Literature DB >> 29503470

Revision of Lophiotremataceae (Pleosporales, Dothideomycetes): Aquasubmersaceae, Cryptocoryneaceae, and Hermatomycetaceae fam. nov.

A Hashimoto1,2, M Matsumura1,3, K Hirayama4, K Tanaka1,3.   

Abstract

The family Lophiotremataceae (Pleosporales, Dothideomycetes) is taxonomically revised on the basis of morphological observations and phylogenetic analyses of sequences of nuclear rDNA SSU, ITS, and LSU regions and tef1 and rpb2 genes. A total of 208 sequences were generated from species of Lophiotremataceae and its relatives. According to phylogenetic analyses, Lophiotremataceae encompasses the genus Lophiotrema and five new genera: Atrocalyx, Crassimassarina, Cryptoclypeus, Galeaticarpa, and Pseudocryptoclypeus. These genera are characterised by ascomata with or without a slit-like ostiole and pycnidial conidiomata. Three new families, Aquasubmersaceae, Cryptocoryneaceae, and Hermatomycetaceae, are proposed. Two genera previously recognised as members of Lophiotremataceae, namely, Aquasubmersa having ascomata with a papillate ostiolar neck and pycnidial conidiomata and Hermatomyces possessing sporodochial conidiomata and dimorphic (lenticular and cylindrical) conidia, are included in Aquasubmersaceae and Hermatomycetaceae, respectively. Cryptocoryneum, characterised by the presence of stromatic sporodochia, cheiroid conidia, and conidial arms developed downward from the cap cells, is placed in Cryptocoryneaceae. Two new genera, Antealophiotrema and Pseudolophiotrema, are established, but their familial placements remain unresolved. Antealophiotrema bears ascomata morphologically similar to those of Lophiotrema, but is differentiated from the latter by having ascomata with a well-developed peridium and a monodictys-like asexual morph. Pseudolophiotrema is also similar to Lophiotrema, but can be distinguished by ascomata with a thin peridium. A total of three new families, seven new genera, eight new species, and two new combinations are described and illustrated.

Entities:  

Keywords:  coelomycetes; holomorph; hyphomycetes; systematics

Year:  2017        PMID: 29503470      PMCID: PMC5832957          DOI: 10.3767/persoonia.2017.39.03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Persoonia        ISSN: 0031-5850            Impact factor:   11.051


INTRODUCTION

Lophiotremataceae was originally established as a monotypic family comprising the type genus Lophiotrema (Hirayama & Tanaka 2011). This genus is relatively common, known from throughout the world, and new species are continually being discovered (Mathiassen 1993, Tanaka & Harada 2003, Zhang et al. 2009, Liu et al. 2015, Hyde et al. 2016). Species in Lophiotrema are characterised by immersed ascomata with a crest-like ostiolar neck and cylindrical asci. Although the taxonomic validity of Lophiotremataceae has been confirmed by molecular studies, only a few of its members have been confirmed based on DNA studies (Hyde et al. 2013). Several major taxonomic and phylogenetic investigations have been carried out to discover missing lineages in Ascomycota (Zhang et al. 2012, Ariyawansa et al. 2015, Liu et al. 2015, Doilom et al. 2016, Hashimoto et al. 2016, Hyde et al. 2016). In these studies, three interesting genera, Aquasubmersa, Cryptocoryneum, and Hermatomyces, were analysed phylogenetically suggesting a close relationship to Lophiotremataceae. Aquasubmersa was initially described as a coelomycetous genus (Zhang et al. 2012). Later, a second species of this genus, A. japonicum with sexual and asexual morphs, was reported (Ariyawansa et al. 2015). The asexual genus Hermatomyces is characterised by having sporodochial conidiomata and dimorphic, i.e., lenticular and cylindrical, conidia (Chang 1995). Phylogenetic analyses using sequences of nuclear rDNA small subunit (18S; SSU), internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and large subunit (28S; LSU) regions and translation elongation factor 1-α (tef1) and DNA-directed RNA polymer-ase II second largest subunit (rpb2) genes have suggested that Aquasubmersa and Hermatomyces are closely related to Lophiotrema (Doilom et al. 2016, Tibpromma et al. 2016). On the basis of their phylogenetic studies, Doilom et al. (2016) and Tibpromma et al. (2016) proposed that Aquasubmersa and Hermatomyces are additional members of Lophiotremataceae. Another genus, Cryptocoryneum, is characterised by having stromatic sporodochia and cheiroid conidia (Schoknecht & Crane 1977). Recently, Hashimoto et al. (2016) assessed the taxonomic placement of Cryptocoryneum species on the basis of morphological observations and the results of a molecular phylogenetic analysis. Although their BLAST search of NCBIs GenBank nucleotide database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/) suggested that the genus is also related to Lophiotremataceae (Hashimoto et al. 2016), they could not resolve the familial position of Cryptocoryneum. Many genera related to the family Lophiotremataceae still need to be re-evaluated. During our on-going studies of ascomycetous fungi in Japan (Tanaka et al. 2010, 2011, 2015, Hashimoto et al. 2015a, b, 2016), we have collected 57 strains morphologically or phylogenetically related to Lophiotremataceae. The main objectives of the present study were to establish a taxonomic framework within Lophiotremataceae s.lat. and to evaluate the circumscription of this family based on morphological observations and phylogenetic analyses of SSU, ITS, and LSU nuclear rDNA and tef1 and rpb2 gene sequences.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Isolation and morphological observation

All fungal structures were observed in preparations mounted in distilled water. Morphological characters were observed by differential interference and phase contrast microscopy (Olympus BX53), with images captured with an Olympus digital camera (DP21). A total of 57 single-spore isolates were used for morphological observations and phylogenetic analyses (Table 1). Colony characteristics of cultures grown on potato dextrose agar (PDA; Difco) were observed after 3 wk cultivation at 20 °C in the dark. Colours were noted as described by Rayner (1970). To induce sexual or asexual fructification in culture, 5-mm squares of mycelial agar were placed on water agar including sterilised natural substrate, such as rice straws and pine needles, and the plates were incubated at 20 °C for 2 wk in the dark. When the substrate was colonised, the plates were incubated at 20 °C under blacklight blue illumination for 2 mo to observe sporulation. Cultures were deposited in the Japan Collection of Microorganisms (JCM), the NITE Biological Resource Centre (NBRC), and the GeneBank Project, NARO, Japan (MAFF). Specimens were deposited in the fungus herbarium of Hirosaki University (HHUF).
Table 1

Specimens, isolates and new sequence accessions used in this study.

SpeciesFamilyOriginal no.Specimen no.aStrain no.GenBank Accession no.b
SSULSUtef1rpb2ITS
Antealophiotrema brunneosporumincertae sedisCBS H-20222HCBS 123095LC194298LC194340LC194382LC194419LC194474
Aquasubmersa japonicaAquasubmersaceaeKT 2813HHUF 30468PMAFF 245218LC0615811LC0615861LC194383LC194420LC0615911
AquasubmersaceaeKT 2862HHUF 30469HMAFF 245219LC0615821LC0615871LC194384LC194421LC0615921
AquasubmersaceaeKT 2863HHUF 30470PMAFF 245220LC0615831LC0615881LC194385LC194422LC0615931
Atrocalyx acutisporusLophiotremataceaeKT 2436HHUF 30504HMAFF 245613 = NBRC 112316LC194299LC194341LC194386LC194423LC194475
A. lignicolaLophiotremataceaeCBS H-20221HCBS 122364LC194300LC194342LC194387LC194424LC194476
Crassimassarina macrosporaLophiotremataceaeKH 152HHUF 30512PMAFF 245617LC194301LC194343LC194388LC194425LC194477
LophiotremataceaeKT 1764HHUF 29084HJCM 13096 = MAFF 239606LC194302LC194344LC194389LC194426LC194478
Cryptoclypeus oxysporusLophiotremataceaeKT 2772HHUF 30507HMAFF 245614 = NBRC 112317LC194303LC194345LC194390LC194427LC194479
C. ryukyuensisLophiotremataceaeAH 342HHUF 30510PMAFF 245616LC194304LC194346LC194391LC194428LC194480
LophiotremataceaeKT 3534HHUF 30509HMAFF 245615 = NBRC 112318LC194305LC194347LC194392LC194429LC194481
Cryptocoryneum akitaenseCryptocoryneaceaeKT 3019HHUF 30477HMAFF 245365 = NBRC 111758LC194306LC194348LC0961362LC194430LC0961542
C. brevicondensatumCryptocoryneaceaeyone 152HHUF 30478HMAFF 245366 = NBRC 111759LC194307LC194349LC0961372LC194431LC096155 2
C. condensatumCryptocoryneaceaeUPS F-632989CBS 113959LC194308LC194350LC0961382LC194432LC0961562
CryptocoryneaceaeCBS 122629LC194309LC194351LC0961392LC194433LC0961572
CryptocoryneaceaeCBS 122633LC194310LC194352LC0961402LC194434LC096158 2
CryptocoryneaceaeKT 2892HHUF 30479HMAFF 245367 = NBRC 111760LC194311LC194353LC0961412LC194435LC096159 2
C. japonicumCryptocoryneaceaeKT 2961HHUF 30480PMAFF 245368LC194312LC194354LC0961422LC194436LC0961602
CryptocoryneaceaeKT 3291HHUF 30481PMAFF 245369LC194313LC194355LC0961432LC194437LC0961612
CryptocoryneaceaeKT 3300HHUF 30482HMAFF 245370 = NBRC 111761LC194314LC194356LC0961442LC194438LC0961622
CryptocoryneaceaeKT 3413HHUF 30483PMAFF 245371LC194315LC194357LC0961452LC194439LC0961632
Cryptocoryneaceaeyone 36HHUF 30484PMAFF 245372LC194316LC194358LC0961462LC194440LC0961642
Cryptocoryneaceaeyone 157HHUF 30485PMAFF 245373LC194317LC194359LC0961472LC194441LC0961652
C. longicondensatumCryptocoryneaceaeKT 2913HHUF 30486HMAFF 245374 = NBRC 111762LC194318LC194360LC0961482LC194442LC0961662
CryptocoryneaceaeKT 3487HHUF 30487PMAFF 245375LC194319LC194361LC0961492LC194443LC0961672
C. paracondensatumCryptocoryneaceaeKT 3071HHUF 30488PMAFF 245376LC194320LC194362LC0961502LC194444LC0961682
CryptocoryneaceaeKT 3241HHUF 30489HMAFF 245377 = NBRC 111763LC194321LC194363LC0961512LC194445LC0961692
C. pseudorilstoneiCryptocoryneaceaeHHUF 30490HCBS 113641LC194322LC194364LC0961522LC194446LC0961702
Cryptocoryneum sp.CryptocoryneaceaeCBS 114518LC194323LC194365LC0961532LC194447LC0961712
Galeaticarpa aomoriensisLophiotremataceaeKT 2563HHUF 30505HMAFF 245618 = NBRC 112319LC194324LC194366LC194393LC194448LC194482
Hermatomyces iriomotensisHermatomycetaceaeKH 361HHUF 30518HMAFF 245730 = NBRC 112471LC194325LC194367LC194394LC194449LC194483
H. tectonaeHermatomycetaceaeKT 2450HHUF 30520MAFF 245731LC194326LC194368LC194395LC194450LC194484
HermatomycetaceaeAH 276HHUF 30521MAFF 245732LC194327LC194369LC194396LC194451LC194485
HermatomycetaceaeAH 314HHUF 30522MAFF 245733LC194328LC194370LC194397LC194452LC194486
HermatomycetaceaeKH 329HHUF 30523MAFF 245734LC194329LC194371LC194398LC194453LC194487
HermatomycetaceaeKH 356HHUF 30524MAFF 245735LC194330LC194372LC194399LC194454LC194488
HermatomycetaceaeKH 390HHUF 30525MAFF 245736LC194331LC194373LC194400LC194455LC194489
HermatomycetaceaeKH 409HHUF 30526MAFF 245737LC194332LC194374LC194401LC194456LC194490
Lophiotremaborealeincertae sedisCBS 114422 = JCM 14136LC194333LC194375LC194402LC194457LC194491
L. eburnoidesLophiotremataceaeKT 1424-1HHUF 30079HJCM 17826 = MAFF 242970LC0017063LC0017073LC194403LC194458LC0017093
L. fallopiaeLophiotremataceaeKT 2748HHUF 30506HMAFF 245612LC1499114LC1499154LC194404LC194459LC149913 4
L. neoarundinariaLophiotremataceaeKT 856HHUF 27547MAFF 239461AB5244555AB5245965AB5391096AB539096AB5247865
LophiotremataceaeKT 1034HHUF 30015NBRC 106239AB524457 5AB5245985LC194405LC194460LC194492
LophiotremataceaeKT 2200HHUF 30014NBRC 106238AB524456 5AB5245975AB539110 6AB5390976AB5247875
LophiotremataceaeKH 17HHUF 30511MAFF 245619LC194334LC194376LC194406LC194461LC194493
LophiotremataceaeKT 588HHUF 27368MAFF 245620LC194335LC194377LC194407LC194462LC194494
LophiotremataceaeKT 713HHUF 27328JCM 17673AB6187017AB6190197LC194408LC194463LC194495
LophiotremataceaeKT 756HHUF 27330MAFF 239457AB6187027AB6190207LC194409LC194464LC194496
L. nuculaLophiotremataceaeCBS 627.86 = JCM 14132AB6187037AB6190217LC194410LC194465LC194497
L. vagabundumLophiotremataceaeKH 164HHUF 30077JCM 17674AB618704 7AB619022 7LC194411LC194466LC194498
LophiotremataceaeKH 172HHUF 30078JCM 17675AB618705 7AB619023 7LC194412LC194467LC194499
LophiotremataceaeKT 664HHUF 27323MAFF 239456AB618706 7AB6190247LC194413LC194468LC194500
LophiotremataceaeKT 3310HHUF 30508MAFF 245621LC194336LC194378LC194414LC194469LC194501
LophiotremataceaeF-634236CBS 113975 = JCM 14138AB618707 7AB6190257LC194415LC194470LC194502
Massarina albocarnisLophiotremataceaeCBS 119345LC194337LC194379LC194416LC194471LC194503
Pseudocryptoclypeus yakushimensisLophiotremataceaeKT 2186HHUF 30503HMAFF 245622 = NBRC 112320LC194338LC194380LC194417LC194472LC194504
Pseudolophiotrema elymicolaincertae sedisKT 1450HHUF 28984HJCM 13090 = MAFF 239600LC194339LC194381LC194418LC194473LC194505

