A Shuttleworth; G A Silva; M Silva; J P Z Siqueira; C M Souza-Motta; S L Stephenson; D A Sutton; N Tamakeaw; M T Telleria; N Valenzuela-Lopez; A Viljoen; C M Visagie; A Vizzini; F Wartchow; B D Wingfield; E Yurchenko; J C Zamora; J Z Groenewald Journal: Persoonia Date: 2016-12-21 Impact factor: 11.051
Authors: Fredrik Ronquist; Maxim Teslenko; Paul van der Mark; Daniel L Ayres; Aaron Darling; Sebastian Höhna; Bret Larget; Liang Liu; Marc A Suchard; John P Huelsenbeck Journal: Syst Biol Date: 2012-02-22 Impact factor: 15.683
Authors: A Hashimoto; K Hirayama; H Takahashi; M Matsumura; G Okada; C Y Chen; J W Huang; M Kakishima; T Ono; K Tanaka Journal: Stud Mycol Date: 2018-03-07 Impact factor: 16.097
Authors: Valentina Hurtado-McCormick; Tim Kahlke; Katherina Petrou; Thomas Jeffries; Peter J Ralph; Justin Robert Seymour Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2019-05-14 Impact factor: 5.640
Authors: Sirinapa Konta; Kevin D Hyde; Samantha C Karunarathna; Ausana Mapook; Chanokned Senwanna; Lucas A P Dauner; Chandrika M Nanayakkara; Jianchu Xu; Saowaluck Tibpromma; Saisamorn Lumyong Journal: Life (Basel) Date: 2021-05-19