a H = holotype; P = paratype.

b Sequences obtained in this study are shown in bold.

Sequences with 1 from Ariyawansa et al. (2015),

2 from Hashimoto et al. (2016),

3 from Liu et al. (2015),

4 from Hyde et al. (2016),

5 from Tanaka et al. (2009),

6 from Schoch et al. (2009),

7 from Hirayama & Tanaka (2011).

Phylogenetic analyses

DNA extraction was carried out with an ISOPLANT II kit (Nippon Gene, Japan) in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol. Partial SSU, complete ITS, and partial LSU nuclear rDNA regions and partial tef1 and partial rpb2 genes were amplified by PCR with the primer pairs NS1/NS4, ITS1/ITS4 (White et al. 1990), LR0R/LR7 (Rehner & Samuels 1994, Vilgalys & Hester 1990), EF1-983F/EF1-2218R (Rehner & Buckley 2005), and fRPB2-5F/fRPB2-7cR (Liu et al. 1999), respectively. Amplifications were performed in 25 μL volumes consisting of 2 μL DNA extract, 2.5 μL of 10× TEMPase Buffer I, 10 mM dNTP mix, 1 μL of each 20-pM primer, 25 mM MgCl2, 14.5 μL MilliQ water, and 0.5 μL TEMPase Hot Start DNA polymerase (Ampliqon, Denmark). PCRs were carried out on a PC 320 thermocycler (ASTEC, Japan) as follows: 95 °C for 15 min, followed by 35 cycles of 1 min at 94 °C, 1 min at the designated annealing temperature (42.2 °C for SSU, 61.5 °C for ITS, 46 °C for LSU, 60 °C for tef1, and 58 °C for rpb2), and 1 min at 72 °C, with a final denaturation step of 7 min at 72 °C. The PCR products were sequenced directly at SolGent (South Korea). Newly generated sequences were deposited in GenBank (Table 1). Sequences of 32 taxa from Amniculicolaceae, Anteagloniaceae, Aquasubmersaceae, Hermatomycetaceae, Lophiotremataceae, Pseudoastrosphaeriellaceae, Testudinaceae, and Tetraplosphaeriaceae were also phylogenetically analysed (Table 2). Lophiostoma crenatum and L. arundinis (Lophiostomataceae) were used as outgroups. All sequences were aligned using the MUSCLE algorithm as implemented in MEGA v. 5 (Tamura et al. 2011). Phylogenetic analyses were conducted using maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian methods. The optimum substitution models for each dataset were estimated by Kakusan4 (Tanabe 2011) based on the Akaike information Criterion (AIC; Akaike 1974) for the ML analysis and the Bayesian information Criterion (BIC; Schwarz 1978) for the Bayesian analysis. The ML analysis was performed using TreeFinder Mar 2011 (Jobb 2011) based on the models selected with the AICc4 parameter (proportional model among genes and proportional model among codons), namely, TN93ef+G for SSU, TN93+G for LSU, J2ef+G for ITS, F81+G for the tef1 first codon position, TIMef+G for the tef1 second codon position, J2+G for the tef1 third codon position, J2+G for the rpb2 first codon position, JC69+G for the rpb2 second codon position, and TN93ef+G for the rpb2 third codon position. Bootstrap proportions (BPs) were obtained by 1 000 bootstrap replications. Bayesian analysis was performed with MrBayes v. 3.2.2 (Ronquist et al. 2012) with substitution models for different regions selected with the BIC4 parameter (i.e., proportional model among loci and among codons): K80+G for SSU, SYM+G for LSU, SYM+G for ITS, F81+G for the tef1 first codon position, GTR+G for the tef1 second codon position, GTR+G for the tef1 third codon position, GTR+G for the rpb2 first codon position, HKY85+G for the rpb2 second codon position, and SYM+G for the rpb2 third codon position. Two simultaneous, independent Metropolis-coupled Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) runs were performed for 2 M generations with trees sampled every 1 000 generations. Convergence of the MCMC procedure was assessed from the average standard deviation of split frequencies (< 0.01) and effective sample size scores (all > 100) using MrBayes and Tracer v. 1.6 (Rambaut et al. 2014), respectively. The first 25 % of trees were discarded as burn-in, and the remaining trees were used to calculate 50 % majority rule trees and to determine posterior probabilities (PPs) for individual branches. The alignment was submitted to TreeBASE under study number S19310.
Table 2

Specimens, isolates and GenBank accession numbers of species used in the phylogenetic study.

SpeciesFamilySpecimen no.aStrain no.GenBan k Accession no.
SSULSUtef1rpb2ITS
Amniculicola immersaAmniculicolaceaeCBS H-20226HCBS 123083GU456295FJ795498GU456273GU456358
A. parvaAmniculicolaceaeCBS H-20227HCBS 123092GU296134GU301797GU349065
Anteaglonium abbreviatumAnteagloniaceaeANM 925.1GQ221877GQ221924
A. globosumAnteagloniaceaeANM 925.2HGQ221879GQ221925
AnteagloniaceaeSMH 5283PGQ221911GQ221919
A. parvulumAnteagloniaceaeMFLU 16-0473MFLUCC 14-0815KU922912KU922911KU922919
AnteagloniaceaeMFLU 16-0472MFLUCC 14-0817KU922914KU922913
AnteagloniaceaeMFLU 16-0474MFLUCC 14-0821KU922916KU922915KU922921
AnteagloniaceaeMFLU 16-0470MFLUCC 14-0823KU922918KU922917KU922922
A. thailandicumAnteagloniaceaeMFLU 16-0471HMFLUCC 14-0816KU922910KU922909KU922920
Aquasubmersa mircensisAquasubmersaceaeMFLU 111001HMFLUCC 11-0401 = IFRDCC 2572JX276956JX276955JX276954
Byssolophis sphaerioidesincertae sedisIFRDCC 2053GU456296GU456318GU456263GU456348
Hermatomyces tectonaeHermatomycetaceaeMFLU 15-3437HMFLUCC 14-1140KU712465KU764695KU872757KU712486KU144917
HermatomycetaceaeMFLU 15-3438 PMFLUCC 14-1141KU712466KU764696KU872758KU144918
HermatomycetaceaeMFLU 15-3439 PMFLUCC 14-1142KU712467KU764697KU712487KU144919
H. thailandicaHermatomycetaceaeMFLU 15-3440HMFLUCC 14-1143KU712468KU764692KU872754KU712488KU144920
HermatomycetaceaeMFLU 15-3441PMFLUCC 14-1144KU712469KU764693KU872755KU712489KU144921
HermatomycetaceaeMFLU 15-3442PMFLUCC 14-1145KU712470KU764694KU872756KU712490KU144922
Lepidosphaeria nicotiaeTestudinaceaeCBS 101341DQ678067DQ677910DQ677963
Lophiostoma arundinisLophiostomataceaeCBS 621.86DQ782383DQ782384DQ782387DQ782386AJ496633
LophiotremabambusaeLophiotremataceaeMFLU 11-0150MFLUCC 10-0558KX672159KX672154KX672162KX672161KX672149
L. crenatumLophiostomataceaeCBS 629.86DQ678017DQ678069DQ677912DQ677965
Polyplosphaeria fuscaTetraplosphaeriaceaeHHUF 29399HJCM 13175 = MAFF 239685AB524463AB524604AB524789
Pseudoastrosphaeriella bambusaePseudoastrosphaeriellaceaeMFLU 11-0155HMFLUCC 11-0205KT955455KT955475KT955437KT955414
P. longicollaPseudoastrosphaeriellaceaeMFLU 11-0207HMFLUCC 11-0171KT955476KT955438KT955420
P. thailandensisPseudoastrosphaeriellaceaeMFLU 11-0145HMFLUCC 10-0553KT955456KT955477KT955439KT955411
Pseudotetraploa curviappendiculataTetraplosphaeriaceaeHHUF 28582HJCM 12852 = MAFF 239495AB524467AB524608AB524792
Quadricrura septentrionalisTetraplosphaeriaceaeHHUF 28781PCBS 125429AB524474AB524615AB524799
Tetrapla sasicolaTetraplosphaeriaceaeHHUF 27566HJCM 13167 = MAFF 239677AB524490AB524631AB524807
Triplosphaeria maximaTetraplosphaeriaceaeHHUF 29390HJCM 13172 = MAFF 239682AB524496AB524637AB524812
Ulospora bilgramiiTestudinaceaeCBS 101364DQ678025DQ678076DQ677921DQ677974
Verruculina enaliaTestudinaceaeBCC 18402GU479771GU479803GU479864GU479836

a H = holotype, P = paratype.

RESULTS

The ML and Bayesian phylogenetic analyses were conducted using an aligned sequence dataset comprising 970 nucleotide positions from SSU, 1 275 from LSU, 340 from ITS, 909 from tef1, and 1 023 from rpb2. The alignment contained a total of 89 taxa, which consisted of 84 taxa (94.4 %) in SSU, 89 (100 %) in LSU, 71 (79.8 %) in ITS, 81 (91 %) in tef1, 73 (82 %) in rpb2 (Table 1, 2). No significant conflict was observed among individual gene phylogenies, allowing the five genes to be combined into a single dataset. This combined dataset provided higher confidence values for the familial level than did those of the individual gene trees (data not shown). ITS1 was excluded from the analyses because it contained too many ambiguously aligned regions. Of the 4 517 characters included in the alignment, 1 307 were variable and 3 189 were conserved. The ML tree with the highest log likelihood (–31261.0019) is shown in Fig. 1. The Bayesian likelihood score was –31334.0529. The topology recovered by the Bayesian analysis was almost identical to that of the ML tree except for the position of Anteagloniaceae.
Fig. 1

Maximum-likelihood (ML) tree of Aquasubmersaceae, Cryptocoryneaceae, Hermatomycetaceae, and Lophiotremataceae based on SSU-ITS-LSU-tef1-rpb2 sequences. ML bootstrap proportion (BP) > 60 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) > 0.95 are presented at the nodes as ML BP/Bayesian PP. A hyphen (‘-’) indicates values < 60 % BP or 0.95 PP, and a node not present in the Bayesian analysis is shown with ‘x’. Ex-holotype strains are indicated with a superscript H. The newly obtained sequences are shown in bold and red. The scale bar represents nucleotide substitutions per site.

In the phylogenetic tree shown in Fig. 1, Lophiotremataceae forms a moderately supported clade (77 % ML BP/1.00 Bayesian PP) (Fig. 1). The clade corresponding to Lophiotrema s.str. includes L. eburnoides, L. fallopiae, L. neoarundinaria, L. neohysterioides, L. nucula, and L. vagabundum. The results of the phylogenetic analyses suggest that four species previously placed in Lophiotrema, i.e., L. boreale, L. brunneosporum, L.lignicola, and L. bambusae (Mathiassen 1993, Zhang et al. 2009, Hyde et al. 2016), should be excluded from the genus. The first two species, L. boreale and L. brunneosporum, lie outside of Lophiotremataceae, but their familial placements are unresolved (Fig. 1). On the basis of these results, a new genus, Antealophiotrema, is established for L. brunneosporum. Lophiotrema lignicola is transferred to the new genus Atrocalyx, and a new combination, Atrocalyx lignicola, is proposed. The generic placement of L. bambusae and L. boreale remains unresolved because we were unable to examine any material of these species. Four families, including the three new families, Aquasubmersaceae, Cryptocoryneaceae, and Hermatomycetaceae, 10 genera including seven new genera, nine species including seven new species, and two new combinations are described below. A. Hashim. & Kaz. Tanaka, fam. nov. — MycoBank MB819235 Type genus. Aquasubmersa K.D. Hyde & Huang Zhang, Cryptog. Mycol. 33: 340. 2012. Saprobic on woody plants. Sexual morph: Ascomata scattered to grouped, subglobose, semi-immersed, with a papillate ostiolar neck. Peridium composed of flattened, thin-walled, polygonal cells. Pseudoparaphyses septate, branched. Asci bitunicate, cylindrical, with a short pedicel, 8-spored. Ascospores hyaline, broadly fusiform with rounded ends, septate. Asexual morph: Conidiomata pycnidial, globose to subglobose, scattered, semi-immersed, ostiolate. Conidiophores absent. Conidiogenous cells holoblastic, lageniform, hyaline, smooth. Conidia hyaline, ellipsoidal, smooth. Notes — Previous phylogenetic studies using SSU and LSU rDNA sequences placed Aquasubmersa in Pleosporales (Zhang et al. 2012, Ariyawansa et al. 2015). This genus was treated as a member of Lophiotremataceae in a recent study (Doilom et al. 2016). The results of our phylogenetic analyses based on SSU-ITS-LSU-tef1-rpb2 sequences strongly support (99 % ML BP/1.00 Bayesian PP) this genus as sister to a clade comprising Lophiotremataceae and Cryptocoryneaceae (Fig. 1). To accommodate the genus Aquasubmersa, we introduce a new family, Aquasubmersaceae. Species in Aquasubmersa ceae share several common features, such as ascomata having a papillate ostiolar neck and pycnidial conidiomata. Lophiotremataceae differs from Aquasubmersaceae in having ascomata with a compressed, slit-like ostiole. Cryptocoryneaceae and Hermatomycetaceae, whose sexual morphs are still undetermined, can be easily distinguished from Aquasubmersaceae, which has ellipsoidal conidia, because two families have sporodochial conidiomata and cheiroid or lenticular conidia, respectively. K.D. Hyde & Huang Zhang, Cryptog. Mycol. 33: 340. 2012 Type species. Aquasubmersa mircensis Huang Zhang & K.D. Hyde, Cryptog. Mycol. 33: 340. 2012. Notes — The type species of this genus, A. mircensis, was reported only as an asexual morph (Zhang et al. 2012). Ariyawansa et al. (2015) subsequently introduced the second species, A. japonica, with sexual and asexual morphs. Both species occurred on submerged woody plants. A. Hashim. & Kaz. Tanaka, fam. nov. — MycoBank MB819237 Type genus. Cryptocoryneum Fuckel, Fungi Rhenani Exsicc. XV–XVI: 25. 1865. Saprobic on various plants. Sexual morph: Undetermined. Asexual morph: Conidiomata sporodochial, pulvinate, often confluent, dark brown to black. Conidiophores arising from stromatic cells, simple, septate, hyaline to pale brown. Conidiogenous cells monoblastic, cylindrical to oblong, terminal, determinate, hyaline to pale brown. Conidia solitary, acrogenous, branched, cheiroid, with dark brown to black cap cells firmly united together, multi-armed; basal cells brown, cuneiform, smooth, thin-walled; arms cylindrical, pale brown, branched at base, smooth, multi-septate. Notes — Cryptocoryneum is characterised by having stromatic sporodochia, cheiroid conidia, and conidial arms that are developed downward from the cap cells (Schoknecht & Crane 1977). This genus was recently taxonomically and phylogenetically reassessed by Hashimoto et al. (2016). A BLAST search with ITS sequences of species in this genus suggested a close relationship with Lophiotremataceae, but their familial position remains unresolved (Hashimoto et al. 2016). According to our results, Cryptocoryneum forms a lineage that is phylogenetically distinct from Lophiotremataceae (Fig. 1). Although the sexual morph of Cryptocoryneum has not been determined, asexual morphs of this genus are phenotypically different from the coelomycetous asexual morph of Lophiotremataceae (Leuchtmann 1985, this study). We therefore introduce the new family Cryptocoryneaceae to accommodate the genus Cryptocoryneum. Fuckel, Fungi Rhenani Exsicc. XV–XVI: 25. 1865 Type species. Cryptocoryneum fasciculatum Fuckel, Fungi Rhenani Exsicc. XV–XVI: 25. Fung. Rhen. 1527. 1865. (= Cryptocoryneum hysterioides (Corda) Peyronel, Nuovo Giorn. Bot. Ital. 25: 449. 1918.) Notes — For further information on this genus, see Hashimoto et al. (2016). Locq. ex A. Hashim. & Kaz. Tanaka, fam. nov. — MycoBank MB819238 Hermatomycetaceae Locq., Mycologie générale et structural: 202. 1984. nom. inval. (Art. 36.1, Melbourne Code). Type genus. Hermatomyces Speg., Anales Mus. Nac. Buenos Aires, ser. 3, 13: 445. 1911. Saprobic on various plants. Sexual morph: Undetermined. Asexual morph: Conidiomata sporodochial, pulvinate, dark brown to black. Conidiophores mononematous, pale brown. Conidiogenous cells monoblastic, integrated, terminal, cylindrical. Conidia dimorphic; lenticular conidia ellipsoidal, muriform; cylindrical trans-septate, hyaline to brown. Notes — The family Hermatomycetaceae sensu Locq. was informally proposed as a provisional name (Locquin 1984). Hermatomycetaceae is established here to accommodate the single genus Hermatomyces. Two of the most striking features of Hermatomyces are the sporodochial conidiomata and the dimorphic conidia, the latter existing in lenticular and cylindrical forms (Chang 1995). As a sexual morph of this genus has not been reported and a phylogenetic study has not been performed, this genus has long been treated as ‘incertae sedis’ within Ascomycota (Wijayawardene et al. 2012). Doilom et al. (2016) and Tibpromma et al. (2016) have suggested that this genus belongs to Lophiotremataceae on the basis of their phylogenetic analyses using SSU, LSU, tef1, and rpb2. Our analyses using additional species of Lophiotremataceae and its related taxa revealed that Hermatomyces is distantly related to Lophiotremataceae (Fig. 1). Speg., Anales Mus. Nac. Buenos Aires, ser. 3, 13: 445. 1911 Type species. Hermatomyces tucumanensis Speg., Anales Mus. Nac. Buenos Aires, ser. 3, 13: 446. 1911. Saprobic on various plants. Sexual morph: Undetermined. Asexual morph: Conidiomata sporodochial, pulvinate, often confluent, dark brown to black. Conidiophores mononematous, septate, pale brown. Conidiogenous cells monoblastic, integrated, terminal, cylindrical. Conidia dimorphic; lenticular conidia ellipsoidal, muriform, dark brown to black at central cells, pale brown at peripheral cells; cylindrical conidia composed of black peripheral cells and dark brown upper cells, hyaline at lower cells. Notes — This genus was established by Spegazzini (1911) to accommodate H. tucumanensis. Since its establishment, 10 additional taxa have been described worldwide (Spegazzini 1911, Hughes 1953, Rao & De Hoog 1986, Castañeda-Ruiz & Heredia 2000, Leão-Ferreira et al. 2013, Prasher & Prasher 2014, Doilom et al. 2016, Tibpromma et al. 2016). Most species of this genus occur on angiosperms and monocots, with a few rarely reported from ferns (Castañeda-Ruiz & Heredia 2000) or gymnosperms (Mel’nik 2000). The most widespread species in the genus, H. sphaericus, has been reported from Africa, Eurasia, and Central and South America (Spegazzini 1911, Hughes 1953, Chang 1995, Matsushima 1993, Mel’nik 2000, Barbosa & Gusmão 2011). A. Hashim. & Kaz. Tanaka, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB819239; Fig. 2a, 3
Fig. 2

Colony characters of lophiotremataceous species used in this study on PDA within 3 wk at 20 °C in the dark (left: upper, right: reverse). a. Hermatomyces iriomotensis (MAFF 245730 = NBRC 112471, ex-holotype culture); b. Atrocalyx acutisporus (MAFF 245613 = NBRC 112316, ex-holotype culture); c. A. lignicola (CBS 122364, ex-holotype culture); d. Crassimassarina macrospora (JCM 13096 = MAFF 239606, ex-holotype culture); e. C. macrospora (MAFF 245617, ex-paratype culture); f. Cryptoclypeus oxysporus (MAFF 245614 = NBRC 112317, ex-holotype culture); g. C. ryukyuensis (MAFF 245615 = NBRC 112318, ex-holotype culture); h. C. ryukyuensis (MAFF 245616, ex-paratype culture); i. Galeaticarpa aomoriensis (MAFF 245618 = NBRC 112319, ex-holotype culture); j. Pseudocryptoclypeus yakushimensis (MAFF 245622 = NBRC 112320, ex-holotype culture); k. Antealophiotrema brunneosporum (CBS 123095, ex-holotype culture); l. Pseudolophiotrema elymicola (JCM 13090 = MAFF 239600, ex-holotype culture). — Scale bar = 1 cm.

Fig. 3

Hermatomyces iriomotensis. a–b. Conidiomata on substrate; c. conidiogenous cell and immature lenticular conidium; d–f. lenticular conidia (f. lateral view); g. conidiogenous cells and immature cylindrical conidium; h–j. cylindrical conidia (all: HHUF 30518, holotype). — Scale bars: a = 1 mm; b = 200 μm; c, e–j = 5 μm; d = 10 μm.

Etymology. Referring to the collection site. Saprobic on woody plants. Sexual morph: Undetermined. Asexual morph: Conidiomata sporodochial, pulvinate, often confluent, dark brown to black. Conidiophores mononematous, short, pale brown, smooth, 2.5–3 μm wide, 17.5–22 μm high, sometimes reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells monoblastic, terminal, integrated. Conidia dimorphic, lenticular and cylindrical. Lenticular conidia solitary, elliptical to almost round in one plane, smooth, muriform, with pale peripheral cells surrounding central dark brown to black cells, 30–36 × 20–27 μm (av. = 33.6 × 23.5 μm, n = 50), 18–24 μm thick (av. = 21.9 μm, n = 30) in lateral view. Cylindrical conidia straight to curved, with one to two columns, 3–7-septate, hyaline, sometimes pale brown at apical cell, constricted at the septa, 20.5–33 × 7–12.5 μm (av. = 28.7 × 9.6 μm, n = 20). Culture characteristics — Colonies on PDA attaining 24–28 mm diam within 21 d at 20 °C in the dark, floccose, centrally raised, straw (46: Rayner 1970) to grey olivaceous (107); reverse smoke grey (105) to grey olivaceous (107) (Fig. 2a); no sporulation observed. Specimen examined. Japan, Okinawa, Isl. Iriomote, near Tropical botanic garden, on dead twigs of woody plant, 13 July 2011, K. Hirayama & K. Tanaka, KH 361 (HHUF 30518 holotype designated here, ex-holotype living culture MAFF 245730 = NBRC 112471). Notes — Lenticular conidia of this species resemble those of H. uniseriatum, but H. iriomotensis can be distinguished from the latter species by the presence of 3–7-septate cylindrical conidia arranged in 1–2 columns (vs 2–3-septate and one row in the latter; Leão-Ferreira et al. 2013). Hermatomyces iriomotensis differs from H. krabiensis, which has cylindrical conidia with swollen lower cells (Tibpromma et al. 2016). Additionally, ITS sequences between these two taxa differed at seven positions. K. Hiray. & Kaz. Tanaka, Mycoscience 52: 405. 2011 Type genus. Lophiotrema Sacc., Michelia 1 (no. 3): 338. 1878. Saprobic on various plants. Sexual morph: Ascomata immersed, erumpent at the apex, subglobose. Ostiolar neck crest-like or rarely papillate, mostly elongated and laterally compressed. Peridium composed of rectangular to globose cells. Pseudoparaphyses septate, branched and anastomosed. Asci bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical, with a short stipe, 8-spored. Ascospores fusiform to broadly fusiform, hyaline, smooth. Asexual morph: Conidiomata pycnidial, globose to subglobose, scattered, semi-immersed, ostiolate. Peridium composed of subglobose to angular, brown cells. Conidiophores absent. Conidiogenous cells holoblastic or phialidic, cylindrical to ampliform, hyaline. Conidia ellipsoidal to cylindrical with rounded ends, hyaline, smooth, aseptate or multi-septate. Notes — As originally circumscribed Lophiotremataceae was a monotypic family comprising the genus Lophiotrema (Zhang et al. 2009, Hirayama & Tanaka 2011, Hyde et al. 2013). A somewhat broader familial concept for Lophiotremataceae was adopted by Doilom et al. (2016) and Tibpromma et al. (2016), who considered the family to comprise Aquasubmersa, Hermatomyces, and Lophiotrema on the basis of phylogenetic studies. However, the results of our morphological examination and phylogenetic analyses using SSU, ITS, LSU, tef1, and rpb2 sequences suggest that this family encompasses Lophiotrema and five new genera. Because Aquasubmersa and Hermatomyces were placed outside of Lophiotremataceae in our phylogenetic tree (Fig. 1), we treat these genera as belonging to the families Aquasubmersaceae and Hermatomycetaceae, respectively. One species of Lophiotrema (L. lignicola) grouped with Atrocalyx, a new genus in Lophiotremataceae, while two species (Lophiotrema boreale and L. brunneosporum) were placed outside of Lophiotremataceae entirely. Marincowitz et al. (2008) have suggested that ‘Massarina albocarnis’ (CBS 119345) has a phylogenetic affinity with Lophiotrema based on BLAST results involving ITS and LSU sequences. However, Beier et al. (2015), who observed the holotype specimen of M. albocarnis, has indicated that this species belongs to Diaporthe (Sordariomycetes). The isolate CBS 119345 may thus be misidentified. Unfortunately, we were unable to examine any morphological features of CBS 119345 because it did not sporulate in culture. Sacc., Michelia 1 (no. 3): 338. 1878 Type species. Lophiotrema nucula (Fr.) Sacc., Michelia 1 (no. 3): 338. 1878. Notes — For further information on this genus, see Holm & Holm (1988), Tanaka & Harada (2003), Zhang et al. (2009), and Hirayama & Tanaka (2011). In the present study, we found that Lophiotrema s.str. should be limited to species having ascomata with a slit-like ostiole and an ascomatal wall of uniform thickness, asci with a short stipe, and pycnidial asexual morphs. Although L. brunneosporum with a monodictys-like asexual morph was sister to ‘Lophiotrema’ boreale in our phylogenetic tree (Fig. 1), these two taxa were distinct from Lophiotremataceae s.str. (Fig. 1). Consequently, they should be treated as distinct lineages in Dothideomycetes. We were unable to morphologically examine L. boreale from an isolate of this species (CBS 114422) or the original specimen used for isolation. Further examination is required to clarify the taxonomic placement of this species. A. Hashim. & Kaz. Tanaka, gen. nov. — MycoBank MB819240 Etymology. From the Latin atro-, meaning black, and calyx, meaning cap. Type species. Atrocalyx acutisporus A. Hashim. & Kaz. Tanaka. Saprobic on woody plants. Sexual morph: Ascomata solitary to grouped, semi-immersed to immersed. Ostiolar neck crest-like, elongated and laterally compressed, surrounded by dark brown hyphae. Peridium composed of 2 zones at side. Pseudoparaphyses septate, branched and anastomosed. Asci bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical, 8-spored. Ascospores broadly fusiform, hyaline, 1-septate, smooth. Asexual morph: Conidiomata pycnidial, globose to subglobose, superficial, black, ostiolate. Peridium composed of elongated, brown cells. Conidiophores absent. Conidiogenous cells holoblastic, ampliform to cylindrical, hyaline. Conidia ellipsoidal, hyaline, smooth, aseptate. Notes — The new genus Atrocalyx is established to accommodate A. lignicola (formerly L. lignicola) and a new species, A. acutisporus. These two species are characterised by a crest-like, elongated and laterally compressed ostiolar neck (Fig. 4b, 5b) surrounded by a well-developed peridium (up to 62.5 μm) (Fig. 4c, 5c). ‘Lophiotrema’ bambusae, which was recently introduced as a species in Lophiotrema (Hyde et al. 2016), was nested within a moderately supported clade (67 % ML BP/1.00 Bayesian PP) along with these two species in our phylogenetic tree (Fig. 1). Because we could not observe any material of ‘Lophiotrema’ bambusae, the generic placement of this species is pending.
Fig. 4

Atrocalyx acutisporus. a–b. Appearance of ascomata on substrate; c. ascoma in longitudinal section; d. peridium of ascoma; e. pseudoparaphyses; f–g. asci; h. ascus apex; i. ascus stipe; j–k. ascospores; l. germinating ascospore; m–n. conidiomata in culture; o. conidioma in longitudinal section; p. peridium of conidioma; q–r. conidiogenous cells; s–t. conidia; u. germinating conidium (a–l: HHUF 30504, holotype; m–u: MAFF 245613, ex-holotype culture). — Scale bars: a = 500 μm; b = 200 μm; c, o = 20 μm; d–g, p = 10 μm; h–l, q–u = 5 μm; m = 1 mm; n = 250 μm.

Fig. 5

Atrocalyx lignicola. a–b. Appearance of ascomata on substrate; c. ascoma in longitudinal section; d. peridium of ascoma; e–f. asci; g. ascus apex; h. ascus stipe; i. pseudoparaphyses; j–n. ascospores (all: CBS H-20221, holotype). — Scale bars: a = 1 mm; b = 250 μm; c = 20 μm; d–f, i = 10 μm; g, h, j–n = 5 μm.

The genus is morphologically similar to Lophiotrema, but can be distinguished from the latter by its well-developed peridium around the ostiolar neck and base (vs a poorly developed peridium up to 25 μm thick; Holm & Holm 1988). A. Hashim. & Kaz. Tanaka, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB819241; Fig. 2b, 4 Etymology. Referring to the ascospores with acute ends. Saprobic on dead twigs of woody plants. Sexual morph: Ascomata ellipsoidal, solitary to 2–4-grouped, immersed, 110–140 μm high, 190–210 μm diam. Ostiolar neck crest-like, elongated and laterally compressed, surrounded by dark brown hyphae. Peridium 20–30 μm thick at side, composed of 2 zones; outer zone 11–17 μm thick, composed of elongated, thin-walled, 8.5–12.5 × 2.5–3 μm, brown cells; inner zone 15–17 μm thick, composed of globose to rectangular, 7.5–9 × 4–5 μm, hyaline cells; near the ostiole 37.5–45 μm thick, composed of globose, brown to black cells; 19–37.5 μm thick at the base, composed of globose to rectangular, 1.8–2.5 μm diam cells. Pseudoparaphyses numerous, 1–1.5 μm wide, septate, branched and anastomosed. Asci bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical, (66.5–)75–89.5 × 8–11 μm (av. = 80.8 × 9.2 μm, n = 10), with a short stipe (4–7.5 μm long, av. = 5.5 μm, n = 10), apically rounded with an ocular chamber, 8-spored. Ascospores broadly fusiform with acute ends, 13.5–18(–20) × 3–4(–5.5) μm (av. = 15.9 × 3.7 μm, n = 50), l/w 3.7–5.1 (av. = 4.4, n = 50), hyaline, with a septum nearly median (0.44–0.59, av. = 0.51, n = 50), slightly constricted at the septum, smooth, with an entire gelatinous sheath up to 2 μm thick. Asexual morph: Conidiomata pycnidial, globose to subglobose, up to 145 μm high, 60–130 μm diam, 2–3-grouped, superficial, black, with a papillate ostiolar neck. Peridium 7.5–10 μm thick, composed of 3–4 layers of 7.5–13 × 1.5–3 μm, elongated, brown cells. Conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells holoblastic, 7.5–12 × 1.5–3 μm, ampliform to cylindrical, hyaline, smooth. Conidia ellipsoidal, 3–4 × 1.9–2 μm (av. = 3.5 × 2.0 μm, n = 50), l/w 1.5–2.1 (av. = 1.8, n = 50), hyaline, smooth, aseptate, guttulate when young. Culture characteristics — Colonies on PDA attaining 24–25 mm diam within 21 d at 20 °C in the dark, floccose, radiately, smoke grey (105); reverse olivaceous grey to olivaceous black (108) (Fig. 2b); asexual morph formed. Specimen examined. Japan, Okinawa, Isl. Iriomote, Sono trail, on dead twigs of woody plant, 29 Sept. 2007, K. Tanaka & H. Yonezawa, KT 2436 (HHUF 30504 holotype designated here, ex-holotype living culture MAFF 245613 = NBRC 112316). Notes — Atrocalyx acutisporus superficially resembles A. lignicola, but can be distinguished from the latter by its smaller ascospores (13.5 –18(–20) × 3 – 4(– 5.5) μm vs 20 – 26 × 4–5.5(–6) μm, respectively). ITS sequence differences between these two species were found at 16 of 529 nucleotide positions, with two gaps. (Ying Zhang, J. Fourn. & K.D. Hyde) A. Hashim. & Kaz. Tanaka, comb. nov. — MycoBank MB819242; Fig. 2c, 5 Basionym. Lophiotrema lignicola Ying Zhang, J. Fourn. & K.D. Hyde, Fung. Diversity 38: 238. 2009. Saprobic on dead twigs of Populus sp. Sexual morph: Ascomata ellipsoidal, 330 – 380 μm high, 350–600 μm long, 230–400 μm wide, solitary to 4–5-grouped, semi-immersed. Ostiolar neck crest-like, elongated and laterally compressed, surrounded by dark brown hyphae. Peridium 27.5–42 μm thick at side, composed of 2 zones; outer zone 15–20 μm thick, composed of elongated, thin-walled, 10–12.5 × 3.5–5 μm, brown cells; inner zone 15–22 μm thick, composed of globose to rectangular, 5–6.5 μm diam, hyaline cells; near the ostiole 57–62.5 μm thick, composed of dark brown cells; at base 35–46 μm thick, composed of globose to rectangular, 2.5–4(–6) μm diam, brown to black cells. Pseudoparaphyses numerous, 1–1.5 μm wide, septate, branched and anastomosed. Asci bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical, 100–146 × 12.5– 17 μm (av. = 125.2 × 13.4 μm, n = 11), with a short stipe (4–18 μm long, av. = 8.4 μm, n = 11), apically rounded with an ocular chamber, 8-spored. Ascospores broadly fusiform with rounded ends, 20–26 × 6.5–9.5 μm (av. = 22.3 × 7.4 μm, n = 50), hyaline, with a septum nearly median (0.45–0.54, av. = 0.50, n = 50), slightly constricted at the septum, smooth, with an entire gelatinous sheath up to 2 μm thick. Senescent ascospores 3-septate, yellowish. Asexual morph: Undetermined. Culture characteristics — Colonies on PDA attaining 23–26 mm diam within 21 d at 20 °C in the dark, velvety, plane, smoke grey (105); reverse olivaceous black (108) (Fig. 2c); no sporulation observed. Specimen examined. Belgium, Hainaut, Orval, ruisseau de Williers, on decorticated trunk of Populus sp., 29 Sept. 2006, J. Fournier (CBS H-20221 holotype, ex-holotype living culture CBS 122364). Notes — Atrocalyx lignicola was first described as a species of Lophiotrema on the basis of its 1-septate, hyaline, strongly constricted ascospores (Zhang et al. 2009). According to our morphological observations of the holotype specimen, however, this species is not typical for the genus Lophiotrema; in particular, A. lignicola possesses ascomata with well-developed peridium (Fig. 5c). A. Hashim. & Kaz. Tanaka, gen. nov. — MycoBank MB819243 Etymology. After its morphological similarity to Massarina, but with well-developed ascomatal wall. Type species. Crassimassarina macrospora A. Hashim. & Kaz. Tanaka. Saprobic on dead twigs of woody plants. Sexual morph: Ascomata solitary to grouped, immersed to erumpent, subglobose. Ostiolar neck papillate, without slit-like ostiole, composed of carbonaceous, thick-walled, black cells. Peridium composed of rectangular, thin-walled cells. Pseudoparaphyses trabeculate, septate, branched and anastomosed. Asci bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical, 8-spored. Ascospores broadly fusiform with rounded ends, straight, 1-septate, hyaline, smooth. Asexual morph: Conidiomata pycnidial, globose to subglobose, scattered, semi-immersed, solitary, black, ostiolate. Peridium composed of subglobose to rectangular, brown cells. Conidiophores absent. Conidiogenous cells holoblastic, cylindrical, hyaline. Conidia cylindrical with rounded ends, hyaline, smooth, multi-septate. A. Hashim. & Kaz. Tanaka, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB819244; Fig. 2d–e, 6
Fig. 6

Crassimassarina macrospora. a–b. Appearance of ascomata on substrate; c. ascoma in longitudinal section; d. peridium of ascoma; e. pseudoparaphyses; f–g. asci; h. ascus apex; i. ascus stipe; j–m. ascospores; n. ascospore with a gelatinous sheath (in India ink); o–p. conidiomata in culture; q. conidioma in longitudinal section; r. peridium of conidioma; s. conidiogenous cells; t–v. conidia (u in Trypan Blue) (a, c–f, j–k, n: HHUF 29084, holotype; b, g–i, l–m: HHUF 30512, paratype; o–s, u–v: JCM 13096 = MAFF 239606, ex-holotype culture; t: MAFF 245617, ex-paratype culture). — Scale bars: a, o = 1 mm; b, p = 250 μm; c, q = 20 μm; d–g, m–n, r = 10 μm; h–l, s–v = 5 μm.

Etymology. Referring to the large ascospores. Saprobic on dead twigs of Cornus controversa. Sexual morph: Ascomata solitary to 4–5-grouped, immersed, erumpent at the apex, subglobose in section, 450–620 μm high, 380–700 μm diam. Ostiolar neck papillate, without slit-like ostiole, composed of carbonaceous, thick-walled, black cells. Peridium 25–60 μm thick, composed of 6–8 layers of rectangular, thin-walled, 5–12.5 μm diam cells, surrounded by brown hyphae (2–3 μm thick). Pseudoparaphyses numerous, trabeculate, 1–1.5 μm wide, septate, branched and anastomosed. Asci numerous, bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical, 165–200 × 25–33 μm (av. = 183.5 × 27.9 μm, n = 7), with a short stipe (7.5–26 μm long, av. = 16.8 μm, n = 7), apically rounded with an ocular chamber, 8-spored. Ascospores broadly fusiform with rounded ends, straight, (29.5–)33–42 × 9–15 μm (av. = 37.8 × 13.0 μm, n = 55), l/w 2.1–4.0 (av. = 2.9, n = 55), 1(–3)-septate, with a submedian primary septum (0.51–0.58(–0.71), av. = 0.53, n = 55), strongly constricted at the septum and midpoints of each cell, hyaline, smooth, guttulate when young, with an entire gelatinous sheath (1–3 μm wide at sides). Asexual morph: Conidiomata pycnidial, globose to subglobose, up to 240 μm high, 190–250 μm diam, scattered, semi-immersed, solitary, black, with a papillate ostiolar neck. Peridium 15–20 μm thick, composed of 4–6 layers of 4–7 μm diam, subglobose to rectangular, brown cells. Conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells holoblastic, 6–14 × 3–5 μm, cylindrical, hyaline, smooth. Conidia cylindrical with rounded ends, (32–)36–55(–58) × 6–8 μm (av. = 44.1 × 7.2 μm, n = 50), l/w 4.7–8.1 (av. = 6.2, n = 50), hyaline, smooth, 3(–7)-septate, guttulate when young. Culture characteristics — Colonies on PDA attaining 36–40 mm diam within 21 d, velvety, plane, smoke grey (105), grey olivaceous (107) at margin; reverse olivaceous black (108) (Fig. 2d–e); asexual morph formed. Specimens examined. Japan, Ibaraki, Tsukuba, Amakubo, Tsukuba botanical garden, on dead twigs of Cornus controversa, 20 Nov. 2004, Y. Ooki, KT 1764 (HHUF 29084 holotype designated here, ex-holotype living culture JCM 13096 = MAFF 239606); ibid., KT 1765 (HHUF 29085 paratype); Aomori, Minamitsugaru, Owani, on dead twigs of woody plant, 28 June 2008, K. Hirayama & K. Tanaka, KH 152 (HHUF 30512 paratype, ex-paratype living culture MAFF 245617). Notes — This genus is morphologically similar to Massarina and genera in Pleomassariaceae s.lat. (Barr 1982, Tanaka et al. 2005, 2015) in having large, immersed ascomata with a short papillate ostiolar neck and relatively large ascospores. However, Crassimassarina is different from Massarina in having a well-developed ascomatal wall; it differs from pleomassariaceous genera in having trabeculate pseudoparaphyses and hyaline ascospores. The asexual morph of Crassimassarina resembles that of Stagonospora in regards to its pycnidial conidiomata, conidiophores with reduced conidiogenous cells, and multi-septate cylindrical conidia; however, the latter genus differs from Crassimassarina in having phialidic conidiogenous cells (Quaedvlieg et al. 2013, Tanaka et al. 2015). Massarina and Stagonospora (Pleosporales, Massarinaceae) are phylogenetically distinct lineages from Lophiotremataceae containing Crassimassarina. Crassimassarina can be distinguished from other genera in Lophiotremataceae by its ascomata lacking a slit-like ostiole, an ascomatal peridium composed of carbonaceous cells (Fig. 6c), and multi-septate, large conidia (Fig. 6t–v). ITS sequences of the two examined isolates of C. macrospora differed at only two positions, with two gaps. Morphological features and culture characteristics of these isolates were completely identical (Fig. 2d–e, 6k–l). A. Hashim. & Kaz. Tanaka, gen. nov. — MycoBank MB819245 Etymology. Referring to the ascomata covered by a less-developed clypeus. Type species. Cryptoclypeus ryukyuensis A. Hashim. & Kaz. Tanaka. Saprobic on dead twigs of bamboo. Sexual morph: Ascomata solitary to grouped, immersed. Ostiolar neck crest-like, elongated, laterally compressed, with a slit-like ostiole and less-developed clypeus. Peridium composed of rectangular, thin-walled, pale brown cells. Pseudoparaphyses septate, branched and anastomosed. Asci bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical, 8-spored. Ascospores fusiform, multi-septate, hyaline, smooth. Asexual morph: Conidiomata pycnidial, globose to subglobose, grouped, immersed, ostiolate. Peridium composed of subglobose to rectangular, brown cells. Conidiophores absent. Conidiogenous cells phialidic, ampliform to cylindrical. Conidia cylindrical with slightly angular ends, hyaline, smooth, 1-septate. Notes — Two species of Cryptoclypeus share common characteristics, e.g., ascomata with a less-developed clypeus (up to 450 μm wide), and a peridium composed of rectangular cells (Fig. 7c–d, 8c–d). In the phylogenetic tree, they formed a well-supported clade in Lophiotremataceae (99 % ML BP/1.00 Bayesian PP) (Fig. 1).
Fig. 7

Cryptoclypeus oxysporus. a–b. Appearance of ascomata on substrate; c. ascoma in longitudinal section; d. peridium of ascoma; e–f. asci; g. ascus apex; h. ascus stipe; i. pseudoparaphyses; j–n. ascospores (all: HHUF 30507, holotype). — Scale bars: a = 1 mm; b = 250 μm; c = 20 μm; d–f, i = 10 μm; g–h, j–n = 5 μm.

Fig. 8

Cryptoclypeus ryukyuensis. a–b. Appearance of ascomata on substrate; c. ascoma in longitudinal section; d. peridium of ascoma; e. pseudoparaphyses; f–g. asci (g in Trypan Blue); h. ascus apex; i. ascus stipe; j–m. ascospores (m in Trypan Blue); n. germinating ascospore; o–p. conidiomata on substrate; q. conidioma in longitudinal section; r. peridium of conidioma; s–t. conidiogenous cells; u–y. conidia (y in Trypan Blue); z. germinating conidium (a–n: HHUF 30509, holotype; o–z: HHUF 30510, paratype). — Scale bars: a, o = 1 mm; b, p = 250 μm; c, q = 20 μm; d–g, j, n, r, u = 10 μm; h–i, k–m, s–t, v–z = 5 μm.

The sexual morph of Cryptoclypeus is similar to that of Tetraploa (Tetraplosphaeriaceae), which also has ascomata with a clypeus and narrowly fusiform ascospores (Tanaka et al. 2009). Cryptoclypeus, however, can be distinguished from the latter genus by having a well-developed neck with a slit-like ostiole. The asexual morph of Cryptoclypeus superficially resembles that of Bambusicola (Bambusicolaceae), but is easily distinguishable from the latter by having phialidic conidiogenous cells rather than annellidic ones (Dai et al. 2012). A. Hashim. & Kaz. Tanaka, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB819246; Fig. 2f, 7 Etymology. Referring to the sharp ascospores. Saprobic on dead culm of Sasa sp. Sexual morph: Ascomata ellipsoidal, solitary, immersed, 245–310 μm high, 180–240 μm diam. Ostiolar neck crest-like, elongated, laterally compressed, with less-developed clypeus (230–320 μm wide). Peridium uniform, 15–17.5 μm thick, composed of rectangular, thin-walled, 6.5–14 × 2.5–4.5 μm, pale brown cells. Pseudoparaphyses numerous, 0.5–1 μm wide, septate, branched and anastomosed. Asci bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical, 71–100 × 6–9 μm (av. = 85.8 × 7.7 μm, n = 10), with a short stipe (5.5–11 μm long, av. = 7.8 μm, n = 10), apically rounded with an ocular chamber, 8-spored. Ascospores fusiform with acute ends, straight, 19–27 × 3–4.5 μm (av. = 23.3 × 3.2 μm, n = 50), l/w 5.5–8.9 (av. = 7.2, n = 50), 3-septate, slightly constricted at the primary septum nearly median (0.46–0.55, av. = 0.50, n = 50), hyaline, smooth. Asexual morph: Undetermined. Culture characteristics — Colonies on PDA attaining 24–28 mm diam within 21 d at 20 °C in the dark, velvety, radiately, centrally raised, smoke grey (105) to grey olivaceous (107); reverse olivaceous black (108) (Fig. 2f); no sporulation observed. Specimen examined. Japan, Iwate, Hanamaki, near Dai spa, on dead culm of Sasa sp., 25 June 2011, K. Tanaka, KT 2772 (HHUF 30507 holotype designated here, ex-holotype living culture MAFF 245614 = NBRC 112317). Notes — This species can be distinguished from C. ryukyuensis by its slightly larger ascospores with acute ends (Fig. 7k–n) (19–27 × 3–4.5 μm vs 15–24 × 3–4.5 μm, with rounded ends in the latter species; Fig. 8k–m). ITS sequences between these two species differed at 17–18 positions, with eight gaps. A. Hashim. & Kaz. Tanaka, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB819247; Fig. 2g–h, 8 Etymology. Referring to the collection site. Saprobic on dead twigs of Pleioblastus linearis. Sexual morph: Ascomata ellipsoidal, solitary to 3–5-grouped, immersed, 220–240 μm high, 330–380 μm diam. Ostiolar neck crest-like, elongated, laterally compressed, with less-developed black clypeus (380–450 μm wide). Peridium uniform, 22.5–25 μm thick at side, composed of rectangular, thin-walled, 10–22.5 × 5–6.5 μm, pale brown cells. Pseudoparaphyses numerous, 1–1.5 μm wide, septate, branched and anastomosed. Asci bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical, 72.5–100.5 × 6–10 μm (av. = 87.0 × 7.8 μm, n = 20), with a short stipe (4–9 μm long, av. = 6.5 μm, n = 20), apically rounded with an ocular chamber, 8-spored. Ascospores fusiform with rounded ends, straight, 15–24 × 3–4.5 μm (av. = 19.7 × 3.8 μm, n = 50), l/w (3.8–)4.3–6.6 (av. = 5.2, n = 50), 3-septate, slightly constricted at the primary septum nearly median (0.45–0.53, av. = 0.50, n = 50), hyaline, smooth, guttulate when young. Asexual morph: Conidiomata pycnidial, globose to subglobose, up to 230 μm high, 230–340 μm diam, 3–5-grouped, immersed. Ostiolar neck up to 50 μm high, carbonaceous, papillate. Peridium 17.5–27.5 μm thick, composed of 7–10 layers of 4–8 × 2.5–6.5 μm, subglobose to rectangular, brown cells. Conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells holoblastic, 7–12 × 2–3 μm, ampliform to cylindrical, hyaline, smooth. Conidia cylindrical with slightly angular ends, 11.5–15 × 2–2.5 μm (av. = 12.9 × 2.1 μm, n = 50), l/w 5.1–7.0(–8.3) (av. = 6.3, n = 50), hyaline, smooth, 1-septate, guttulate when young. Culture characteristics — Colonies on PDA attaining 28–30 mm diam within 21 d at 20 °C in the dark, velvety, radiately, centrally raised, smoke grey (105) to grey olivaceous (107); reverse greenish black (124) (Fig. 2g–h); no sporulation observed. Specimens examined. Japan, Okinawa, Kunigami-son, Okuma, Mt Yonaha, on dead culm of Pleioblastus linearis, 18 May 2015, A. Hashimoto et al., AH 342 (HHUF 30510 paratype, ex-paratype living culture MAFF 245616); Yona, Mt Fuenchiji, on dead culm of Pleioblastus linearis, 19 May 2015, K. Tanaka et al., KT 3534 (HHUF 30509 holotype designated here, exholotype living culture MAFF 245615 = NBRC 112318). Notes — Ex-holotype and ex-paratype isolates of C. ryukyuensis are derived from sexual and asexual morphs, respectively. Unfortunately, a connection between sexual and asexual forms of this species could not be confirmed in culture. Nonetheless, rpb2 sequences were completely identical between the two strains, while ITS sequences differed at only one position and tef1 sequences differed at two, neither of which caused an amino acid substitution. Culture characteristics were also identical (Fig. 2g–h). We therefore regard these isolates as conspecific. A. Hashim. & Kaz. Tanaka, gen. nov. — MycoBank MB819248 Etymology. From the Latin galea, meaning helmet, and carpa, meaning fruiting body. Type species. Galeaticarpa aomoriensis A. Hashim. & Kaz. Tanaka. Saprobic on woody plants. Sexual morph: Ascomata solitary to grouped, immersed to erumpent, subglobose. Ostiolar neck elongated, laterally compressed, surrounded by well-developed clypeus. Peridium composed of rectangular, brown cells. Pseudoparaphyses septate, branched and anastomosed. Asci bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical, 8-spored. Ascospores fusiform, multi-septate, hyaline, smooth. Asexual morph: Conidiomata pycnidial, globose to subglobose, grouped, immersed. Ostiolar neck carbonaceous, papillate. Peridium composed of rectangular, pale brown to brown cells. Conidiophores absent. Conidiogenous cells holoblastic, cylindrical, hyaline, smooth. Conidia ellipsoidal with rounded ends, hyaline, smooth, aseptate. A. Hashim. & Kaz. Tanaka, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB819249; Fig. 2i, 9
Fig. 9

Galeaticarpa aomoriensis. a–c. Appearance of ascomata on substrate; d. ascoma in longitudinal section; e. peridium of ascoma; f. pseudoparaphyses; g–h. asci; i. ascus apex; j. ascus stipe; k–m. ascospores; n–o. conidiomata in culture; p. conidioma in longitudinal section; q. peridium of conidioma; r. conidiogenous cells; s–t. conidia; u. germinating conidium (a–m: HHUF 30505, holotype; n–u: MAFF 245618 = NBRC 112319, ex-holotype culture). — Scale bars: a, n = 1 mm; b–c, o = 250 μm; d, p = 20 μm; e–h, q = 10 μm; i–m, r–u = 5 μm.

Etymology. Referring to the collection site. Saprobic on dead twigs of woody plants. Sexual morph: Ascomata ellipsoidal, solitary to 4–5-grouped, immersed to erumpent, subglobose, 265 – 285 μm high, 370–400 μm diam. Ostiolar neck crest-like, elongated, laterally compressed, surrounded by well-developed clypeus (620–750 μm wide). Peridium uniform, 15–26 μm thick, composed of 3–5 layers of rectangular, thin-walled, 7.5 × 3–6.5 μm, brown cells. Pseudoparaphyses numerous, 1–1.5 μm wide, septate, branched and anastomosed. Asci numerous, bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical, 78–102 × 8.5–11 μm (av. = 93.5 × 9.7 μm, n = 11), with a short stipe (4–11 μm long, av. = 7.2 μm, n = 11), apically rounded with an ocular chamber, 8-spored. Ascospores fusiform with acute ends, straight, 31–47 × 4–5.5 μm (av. = 40.6 × 4.7 μm, n = 50), l/w (5.8–)7.2–10.5 (av. = 8.7, n = 50), 5-septate, with a primary septum nearly median (0.46–0.57, av. = 0.51, n = 50), slightly constricted at the primary septum, hyaline, smooth. Asexual morph: Conidiomata pycnidial, flask-shaped, up to 135 μm high in section, 210–250(–420) μm diam, 3–5-grouped, semi-immersed. Ostiolar neck 32–50 μm high, carbonaceous, papillate. Peridium 10–12.5 μm wide, composed of 2–3 layers of 10–12 × 3–4 μm, rectangular, pale brown to brown cells. Conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells holoblastic, 5.5 –11 × 2.5 – 3 μm, cylindrical, hyaline, smooth. Conidia ellipsoidal with rounded ends, 3.5–6 × 1.8–2.2 μm (av. = 4.5 × 2.0 μm, n = 50), l/w 1.8–3.0 (av. = 2.2, n = 50), hyaline, smooth, aseptate, guttulate when young. Culture characteristics — Colonies on PDA attaining 17–19 mm diam within 21 d at 20 °C in the dark, velvety, plane, smoke grey (105); reverse chestnut (40), brown vinaceous (84) pigment produced (Fig. 2i); asexual morph formed. Specimen examined. Japan, Aomori, Nishimeya, Shirakami, Ooshirosawa stream, on dead twigs of dead woody plant, 30 Aug. 2008, K. Tanaka et al., KT 2563 (HHUF 30505 holotype designated here, ex-holotype living culture MAFF 245618 = NBRC 112319). Notes — A new monotypic genus, Galeaticarpa, is proposed here for species having ascomata with a clypeus, cylindrical asci with a short stipe, and fusiform, multi-septate, hyaline ascospores. These morphological characters are similar to those of Astrosphaeriella, but Galeaticarpa can be distinguished from Astrosphaeriella by its crest-like ostiolar neck and uniformly developed peridium (vs a poorly developed peridium at the base in Astrosphaeriella; Chen & Hsieh 2004, Phookamsak et al. 2015). These two genera are distantly related and belong to the families Lophiotremataceae and Astrosphaeriellaceae, respectively. Cryptoclypeus, Galeaticarpa, and Pseudocryptoclypeus are morphologically similar to one another in having ascomata with a clypeus, but Galeaticarpa can be distinguished from these other genera by its most striking features – a well-developed clypeus (up to 750 μm wide) (Fig. 9a–d) and flask-shaped conidiomata (Fig. 9p). In addition to phenotypic differences, Cryptoclypeus and Pseudocryptoclypeus tend to occur exclusively on bamboos, while Galeaticarpa occurs on woody plant hosts. Several bambusicolous fungi have been reported to be phylogenetically unrelated to genera and species on other host plants, even though they have morphological similarities with those groups (Tanaka et al. 2009, Hashimoto et al. 2015b). Further discovery of new lineages related to these genera is needed to clarify the relationship between their evolution and host preference. A. Hashim. & Kaz. Tanaka, gen. nov. — MycoBank MB819250 Etymology. After its morphological similarity to Cryptoclypeus. Type species. Pseudocryptoclypeus yakushimensis A. Hashim. & Kaz. Tanaka. Saprobic on bamboo. Sexual morph: Ascomata scattered to grouped, immersed. Ostiolar neck crest-like, elongated, laterally compressed, with less-developed clypeus. Peridium composed of compressed, rectangular, thin-walled, brown cells. Pseudoparaphyses septate, branched and anastomosed. Asci bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical, 8-spored. Ascospores fusiform with acute ends, multi-septate, hyaline, smooth. Asexual morph: Conidiomata pycnidial, globose to subglobose, grouped, immersed, ostiolate. Peridium composed of rectangular, pale brown cells. Conidiophores absent. Conidiogenous cells holoblastic, ampliform to cylindrical, hyaline. Conidia cylindrical with rounded ends, hyaline, smooth, 1-septate. A. Hashim. & Kaz. Tanaka, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB819251; Fig. 2j, 10
Fig. 10

Pseudocryptoclypeus yakushimensis. a–b. Appearance of ascomata on substrate; c. ascoma in longitudinal section; d. peridium of ascoma; e. pseudoparaphyses; f. ascus; g. ascus apex; h. ascus stipe; i–j. ascospores (j arrowheads indicate gelatinous pad); k–l. conidiomata in culture; m. conidioma in longitudinal section; n. peridium of conidioma; o. conidiogenous cells; p–r. conidia; s. germinating conidium (a–j: HHUF 30503, holotype; k–s: MAFF 245622 = NBRC 112320, ex-holotype culture). — Scale bars: a, k = 1 mm; b = 200 μm; c, m = 20 μm; d–f, n = 10 μm; g–j, o–s = 5 μm; l = 250 μm.

Etymology. Referring to the collection site. Saprobic on dead culms of bamboo. Sexual morph: Ascomata ellipsoidal, 4–5-grouped, immersed, 325–380 μm high, 250–260 μm diam. Ostiolar neck crest-like, elongated, laterally compressed, with less-developed clypeus (200–315 μm wide). Peridium 17.5–25 μm thick of 2 zones at side; outer zone 10–17.5 μm thick of compressed, thin-walled, 12–17 × 1.5–4.2 μm, brown cells; inner zone of 7.5–10 μm thick, rectangular, 5–9 × 4–6 μm, pale brown cells. Pseudoparaphyses 0.5–1 μm wide, septate, branched, anastomosed. Asci bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical, 92.5–127 × 7.5–10 μm (av. = 104.8 × 8.2 μm, n = 15), with a short stipe (5–15 μm long, av. = 8.2 μm, n = 15), apically rounded with an ocular chamber, 8-spored. Ascospores fusiform with acute ends, straight, 20–32.5 × 3–5 μm (av. = 25.4 × 4.0 μm, n = 50), l/w 4.7–8.1 (av. = 6.4, n = 50), 5-septate, with a primary septum nearly median (0.44–0.57, av. = 0.50, n = 50), slightly constricted at the primary septum, hyaline, smooth, with gelatinous pad at each end. Asexual morph: Conidiomata pycnidial, globose to subglobose, up to 375 μm high, 400–480 μm diam, 5–6-grouped, immersed. Ostiolar neck carbonaceous, papillate, 47.5–77.5 μm high. Peridium 10–15 μm thick, composed of 3–4 layers of 7.5–10 × 0.8–1.0 μm, rectangular, pale brown cells. Conidiophores absent. Conidiogenous cells holoblastic, 12–16 × 2.5–3 μm, ampliform to cylindrical, hyaline, smooth. Conidia cylindrical with rounded ends, 9–14 × 2.5–3.5 μm (av. = 12.0 × 3.0 μm, n = 50), l/w 3.3–4.8 (av. = 4.0, n = 50), hyaline, smooth, 1-septate, guttulate when young. Culture characteristics — Colonies on PDA attaining 32–52 mm diam within 21 d at 20 °C in the dark, floccose, plane, smoke grey (105); reverse grey olivaceous (107) to olivaceous black (108) (Fig. 2j); asexual morph formed. Specimen examined. Japan, Kagoshima, Isl. Yakushima, Nagata, on dead culms of bamboo, 16 Mar. 2007, K. Tanaka & H. Yonezawa, KT 2186 (HHUF 30503 holotype designated here, ex-holotype living culture MAFF 245622 = NBRC 112320). Notes — Pseudocryptoclypeus is similar to Cryptoclypeus in having a less-developed clypeus in ascomata, multi-septate ascospores, pycnidial conidiomata, and 1-septate, hyaline conidia. Pseudocryptoclypeus has an ascomatal peridium composed of 2 zones and holoblastic conidiogenous cells (Fig. 10d, o) rather than the ascomatal wall with 1 zone and phialidic conidiogenous cells of Cryptoclypeus (Fig. 8d, s–t). Although these two genera constituted a highly supported clade (90 % ML BP/1.00 Bayesian PP) in our phylogenetic tree (Fig. 1), they had 43–45 base differences with 61–63 gaps in their ITS regions.

INCERTAE SEDIS

A. Hashim. & Kaz. Tanaka, gen. nov. — MycoBank MB819252 Etymology. Formerly belonging to Lophiotrema. Type species. Antealophiotrema brunneosporum (Ying Zhang, J. Fourn. & K.D. Hyde) A. Hashim. & Kaz. Tanaka. Saprobic on woody plants. Sexual morph: Ascomata subglobose to depressed ellipsoidal. Ostiolar neck crest-like, elongated, laterally compressed. Peridium composed of globose to rectangular, hyaline to brown cells, with brown hyphae at side. Pseudoparaphyses septate, branched and anastomosed. Asci bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical to clavate, 4–8-spored. Ascospores narrowly fusiform, 1-septate, brown, smooth. Asexual morph: Mycelium superficial, brown. Conidiophores absent. Conidiogenous cells holoblastic, integrated, terminal, brown, truncate, solitary, acrogenous. Conidia globose to obovoid, black, muriform. (Ying Zhang, J. Fourn. & K.D. Hyde) A. Hashim. & Kaz. Tanaka, comb. nov. — MycoBank MB819253; Fig. 2k, 11
Fig. 11

Antealophiotrema brunneosporum. a–b. Appearance of ascomata on substrate; c. ascoma in longitudinal section; d. peridium of ascoma near ostiole; e. peridium of ascoma at side; f. ascus; g. ascus apex; h. ascus stipe; i. pseudoparaphyses; j. ascospore; k–l. conidia in culture; m–n. conidiogenous cells and immature conidia; o–q. conidia; r. germinating conidium (a–j: CBS H-20222, holotype; k–r: CBS 123095, ex-holotype culture). — Scale bars: a, k = 1 mm; b, l = 250 μm; c, o, r = 20 μm; d–f, i, p–q = 10 μm; g–h, j, m–n = 5 μm.

Basionym. Lophiotrema brunneosporum Ying Zhang, J. Fourn. & K.D. Hyde, Fung. Diversity 38: 240. 2009. Saprobic on decorticated wood of Salix sp. Sexual morph: Ascomata subglobose to depressed ellipsoidal, up to 380 μm high, 460–530 μm diam. Ostiolar neck crest-like, elongated, laterally compressed. Peridium ununiform, 42.5–62.5 μm thick, composed of 2 zones; outer zone 22.5–25 μm thick, composed of moderately thick-walled, rectangular, (5–)7–9 × 5–7.5 μm, brown cells, with brown hyphae; inner zone 20–32.5 μm thick of thin-walled, rectangular, 7–9 × 4–7.5 μm, hyaline to pale brown cells; at base 27.5–35 μm thick, of globose to rectangular, 3.5–7 × 3.5–4 μm, pale brown cells. Pseudoparaphyses numerous, 0.8 –1.5 μm wide, septate, branched and anastomosed. Asci bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical to clavate, 119–148 × 13–15 μm (av. = 138.2 × 14.3 μm, n = 8), with a short stipe (8.5–16 μm long, av. = 10.9 μm, n = 8), apically rounded with an ocular chamber, with biseriate 4–8 ascospores. Ascospores narrowly fusiform with slightly rounded ends, 34.5–48 × 6.5–10 μm (av. = 39.8 × 8.0 μm, n = 32), l/w 4.1–6.1 (av. = 5.0, n = 32), with a septum nearly median (0.44–0.54, av. = 0.49, n = 50), strongly constricted at the septum, brown, smooth. Asexual morph: Mycelium superficial, brown. Conidiophores absent. Conidiogenous cells holoblastic, integrated, terminal, brown, truncate, solitary, acrogenous. Conidia globose to obovoid, black, 27.5–85 μm diam (av. = 52.0 μm, n = 57), muriform. Culture characteristics — Colonies on PDA attaining 12–17 mm diam within 21 d at 20 °C in the dark, floccose, centrally raised, grey olivaceous (107); reverse olivaceous black (108) (Fig. 2k); asexual morph formed. Specimen examined. France, Ariège, Rimont, Las Muros, on decorticated wood of Salix sp., 24 Sept. 2006, J. Fournier & K.D. Hyde (CBS H-20222 holotype, ex-holotype culture CBS 123095). Notes — The transfer of L. brunneosporum to Antealophiotrema is based on its morphological features, as it differs from Lophiotrema s.str. in having a well-developed peridium (up to 62.5 μm thick, Fig. 11c) as well as a monodictys-like asexual morph (Fig. 11k – r). In our phylogenetic tree, this species and ‘Lophiotrema’ boreale (CBS 114422) formed a fully supported clade (100 % ML BP/1.00 Bayesian PP) outside of Lophiotremataceae and are recognised as a lineage distinct from Lophiotrema s.str. (Fig. 1). We treat Antealophiotrema as ‘incertae sedis’ in Pleosporales at present; additional taxa related to this monotypic genus will be required to resolve its familial placement. A. Hashim. & Kaz. Tanaka, gen. nov. — MycoBank MB819254 Etymology. After its morphological similarity to Lophiotrema. Type species. Pseudolophiotrema elymicola A. Hashim. & Kaz. Tanaka. Saprobic on herbaceous plants. Sexual morph: Ascomata grouped, immersed, globose. Ostiolar neck crest-like, elongated, laterally compressed. Peridium composed of compressed, thin-walled, pale brown cells. Pseudoparaphyses numerous, septate, branched and anastomosed. Asci bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical, 8-spored. Ascospores fusiform, 1-septate, hyaline, smooth. Asexual morph: Undetermined. A. Hashim. & Kaz. Tanaka, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB819255; Fig. 2l, 12
Fig. 12

Pseudolophiotrema elymicola. a–b. Appearance of ascomata on substrate; c–d. ascomata in longitudinal section; e. peridium of ascoma; f. pseudoparaphyses; g–h. asci; i. ascus apex; j. ascus stipe; k–n. ascospores; o. ascospore with a gelatinous sheath (in India ink); p. germinating ascospore (a–m, o–p: HHUF 28984, holotype; n: JCM 13090 = MAFF 239600, ex-holotype culture). — Scale bars: a = 500 μm; b = 250 μm; c–d = 20 μm; e–h, k, o–p = 10 μm; i–j, l–n = 5 μm.

Etymology. Referring to the generic name of the host plant. Saprobic on dead leaves of Leymus mollis. Sexual morph: Ascomata grouped, immersed, globose, 200–300 μm high, 190–340 μm diam. Ostiolar neck crest-like, elongated, laterally compressed. Peridium uniform, 10–12.5 μm thick composed of compressed, thin-walled, 5–12 × 2–3.5 μm, pale brown cells. Pseudoparaphyses numerous, 1.5–2 μm wide, septate, branched and anastomosed. Asci bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical, 82–108 × 10–17 μm (av. = 92.4 × 13.9 μm, n = 11), with a short stipe (5–8 μm long, av. = 6.3 μm, n = 10), apically rounded with an ocular chamber, 8-spored. Ascospores fusiform with acute ends, straight, 20–28 × 4.5–7 μm (av. = 22.7 × 5.5 μm, n = 50), l/w 3.2–5.1 (av. = 4.2, n = 50), with a septum nearly median (0.47–0.56, av. = 0.51, n = 50), strongly constricted at the septum and midpoint of each cell, hyaline, smooth, with a gelatinous sheath. Asexual morph: Undetermined. Culture characteristics — Colonies on PDA attaining 18–19 mm diam within 21 d at 20 °C in the dark, velvety, plane, radiately, smoke grey (105); reverse grey olivaceous (107) (Fig. 2l); sexual morph formed. Specimen examined. Japan, Hokkaido, Yufutsu, on dead leaves of Leymus mollis, 1 Sept. 2003, Y. Harada, KT 1450 (HHUF 28984 holotype designated here, ex-holotype culture JCM 13090 = MAFF 239600). Notes — Pseudolophiotrema is quite similar to Lophiotrema in having a crest-like ostiolar neck, a peridium of uniform thickness, cylindrical asci with a short stipe, and 1-septate hyaline ascospores with a gelatinous sheath. However, it can be separated from the latter genus by its thinner ascomatal wall (10–12.5 μm thick; Fig. 12d–e) composed of compressed cells vs the 20–30 μm thick wall made up of rectangular cells in Lophiotrema (Holm & Holm 1988). In our phylogenetic tree, the genus Pseudolophiotrema was placed completely outside of Lophiotremataceae, and was also separate from the families Cryptocoryneaceae and Aquasubmersaceae (Fig. 1). The familial placement of Pseudolophiotrema remains unclear. Additional taxa belonging to this genus are needed to fully understand its taxonomic affiliations within Pleosporales.

DISCUSSION

Lophiotremataceae was established by Hirayama & Tanaka (2011) to accommodate Lophiotrema. Subsequently, Aquasubmersa and Hermatomyces were recognised as additional members of this family on the basis of molecular phylogenetic analyses (Ariyawansa et al. 2015, Doilom et al. 2016, Hyde et al. 2016). A phylogenetic relationship between Cryptocoryneum and Lophiotremataceae was also suggested by a BLAST search of ITS sequences of species in that genus (Hashimoto et al. 2016). Although tree topologies generated in previous molecular studies have suggested that the above-mentioned genera might be members of Lophiotremataceae, statistical support for a Lophiotremataceae s.lat. clade has been relatively weak (Ariyawansa et al. 2015, Doilom et al. 2016, Hashimoto et al. 2016, Hyde et al. 2016). Our results do not support the monophyly of Lophiotremataceae s.lat. as recognised in several previous studies (Fig. 1). Instead, the various asexual morphs found in Aquasubmersa, Cryptocoryneum, and Hermatomyces belong to separate families whose monophyly is strongly supported (Fig. 1). We thus consider Lophiotremataceae to be restricted to Lophiotrema and five new genera (Atrocalyx, Crassimassarina, Cryptoclypeus, Galeaticarpa, and Pseudocryptoclypeus), all of which have ascomata with or without slit-like ostioles and pycnidial conidiomata. We also conclude that Aquasubmersa (a freshwater lineage having papillate ascomatal ostioles and pycnidial conidiomata with 1-celled conidia), Cryptocoryneum (having sporodochial conidiomata with cheiroid conidia), and Hermatomyces (having sporodochial conidiomata with lenticular and/or cylindrical conidia), which have provisionally been regarded as genera of Lophiotremataceae, should be placed in their own families given their different asexual morphs. Except for Crassimassarina, genera accepted in the present study as members of Lophiotremataceae (i.e., Lophiotrema s.str. and the newly introduced genera Atrocalyx, Cryptoclypeus, Galeaticarpa, and Pseudocryptoclypeus) have features that are generally consistent with traditional generic concepts of Lophiotrema s.lat. (Holm & Holm 1988, Tanaka & Harada 2003, Zhang et al. 2009, Hirayama & Tanaka 2011). In contrast, Crassimassarina has some characteristics atypical of Lophiotremataceae: large, immersed ascomata with a papillate ostiolar neck, resembling those of genera in Pleomassariaceae s.lat. (Barr 1982, Tanaka et al. 2005), as well as pycnidial conidiomata with multi-septate cylindrical conidia resembling those of Stagonospora (Quaedvlieg et al. 2013, Tanaka et al. 2015). The phylogenetic placement of this morphologically distinct lineage in Lophiotremataceae led us to conduct detailed observations of the above lophiotremataceous genera. These observations revealed morphological variations among ascomata with slit-like ostioles in Lophiotremataceae, such as ascomata with a distinct clypeus around the ostiolar neck (in Cryptoclypeus, Galeaticarpa and Pseudocryptoclypeus, Fig. 7c, 8c, 9d, 10c), ascomata with a well-developed peridium (Atrocalyx, Fig. 4c, 5c), and ascomata with a less-developed peridium of a uniform thickness up to 25 μm (Lophiotrema; Holm & Holm 1988). These morphologically distinguishable groups constitute phylogenetically distinct lineages that also correspond to their differing asexual morphs (Fig. 4o, 6q, 8q, 9p, 10m). For example, the sexual morphs of Cryptoclypeus, Galeaticarpa, and Pseudocryptoclypeus have similar morphological features, but these genera can be separated from one another according to the morphology of their conidiomata or conidiogenous cells (see Notes on each genus). Consequently, we treat these five genera as separate from Lophiotrema s.str. on the basis of holomorph morphology and phylogenetic relationships. Antealophiotrema brunneosporum, originally misidentified as a species in Lophiotrema because of its morphological resemblance to that genus (Zhang et al. 2009), is only distantly related to Lophiotremataceae. This species is clearly different from Lophiotrema in regard to the anatomical characteristics of its peridium and its monodictys-like asexual morph. The result of our present study strongly confirms that the presence of a slit-like ostiole is an unreliable character for delimitation of generic relationships. Traditionally, the slit-like ostiole of the ascomata has been especially emphasised as a useful character for familial circumscription in ascomycetes (Chesters & Bell 1970). In earlier studies, Lophiotrema was placed in Lophiostomataceae according to this criterion (Chesters & Bell 1970, Leuchtmann 1985, Holm & Holm 1988, Barr 1992). Zhang et al. (2009) suggested that Lophiotrema is phylogenetically distinct from Lophiostomataceae but could not find any morphological differences between their sexual morphs. Hirayama & Tanaka (2011) re-evaluated the phylogenetic significance of several morphological features used for characterisation of each genus in previous studies. After determining that ascus shape and length of ascus stipe are reliable taxonomic indicators to delineate these two genera, they established Lophiotremataceae to accommodate Lophiotrema (Hirayama & Tanaka 2011). Our results, however, strongly confirm that several lophiotrema-like species, i.e., Antealophiotrema brunneosporum, ‘Lophiotrema’ boreale, and Pseudolophiotrema elymicola, deviate from Lophiotremataceae. These species were originally misidentified or provisionally identified as species in Lophiotrema on the basis of their morphological resemblance to the genus (Mathiassen 1989, 1993, Zhang et al. 2009), but were found to be phylogenetically separate from Lophiotrema s.str. in this study. Previous morphological circumscriptions of Lophiotremataceae and Lophiotrema (Holm & Holm 1988, Mathiassen 1989, 1993, Tanaka & Harada 2003, Zhang et al. 2009, Hirayama & Tanaka 2011, Ariyawansa et al. 2015, Doilom et al. 2016, Hyde et al. 2016) were obviously fairly broad concepts that did not reflect their phylogenetic relationships. We additionally discovered several morphological variants of ascomata having slit-like ostioles (e.g. Atrocalyx, Cryptoclypeus, Galeaticarpa, and Pseudocryptoclypeus), revealed the phylogenetic position of a genus without slit-like ostioles in Lophiotremataceae (i.e., Crassimassarina), and observed asexual morphs of genera belonging to Lophiotremataceae. More precise morphological examination of both sexual and asexual morphs in this family will be needed to define familial concepts of Lophiotremataceae and its relatives. The phylogenetic significance of slit-like ostioles of ascomata should also be re-evaluated because this phenotypic character is now known in several families, such as Aigialaceae (Suetrong et al. 2009), Ligninsphaeriaceae (Zhang et al. 2016), and Lophiostomataceae (Thambugala et al. 2015). The slit-like ostiole should be regarded as a character that has evolved multiple times independently within Dothideomycetes, similar to the parallel evolution of hysterothecial ascomata in Anteagloniaceae (Mugambi & Huhndorf 2009), Gloniaceae (Boehm et al. 2009), Hysteriaceae (Boehm et al. 2009), Lophiostomataceae (Thambugala et al. 2015), and Mytilinidiaceae (Boehm et al. 2009). Recent molecular studies on Dothideomycetes have revealed hidden lineages and prompted revision of several families in this class (Crous et al. 2015, Guatimosim et al. 2015, Knapp et al. 2015, Tanaka et al. 2015, Jaklitsch & Voglmayr 2016, Van Nieuwenhuijzen et al. 2016). Although multiple molecular systematic studies, mainly of pathogenic fungi of woody plants (Phillips et al. 2013, Slippers et al. 2013, Alves et al. 2014, Fan et al. 2015, Trakunyingcharoen et al. 2015), have generated a robust phylogeny for Botryosphaeriales, many additional new lineages in this group, including endophytes and saprophytes, have been discovered from various niches (Thambugala et al. 2014, Crous et al. 2015, 2016, Wyka & Broders 2016, Osorio et al. 2017, Yang et al. 2017). Drawing on many recent collections, our study has revealed previously unrecognised diversity within Lophiotremataceae and its relatives and the potential taxonomic importance of the asexual morphs in defining families. To build a comprehensive taxonomic framework, further morphological surveys based on additional collections together with more molecular data are needed.
  26 in total

1.  Kakusan4 and Aminosan: two programs for comparing nonpartitioned, proportional and separate models for combined molecular phylogenetic analyses of multilocus sequence data.

Authors:  Akifumi S Tanabe
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 7.090

2.  Revision of the Massarineae (Pleosporales, Dothideomycetes).

Authors:  K Tanaka; K Hirayama; H Yonezawa; G Sato; A Toriyabe; H Kudo; A Hashimoto; M Matsumura; Y Harada; Y Kurihara; T Shirouzu; T Hosoya
Journal:  Stud Mycol       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 16.097

3.  A Beauveria phylogeny inferred from nuclear ITS and EF1-alpha sequences: evidence for cryptic diversification and links to Cordyceps teleomorphs.

Authors:  Stephen A Rehner; Ellen Buckley
Journal:  Mycologia       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.696

4.  Fungal Planet description sheets: 469-557.

Authors:  P W Crous; M J Wingfield; T I Burgess; G E St J Hardy; C Crane; S Barrett; J F Cano-Lira; J J Le Roux; R Thangavel; J Guarro; A M Stchigel; M P Martín; D S Alfredo; P A Barber; R W Barreto; I G Baseia; J Cano-Canals; R Cheewangkoon; R J Ferreira; J Gené; C Lechat; G Moreno; F Roets; R G Shivas; J O Sousa; Y P Tan; N P Wiederhold; S E Abell; T Accioly; J L Albizu; J L Alves; Z I Antoniolli; N Aplin; J Araújo; M Arzanlou; J D P Bezerra; J-P Bouchara; J R Carlavilla; A Castillo; V L Castroagudín; P C Ceresini; G F Claridge; G Coelho; V R M Coimbra; L A Costa; K C da Cunha; S S da Silva; R Daniel; Z W de Beer; M Dueñas; J Edwards; P Enwistle; P O Fiuza; J Fournier; D García; T B Gibertoni; S Giraud; M Guevara-Suarez; L F P Gusmão; S Haituk; M Heykoop; Y Hirooka; T A Hofmann; J Houbraken; D P Hughes; I Kautmanová; O Koppel; O Koukol; E Larsson; K P D Latha; D H Lee; D O Lisboa; W S Lisboa; Á López-Villalba; J L N Maciel; P Manimohan; J L Manjón; S Marincowitz; T S Marney; M Meijer; A N Miller; I Olariaga; L M Paiva; M Piepenbring; J C Poveda-Molero; K N A Raj; H A Raja; A Rougeron; I Salcedo; R Samadi; T A B Santos; K Scarlett; K A Seifert; L A Shuttleworth; G A Silva; M Silva; J P Z Siqueira; C M Souza-Motta; S L Stephenson; D A Sutton; N Tamakeaw; M T Telleria; N Valenzuela-Lopez; A Viljoen; C M Visagie; A Vizzini; F Wartchow; B D Wingfield; E Yurchenko; J C Zamora; J Z Groenewald
Journal:  Persoonia       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 11.051

5.  Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species.

Authors:  R Vilgalys; M Hester
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Phylogeny of Discosia and Seimatosporium, and introduction of Adisciso and Immersidiscosia genera nova.

Authors:  K Tanaka; M Endo; K Hirayama; I Okane; T Hosoya; T Sato
Journal:  Persoonia       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 11.051

7.  MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space.

Authors:  Fredrik Ronquist; Maxim Teslenko; Paul van der Mark; Daniel L Ayres; Aaron Darling; Sebastian Höhna; Bret Larget; Liang Liu; Marc A Suchard; John P Huelsenbeck
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 15.683

8.  Hidden diversity in Thyridaria and a new circumscription of the Thyridariaceae.

Authors:  W M Jaklitsch; H Voglmayr
Journal:  Stud Mycol       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 16.097

9.  Towards a phylogenetic reappraisal of Parmulariaceae and Asterinaceae (Dothideomycetes).

Authors:  E Guatimosim; A L Firmino; J L Bezerra; O L Pereira; R W Barreto; P W Crous
Journal:  Persoonia       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 11.051

10.  Dark septate endophytic pleosporalean genera from semiarid areas.

Authors:  D G Knapp; G M Kovács; E Zajta; J Z Groenewald; P W Crous
Journal:  Persoonia       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 11.051

View more
  9 in total

1.  Bambusicolous Fungi in Pleosporales: Introducing Four Novel Taxa and a New Habitat Record for Anastomitrabeculia didymospora.

Authors:  Rungtiwa Phookamsak; Hongbo Jiang; Nakarin Suwannarach; Saisamorn Lumyong; Jianchu Xu; Sheng Xu; Chun-Fang Liao; Putarak Chomnunti
Journal:  J Fungi (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-13

2.  Two unusual new species of Pleosporales: Anteaglonium rubescens and Atrocalyx asturiensis.

Authors:  Walter M Jaklitsch; Jacques Fournier; Hermann Voglmayr
Journal:  Sydowia       Date:  2018-05-04

3.  Resolving the Lophiostoma bipolare complex: Generic delimitations within Lophiostomataceae.

Authors:  A Hashimoto; K Hirayama; H Takahashi; M Matsumura; G Okada; C Y Chen; J W Huang; M Kakishima; T Ono; K Tanaka
Journal:  Stud Mycol       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 16.097

4.  Regional and Microenvironmental Scale Characterization of the Zostera muelleri Seagrass Microbiome.

Authors:  Valentina Hurtado-McCormick; Tim Kahlke; Katherina Petrou; Thomas Jeffries; Peter J Ralph; Justin Robert Seymour
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Pleocatenatachiangraiensis gen. et. sp. nov. (Pleosporales, Dothideomycetes) from medicinal plants in northern Thailand.

Authors:  Ya-Ru Sun; Ning-Guo Liu; Kevin D Hyde; Ruvishika S Jayawardena; Yong Wang
Journal:  MycoKeys       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Multi-locus phylogenetic analysis of lophiostomatoid fungi motivates a broad concept of Lophiostoma and reveals nine new species.

Authors:  M Andreasen; I Skrede; W M Jaklitsch; H Voglmayr; B Nordén
Journal:  Persoonia       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 11.658

7.  CRISPR/Cas9 RNP-assisted validation of palmarumycin biosynthetic gene cluster in Lophiotrema sp. F6932.

Authors:  Martin Muthee Gakuubi; Kuan Chieh Ching; Madhaiyan Munusamy; Mario Wibowo; Chun Teck Lim; Guang-Lei Ma; Zhao-Xun Liang; Yoganathan Kanagasundaram; Siew Bee Ng
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 6.064

8.  Multi-Gene Phylogeny and Morphology Reveal Haplohelminthosporium gen. nov. and Helminthosporiella gen. nov. Associated with Palms in Thailand and A Checklist for Helminthosporium Reported Worldwide.

Authors:  Sirinapa Konta; Kevin D Hyde; Samantha C Karunarathna; Ausana Mapook; Chanokned Senwanna; Lucas A P Dauner; Chandrika M Nanayakkara; Jianchu Xu; Saowaluck Tibpromma; Saisamorn Lumyong
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-19

9.  Panama, a hot spot for Hermatomyces (Hermatomycetaceae, Pleosporales) with five new species, and a critical synopsis of the genus.

Authors:  Ondřej Koukol; Gregorio Delgado; Tina A Hofmann; Meike Piepenbring
Journal:  IMA Fungus       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 3.515

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.